Polls: Society & Politics

This Asian girl captioned "#alllivesmatter" with a black screen on insta and she is starting to make me feel less attracted to her

Let me start by saying this, she's a self described aerialist, yogi, she looks 18.. she's hot and Asian, i followed her a few months ago and surprisingly she followed me back !

She liked a few if not many of my photos.. I put a black screen stating only #blackouttuesday (since I didn't know how people would react if i put black, all, blue or white lives matter.. lol)

Considering i have many centrist and right wing friends and family members, I have considered not unfollowing this girl. She liked my black screen pic and also put one of her own with both #blackouttuesday and #alllivesmatter (just not #blacklivesmatter)

I have also considered context since she didn't put a cop or rebel flag.. that to me would flinge me as thinking she is " too right wing " for me..

Most of my online female mutuals (both single and taken) are white and hispanic, and at least center-left, if not left-wing as hell.. a lot of them follow Cardi B/Nicki Minaj/Ariana Grande, and some even follow centrists like Kim K (who might even be center-right since she has liberal views but is married to right winger Kanye West) and/or Taylor Swift (who is definitely a moderate) — I might have one female friend that follows a true right wing celebrity (like carrie underwood or maybe hilary duff), not so sure about that tho..

Politics don't usually turn me on, but I'm more attracted to center-left girls than anyone... (far left doesn't turn me on that much... and centrist and right wing are not that hippie to me... most right wing girls tbh tend to have a smaller ass than left and centrist girls)

My conspiracy is that flat assed girls tend to be more right wing and vice versa since they tend to be pale white aussie or vegas lookin and their super christian deadbeat daddies will blow their heads off if they dare date a black or a mexican dude..

On May 4, 1970 members of the Ohio National Guard fired into a crowd of Kent State University demonstrators, killing four and wounding nine Kent State students.

Chicago mayor Roswell B. Mason declared a state of martial law and placed General Philip Sheridan in charge of the city on October 9, 1871.

The Great Chicago Fire of 1871 and Its Aftermath The Great Chicago Fire of 1871 destroyed a major American city, making it one of the great disasters of the 19th century. The Great Chicago Fire of 1871 destroyed a major American city, making it one of the great disasters of the 19th century.

killed an estimated 300 people and caused an estimated $200 million in damages.

The riot ignited when a crowd of black freedmen marching for their liberties against the newly-legislated Black Codes was attacked by a mob of Democrats. The Democratic mob included many policemen from the New Orleans Police Department, and a fair number of former soldiers from the Confederate military. The freedmen marchers had former Union soldiers in their mix, so the animosity was mutual. Nobody knows who shot first, but by the time federal troops had put down the riot, 44 people had died, most of them black. Thanks to the riot, martial law was re-declared and the First Reconstruction Act was passed in 1867 in large part because of the New Orleans riot of 1866

all lives don’t matter until black lives do

So as a part of a racial/culture workshop online back in the 90s I constructed this idea in my late 20s. We were having these discussion on a bulletin board online. It was conveniently titled Race Relations. Of course there many racists there advocating for the race war etc. So I came up with a proposal that I thought made sense. It was called Partial Racial Segregation.

Where we would divide the nation up into two parts. The larger part is the just where life proceeds normally. Then one area would be designated a "racial nation". In this nation, you could construct "no go zones" based upon race or whatever standard you guys were comfortable with.

That way, you can have a "White" city or county or state. Or a "Black" one. Or an Arab one. I mean depending upon how many wanted this "freedom". You could create your racial. religious, or whatever state based upon whatever rules you see fit. I think there should be a minimum requirement in terms of population. I mean you can't create a zone for a dozen people. That's ridiculous.

I played around with the idea and it would be costly. But less costly than riots, looting, lawsuits, turmoil, etc. that goes along with our insane race problems that have existed since we were a nation. It is a proposal that could save us.

What do you guys think? Workable?

Here is my take on it:

The fact that millions of people are online and out there worshipping George Floyd baffles me. The police were absolutely in the right to defend themselves against such a crooked, bank-robbing terrorist.

This reminds me of how the same kind of people worshipped (and still to this day worship) mass murderers like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Dylan Roof. Like the aforementioned three, Floyd was a pure evil womanizer and terrorist with a racist agenda. His list of people on his written "To Kill" document included mostly Hispanic, Indian, and White people.

He used a fake $20 bill knowing he would get the police called on.

As he got mad towards a cashier at a 7-Eleven, as the cashier tells him he cannot use that bill, he loaded a shotgun and pointed it right to his face before stealing $220 from the cashier's desk.

The police officer who pushed Floyd down was in the right to do so. Floyd was whining like a little bitch saying "uh I can't breathe durggghh." He was calling two white officers racist names such as "cracker, honky, white n**," and many more, and was also taking tons of cocaine, meth and marijuana for recreational reasons.

Many friends and classmates around him admitted to the police that he was a liar, a crook, a racist, an "asshole," a "whiny bitch," and from one cousin, "a narcissistic fucking piece of shit."

Floyd also has a history of domestic violence and physical abuse of first- and second-grade children with disabilities. He even wanted to start fights with elementary-age children. His main attraction was towards 5 to 15 year old girls and would often befriend 10 to 17 year old boys on Instagram, Twitter and in real life.

George Floyd is an evil asshole. He sucks. Don't worship him. I would avoid him like Hitler.

theconversation.com/incel-violence-is-a-form-of-extremism-its-time-we-treated-it-as-a-security-threat-138536

What is your opinion on how incel violence should be dealt with? Personally I think they do fit the terrorism definition. But like the article says treating them that way may only make the problem worse. And what about the ones who are still redeemable? What should be done to prevent more incel violence?

Before it comes up, no I'm not an incel, I disagree with that world view. This question isn't for debating incel theories but for ideas on how to handle the growing threat of incel violence. I made poll options but I realize public opinion may be far more complex on this issue than just a simple poll feel free to add your opinion if you don't see something that fits your view in the poll.

I also thought Russians hate western culture. There are actually women teams and men teams in Russia. Also, national American Football teams for both women and men. However, I find it odder for Russian women to play tackle football due to the conservative religious Russian culture which makes a huge deal to follow traditional gender roles