And on the seventh day, GAG said: "Lo, sexism be rampant in this place!" or why sex-based filters are a kick in the face of gender equality

And on the seventh day, GAG said:


There has been an update. GAG is always tinkering about, making the user experience as top-notch as their internal decide how it's meant to be.


And now, I feel they have made a terrible decision.


After all the questions we've asked, and opinions we've stated, helping people realize that "no, sex is not as important as people claim it to be in terms of who someone is as a person and how valuable they are; people make it seem like your genitals define you as a person even though that's obviously not the case, etc etc etc."


And now, you can decide in the most sexist fashion whether you claim that ALL female input or ALL male input is worthless, meaningless, and unnecessary. That a person's opinion on a matter completely lacks any sort of informative value, merely because they have a particular set of genitals. This filter says, "in my opinion, you are only as valuable as your genitals allow you to be".


And on the seventh day, GAG said: "Lo, sexism be rampant in this place!" or why sex-based filters are a kick in the face of gender equality



Applause.


Last time I checked, I've known numerous people who have had periods. My mother also gave birth, so did some other relatives of mine, or my friends'. I could ask any of them for input on any questions that you'd think only females can answer based on their biology. Sure, it might not be my experience, but it is someone else's.


Of course, this is not even about biological structure. This is about gender. This is purely about the belief that females can have no idea about cars and were designed to be subservient to men, and males can have no idea about "emotions" because they are all sexist designed to be manipulated by their desire to have sex with women - as that is all a male is capable of thinking about throughout their lifetime. We do supposedly think about sex every 7 seconds, right?



Obviously not, that would be silly. I wouldn't have ever been able to finish this take. Oh well, we'll see what the admins think - we might actually eventually get to post on questions again. Until then, let's let sexism be rampant in this place.

And on the seventh day, GAG said: "Lo, sexism be rampant in this place!" or why sex-based filters are a kick in the face of gender equality
Post Opinion