Anonymous(25-29)+1 yAOC is about the stupidest person in the history of the world. She completely useless and should not be in a position of any power at all, except the power to pour my drink.
222 Reply- +1 y
@ronaldo75 man I totally agree with you
Most Helpful Opinions
11.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Lmao pretty sure Latinos aren’t native Americans. Plus if we counted them, and everyone else with native ancestry, almost anyone could technically claim it.
211 Reply- +1 y
Also originally it was the French in South America that started the term Latino. The Latino race was originally to mean those descendants of the Latin languages which includes Romania.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
95Opinion
- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 y"human mobility is a right". Hey, I hear she has some ice cream in her fridge, at least I know Nancy Pelosi does. Lets go get some. Don't worry about the door and lock on her house, we'll ignore that. The people responsible for guarding that persons possessions (police in this case, INS in case of immigrations)... well they can just shut up, we have rights to that ice cream, it's a finders keepers world for AOC.
Latino people... would be descendants of Africans like everyone else. They would have crossed ice bridges to get to the "Americas" (forgive the offensive non native name). And thus, they have every right to go to any continent they choose. Frankly, every human has a right to go wherever they want. There is no need for countries, we'll have a one world free flowing system. Um... not sure who will be in power of that... maybe the IMF?
This goes back to their model of the world... that there is one world government.
Why doesn't she go down to these Latino countries and fix them rather than complain about letting people into this one? Oh yea... because she doesn't know how. It's good she cares about these people. They are VERY poor people and I care about them as well. Lets work together to fix their corrupt governments, economies and societies so they can have better wealth and success and don't need to come to the USA. This may be very difficult because USA is horifically corrupt with our printing press. And that... is the root of the problem... we are stealing from all other countries by way of our magical printing press. Don't worry AOC, listen to investent people...$ is going to emerging markets. Your people will receive those resources, if the governments there don't steal it from them.
I need stats on how many people die in these detention centers, or the amount of abuse. I also need stats on how many people die, are kidnapped, murdered on their way to the border. From what I recall, people were dying in the deserts back in the Clinton admin... litterly dying of thirst.00 Reply - 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 y>Latinos called natives and given keys to walk into the United States with free reign
>Over 10 million Latinos walk across the border in the first year alone
>Latino wave descends into inner cities all across the US.
>Start taking over all of the working-class jobs because they're willing to earn 25% less for the same work
>All currently working-class people, especially black Americans, pushed out of work
>Entire Latino communities start popping un in traditionally Asain or Black communities
>States like California give these people free housing, healthcare, and school for simply existing
>California literally goes bankrupt now Trillions in debt
>Black Americans start attacking latinos due to the power struggle
>Chicanos and Cartel members start attacking any black people they see even out in the streets
>Police powerless to do anything
>Me cracking a cold one watching 40 million new Latino migrants allowed to descend into the country unopposed started a race war amongst minorities.10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 y


I would like to point out to people that this country treats Hispanic people terribly. Also, these are not violent people. They live in equal rates of poverty compared to black people. However, stats/data show that black people are more violent (13/50). This violence can be attributed to genetics (75%) or environment (25%). Meanwhile, We lock Mexican women and children in cages. Sex trafficked thousands. One year ago, a white supremacist shot 60 and killed 23 Hispanics at a local Walmart. It was Hispanic targeted. It's also been proven that these immigrants are some of the most thankful ones to be here (they are less likely to commit crimes compared to citizens). They are leaving a country where corruption and poverty roam and are very thankful to be here. If black people received half of the treatment Hispanics do, we would be bombed. We do not put black people in cages. We do not discriminate against them (ICE). Etc.
09 Reply- +1 y
your emotional appeal is just propaganda from the rich to trick you into lowering your wages, immigration lowers your wages. we have a moral obligation to treat illegal immigrants badly because they are here to steal from us. that makes us good people
- +1 y
Yet how violent they are has nothing to do with the issue at hand. This is just random waffling.
- +1 y
@007kingifrit wrong! its diferent a guy, girl, dudette that makes all legaly than someone that start his life breaking the law. the one that breaks it should be treated acording to the law.
- +1 y
Latino migrants may not be bad people, but their kids turn to gangs and selling drugs and other crimes. There are too many gang shootings where innocent people are killed. We don't need that. We also have millions of citizens and homeless that cannot find jobs so what will migrants do for a living? When they come over illegally they are not governed by laws and conditions of immigration, like being sponsored by someone that can guarantee they will have a job when they get here. I also don't like how children get treated but the fact is most of them didn't come with family. I would be ticked if I were not allowed to enter the US legally because the quota had been filled while illegals don't have to play by the rules. But never fear, Biden is planning on giving amnesty to 11 million illegals and give them a pathway to citizenship. Something that legally immigrating people don't get.
Opinion Owner+1 yThe only reason I support blm and am for illegal immigration is because of the crazy amount of neo nazi white people like you. I want to piss off all the neo nazis.
- +1 y
so you don't think about what you do at all you just have what is called "compulsive disagreement" another tool of the rich, they break you down into sides and teach you to be against the other side. then they label the other side bad things
nobody here has said anything nazi like at all - +1 y
I'm not against legal immigration and it is irrelevant what there ethnicity is, illegal immigrants are more likely to break the law than citizens. Coming here illegally already breaks the law, so all illegal immigrants are more likely to break the law than citizens.
- +1 y
@OpinionOwner
If that's the only reason then aren't you also saying they're right?
Like... if there's *actual* problems that exist, but you choose not to solve them because it would make bad people mad, then aren't you equally -- if not even more -- part of the problem? - +1 y
The scent of ignorance can be smelled through a computer screen with this one.
- 3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThats stupid. No, latino's were not native to this land. They did have texas and some other areas but they freely gave up those lands to the US settlers in hopes that they would act like a meat shield against the comache who would otherwise brutalize them and raid them (in fact this is why we had the texas rangers. They were specifically trained to fight comache and native americans because they were so vicious and brutal. Once they were conquered mexico then decided they want that land back after all the americans managed to fight off the natives and civilize the area. This is what lead to the mexican American war). Also if we get technical it wasn' even their land because they took that land from other groups, and the aztecs enslaved their neighbors and took it over from those who came before them. So its a stupid argument.
30 Reply 324 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. What happened to the theory of the ice bridge over the Bering Sea and how Native Americans are actually descendants of the Asians? I hadn't heard of her recent claims, so I'd have to look into it, but if it's true, someone needs to do their homework on human migration, starting in Africa, and then going from there.
She'll especially love the part how the Asians began migrating east, eventually becoming the Native Americans who were in North and South America first -- who by the way didn't go on to birth Latinos, much to her disappointment -- and that the Norse were the next to find North America about 14,000 years after the Native Americans did, roughly four years before the Italians.27 Reply- +1 y
@chapawapa I'm not so sure.
activehistory.ca/.../
I only say this because I also see links to the cultures of Native Americans and Asians - and although these aren't things that can be scientifically *proven* it's the likelihood that they are. Also, scientists who have done DNA mapping can link Native Americans to Asians.
www.sciencemag.org/.../ancient-dna-confirms-native-americans-deep-roots-north-and-south-america
To me, with all of the theories these ones make the most sense.
But I think we can agree that the Native Americans certainly did NOT birth the Latinos. ;) - +1 y
Currently, there is more research being conducted... One of them is of a 130,000 year old site. More evidence is needed to make it a reliable site. But interesting none the less. api.nationalgeographic.com/.../mastodons-americas-peopling-migrations-archaeology-science
And a site dated at about 30,000 years ago (about double the length of time than the Bering Strait suggest. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02190-y
Then there is research that concludes that the bering strait, although a pass, was uninhabitable, not enough resources for humans to live to get across. www.smithsonianmag.com/.../
I believe the anzick child had ancient human DNA with modern human DNA and some studies have found that south American native DNA is older than north American DNA which also doesn't make sense if they came through the Bering A. (the human odyssey documentary)
There seems to be a lot of unknowns and continued research in the area of the first Americans. So it wouldn't be appropriate to have a definitive answer. Which makes sense to the growing research...
Actually natives did birth Hispanics they came from someone. Typically a native and a colonizer from the Iberian Peninsula area (I. e., Spaniards Portuguese) this is how the colonizers classified their Hispanic and latino mixed kids for social status back in the day. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta
Natives and Hispanics are different cultures and natives are the ones who were not colonized and kept their culture through all that colonization.
- +1 y
@chapawapa either way the discussion is moot. conequered people have lost their land fair and square. nations cannot steal from one another because sovereign entities cannot own things. only win or lose them
+1 yEverything that comes out of her mouth is an absolute joke lol. I’ve tried to give her so many chances because I can appreciate passion, but my god this woman is stupid. She’s very good at approaching issues at a surface level in a way that appeals to democrats, but there is absolutely NO depth.
Open the borders! What about crime that this brings in? Tax the rich! What about when the businesses leave with their jobs because there’s no incentive to be there? Massive stimulus checks! What about the depreciation of the US dollar?
When you try to dig past that, she’ll attack you with morality and a lot of fluff. Her emotional maturity and level of intellect is almost embarrassing for our country.
Her Twitter is also straight up hateful. She literally hates republicans, white people, and police officers... yet claims to be a beacon of unity. So to answer your question, no. I just ignore her and treat her as a funny meme at this point.30 Reply- 553 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThis is an odd statement. Latinos are not necessarily descendents of Native Americans.
I have Latin blood and Indian blood, but it's Caribbean Indian. It's Puerto Rican Taino Indian and the Tainos didn't inhabit land in the United States.
This would be true of other Latinos. Some have no Native North American blood and are strictly Hispanic.
I don't know what percentage of Latins have South American, Central American or Mexican American Native blood. It's not all.
You'd have to provide a DNA test to prove where your Native American heritage was from.
But the RATIONAL point would be where did the person with Native American heritage grow up and where was that person born. If that person was born and raised in a foreign country, their long ago Native heritage doesn't count to establish current residency/land ownership.
Unless someone is a current member of a recognized tribe I don't think this counts for anything.10 Reply - 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI do not agree with that one second. Anything that comes out of her mouth stems from passion and forgoes logic.
If you are a resident of another country and wish to immigrate to America, there is a process for it. You go through the port of entry legally and have paperwork put in for a Visa which must be renewed as necessary until they are able to take and pass their citizenship test.
Latinos that have actually done it the legal way, along with other races, my mother included get livid beyond belief when illegal immigrants get in with no repercussions and disregard for law and processing. It is a slap in the face. You don't get grandfathered in because of that.10 Reply 910 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Lol why is she talking about this instead of forcing a vote on Medicare for All? This is why I can't take any identity politics seriously it's always used to distract from the economic issues that are crippling and enslaving the poor and the middle class. It's the middle of a pandemic and she says it's not the time to do medicare for all now.
If people had medicare for all then they wouldn't have to depend on their employers for healthcare which means they could actually do things like strike and ask for better wages but rich people don't like that at all. They like desperate employees with debt and no other options so they have to stay in a job they don't like and are underpaid just in case they might get sick.
Im not saying things like police brutality are not issues but they get used so often when it's politically convenient that I just can't trust it anymore.10 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yThey're descended from Latin American tribes. Maybe not all of them, but most of them. But even if they're descended, it doesn't matter, because we have a country now. And just because your great, great, great, great grandfather was a Native that doesn't entitle you to special treatment. Your great, great, great, great grandfather had his land "stolen", not YOU! Be mad at HIM for not having better weapons.
Also, pretty much every piece of territory on earth was conquered by someone else, so this rule should apply everywhere than. Should the Russians get free citizenship to places they lost in WWII. It doesn't work that way.
The Incas conquered other tribes, the Spanish conquered the Incas. That's how the world works. They should have fought harder.12 Reply- +1 y
I agree.
Opinion Owner+1 yThanks
1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. AOC needs to put the bong down.
I saw the video. The US has a right to protect it's borders just like any other country on Earth. As for Latinos being descended from Natives peoples this is - in may cases - technically correct yet it is a weak argument as far as I am concerned. Latin American countries have been nation states for several hundred years already. This means that they already have a system of laws in place to guide their respective societies. They also have immigration laws - from Mexico all the way down to Chile and Argentina. That some of them have Native blood does not eliminate the need for immigration Laws amongst the American* countries.
*As in countries of the western hemisphere.10 Reply- 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo, I don't. Plus, I don't like her. She get bad vibes from & about her. I'm glad she lost her bid for a seat on the House's Energy and Commerce Committee.
101 Reply- +1 y
I meant: "I* get bad vibes from & about her."
+1 yAt one time that may have applied when tons of people immigrated to the United States. But thing changed when coming here was limited on how many people could enter. Now people have to wait their turn to get in and have conditions apply. If Latinos immigrate legally it is not a problem. Coming over illegally is.
40 ReplyI get what she’s saying, because I mean it is true Texas, California, New Mexico these all used to be a part of Mexico. That land is native to those Hispanic people who had been living there for longer than it’s been a part of the U. S. so it is unfair that now they are the ones being called the “outsiders” or the “intruders”. I do think we need a more compassionate approach to immigration and immigration reform. I completely disagree with Trumps approach and I also even disagree with how Obama handled the issue. But I don’t think Hispanic people should be automatically given citizenship status like how AOC is saying. I think there should be some process in place that leads to a path to citizenship.
25 Reply- +1 y
Not true; most of the people who lived in those parts when those states were part of Mexico never left and their descendants ARE US citizens. The ancient civilizations of Mexico didn't extend to Texas or California. They were only part of Mexico due to Spanish colonization; European outsiders, in other words.
- +1 y
so? nations win and lose land in war. they lost. they were defeated. that's life
- +1 y
@007kingifrit don’t disagree w that which is why I don’t think they should automatically citizenship.
1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. For the sake of argument let's say that 100% of latinos are members of some native tribe. A tribe has ancestral lands and/or reservation. Wherever country that is locate in determines the national citizenship of the tribal member. So if your tribal homeland is in Mexico you're a citizen of Mexico not the U. S. If your tribal land happens to be in New Mexico then sure, you would be a U. S. citizen. Point is it's not automatic that you'd be a U. S. citizen just because you're from a tribe from some random place in the Americas. That's just now how existing tribal stuff works.
But if you are a native you could move freely between countries if the tribal land is in both countries.00 Reply3.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. So let me say this, if we completely got rid of welfare and food stamp no disability no mothers getting a pay check for being a single mother. I would be fine with more porous borders because my tax dollars aren’t going to pay for them to live in the United States, As long as we have welfare I don’t believe we should be excepting people crossing the border illegally.
that being said I don’t like the idea of illegal immigrants coming into the country because people will get killed not all the illegal emigrants are murderers but it is nice to be able to vet the people coming into the country rather then not knowing if a murder or a sex trafficker just came into the country. But I’ll compromise you completely get rid of welfare and I’ll allow illegal immigrants to come into the country00 Reply
+1 y
She's a joke.
120 Reply
+1 yThat's wholly incorrect to begin with. And you can't build immigration laws on "one rule for them and another for them", no group of people can receive special treatment when immigrating for any reason. The mad nonsense this woman spews never seizes to amaze. An embarrassment to the office.
30 ReplyI think your question is very misleading. It doesn't reflect what Ocazio Reese Cortez was saying in the video.
I watched the whole video from beginning to end and not once does she say or imply that immigration laws should not apply to Latino people.
About the Latinos being descendants of Native Americans, that is actually true. There is no group of people in America that has more native blood running through their veins than Latinos.
Any way my only issue here is the questioning. I think it is very important not to take what a person has said out of context which is exactly what this question did.00 Reply
+1 yWell Mexicans are generally part Native American and part European. In which way does their heritage apply to the present? blood or blood + if they maintain tribal affiliation? If they and their family have denied that part of their past, maybe it's not so relevant. And for the Mexicans already here and citizens.. Are you going to give them the same rights as Native Americans even though they lost the connection to the tribe? If so hit me up with that free tuition!
I can't say whether or not they have a right to it. As these things are very ambiguous.10 ReplyPMAO, you are taking advice from a dumb bitch who doesn't even know the term ILLEGAL. She doesn't even know what a garbage disposal is, and she throws tantrums over a waitress job. This is why no one takes any democrat seriously
60 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yOf course not, thats insane.
I dont know if the US is the same but in the UK having family in the country makes it easier for you to get into the country which would resolve some? most? all? issues along these lines.
But no, the iron price has been paid for the borders of countries, you dont just get to cross them because you are snow flake shaped and have a boo boo on your feelings.30 ReplyAOC is one of the dumbest fucking politicians every to reach congress... My lord.
That's one of the dumbest fucking things I've ever heard in my life. So then what, now all a Muslims or European has to do is go to Mexico, apply for a Mexican citizenship then they can come into the US legally? The only way to combat that is to have race-based immigration policy where only Native Hispanics get to come into the country. What if a Black Afro-Latino from Brazil wants to come into the US? They're not genetically latino but they are Brazil, do we block them?00 Reply- 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yActually archeologists now believe the first Americans were Europeans who traveled across the ocean during the ice age, and were killed off later by immigrants from asia over the bering strait.
Meaning, Europeans actually have legit claim to America.10 Reply - 4.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWhy are latinos considered natives of America? They are from Spain and Portugal.
This is concerning that it's allowed for AOC to push this narrative so freely and no one is """debunking""" it even though it's basic knowledge that Hispanics are "colonisers" also.20 Reply - 756 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYeah, that's a stupid hyperbole. She should talk about how much our economy depends on migrant labor and about how the reason that so many people are coming here is because the CIA activities fucked up their countries (that's why they're such "shitholes").
166 Reply- +1 y
our economy does not in any way depend on migrant labor. that is just propaganda the rich tell you to trick you into lowering your wages. its so funny how the elites manipulate you "socialists" lol
- +1 y
also the CIA only picked sides in conflicts that were already going on, thus speeding the end of the conflict and actually sparing the regions long drawn out conflicts. its really helpful to them actually
- +1 y
@007kingifrit wrong, they want to classify them as "illegal" so they don't have any recourse when abused while pulling the strings behind the scenes to prevent deportations (note that the undocumented migrant population didn't decrease under the Trump administration but the number of arrests related to human trafficking decreased but the number of calls to human trafficking hotlines increased so while the same number of people are coming in, corporations are more free to abuse them). And many conflicts were started by CIA organized coups in the first place.
- +1 y
lets ignore the illegal vs legal thing for a sec, ANY immigrant is going to lower your wages and all of it is a ploy by the rich to lower your wages
- +1 y
@007kingifrit That's assuming that they are working jobs that would be filled by Americans otherwise but for the most part, employers can't get Americans to fill the positions filled by undocumented migrants. Now you could argue that if we gutted social security Americans would be willing to work those jobs but given that there are > 3 million jobs that pay over 50,000 a year that employers are struggling to fill, such an argument is quite tenuous at best. Besides, the rich would get off to the thought of gutting social security.
- +1 y
and don’t tell me they only take jobs that others don’t want because after ICE raided meat processing plants thousands of american’s applied for those jobs www.apnews.com/a2f7d00232bd408285f2f7e9c041cf1e
you are just making the arguments the rich tell you to make. it is objectively false that americans don't want those jobs. illegal immigrants just lower the wages so much americans CAN'T take those jobs
but what happens when you cut the immigration?
a national small business survey found that as we decrease immigration small business owners increase wages and take extra steps to maintain their employees www.cnbc.com/.../...cern-for-small-businesses.html - +1 y
@007kingifrit Because some small businesses increased wages doesn't mean that there was a statistically significant impact on wages across the board in the US (talk about a stretch) and that doesn't mean that an increased failure rate of small businesses due to labor shortages wouldn't offset any economic benefits said increase brought to the country. And you're talking "thousands" in a country (and undocumented migrant population) of millions; it's a drop in the bucket.
And tell you what, I'll call undocumented migrants "illegal immigrants" when you call the "detention centers" concentration camps. - +1 y
since 2017 wages have risen 6.8% in america https://archive.vn/uwTcB
you just don't want to believe the rich fooled you
and yes we do know it is caused by immigration , a 2018 study by the bank of england found that for every 10% increase to immigration there was a 1% drop in worker's wages... but nvm the studies for a second. its common sense. more workers = more competition, more competition = more chances to lower your wages or not raise them, its so fucking simple anyone could understand it unless the rich hard programmed them not to
you're no a socialist lol you're a lap dog for the elite - +1 y
also detention centers are not the same as concentration camps
concentration camp; where you are imprisoned for who you are
detention center: where you are put based on what you have done - +1 y
@007kingifrit And we know that in the US the impact that migrants have on wages is negligible and even if it did have an adverse impact, that still has to be weighed against the impact of having only a fraction of the jobs worked by migrant labor filled by native born workers.
https://www.nap.edu/read/23550/chapter/2
You're just knit picking to project your subservience to the wealthy onto the left. - +1 y
there is no evidence workers would not replace all the migrant labor. all of it
and wages would go up, for everyone
also if you are going to post a 600 page source i expect direct quotes with page numbers - +1 y
@007kingifrit
www.researchgate.net/.../274204124_Do_migrants_take_the_jobs_of_native_workers
"The evidence does not support policy intervention to “protect” native employment. Instead, the quantitative evidence shows that, overall, immigrants do not take native workers’ jobs in the long term and that they stimulate job creation through increased production, self-employment, entrepreneurship, and innovation."
And I know that you need information spoon fed to you but the source I gave you had a subscript. - +1 y
"overall" "in the long term" i gave proof that it did, they try to talk about this using only numbers, they don't really understand the real world
i showed you that yes, they are taking jobs americans want, yes they do lower people's wages. and you just repeat the propaganda of the establishment to avoid admitting they tricked you
if you stopped being such a puppet of the rich we would have so much in common - +1 y
@007kingifrit You showed that there are instances of that but you didn't show that the economic benefits of having the jobs that otherwise wouldn't be occupied filled wouldn't create more jobs than any minor displacement would cost. The right plays this game where you look at one downside of a policy to make your case while completely ignoring the net impact. And you showed that was long term in the UK but not true for the US. Again, you're just trying to project your subservience to the wealthy.
- +1 y
the fact that they exist at all combined with common sense should tell us that it is a profound impact.
my sources give exact numbers, show concrete examples. yours doesn't. it just says vague subjective terms like "negligable impact" to who? to the rich people writing the study and paying for it? i bet
you're a puppet of the rich - +1 y
@007kingifrit The sources I gave indicated that the economic benefits outweighed the downsides and now you're appealing to emotions ("common sense" because something being intuitive doesn't necessarily make it true). Stop projecting your subservience to the rich and own it.
- +1 y
common sense is not an emotion, it is the basic understanding that your institutions are not trustworthy and you need to rely on your own ability to gather information
your sources quantify nothing. just give vague statements. i gave exact numbers
when sources conflict with eachother common sense is all that is left. common sense says if 10 people apply for a job the workers have more say in what they get than if 1000 people applied. on a puppet of the rich would disagree with that - +1 y
@007kingifrit If you read beyond the abstracts you'd see that they did do analysis or cited sources that gave analysis. Do you know why? because they looked at the cumulative information while you just knit picked bits of data to advance your fictitious narrative. As for using intuition, the human mind is terrible at statistics so when you say "rely on your own experiences" you're just using that to lend false credence to BS you pulled out of your ass.
- +1 y
there is nothing empirical there and its wording is all subjective. "negligible impact" to who? to the rich people that wrote the study? i know its not negligible. I've seen it first hand and its also common sense
my studies are real. yours are impractical - +1 y
above all you still ignore the common sense that the working class benefits when there is a labor shortage. because you are a slave to the rich
- +1 y
@007kingifrit And you're ignoring that the economy can grow faster, creating more job opportunities when essential jobs that otherwise wouldn't be filled are occupied because you want to project your subservience to the rich onto the left. Now just own it and stop being so pretentious.
- +1 y
look at you sounding like a republican lol
immigration is only good for the economy by hurting the working class for the investors. it is never good for the people - +1 y
@007kingifrit And you're acting like you don't understand that it's not a zero sum game. Oh wait, you're not acting like it, you're genuinely so myopic you can't wrap your head around it.
Trumps expansion of the concentration camp system at the borders hasn't decreased the number of undocumented migrants, it just made them easier to control for the owners of industry so they can exploit them harder. Your policies benefit the rich, that's all there is to the migrant debate, accept it, move on and fly under your true colors. - +1 y
yes all things in life taken to their highest scale are a zero sum game. there are a limited number of atoms in the universe.
immigraiton lowers wages, the only ones who benefit from it are the rich. it does not create new jobs even in highly growth based industries like big tech. the H1B1 visa has destroyed the wages of tech workers at google and the rest of those big companies.
all because you bleeding hearts have to go "ooooh the immigrants we have to take care of them" - +1 y
@007kingifrit
-Wow talk about a stretch; remind me where are we on the Kardashev scale?
- H1B1 visas provided work for positions that would for the most part be occupied by native workers (false equivalence on your part).
- +1 y
ALL immigrants take jobs that would be occupied by native workers. its the same thing. you just don't want it to be true because you don't want to admit the rich fooled you
- +1 y
@007kingifrit With millions of jobs that don't require a college degree that pay in excess of $50,000 a year going unoccupied by native workers, the notion that the jobs worked by immigrants would be filled by native workers is simply ludicrous. Just admit that the rich have their hand up your ass and stop trying to project it onto the left.
- +1 y
there are no unoccupied jobs like that you are living in some fantasy world. plus immigration lowers wages so jobs pay so little americans CAN'T take them
where did you come up with this fake idea that 50k a year jobs are not being filled? its like you live in a portland fairytale and have never been outside your parent's yacht club - +1 y
@007kingifrit
www.kiplinger.com/.../...y-do-jobs-go-begging.html
washingtonmonthly.com/.../
And it's that (not "like") I can actually do research while you have a completely myopic view of reality and cling to a simplistic world view to justify keeping people in concentration camps to benefit the rich.
www.usatoday.com/.../
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/list-of-major-companies-involved-in-the-concentration-camps - +1 y
This claim that they are taking the jobs of native born workers doesn't stand up to scrutiny:
wol.iza.org/.../...-the-jobs-of-native-workers.pdf - +1 y
your article is about the skills gap. not americans being UNWILLING to take those 50k a year jobs
your article implies we should fix the broken college education system and stop letting kids pick stupid majors. it does not imply we should take in immigrants - +1 y
@007kingifrit They are unwilling to go to trade school versus pick stupid majors (even though the former would be cheaper) so it's fair to say that they are unwilling to take the jobs but the other article showed that they don't take jobs. That's a myth debunked long ago.
- +1 y
you are now starting a whole different argument. you have abbandoned your claim they don't want those jobs
nobody is telling them to go to trade schools, they don't know their mistake. so they aren't unwilling.
you may not use the skills gap as evidence for increasing immigration. americans can still take those jobs... infact if companies get desperate enough they will fix the problem of teh skills gap THEMSELVES by paying for trade school and advertising it, ever think of that? - +1 y
@007kingifrit "nobody" told them to chose the career path that they did, they made that choice themselves so your counter is BS.
There is no evidence that immigrants are costing more jobs than they are creating by boosting the economy. - +1 y
actually parents and schools and society at large does push people towards useless college.
either way they are not unwilling to fill those jobs. the skills gap is not evidence of your original claim and if you really cared about workers you would ban immigration to force companies to start seeking ways to use that labor - +1 y
@007kingifrit And there's plenty of information out and about regarding issues with student debt so again, your argument can't hold up to scrutiny. The fact remains that with only a fraction of the educational investment needed to obtain a college degree, people could fill those jobs and even if they weren't, that still wouldn't mean that the jobs worked by migrant workers would be filled by native workers (or at least not to the extent that it wouldn't be outweighed by the economic stimulus they provided).
- +1 y
you're not thinking like a teenager. you need to to properly have context for this information
it doesn't matter if the information on student debt exists they are too young and sheltered to be given that information, and they don't know to look for it so how can they?
either way a labor shortage would force companies to hire them and train them which used to be normal prior to the 60s and mass immigration - +1 y
@007kingifrit Even after you go to college you can still go to trade school afterwards and labor shortages aren't driving companies to train them; the market doesn't have that much foresight.
And even so there's no evidence that migrants cause a net decrease in jobs. - +1 y
the market doesn't need that foresight right now because you are allowing immigration, remove it and the workers will prosper
- +1 y
@007kingifrit The market doesn't have that much foresight because capitalism only cares about the next quarter and it takes a year for someone to acquire a skilled trade. You're just using immigrants as a scapegoats for the shortcomings that are inherently part of capitalism.
- +1 y
the market does have foresight and no capitalism does not care only about the next quarter. you're just making blatantly false dogmatic statements now because you lost the argument
- +1 y
@007kingifrit OK, poor choice of words on my part it doesn't only care about the next quarter but what's going to turn a profit the next quarter is going to weigh into decision making way more than anything that might happen next year. So my statement isn't any more "false" than a model looking at subsonic airflow that uses Newtonian mechanics is "false" because it didn't factor in relativistic (near light speed) effects. Now you're just pulling the Bailey and Motte fallacy because your case was BS from the start.
- +1 y
no, money makers worry very much about YEARS in advance, there are thousands of investment expo you can watch that predict things YEARS in advance. they are the most forward thinking people there are
for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPWZtLPpW8w
so to bring us back on topic; cut the immigration and companies will indeed give free training to people to close the skills gap... but you just aren't pro worker. - +1 y
@007kingifrit You can't predict things years in advance as well as you can predict what will happen around the next quarter so short term profits will always carry a greater weight when determining policy. And if they aren't paying for training now, then suddenly taking away all the migrants won't change that; migrants make more jobs than they take so your argument is a complete non-sequitur.
- +1 y
their longterm projections say idiots like you will keep endorsing shooting workers in the foot by allowing immigration
if that would change, their projections would change. look how desperate you are to not admit you made a mistake - +1 y
@007kingifrit Look how desperate you are resorting to unfounded (and completely asinine) talking points to push the "migrants take the jobs of native workers" mythos. And you obviously have no idea how projections work (like the basic principal that near term events are easier to predict than long term ones).
- +1 y
i used empirical data to prove immigrants do take jobs. that was proven a week ago in this conversation. we aren't even on that anymore
you then moved on to a fake argument about the skills gap and claimed americans didn't want those jobs... which was never true
now you are just using a mirroring tactic to repeat what i say back to me. accusing me of that which you are guilty of because you just can't admit you're a tool of the rich and i'm the hero of the workers - +1 y
@007kingifrit You knit picked bits of information to support an unsustainable conclusion while I cited work by economists that looked at cumulative data that showed that migrant labor makes more jobs than it takes. And you're the one projecting your subservience to the rich at the cost of the workers onto me; not the other way around. Is flying under your true colors really so hard?
- +1 y
i gave real examples in the real world. you -as usual- relied on old broken institutions and labels. you know economists are never right, right? no economist can predict what the economy will do better than random chance its just a label to help stupid people trust
my conclusion is very sustainable, more workers but same employers = lower wages. its super simple. and ALWAYS true. - +1 y
but go on, explain to me how my desire to cut immigration helps the rich
- +1 y
@007kingifrit Your case is over-simplistic, there are a lot more factors that go into it like how having jobs that wouldn't be otherwise occupied work can fuel job growth and create more jobs than they take (i. e. your cherry picked examples). And I used academic sources but you won't believe them because you've fallen for the BS academia vs real world talking point.
Your desire to cut immigration helps the rich because it makes putting migrants in concentration camps more acceptable by the rest of the population. As such, migrants are less likely to speak out if they are abused or put in unsafe working conditions for fear of being sent to said camps and having their children taken away so the rich can make more money off them. - +1 y
ok you're nuts, the rich do not benefit in any way from putting illegals in detention facilities. besides i'm against legal and illegal immigration, cut it all and you won't have this problem.
unsafe working conditions is small potatoes compared to the 1% drop in wages for every 10% increase to immigration. the rich benefit from mass immigration. ban all immigration and the workers will prosper - +1 y
@007kingifrit Correction, the rich benefit from migration when they're free to abuse and exploit them but when jobs that wouldn't otherwise be occupied are filled we all benefit.
- +1 y
the rich benefit from migration. period. the working class do not
when jobs go unfilled employers must try harder to fill them. jobs going unfilled is a good thing and empowers the worker - +1 y
@007kingifrit That's a half truth. The working class benefit from the economic growth by having otherwise unfilled jobs occupied but the rich benefit even more when they are free to abuse migrant workers without fear of repercussions. Get over it.
- +1 y
Is admitting that you're just looking for excuses to separate kids from their parents at the border concentration camps so the rich can exploit migrant labor even harder really so difficult for you?
- +1 y
Because you know, the number of migrants isn't decreasing any faster under Trump than under Obama and if the rich can exploit migrants even harder, then they are even less inclined to hire native workers. But lets get those well paying jobs I mentioned filled; then we can talk about limiting the number of migrant workers.
- +1 y
actually the # of migrants drastically went down under trump, by about 60-70% www.msn.com/.../ar-BB1atamj
- +1 y
@007kingifrit That includes legal and illegal and the rate at which their coming is decreasing because the rate at which the US economy is growing is also decreasing so there is less opportunity to be had.
www.usatoday.com/.../
Not because of immigrants but because of tax cuts to the rich:
en.wikipedia.org/.../...hanges_for_the_Top_10%.jpg - +1 y
your link is adblocked; can't view it
but the U. S economy is not shrinking, it is growing
• Trump added 300,000 manufacturing jobs in his first 30 months; a rate of growth not seen since 1988 www.forbes.com/.../#73d5d4e32677
the U. S economy has been growing in the past 4 years. not shrinking at all, what fantasy land you must live in - +1 y
seriously i'm shocked how dumb and out of touch you would have to be to think the economy was shrinking
• President Trump created 6.6 million jobs in his first three years. That's a 4.4% increase over the 152.2 million people working at the end of 2016 www.thebalance.com/job-creation-by-president-by-number-and-percent-3863218
• Household income has risen 6.8% and poverty has fallen https://archive.vn/uwTcB - +1 y
@007kingifrit I didn't say that the economy was shrinking, I said the growth was stalling; that's like you claiming that I said a car is going backwards because I said it was slowing down. Seriously, did you fail math or something?
- +1 y
either way it proves my point, you argued tax cuts to the rich slowed growth? that makes no sense. and growth isn't slowing the economy grew very fast in the past 4 years and either way the tax cuts only helped that happen. and helped the working class
immigraiton is down because trump made it go down, which is why the rich hate him - +1 y
@007kingifrit Again, you can't tell the difference between a value and a derrivative. The source you gave said the rate of migrant growth was decreasing, not that that the immigrant population was decreasing and initially the economic growth rate went up under Trump but then it started to drop (even before COVID-19) so the policies he put in make the economy grow weren't exactly sustainable.
- +1 y
i never said the migrant population was decreasing only the inflow of them had gone down 70%. which is huge, you claimed it wasn't going down, it is.
this is all a silly aside anyways, immigration going down is good for workers, good for the poor, good for everyone except the rich. migration isn't going down because opportunities went down. its going down because trump thankfully slashed it. and as a result wages rose, new jobs appeared, and workers are better off
the end - +1 y
@007kingifrit When jobs that aren't other wise occupied are filled, it stirs economic growth and creates more of the jobs that the native workers want. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
- 6.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yLogically it was their land but it isn't now. They were conquered fair and square.
76 Reply- +1 y
I don't think conquering any land is ever fair and square.
- +1 y
Advanced civilizations always conquer the less developed, either by blade or bribe. Without conquest society stagnates.
- +1 y
Killing people isn't 'advanced'
- +1 y
@Inquisitive3 look the dame cobckered dudes and duddetes of the aztec enpire. conquered many more and make inmense human sacrifices... also the incas... at least at the south of usa... so please... it was just karma...
- +1 y
@Inquisitive3 then you're a child, conquest is always fair, be strong or die is the law of nature
- +1 y
@Inquisitive3 yes killing people is advanced, you're just spoiled and don't understand how important killing is to our safety
The bigger picture of her argument is that should the US be providing a path to citizenship to immigrants (Latinos and all other races) and protecting DACA/Dreamer students. Although she has a weak argument by saying "We are standing on Native land and Latino people are descendants of Native people and we can not be told and criminalized...", I do believe that immigrants should have a path to citizenship. I think it should be merit based.
01 Reply- +1 y
I'd like to see something like some European countries. Where you come in on a Visa and after so many years you are offered to receive medical assistance and so on.
Based off of public services done over the course of say 5-6 years. If they break any laws, regardless of if you got married in the country. You would be kicked out.
8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That‘s the sort of pretzel logic employed by the crazies that want to eliminate US borders. It’s deranged.
The more interesting question, however, is why she wants open borders.40 ReplyHate to inform you that the term "Latino " implies a person has Spanish blood in him.
So should the immigration law apply based on the percentage of lantin blood his has?
And don't forget. "Native" American isn't an accurate description of those who were here before the evil white man crossed the pond. Those people migrated from Asia thousands of years before10 Reply- 2.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ythat's ridiculously stupid, they weren't indians and its not their land. land cannot be owned by sovereign entities, only won or lost.
its also funny she is just parroting talking points of the rich, she is so easily influenced by the masters of wallstreet. immigration is a tool to lower our wages10 Reply
+1 yI am latin and my answer is No... that happens when you give power to a waitress... americans please next time look for people with good degrees, and some knoledge... cause this lady... I do not know wich problem did she have in the restaurant were she was waitress, but she found cauliflower quite racist... probably cause is racist thowards broccoli.
10 Reply- 731 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYour title paints a narrative different than what's in the video. She's talking mostly about DACA rights and ICE violating human rights, and her statements about mobility are spoken from the context of those fleeing violence - the mobility statement came at the end of the part about children in cages. . context.
00 Reply 3.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Immigration is the international movement of people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.
If we are going by this which is what comes up when you search immigration she is correct if there natives.
So looks like i agree unless there is something i missed?10 ReplyNo, that's not how citizenship works.. Most of them were not in the land when America was made a nation.. Plus most Latinos are not originally from the lands of America, only a few.. Some people actually believe that AOC is smart.. 😂😂😂..
10 Reply- 4.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWell no surprise but this is just one more of a very long string of things that Sandy Cortez is batshit crazy about. It's really disheartening to know there's a congressional district in the United States of America that would elect this person.
10 Reply 8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. While it is probably misrepresenting what she said, its not an insane position. If you have sufficiently strong blood ties to a certain region/country you can more often than not request to return to that country with little fuss. People with Irish decent is a prime example of this.
00 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yUS Immigration Laws should be applied irrespective of who is applying to enter the country, If Latino's can prove they have a right to enter then all's well, but the should not have automatic access because AOC thinks they are descendants of indigenous peoples.
10 Reply
+1 ynot all latinos have native ancestry and even if they do have native ancestry, it usually doesn’t include the natives of america but from other places in the new world. .
60 Reply- 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAren't Latinos also descendants of Native American killing, Spanish colonizers that robbed two-thirds of North and South America of precious metals?
Don't tell me that about that difference between Hispanic and Latino, because if you do I'll ask you about Simon Bolivar real treatment of pardos.
The world is full of history that can be used to advance all kind of agendas. Pick your own agenda and advance it with good cause.10 Reply - 620 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yImmigration laws have less than nothing to do with race and everything to do with keeping threats out.
20 Reply I mean... I doubt people in south america have one drop of northern native American blood.
And while we're at it, I suppose according to her I'm a Swedish and Danish citizen.10 Replyaren't Latinos descendants of of the spainish and Portuguese colonists. Also central and South America are not North America
20 Reply- 974 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yBy that logic we would have to allow anyone with Mongolian ancestry which is what most Latinos are descendant from.
It baffles the mind that he progressive movement believes her to be an intellectual.10 Reply - 777 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo, I don't. That's a dumb statement. They still had to come from across the border. AOC is the best gift the Republicans could ask for. They should just let her keep talking and they should continue to get more votes.
33 Reply- +1 y
+1 yif you are here illegally, whether you are latino, black, indian, chinese, etc., you are still breaking the law by Trespassing.
10 Reply5.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. 🤣🤣🤣 That's what i like about AOC always good for a laugh.
I'll tell you what, i'll support that for any LIVING latino that's native to this land. Fair nuff?20 Reply
+1 yTbh tho I think just letting them in isn't the worst solution to this whole immigration deal. Sure not legally but if it were legal how does that hurt us? The single chances of bad people coming in who get in on their own anyway? I feel like the bad guys are winning either way with this. So wtf
02 Reply- +1 y
immigration lowers wages, raises rent prices, and damages our social safety net, its a ploy by the rich to make money by getting rid of the worker's ability to haggle their wages and thus empower the companies they invest in
immigration is bad for the public. legal and illegal - +1 y
Got it. See I only heard it raises chances for terrorists to make it in
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yThis is a country , your race , ethnicity , color shouldn't matter.
If you are not born in this country in the PRESENT TIMELINE or don't have a valid document of citizenship , you are NOT ALLOWED
How hard is that to understand?10 Reply- 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI mean, at that point wouldn't anyone be allowed to go anywhere?
21 Reply- +1 y
that's what her masters want, she is being guided by the elites on wallstreet who want open border so they can lower your wages with mass immigration
- 3.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yLol. She's so ignorant.
No; most of them are not. Only certain tribes in the Southwest would qualify for that rule. The rest are from "farther."20 Reply
+1 ySeems like she thinks those who if are descendants of Native Americans that do not live in America should be able to freely come here and not have to abide by the immigration laws.
20 Reply8.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. You'd think this pandemic would have given anyone who was for any sort of open borders an inkling of why that would be a horrible idea but I guess not.
30 Reply- 2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yA grotesquely stupid "idea" from a grotesquely stupid person. She has a bowl of cereal in her head.
40 Reply
+1 yNope she's wrong in so many ways, I didn't expect her to be re-elected
30 ReplyI think we should exile her to the Mariana Islands and make her work as a topless bartender.
10 ReplyI would, however, support sending this Communist dullard back to the reservation and locking the gate behind her.
10 Reply11.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I don't agree with her that immigration laws should not apply to Latinos, but I do agree with her assertions that ICE is a violator of human rights, should not receive additional money, and should be dissolved. Technically, the only legal citizens of the US are Native Americans. Everyone else is an illegal immigrant.
04 Reply- +1 y
Didn't the white man take this shit so it's theirs
- +1 y
All is fair in war tho.
- 5.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNo, that's nonsense. If you apply THAT logic, you would be a citizen of every country in both your parents' blood lines !
11 Reply- +1 y
People and kids in cages for months is inhumane. There needs to be some resolution. You were never going to see that under the trump dictatorship. Let's hope this gets fixed asap.
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yThough Latin Americans and natives helped form America, The government that is America is completely independent of illegal immigrants from surrounding countries. That is purely illogical. We have our Native Americans in America.
10 Reply- Show More (56)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 



Most Helpful Opinions