Would you think more of a politician that had a small group of large donors or one with a big group of small donors. ?

[exitseven]

[msc545]

I don't think that matters very much. What does matter is that the person is a politician and that in and of itself is a disreputable thing.

[exitseven]

Yes, they are all tools. You just have to pick the one that can do the job.

[msc545]

Thanks for MHO

[Mangospacho]

There’s a $5,000 limit on donations, though. Aren’t all candidates funded by small donations? 🤭

[Daniela1982]

What? Where? Politicians in the US get tons of big donations. At least certainly more than $5k from all their backers.

[exitseven]

That is what I thought, However with PACs I guess there is a loophole big enough to drive a truck through. Biden had a fundraiser yesterday at $500,000 a plate. So it means that he is bought and paid for by who the hell knows.

[Mangospacho]

Oh I know about the PAC loophole. I just wanted to see who would call me out on it first.

[OlderAndWiser]

Big group of small donors.

[handsomelad70]

I lean towards the latter, but their policies are FAR more important.

[OlderAndWiser]

@handsomelad70 Absolutely!

[Jammaa]

Ohh this is a tough one. I think I lean towards the politician influencing more people to be donors.

[JacobJordan]

I would think more of a politician if they actually did things for the population.

[TrueConfection]

Neither influences me, but who their donors are is what matters to me.

[Jamie05rhs]

None of that matters to me. Because I know that oftentimes, the people who need the most help have the least money. So how can they possibly donate?

[CaptainSmartass]

I'd think more of a politician if they abdicated.

Simples...

[menina]

One with a big group of small donors.