@BeMuse look up the story of the US publishing Company Houghton Mifflin and how they fought for decades for the rights to continue publishing Hitler’s book, even after he lost the war. Eventually they caved to immense pressure and donated the funds to Holocaust survivors and a memorial efforts, but they were at some points spending more on legal fees than they were making from the book. It almost begs the question why was this US publishing company which publishes a fairly large chunk of materials used in the US public schools, so desperate to keep Hitler’s book alive?
A quick look into Houghton Mifflin and their lawsuits in relation to Mein Kampf shows they acquired rights to the first abridged English translated version of the book. Distributions rights were for the UK and USA. This version of Mein Kampf was translated and abridged by Edgar Trevelyan Stratford Dugdale who was encouraged to translate Mein Kampf into English by his wife. This version of Mein Kampf was published in 1933. Edgar was married to a predominate Zionist Blanche Elizabeth Campbell "Baffy" Dugdale who was the niece of Arthur Balfour. Arthur Balfour is obviously famous for his role in the Balfour Declaration which was publicly issued by Briton in 1917 during WWI announcing support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. The declaration was addressed to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild at the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. Arthur Balfour was also an inner circle member of the secrete society The Round Table who was funded by Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild.
Additionally "Baffy" Dugdale worked in the Naval Intelligence Department Associated with the League of Nations Union. This is interesting because Houghton Mifflin under the leadership of their Anglophilic editor-in-chief Ferris Greenslet produced war books between 1914 and 1918 as part of the war effort by working with Wellington House the propaganda division of the British Foreign Office and again in WWII leading up to Operation Overlord. Greenslet admitted in 1943 that, “The chief aim was to try to help educate America to a full knowledge of the evil ambitions that were loose in the world, even if in the end it should lead us to join in fighting them”. So clearly Houghton Mifflin has a strong history of producing propaganda to be used on the American public, for the purpose of agitating war in Europe in favor of positions held by the UK (City of London) who is strongly influenced by the Rothschild family. Thus it was in the interest of the Rothschild family to control the translation, abridgment, and potential annotations of Mein Kampf that would be distributed in the USA so as to control the narrative surrounding Adolf Hitler. This make sense being that the Jewish community was lobbying the government to get into WWII. A holy war was basically declared by Samuel Untermyer who was a delegate of the Democratic National Convention at the time and head of the Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League which has strong ties to Louis Rothschild and the Rothschild Money Trust. One big spiderweb of Rothschild agents...
The majority of Americans at the time opposed any involvement in foreign wars. There was even an “America First” Committee which was the largest anti-war organization in the history of the USA which the Kennedy’s and many other prominent Americans were associated with. They were of course politically smeared as fascists and anti-semetic being that they opposed the goals of the Rothschild family. Communists infiltrated their organization to make them look bad, just as ANTIFA LARPS today in Trump clothes in events like Jan 6th to try to politically smear Trump’s America First movement. Same old games, same old families…
@BeMuse Interesting stuff isn’t it. And somehow none of this will ever be taught in government to Dr. nation mills. Library media is the only thing I could in good conscience teach in a western nation.
@Sixgunsound That’s the major problem... Much of the education system focuses on knowledge retention and regurgitation for standardized testing rather than questioning ideas and debating their validity. Smart people can go through the system doing well enough on tests and still learn how to think on their own, but average or below average people will just try to pass the test for a pat on the head and to move on. Everything should always be approached with skepticism and critical thinking should be applied after approaching an idea from many different angles using many different sources and then the pieces should be put together how they most logically fit together.
@BeMuse George Carlin had a great bit called dumb Americans, where he discussed the state of the US education system, and how the elites do not benefit from educated peasants capable of thinking about how hard they are getting screwed
@Sixgunsound I am a big fan of Georgia Carlin 😂. I had all of his vinyl albums. I also saw him perform in person at around 1971. I still remember some of his stuff Like the Hippy Dippy Weather Man. If you don't like the weather - MOVE!😂
@Sixgunsound It’s not just happening in America… People love to talk about America because we’re the top dogs… This sort of subterfuge happens all over the world by many different organizations. Any philanthropist that comes in the name of diplomacy and offers anything is carrying out espionage. They are spies. The Rothschilds, George Soros, The Clintons, The Gates, The CCP, The DoD, and so many others are all famous for this sort of action. For example Soros’ Open Society Foundation funds school reforms/education in Ukraine. The CCP’s Confucius Institute operates in dozens of countries around the world. If something is free, you are the product… Influence peddlers are everywhere. They work for the benefit of their organization regardless of if they have a nation or not. They build prestige for their organization, they infiltrate systems of governance to get close to power brokers so that decisions favor their organization, they form alliances that strength them, they undermined their enemies, etc. To think we are just a bunch of dumb Americans is very short sighted. This is a global information war happening at all times.
You mean like how the Nazis were inspired by the United States to build concentration camps. They were inspired by the United States genocide of native Americans and I don't care if my answers offend you right wing troll's.
It gets talked about at the university level, but since such a small percentage of the population goes to university, I can see why you would be more concerned that it be taught at the K 12 level. The answer has a lot to do with funding sources and how much it would embarrass current office holders and their future campaigns. On both sides of the aisle.
For example, Kennedy and Johnson both shot down the civil rights act in the 1950s to stop Eisenhower from getting credit for it, when they were in office all of a sudden it was a priority. Somehow this never gets talked about though. Mitch McConnell is married to a Chinese agent who uses his position to steer US policy towards China’s best interests. But yet somehow this never gets talked about either.
Most Americans don’t actually have to learn it. There is no test for citizenship for people who are born here, so people can just get socially promoted and not be able to read right count or do research, and they still get to graduate. There aren’t enough consequences for failure to learn anything in school. Arguably, it is economically advantageous not to.
They tried that in the Soviet union, and it did not work out the way they anticipated.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
1 y
I would say since a black actress is now playing the little mermaid there is no need to do anything else. The world is officially perfect and inclusive and teaches the correct values.
So can you tell me what Party Dwight D Eisenhowet was, the first person to start on the Civil rights bill & deploy Martial law to help protect black children while their in school? Cause after Ike's time as President it was passed onto JFK and what did he do? Nothing but pussy foot around until he passed and then Johnson had to sign it but why did it take Democrats so long to pass the last frw bills of civil rights after they promised it when they were voted in? But when it was Eisenhower he signed it quick? Lol
Heck, even licoln himself, likely, had slaves, and he never actually wanted to get rid of slavery. He wanted the country to stay together more than end slavery. He believed that a unified country was more powerful than a divided one, no matter the cost
It was only later that he had signed the EP, south carolina and the south, had already split from the nation
Home > Society & Politics > Questions > Do you think History should be politically correct and re-written so it does not offend todays children/ college or University students?
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
39Opinion
Do you think history should re-written to delete the Holocaust?, slavery and the Trail of Tears?
You cannot rewrite history, and you can't change it.
Afterall, it us HIS STORY!
If you look at older history books you will learn that history is always being manipulated... It shouldn't be, but it is...
@BeMuse the victors write the history books
@Sixgunsound and then it's gradually changed in publishing companies via infiltration by the loser over decades until people forget the true story...
@BeMuse look up the story of the US publishing Company Houghton Mifflin and how they fought for decades for the rights to continue publishing Hitler’s book, even after he lost the war. Eventually they caved to immense pressure and donated the funds to Holocaust survivors and a memorial efforts, but they were at some points spending more on legal fees than they were making from the book. It almost begs the question why was this US publishing company which publishes a fairly large chunk of materials used in the US public schools, so desperate to keep Hitler’s book alive?
@Sixgunsound I'll take a quick look and see if anything interesting stands out...
A quick look into Houghton Mifflin and their lawsuits in relation to Mein Kampf shows they acquired rights to the first abridged English translated version of the book. Distributions rights were for the UK and USA. This version of Mein Kampf was translated and abridged by Edgar Trevelyan Stratford Dugdale who was encouraged to translate Mein Kampf into English by his wife. This version of Mein Kampf was published in 1933. Edgar was married to a predominate Zionist Blanche Elizabeth Campbell "Baffy" Dugdale who was the niece of Arthur Balfour. Arthur Balfour is obviously famous for his role in the Balfour Declaration which was publicly issued by Briton in 1917 during WWI announcing support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. The declaration was addressed to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild at the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. Arthur Balfour was also an inner circle member of the secrete society The Round Table who was funded by Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild.
Additionally "Baffy" Dugdale worked in the Naval Intelligence Department Associated with the League of Nations Union. This is interesting because Houghton Mifflin under the leadership of their Anglophilic editor-in-chief Ferris Greenslet produced war books between 1914 and 1918 as part of the war effort by working with Wellington House the propaganda division of the British Foreign Office and again in WWII leading up to Operation Overlord. Greenslet admitted in 1943 that, “The chief aim was to try to help educate America to a full knowledge of the evil ambitions that were loose in the world, even if in the end it should lead us to join in fighting them”. So clearly Houghton Mifflin has a strong history of producing propaganda to be used on the American public, for the purpose of agitating war in Europe in favor of positions held by the UK (City of London) who is strongly influenced by the Rothschild family. Thus it was in the interest of the Rothschild family to control the translation, abridgment, and potential annotations of Mein Kampf that would be distributed in the USA so as to control the narrative surrounding Adolf Hitler. This make sense being that the Jewish community was lobbying the government to get into WWII. A holy war was basically declared by Samuel Untermyer who was a delegate of the Democratic National Convention at the time and head of the Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League which has strong ties to Louis Rothschild and the Rothschild Money Trust. One big spiderweb of Rothschild agents...
The majority of Americans at the time opposed any involvement in foreign wars. There was even an “America First” Committee which was the largest anti-war organization in the history of the USA which the Kennedy’s and many other prominent Americans were associated with. They were of course politically smeared as fascists and anti-semetic being that they opposed the goals of the Rothschild family. Communists infiltrated their organization to make them look bad, just as ANTIFA LARPS today in Trump clothes in events like Jan 6th to try to politically smear Trump’s America First movement. Same old games, same old families…
@BeMuse Interesting stuff isn’t it. And somehow none of this will ever be taught in government to Dr. nation mills. Library media is the only thing I could in good conscience teach in a western nation.
Taught in government indoctrination mills
@Sixgunsound That’s the major problem... Much of the education system focuses on knowledge retention and regurgitation for standardized testing rather than questioning ideas and debating their validity. Smart people can go through the system doing well enough on tests and still learn how to think on their own, but average or below average people will just try to pass the test for a pat on the head and to move on. Everything should always be approached with skepticism and critical thinking should be applied after approaching an idea from many different angles using many different sources and then the pieces should be put together how they most logically fit together.
@BeMuse George Carlin had a great bit called dumb Americans, where he discussed the state of the US education system, and how the elites do not benefit from educated peasants capable of thinking about how hard they are getting screwed
@Sixgunsound I am a big fan of Georgia Carlin 😂. I had all of his vinyl albums. I also saw him perform in person at around 1971. I still remember some of his stuff Like the Hippy Dippy Weather Man. If you don't like the weather - MOVE!😂
https://youtu.be/KLODGhEyLvk
@Sixgunsound It’s not just happening in America… People love to talk about America because we’re the top dogs… This sort of subterfuge happens all over the world by many different organizations. Any philanthropist that comes in the name of diplomacy and offers anything is carrying out espionage. They are spies. The Rothschilds, George Soros, The Clintons, The Gates, The CCP, The DoD, and so many others are all famous for this sort of action. For example Soros’ Open Society Foundation funds school reforms/education in Ukraine. The CCP’s Confucius Institute operates in dozens of countries around the world. If something is free, you are the product… Influence peddlers are everywhere. They work for the benefit of their organization regardless of if they have a nation or not. They build prestige for their organization, they infiltrate systems of governance to get close to power brokers so that decisions favor their organization, they form alliances that strength them, they undermined their enemies, etc. To think we are just a bunch of dumb Americans is very short sighted. This is a global information war happening at all times.
The left is trying to do that, we should not be allowing them to do that.
That would be best, yes. It's important we keep the Brownies and Alphabet people happy
You mean like how the Nazis were inspired by the United States to build concentration camps. They were inspired by the United States genocide of native Americans and I don't care if my answers offend you right wing troll's.
It be nice if they just stop hiding the parts that make America look bad and tell the trutn
It gets talked about at the university level, but since such a small percentage of the population goes to university, I can see why you would be more concerned that it be taught at the K 12 level. The answer has a lot to do with funding sources and how much it would embarrass current office holders and their future campaigns. On both sides of the aisle.
For example, Kennedy and Johnson both shot down the civil rights act in the 1950s to stop Eisenhower from getting credit for it, when they were in office all of a sudden it was a priority. Somehow this never gets talked about though. Mitch McConnell is married to a Chinese agent who uses his position to steer US policy towards China’s best interests. But yet somehow this never gets talked about either.
Fox likes to talk shit about Fang Fang, why do I hear crickets about Mrs. McConnel?
@Sixgunsound I'm just so shocked by how many people who are grown and graduated have very little clue about true American history.
Most Americans don’t actually have to learn it. There is no test for citizenship for people who are born here, so people can just get socially promoted and not be able to read right count or do research, and they still get to graduate. There aren’t enough consequences for failure to learn anything in school. Arguably, it is economically advantageous not to.
Creating a fiction about history doesn't change a thing
They tried that in the Soviet union, and it did not work out the way they anticipated.
I would say since a black actress is now playing the little mermaid there is no need to do anything else. The world is officially perfect and inclusive and teaches the correct values.
If they do and they do that
Its called censorship
Absolutely not under no circumstances, History is sometimes Bad, History sometimes is Good thats how it is accept it!
Absolutely, nothing good can come from rewriting of history.
Not if you want to continue using the phrase those that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it
Republicans want it rewritten that they didn't lose the civil war. When in fact, they did. They can't handle being LOSERS
LIKE TRUMP
Abraham Lincoln was a republican go back to school you ignorant human.
@Fuentes Abraham lincoln was a GOOD republican
the party switched sides, after 1964, when johnson signed the civil rights bill
YOU IGNORANT FUCKTARD
No you sponge for brain human reject the racist were always democrats and were always were they never switched. You're just blind
@Fuentes No, you idiot, it was ALWAYS repubicans, you fucking idiotic douchebag
republicans*/republicucks (since they love to see people GET SCREWED)
So can you tell me what Party Dwight D Eisenhowet was, the first person to start on the Civil rights bill & deploy Martial law to help protect black children while their in school? Cause after Ike's time as President it was passed onto JFK and what did he do? Nothing but pussy foot around until he passed and then Johnson had to sign it but why did it take Democrats so long to pass the last frw bills of civil rights after they promised it when they were voted in? But when it was Eisenhower he signed it quick? Lol
@Fuentes Eisenhower was a republican goofball, who dropped the atomic bomb on japan. that never needed to be dropped
he's A FUCKING IDDIOT
THE PARTIES SWITCHED SIDES WHEN JOHNSON SIGNED THE BILL
REPUBCLIANS ARE THE RACISTS, THEYVE ALWAYS BEEN
@Fuentes Why can't people get it in their fucking heads that republicans, ARE FUCKING RACIST
You need to go back to school buddy you're severely ignorant
It was President Truman who dropped the nuke & he was a democrat..
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA!!!
@Fuentes It was eisenhower you dummy
@Fuentes Even if it was truman, they would have been pre 1964 dem and republicans
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE PARTY OF RACISTS, GET OVER IT
I'm done trying to teach you a lesson bozo
@asker, have you ever noticed that the biggest idiots on this site, tend to comment on my opinions, because they know im right, and can't stand it
Heck, even licoln himself, likely, had slaves, and he never actually wanted to get rid of slavery. He wanted the country to stay together more than end slavery. He believed that a unified country was more powerful than a divided one, no matter the cost
It was only later that he had signed the EP, south carolina and the south, had already split from the nation
HE WAS A REPUBLICAN
REPUBLICANS, ARE FUCKING, RACISTS
Why change the past when we can learn from the history of the past.
History needs to stay untainted. How can we ever hope to learn for history if we don't know it.
History? You mean the accurate story of the past? Why would you do that?
No.
It should be truthful.
If someone is offended, then that's too bad.
Absolutely not. It should be reported with all its warts.
No, that's ridiculous. Political correctness can go right in the toilet. Hate that ish.