Like the Trans thing. It's not that I can't be persuaded that there are only two genders: it's more that I don't see why it matters next to rich people robbing us for trillions of dollars. I don't think I can be persuaded to think settling the gender question is more important than rich people robbing us for trillions. But is the reverse possible? If right wingers already knew they are being robbed by rich people, could they be persuaded to believe that's more important than gender definitions? Or, perhaps, it might be more important to ask if rich people don't already know they are being robbed by rich people, could they be persuaded of this fact or would they put up walls to deny it as something something free market?
www.theatlantic.com/.../
Most Helpful Opinions