Since natural immunity is evidently superior in protection (not to mention the side effecfs of vax) why is the super effective ivermectin deemed evil?

Anonymous

PLEASE HELP!!! There are at least 159 studies proving natural immunity superior.

https://brownstone.org/articles/159-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/

And while numerous studies with shockingly positive results of ivermec are being forcefully retracted, you can still ask ivermec users for their experience. I know people who have used ivermec, I had it myself. Same as all the hundreds of people whom I was reading online. For most people, within one day you're totally healrhy. While family members not using it are sick for a number of days. Fewer people report smaller but significant improvements with ivermectin. And almost nobody claims it does nothing. But 100% agree it has not killed or even injured anyone.

So... ivermec being so safe and effective, and not lethal or causing mutated resistant strains or "immune imprinting", nor magnetism... why is it forbidden, just like vitamin D which most people are deficient in and is scientifically proven and published to be effective for covid, to be used to create natural immunity which is superior?

Since natural immunity is evidently superior in protection (not to mention the side effecfs of vax) why is the super effective ivermectin deemed evil?
10 Opinion