I mean, after several months, he would inevitably have new habits ingrained in him.

I mean, after several months, he would inevitably have new habits ingrained in him.

Nah. But I think his outlook on women might change: on what they have to do and how they have to survive in a world dominated by men. I think it would be an interesting experiment.
You might remember that in the 80s or 90s, teen-agers were given a battery powered "baby" to take home that would cry when "wet" or "hungry,": would "wake up "crying" in the middle of the night to be held, or something like that. They would be assigned on a rolling basis for a week of said care.
It destroyed a lot of the "babies are cute." "I'd like to have a baby with him" ideas that young, teen-age girls entertain. When those same teens were tired and bleary eyed and learned the unending demands that parenting a baby required, even if ONLY for a week, they had new outlooks.
If that could be done with men living as women and with the converse, women living as men, each for a few months, it wouldn't destroy the masculinity or femininity those men or women had from their real lives. But it would be an eye-opening experience for both sexes.
Lol, because women can't be masculine?
I get why you went anon on this one, you sound like you have retardation with this idiotic question.
Male Toddlers and Chimps will gravitate towards stereotypical 'boy' toys, girl toddlers and chimps will gravitate towards stereotypical 'girl' toys. Gender roles have an evolutionary advantage and are ingrained.
No, he'd join the WNBA and it wouldn't be a problem.
Opinion
3Opinion
Nope. He would still have higher levels of testosterone and instincts as a guy. While he may get a better perspective as a woman and gain some empathy, he’s still a dude.
I couldn't venture a guess, and I'll never know!
if he's a soyboy he'd already have no masculinity to begin with lol
Are you a Dude
No...
You can also add your opinion below!