What are the limits of privacy and morality?

[Anonymous]

Morality dictates that we give up our privacy so that for example, kids won't be trafficked in the sex trades.

How far do you think governments should be allowed to go, in order to make sure bad things don't happen?

Should the government be able to see everything you do even at home? How can you argue they should not, when bad things are happening behind closed doors hidden from sight? Is it just that resources are not capable yet, but otherwise you would support cameras and AI in people's homes?

How far can it and should it go? Does it depend on how common bad things happening like trafficking of kids in the sex trades?

[strateguy632]

i am certain they already use our computer cameras without the light and microphones. but i feel it is not justified even for good intentions finding the abducted victim because most homes aren't crime.

your question and dilemma is in batman using phones to find joker.

[Asker]

Haha that's cool actually. I've seen other similar problems discussed with the justice league. I don't really watch that stuff but I've seen a bit here and there over the years.

I remember one was superman and batman and wonder woman and I think wonder woman was trying to go off and be the world police or something but batman or superman were like "we have to let humans work through their laws or else we superheros become dictators" or something like that.

Good stuff!