1 mo

The Death of Dating

The Death of Dating

So I've been pondering this and thinking about writing about it for a while now, and today I came a popular question of @sydneysentinel Do single people even want love anymore? and it reminded me once again that there is still a lot of interest and complicated feelings about #love and #dating today.

Sometimes it feels difficult to sort through all the detritus - everything from frustration and bitterness and dismay, from the lovelorn and heartbroken who already put chips in and cashed out, to the disheartened yet somewhat, somehow, still hopeful who are waiting to buy in again. One thing is clear to me - the desire to be with others, to have connections, to have a deep and meaningful relationship, it still exists. It is so strong in some, while understandably for others they have begun or completed the painful process of detaching themselves from the idea that they will ever find or achieve it. There are also those who want no part of it, think it's too much trouble, and those who want to fulfill their carnal desires and nothing more. But for most, they would like to find love, and if unbridled, blow the roof off passion and excitment is not exactly in the cards, they'd [quite happily] settle for someone who is nice, treats them well, and would be good to curl up at night with, with or without the covers on.

Don't believe me? Well without posting a tonne of links etc., I'll just try and summarize with these two polls of mine: 11% of guys want hookups with no potential relationship. "I'm interested in casual hookups because I want to have a variety of experiences, and am not ready to settle down yet." Guys (single men): what do you want: a relationship, hookups, or nothing right now? Lower than you thought, right? And for the ladies (who are getting judged very harshly these days about this), just 3% want the same Girls, Single ladies: why are you not in a relationship?'

... true love is a powerful thing. I'm anxious because I want to experience intimacy but that does not mean I don't want true love the most. I want a sister, a friend that I can share my life with. Someone that I can talk too and will support me. It's so strong a thing that for perfect relationship like that I'd trade intimacy ,if that's what it takes. - @Jjpayne

First, Let's Define Dating. What Constitutes 'A Date'?

Sardinia Unlimited
Sardinia Unlimited


They have a legitimate interest in each other.

Both people know they are on a date. This is clear and mutually understood.

Both parties make a genuine attempt to get to know one another.

Other people are not involved. They are not part of a group, designed to "take the pressure off."

There is adequate, uninterrupted, focused time for conversation.

Alcohol is not necessary to the outcome or success.

Physical interaction may be desired but sex is not the expected outcome.

Hookup Culture

I think there's been a misunderstanding or perhaps a mislabelling of the term #hookupculture Some say it's a media-created phrase designed to get clicks, hook eyes, and sell ads. Some say it's always been here, nothing's changed, but it now it has a catchy title. Others say it's a rampant disease, degrading and eroding the fabric of society. Others bring politics and lack of traditional values into the mix. And those in the sociology realm call it a #socialscript. I propose that this phrase has supplanted the term 'dating', but unlike many words which I criticize for being bastardized, I don't feel that way about this because at least it hasn't warped an existing definition. 'Hookup culture' is attempting to delineate a sea change in the dating world where there are no commitments being made (chosen), and instead casual flings of a sexual nature have taken their place. But what I'd like to say is that while dating may be all but dead, sex (intercourse) amongst strangers is not the norm. It is not just simple hedonism run amok. I believe in order to find the right answers, you must ask the right questions. Just because some people are having casual sex doesn't mean that that is what they really, ultimately want. And I think there needs to be a differentiation, a delineation, between "for now" and what the end goal is, the true desire is.

The Death of Dating

What Is 'Hookup Culture' Then?

It's no commitment. It's a refusal to define the nature of the relationship. It's a byproduct of an anxious, insecure culture. It's a perfect yet contorted example of supply and demand. It's women's liberation and a demand for sexual equality. Yet which likely leaves all, not just one sex, feeling ultimately lonely and unknown.

I feel lonely. I feel like no one really knows me. I feel like no one really cares about me. For 24-48 hrs I feel good. I got game. That was great. I could totally do that again. And then the doubt sets in...the person didn’t text me. The person hooked up with a bunch of other people too? I saw them and they acted as if they didn’t know me. - Kerry Cronin, Professor, Boston College

And this creates feelings of depair. And feelings that they don’t matter. Not just that it didn’t matter, but that they don’t matter. Why, if people want something, something of a higher nature, do they settle for something much less? Maybe because something is better than nothing. Maybe because they want to keep their options open. Maybe because we even though seemingly unlimited choice feels like the ideal scenario, it is stifling the ability to actually make a choice ('the paradox of choice'.) And maybe because they think and hope it will lead to more.

What I believe it is, is not that more people are having sex because that is all they want, but less people are committing to relationships. (Actually amongst the youngest who have just entered the dating world, there is less intercourse, though not all sexuality is lessened, and blow***s are more commonplace; rates of casual sex amongst seniors is up, by contrast; and the in between are having sex, but they are not committing, not getting married nor having children, in typical numbers as in generations past.) Yes, attitudes about sexuality do seem to have loosened and other types of sex and sexuality are being expressed. And yes, some not having relationships is by choice, but some is not for lack of wanting, but for other reasons. And this is where it gets complicated, and the list is long, so I won't attempt to list them here. The whys and how we got here are not as important as what this means for society now.

So in a Nutshell What's the Problem? Why Aren't People 'Dating'?

I think that a lot of people forget how to be loving in a disposable world. - @DanOh2018

Well, for the purposes of this article, I'm not talking about the scenario where somone was dating and it didn't work out and they're reluctant to dip their toe in again (they feel they gave it their best, but the other person just didn't treat them well, accept them for who they are, etc. etc.) I'm speaking now about those who won't even begin, don't even try to get to know the other person. They won't engage, or they objectify. And why is that? Well for starters, fear. Fear of being hurt. Fear of judgement. Fear of rejection. Fear of making desires known. Fear of appearing needy, or wanting anything at all. Some men are now also paralyzed by the idea of a false claim of harrassment. But to a lesser degree and more widely experienced is the fear of being thought of as 'stalkery' (that's equally by both men and women.) But by making the entire venture more casual, "taking the pressure" off the other person and off oneself, it also takes away the fulfillment of getting what you want, and limits the possibility of a greater, deeper connection. Also, if you don't first take the time to really get to know them, you probably don't even know whether you want the other person. First you have to put in the time to listen and to hear. And to know another person is to spend time with them which is [perhaps later but not at first] not primarily, or first and foremost, sexual.

Now you're saying, "But I've met someone I was interested, but it didn't go anywhere." And then, "They were not interested", "I don't know what happened... they just ghosted me", or "I have let them know how I feel about them but they won't commit to me or apparently any relationship right now". Right. All possible scenarios. And why is that? Maybe (see the womens' poll for the myriad of reasons), because they won't even give it a chance. Why? Because they can't imagine it working. Why? Because they won't even get to the dating stage, where they really get to know a person. Because of intolerance. Because we judge too harshly, too quicky, and without enough compassion or acceptance. We have a become a highly individualistic, particular, on-demand society who seems to expect luck or fate to send us, to serve up, a perfect partner who is just 'right'. But has luck or fate or desire changed? No. There isn't "one person" but there are people. "But how do I know?" You don't. Take some risks, make a choice, decide, commit, and go for it. And then compromise, compromise, compromise. And have some fun.

And then there is technology. Technology has brought people together from around the globe, but it has simultaneously created a wall, a way to protect and insulate oneself from rejection, from criticism, or lack of acceptance. We create identities, personas, which may or may not falsify the truth of who we are. We both oversell and undersell. The internet and social media has create a mecca for affirmation... and judgement and criticism, an eden and a cesspool. At best, it is a small sliver of who we are, a best attempt at conveying our complexity and a complete picture. At worst, it is a highly contorted, exaggerated and more appealing, carefully curated version of self. This insulation means that we question whether we are truly known (answer: we are not.) And the only way to be truly loved, is to be fully known. So we feel empty, lonely, and sometimes even unloveable.

Making it clear that you're on a date, you’re saying oh I like this person. Judge me for that, and that can be scary for a lot of people. - The Dating Project

I don't think everyone should permanently pair up, and I don'tt think marriage is always the answer. But I do believe that chasing emptiness or loneliness through seemingly meaningless sexual experiences with relative strangers is a road that leads nowhere. In fact, it probably leads to an even darker place inside. And not trying at all, not engaging with others or taking a risk, taking a chance, it also is sad, a hugely missed opportunity. What would I like to see? For people to not hold back so much, for people to treat each other with kindness, interest, and respect, and fully explore each other.

We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity; more than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost. - @jimboGB

If it doesn't last, it should not be seen as a failure. Think of it as an exploration, a journey that benefits both people. If you both come to a place of understanding, of knowing each other well enough to conclude that this is the end of the road for the two of you, then so be it. You can find closure in this. You can walk away from this with a clear conscience, hopefully some memories, some laughs, and with more knowledge and understanding of yourself and the world. That should be the goal. Not the $30,000 wedding, or any other milestone or indicator of a 'successful' relationship.

I'd like to give the last word to mk200195 as I think he said it well.

Nobody is really single. We all have a range of relationships with other people. Some of them are closer and more emotionally intimate than others; some may involve living with the person; some may involve sex, sensuality, and pleasure; some may be bound by children, parents, or other obligations; some may revolve around money or ambition or ego; some may be matters of convenience while others are goals in themselves; sometimes they last for a moment, others a lifetime.

Yes, there are scripts for the qualities that ought to characterize “single” people’s relationships and different scripts for what sorts of relationships “unsingle” people ought to have. But really, it’s all meaningless. The only question that matters is whether the relationships you are enmeshed in are satisfying to you. We should all be okay with high quality relationships that lift us up. That’s [what's] worth striving for. - @mk200195

And now, a moment of silence...

The Death of Dating
37
5
Add Opinion

Most Helpful Guys

  • Mezius
    You want to know what's going on? We're going through a gigantic culture shift. It all has to do with modernized society and how we live our lives. Pre 1950s society lived in a more pre modernized mindset. We lived based on the old way of doing things. When there was less knowledge about the world. When people were more religious, and life was deadlier. When people had 8 kids at a time because they were needed to help farm and run society. We knew little about science, and everything was run by an authoritarian religious set of customs and traditions. All social interactions were in person, face to face. You actually had to talk to people and meet them to get to know them. Then everything began to change, both for better and for worse. Technology and materialism took over. People stopped believing in religion and going to church. Everything became industrialized, and we became a competitive "Now!" culture. We stopped embracing the values of the old world and became more selfish and empty. Men and women don't date for love anymore. We date simply to snatch someone up into our lives before we get shuffled into adult life and lose the opportunity. We no longer have to pick from a small dating pool out of a the tiny community we live in. People have a huge variety to choose from. Girls have the ability to pick and choose who they want. Women set the social standards for what is attractive, and what they want, and men either conform to that standard or get left behind. Men throw away their identity and take on a persona because it's the only way to be more desirable. Everyone that's attractive has to compete and be hand picked by the opposite gender, and everyone that's not attractive gets left behind like table scraps. As soon as we meet someone we even remotely like we slap a ring on their finger so we don't get exiled back to competing and struggling to find another partner. Industrialized society has made our lives so busy, empty, and meaningless that we've turn to thrill seeking and instant gratification to fulfill us. The "Now" culture teaches us to jump from one thrill to the next. That food, entertainment, people, and things are all just cheap thrills to be used up and thrown away. The upper class is teaching us to cram as much consumerism and materialism into our lives as possible, because we are taught that's all life has to offer. Our lives have become a giant competition for who can have the most fun the fastest, and people are eating it up because we can't imagine a life more meaningful beyond the next fad, the next drive through visit, the next tinder hookup, the next drug fix. Modern society has turned us into mindless pleasure zombies competing over who gets the best life the quickest. It will stay this way for as long as we want to until we realize there's more to life than the next fucking endorphin rush and throw off the shackles. Either that, or we will party the planet to death, in which case good riddance.
    Is this still revelant?
    • AmandaYVR

      Very interesting, Mez. I like it! You made several good points I didn't have time to mention for brevity's sake.

      Agree with almost everything, except a couple - "Men and women don't date for love anymore." Actually marriages and partnering up were more a pragmatic choice in the past. There were many reasons, which I'm sure you know about (arranged marriages, family obligations to gain and protect status, cultural norms about gender roles, repopulating the planet after war decimated entire countries, etc. etc.), but suffice to say people are actually choosing for purely selfish/self-satisfying reasons more now than ever before. I could argue one positive of today's society is that when you are chosen, there is a greater chance now that it is for non-pragmatic reasons, than in the past (though of course they still exist, and will never disappear unless we magically fast-forward to living in the OG Star Trek series era. Oh Roddenberry, I loved you.)

      And "Girls have the ability to pick and choose who they want. Women set the social standards for what is attractive, and what they want, and men either conform to that standard or get left behind. Men throw away their identity and take on a persona because it's the only way to be more desirable." This goes both ways. There is no monopoly on this. Men desire sex more so they initiate and yes, are either accepted or rejected (a definite harshness of life), but women are subsequently discarded if a newer, younger model comes along. The population in North America is about 55% female so at par, and with all this availability, both sides are feeling the standards and pickiness bite them in the ass. The competition is tough and there seems to be little motivation for acceptance, or to change. Yet so many people don't find someone they like and are compatible with. So go figure.

      You remind me of George Carlin a bit. I think you clearly see the emperor has no clothes.

    • Mezius

      I grew up without parents, and thus studying everything around me and adapting to everything became a key part of my personal growth and development. As I grew older this instinct just became sharper and stronger. I study everything and break it apart much in the way a scientist would because I want to understand how everything works. You work with your advantages. I was never good at socializing, or sports. I learned to think my way out of my problems. If Im interested in something I figure it out.

    • AmandaYVR

      That makes perfect sense. I seem to be zoning in on just these types of people on here. I know another guy who was given up for adoption and he has always lived by his wits and reasoning and insatiable curiosity of the world. He describes himself so similar to you. I do see that your ability to analyze is razer sharp and as Cuba Gooding says, "I did that about you!"

    • Show All
  • talloak
    Impressive take! You cover so much ground here, that I don't know where to begin. I'll limited myself to some observations about social media. Someone (I forgot who) noted that when "friend" became a verb and "like" became a noun, something very important was lost in human interactions. This quantifies interactions between people to the point where they are no longer really human. People have exchanged human interactions with virtual ones. Interacting through text is like talking to Siri: it looks like an interaction without being one. So many young people have so little experience with human interaction that dating is considered beyond their skills and understanding.

    Technology has resulted in a long descent in human interaction. The telephone meant less exposure to body language. Once email became widespread, most emotion was stripped out of communication. This was largely a matter of sharing information, hardly much of an interaction at all. Now with texting, communication has been stripped of almost all meaning. People use this mostly to confirm a status. "I still exist." And it hardly even matters. There really is not much further down, unless our phones start texting each other without our knowledge.

    It's fairly disturbing how many young people will not talk to others on the phone (where the interaction is still human) but will immediately respond to a text (where the interaction is with the machine as much as with a potential human on the other side. Given an almost total lack of experience interacting with other humans apart from controlled environments (school, work, outings with friends), is it any surprise that young people would struggle when dealing with a new person outside of a structured environment? How could it be otherwise?

    Try this folks: shut off your phone for an entire week (warn people first). Arrange to have face to face interactions with a different person every day (outside of school or work people). Make notes about what you observed in each interaction. At the end of the week compare the human time with the phone time of a previous week. What did you learn? Where do you find that you lack social skills that you didn't even know you lacked? You might be surprised.
    Is this still revelant?

Most Helpful Girls

  • TayTay21
    I think the reason fewer people are committing to relationships is that most people are holding out for someone better. It's gotten to the point that girls and guys both only want to be with the most exceptional members of the other sex. I've seen this from both sides.

    When I was growing up, I was extremely skinny and painfully awkward because I didn't feel confidence in myself. Guys ignored me and some even mocked me for the way I looked. At the age of 13, I started going to this personal training studio that my mom and sister went to, and the head trainer took me under her wing and helped me learn how eat properly and weight train. By the time I was 15, suddenly guys were staring at me in class and acting weird around me. The mocking stopped completely, at least from guys. By the time I graduated, I had guys trying to flirt and asking me out constantly. Not to sound conceited, but I had worked hard in the gym for years and had a really fit body that made me feel very attractive.

    What got me was that guys who should have been dating girls who were more their speed were wasting time trying to get my attention. They would rather have tried in vain to get my attention rather than pursue girls who they had more of chance of dating. I remember this one boy who was shorter than me who looked like he hadn't even started shaving constantly trying to talk to me and repeatedly asking for my number. He wasn't alone, either. There were other guys who no girl was worried over trying to get with me and just a few other girls in school.

    The bottom line is that most guys wanted either the most attractive girls or nothing. And to be fair, I think girls do this too, although I don't think we're quite as bad about it. I think girls are more realistic in some ways about who we have a chance to date. So what happens is that the most desirable people date and form committed relationships, and most other people refrain from dating as much because they aren't getting the types of people they want to date. So they date less and form committed relationships less frequently, mostly because they're holding out for someone better.
    Is this still revelant?
    • kim45456

      Haha You should have asked that short guy why he even dared to ask you out haha

    • TayTay21

      @kim45456 lol I mean, I admired his confidence, but I just didn't get why he thought I would want to date him when he looked more middle school than college.

    • Who are you to decide whos good enough for who? I dont beleive in leagues. Its all completely subjective. Also, people can't help what their attracted to. Just because someones "ugly" doesn't mean their attracted to ugly.

      Sure, objectively, people are generally below, average , or above average looking or the 1- 10 scale or whatever. But seriously 8s can be attracted to 5s and vice versa.

    • Show All
  • Great job Ms
    Is this still revelant?

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

335
  • coachTanthony
    Hey that was a very good read! I don't really have nothing to add. Just wanted to say nice job!
    • AmandaYVR

      Thank you, Coach. It's your kind of topic, isn't it. Wish there was more hours in a day, but I do often check your account and see what you are up to. We definitely do ponder some of the same thoughts...

  • JimmyQ
    Too long to read it all. I can understand that you feel overwhelmed and it is good to document your feelings. You really need to look at yourself for answers. No one will be able to help you if you don't first help yourself. You are who you are and there will be no changing that. You have either learned from your past mistakes or you are doomed to repeat them all over again.

    My guess is that the class of men you are meeting are not willing and/or able to meet your standards. In truth none of us are by nature lovable. Everything is a trade off. You must give to get. Very often women can't understand this most important ingredient in a relationship. I can't tell you all the useless females I've known who think to themselves and sometimes even say out loud, "I'm beautiful so just fall before me and shake" or something to that effect.

    Once you've poured enough honey and money into those empty holes, you finally figure out that they will never be full, and as a guy, I just quit trying.

    If I can't clearly see where I'm going to be able to communicate with a woman on a partnership level, without a lot of b/s, I lose interest very quickly.

    In other words, the most attractive thing about a woman is her mind. So, blow out the crud and keep it shape.

    We still want you as long as you're not a poor choice as a life partner.
    • AmandaYVR

      Jimmy, you've come to the wrong conclusions. That is not about me, has nothing to do with me. I'm interested in sociology and this is where this comes from. My experiences have not been this. I dated for about ten years, had several committed relationships, and some fun, and have been married for twenty. It adds up to 28 years of experiences. But times have changed and there is a lot that society needs to figure out before the dust can settle. If anything, I have been generally impressed with "the class of men" I have met and who come into my life, and they have made a more lasting impression on me than the callousness of the internet hive. I believe they both exist, but I'm not going to base all my conclusions about the world on the ostensibly anonymous commenters who I have not nor will never meet. I don't know if they are being entirely truthful, nor what their motivations are. I'm much more interested in provable stats, personal stories, and deeper analysis I get with certain people. All these things combined are where I draw my conclusions from.

      "... In other words, the most attractive thing about a woman is her mind." I agree. I have always said the same thing about men.

    • JimmyQ

      I love your writing style. Apologies for my misstep.

    • AmandaYVR

      Thank you, appreciate it.

  • fashionguy17
    Dating is dying out, in my opinion. It's because people are too picky these days and people make a fuss over the small things. Oh, that man has soft voice - UNDATEABLE! Oh, that woman has a small blemish on her arm - UNDATEABLE. This is seriously how superficial dating has become.

    Hell, even in my own personal life, I had a girl reject me, because she didn't know I wore glasses and she doesn't want a man who wears glasses and wanted a man with perfect vision. Wtf, right?

    I am in a relationship right now... but to be honest, I wouldn't even need a relationship in this day in age. Technology has made it so easy to make hookup and brief affection more accessible.

    Horny and in the mood? There are tons of porn sites everywhere.

    Need a quickie? There are women on snapchat who are selling pussy and meetups for $50 an hour (I'm being serious, btw).

    Feeling lonely and need a little affection? Women are selling themselves on social media for money. They allow cuddle sessions, very sensual massages and very personal lap dances.

    Oh, and let's not forgot about all these Instagram models who now have onlyfan accounts and publish nudes that people can view for a monthly fee. Oh, and if you tip these models on their onlyfan accounts, they can make you a personal/sexy video.

    With all these options, men really don't need to go out and date anymore. It's sad... but it's true.
    • AmandaYVR

      You're totally right. I could do an entire mytake or q about how critical and unaccepting people are nowadays. It's a social disease. I must have written it dozens of times by now, in comments here and there. I'm just trying to be careful and not rant about too many topics, but honestly there are many issues that could all use some more exposure. The questions we see brought up on here, again and again, have some common threads and themes. I'm not sure if people don't see them, or aren't interested.

      I remember reading an exchange between you and your girlfriend. It was so sweet. I'm happy you two found each other and are both happy.

      That's a good, pretty comprehensive list you made. Do you think most people who partake in that kind of stuff are really satisfied and fulfilled by it, or is it just filling in, because that's what is easily available? We could be heading towards Japan, and that is not a model for the future I would like to see. Also, I'm sure sex dolls are going to take off, any minute. Only thing preventing it is cash, right now.

  • FatherJack
    This is all by design , deliberately toxic social engineering that has been steadily accelerated over at least 5 decades , designed to drive a wedge between the genders , firstly by influencing girls / young women to see males in a negative light , via the strongly feminist influenced " education " systems and the controlled " media " , as the more emotional female brain is more prone to this programming / indoctrination. This will create an inevitable male backlash , borne from resentment / frustration. Since the 1990's , popular culture aimed at female consumption , has had the theme of " I don't need no man / men are useless morons " , all designed to influence women to reject having men in their lives , & for men to view women as negative towards men , and not worth bothering with.

    Personally I do not want to ever date , as I simply can't be bothered with multiple job interviews , and my former marriage took in toll , I view relationships as a stressful hell , plus I am mostly rid of my Male Curse , so no biological drive to pair up. In addition , being a single dad , being real , I will have very few potential options , I cannot compete with the vast number of baggage free men out there.
    • its not just brainwashing. the system empowered women to the point that they don't need men.

    • DJZest

      Another thing to add is that lesbianism has been pushed, and it's been extremely successful, with many women having gained and bred the desire for they own sex, which never dies.

      Today they're pushing pedophilia. I see channels on youtube that dress young girls (6 year olds) scnatily and make them do the cat walk, with posing and everything. Somw have upwards of 100k subscribers, with many creeps posting enthusiastic, cheefrul comments. Do that's going somewhat successfully, too.

    • @DJZest i always thought that pedophilia was the endgame with the lgbt propaganda. But its unlikely that it will ever be accepted.

    • Show All
  • soleil2666
    You mention Sydney,

    I was there in the late 90s when it was beautifully human and kind - and again 2014-2018 when it was a complete disaster of angry shallow self-agrandisation at the expense of others.

    The dating, if anything, will come back - but Dating was always about enjoying the other person't presence, not the achievements of being with their looks (which relates not to the person one bit). Sydney has gone completely bonkers - no other place in the world is so stuck in being a mirror image of the worst of what is to be found online.

    Funnily enough, both Europe and America are entirely different in person to this raging anti-dating anger on the internet (which seems to pertain to Sydney the most, then to the rest of Australia, of all the places I have seen)

    Find back being a fair dinkum mate feeling and a bit of that true blue helpfulness to each other and you'll be back on track and fine (but let me not excuse Sydney too fast - it will be a painful experience to get off the Insta-hatred drug)
    • AmandaYVR

      That was incredibly well written. And so nice to read a POV from another locale around the globe. The entire world does begin and end with America, even if it is population and pop culture-dense, so I always enjoy alternative perspectives. It can be very eye-opening.
      Thank you very much for your contribution to this topic.

  • startingfitness
    in my opinion, dating was a flawed process from the beginning. it pretends to be a romantic process in which a man tries to find and win over a wife, but it looks more like a man trying to arrange a deal with a pr*stitute.

    why would you need to privately meet in a restaurant or another avenue , pay for her and hope she has a good time. that's kind of like soliciting a pr*stitute.
    actually you should get to know her friends , her family, talk to people , talk to her, see if you are a good match and take it from there. Usually that is more likely to be successful , it involves more personal investment and less monetary investment. but anyway, dating worked for a while and it doesn't now.

    I think it just needs a change to adjust to modern times. women work these days , so take out the " pay for her " and pay 50/50.
    if the guy plans one date, let the girl plan the next one. you get to know each other better and see what each other likes to do.
    do more personal things instead of things you waste money on. like Netflix and chill at home instead of going to movies, cook up something together at one of your places instead of going to a fancy restaurant.
    and the last one ( probably a lot of people don't like this) get friends and family involved and get to know them. I think if we adjusted it to modern times, and made it a bit more personal, it can be saved.
    • AmandaYVR

      Good points. I can understand you feel that way about spending money and paying for dates. A lot of men feel that way nowadays (and some women.) I'm sure one of the big reasons a dinner is still a popular arrangement is because all of the peripheral people in that person's life don't matter as much at the beginning. What matters is your connection to each other, just the two of you. If it was in the olden days (and many countries who still strongly are fighting for arranged marriages), the family would be paramount, above most else, but anyway in North America and most 1st world countries it's not the norm. Cooking together or one cooks at another's place is a good way to get to know each other. But a lot of people live in tight urban centres and with roommates or with their parents still, so I think for probably practical reasons the outside date will remain. But for the people who say that money is the obstacle to them dating, if expectations were generally lower (or we lived in less consumerist times), it could still be done. It's almost like having a double whammy - no person in their life and no money to do many activities. But life wasn't always like this. We used to have very little and were people more miserable?

    • Yeah, actually we are more miserable now. Having a lot of option doesn't ensure happiness. In fact there was some study that said beyond a certain number, incteasing options causes a negative effect on happiness. And also anxiety i think. I will try to look it up.

      I guess you would have to go out to eat in some circumstances. But i feel like cooking together is a lot more intimate. My roommate, his date (later gf) and i used to all cook together at our place. I would give them privacy when they needed, but we did the cooking together and ate together. They would then go out or stay in his room. If he went to her place it would be the same with her roommate. But it was actually good since we all good to know each other. But i can see how that's not ideal fpr a lot of people. Me and my roommate were good friends, if you aren't good friends with your roommates you probably dont want to introduce your date to them.

    • AmandaYVR

      Yep, agreed.
      3 choices. 5 at the outset.

    • Show All
  • This is amazing!! Thanks for using me! I am humbled and honored! And thanks for using the dating project! I love that movie. Now this is not flattery but have you considered writing a book? I honestly think you could do a great one. Even if it only gets to Amazon... But I honestly think you should attempt one. And if you do, let me know and I will buy a copy :)
  • Kurαȷ
    Honestly, good riddance.
    Both the dating culture and the hookup culture are cesspools of the entitled, shallow and ungrateful.

    The true meaningful connections form organically, between people, friends, acquaintances not keen on dishonesty and contrivances.

    Dating has always been an ugly corpse.
  • Twalli
    My girlfriend and I go on dates quite often. It may just be the movies, but we make sure that it's just us most of the time. If it's a group event we don't count it as a date.
    I think my sister will be with us on our date on Saturday, but that's because we need a driver.
  • Lightning8
    I do find all of these silly and insecure luke warm dating terms counterproductive and even dishonest. Just go for it and if you feel more strongly, so be it. If they feel more strongly so be it. It's ok when you just communicate and compromise, and are clear that this is what you're trying to do. It really isn't as scary as we often make it.

    Anyway, this is well written and has a professional flair to it
    • AmandaYVR

      Thanks, Lightning.
      Yep, I do know what you mean. Sometimes I just think everyone should have a drink and a smoke and stop overthinking it all (and yes, the terms can be dishonest and counterproductive.) The daytime Amanda sees the endless parade of angsty questions on here about relationships and dating and can't help but ponder it all, and the nightime Amanda just does the first technique and chills contentedly on the sofa, not worrying about it at all.

  • Kdude010
    Dating is dead because of the hookup culture. Who needs dating when people are more sexually active than ever before?

    Given the rise of STDs in America, I'm glad that I am single and not taking part in this hookup culture. I sure as hell wouldn't sleep with some random girl I met on a night out. Who knows what is going around.
    • AmandaYVR

      Yep, fair point. They are way up. And some are antibiotic-resistant now.

  • IHateBeingaMan
    some people think we are in a dating, relationship apocalypse, specifically saying, there are more single adults today than ever before, marriage is on the decline, the birth rate is at the lowest point in U. S. history.
    • AmandaYVR

      Yes! All true.

    • is there evidence that supports that?

    • AmandaYVR

      I don't know about the 'relationship apocalypse' term, but yes I have heard all of the others stats, here and there. I can't consolidate them into one article, but I can confirm them.

      This article comes to mind, which is very interesting. The Atlantic is notorious for the length of their articles (it will lose most peoples' interest on gag), but I agree with them that many topics just cannot be encapsulated in short verse. This one is very informative.
      It is specifically about the sex (or lack of sex) of the high school aged. aka The Sex Recession. Definitely worth a read, if you're interested in this topic.
      (It is separate from the 'hookup culture' discussion. Hookups are happening with older adults.)
      www.theatlantic.com/.../

  • Robertcw
    Hmm. Actually the facts are that intimacy and sex are just down in general.

    Birth rates are at record lows, partner counts are at record lows and sexlessness is at record highs for under 30 age bracket.

    The reason is obvious, economical hardship due to intergenerational conflict.

    The damn boomers are taking things their graves without letting us take over ideologically. Fact: 54% of democratic voters under 35 support Bernie Sanders for president.

    60+ voters overwhelmingly support Biden.

    35 - 49 voters overwhelmingly support Buttigieg (🤮).

    Traditionally, women have dated older men by 2-6 years older. But now, if you are 21 there's a huge difference between what you believe in and what a 25 year old believes in. This wasn't the case before this era.

    Guys in their 30's would pair off with girls in their late 28's.

    But if you're a Buttigieg supporter then you're jot going to get along with someone who is a Sanders supporter -- not because of candidate choice but because of the underlying moral framework and thought process at hand.

    I see it all the time, younger girls looking up to the current older guys and looking a little upset -- concerned, disappointed, jealous of previous generations and ultimately kinda cheated. So we're going to see Gen Z shift to equal age pairings.

    Gen X guys paired off with older Gen Y girls in the 2010's (🤮).

    Younger Gen Y girls are putt- off by Gen X'ers.

    And so on. Cultural differences are no longer decades apart, they're 3-6 years apart. This is what os creating waves in dating. Young women have never had this problem before now.
    • Robertcw

      Oh and this isn't even including race and culture as a factor in an increasingly multi-cultural society with more than one language.

      White births are falling, all other race births are rising. Ie, young white people are being ostracized by young people of color.

    • kim45456

      What is wrong dating younger guys? Do i have to date old ugly men?

  • FriedPickles1218
    Coming from a guy. I think it has a lot to do with guys and insecurity tbh.

    Men are well aware of how disposable we are to women these days. With the rise of feminism, all this sexual harrasssment stuff going on , dating apps , social media etc. Men are afraid to even stare at a woman too long let alone start a conversation. But dont even get me started on marriage which can destroy his life if she wants a divorce. Bottom line is women, especially attractive women, or at least women were attracted to, know they can toss us anytime they want for a richer, better looking guy or whatever. Thats just my thoights.
    • AmandaYVR

      Thank you, that's interesting.
      I'm not going to argue against what you said but I'm sorry you feel that way.
      I have never felt that way and nor have any of my girl friends. (In fact, I've felt that I was the replaceable one, and have been memorably replaced twice.) But I understand how much of culture has changed, and how these demographic, economic, cultural and philosphical shifts have left many men feeling disposable, or at the very least wondering what role they now play. All people being self-sufficient sounds like the ideal, but in a twisted way it has also made us less emotionally reliant on each other and that is a double edged sword. We do have more fulfilling lives when we are needed. It can go too far, bear too much a weight, but there can be purpose and meaning in helping others, and being part of a partnership.

      In regards to dating apps: I have read that men have the advantage there. Because it is so objectifying, choosing people based primarily on photos with not that much else to go on, and because men tend to cast a wide net, the women are not that carefully chosen and they, feeling that there is much competition out there, are playing to the sex advantage, in hopes of keeping a man interested, which of course often fails because the pool of potentials is so large. And to that end, regarding your last comment, women are passed over for younger models all the time too. They are not chosen for money, but for youth. And I'll add that novelty is a lure to both. It appears both are pretty evenly disadvantaged.

    • I've been doing some reading on this "lonliness epidemic". I must say i was kind of shocked. I didn't even know there was a lonliness epidemic but honestly, its kind of bitter sweet for me knowing that im not the only who feels lonely lol.

    • AmandaYVR

      "Bittersweet" - definitely. I think about it all the time. Everything is tied together, connected, in this intricate web. It can be hard to extricate the different elements, but many are nonetheless connected.

  • Good detailed analysis.

    The stats were lower than I had thought, maybe it's some corner of society. I think it's the path of least resistance... to avoid vulnerability and risk, it's easier, feels good for the time, and has less pain. Being more selfish and unsure of what they want and who is right for them with an abundance of options, they do what is easiest and what they think others are doing (Tinder).

    It's a time when you have to know what you want, what your boundaries are, communicate clearly and stick to it. Because those boundaries are likely to be tested.
  • xkildy
    I agree it does seem to work out that way.. like the old saying goes... one bad egg can ruin a carton.. (being the person)
    • AmandaYVR

      Yes, it makes you think, hey? In one way it's like, well to each his own, do as you please (as long as you're being honest about it.) But in another, it's having a ripple effect in society, creating distrust and bitterness, people feeling unappreciated, and that is not good.

    • xkildy

      Thank you for understanding

  • Damn that made me think. But i still have hope. There has to be more out there than just a bunch of relationships with no meaning.
    • AmandaYVR

      There are many people like yourself you want more. Just keep one eye and ear open. 👀

    • Yay!!! thanks Amanda!! 😁*hug and kiss*

  • maxgdek
    Being together with somebody is built into the species... Thousands of years a selection favoring bonding pairs over single parents. That's right when it's built into the species
    • AmandaYVR

      Absolutely! We are communal creatures, and surrounding ourselves with others brings safety and security, and apparently fulfillment. As much as people drive each other crazy, and same goes for 55% of marriages that ultimately end, people who do stay together, and have people in their lives, tend to live longer and report higher happiness rates.

  • great take but two points i would like to put forward... one, hook ups or people partaking in casual sex are less than previous generations because sexting seems to have taken over rather than realworld social interaction and two this is directly linked to social media and dating apps that seem to have failed as a form of introduction but instead become a place to find pen pals but i dont see the over relliance on smartphones lasting beyond 30 or 40 years... can you believe it was the same when books first became widely available to a newly educated populus back in the 1600s... people were page zombies stood in the street losing themselves in a world of literature in the same way we see people today glued to that tiny glowing screen and a history teaches that was indeed a 40yr phenomena before it all levelled out again... ergo its not quite the end of humanity even if it appears that way for now
    • AmandaYVR

      Interesting, Thanks, wankiam, I always enjoy your analysis.
      I haven't heard that thinking about smartphones losing their appeal. I can't imagine it (unless chips in the brain or in glasses take their place, which would be probably even worse), but I'll be happy if it happens. Or I'll be dead by then so whatever.

      Yes, more social media means more sexting and more people getting off singly, which is a lot less fulfilling but better than nothing. The issue is whether the SM is making people lose their drive and skill in finding real life partners. Could be compensating, or could be causing. Hard to say yet.

    • i think it takes away from people learning real social skills to the degree we see very small children talking in text speak and trying to swipe books

  • JackSmy
    Dearest AmandaYVR I love, and adore your posts, the thoroughness, and your intelligent thought process, but, like Kevin Costner, when he directs movies, the term 'Brevity' or "Concise" are not apparently in your vocabulary!! Loving your posts, nonetheless!! :) :) :)
    Why does 'dating' need to be defined? When I am with a lady I like, maybe love, I don't want any rules, as to what constitutes a 'date'! I just want to be with her, in whatever way we choose, with whatever we decide to do, together!
    I admit, I lost interest, and stopped reading, because it was sooooooo long! Who has the attention span to want to read War and Peace? (Ok, I do, and would, but I stopped, and lost interest, because I didn't agree or need all that, even though I think you are amazing and love your posts!)
    • AmandaYVR

      Jack, my dear, just because you wrap your criticisms and critiques in smiley faces and exclamation points doesn't take away from the gist of what you are saying. You criticize and disagree with many or most of my posts and questions so I don't know why you want to continue commenting on them. I wonder if you are essentially a troll who doesn't believe he's a troll. You and I have quarrelled before, and come out the other end (you chalking it up to a misunderstanding or miscommunication, but I am not so sure about that), but it seems to me that you are consistently disagreeable. You just have a way of writing that attempts to make it appear otherwise. Bookending criticisms is a technique and I don't like pandering.
      I know my writing is long, and certainly longer than most. I am well aware, and I expect a lot more than half the users will not read what I write. But I am honestly ok with that. I know who I am, what I am interested in, and the type of people I enjoy communicating with. I don't believe in a watered-down, so democratic to the point of complete neutrality stance on all things in life. Not all things can appeal to all people. I did everything I could to edit this mytake to make it shorter and more concise, but some topics just cannot be distilled down shorter (I always try to be concise but I don't always succeed).

    • AmandaYVR

      And I did not even close to encompass all that there is to say about it. I expected others to share their information and opinions, and this helps to fill in a topic, which they are.
      You repeat yourself, my dear. Often. I've heard the same comment from you over and over, about how you just want to love and hug and kiss and have dinner with someone and you don't want to over-complicate or over-analyze it, and apparently you don't want you or anyone else to define anything either (that's twice now). So fine. You do you and I'll do me. You don't have to read my stuff if you don't like it. Really. I'm interested in sociology and psychology and I have read and seen a lot of stuff about relationships and dating, and I instinctively analyze it because that's who I am, but if you don't want to, then don't.

      P. S. And yes, I agree with you, Kevin Costner's movies are too long. There. We have one thing in common. But that might be the end of the list.

  • Daniel3035
    Hook up culture is just natural biology. We're made to fuck and move on to the next.
    • AmandaYVR

      That seems like a simple enough idea, but I can counter it with this:
      1. Our ancestors were not monogamous and did have multiple partners, but they also helped to raise the offspring. Because there were no paternity tests, they usually could not tell who the child's father was, so multiple males would help raise the kid in the tribe, which helped to ensure their genes were passed on, and aided in the survival of the group - strength in numbers. Up until just recently, we were not living singly and were more often part of a community, not anonymous strangers who never cross paths again.
      2. If we're best suited to screwing and moving onto the next, then why is there a global loneliness epidemic, rampant anxiety, male suicides are up, and happiness rates declining? I don't buy that they're completely disconnected.

    • englisc

      Point 1 isn't entirely true. It's true for some cultures but not for many others. The idea that our ancestors were like that comes mainly from books like "Sex At Dawn" by Cacilda Jethá and Christopher Ryan.

      Many experts disagree with their ideas. They jump to conclusions on a lot of things when there are usually multiple explanations. What I think is going on there as well, as well as what I think is going on with the people who argue this, is confirmation bias. That it's what they'd like to believe is the case, not necessarily because it's true.

      I was in a discussion recently about the evolution of mating strategies and the people who believe the above like to say that we're most closely related to the bonobos, not the chimpanzees. Chimpanzees have more of a patriarchal structure with a male dominance hierarchy, more females mating with alpha males. Bonobos are more matriarchal and more polyamorous in the way you describe. Some studies show that we're more related to bonobos, others to chimpanzees, and most to both. There's no solid proof to that. Again here I think that's about confirmation bias. If most studies show that we're related to both, that's probably the truth.

    • englisc

      The reason I doubt it also is that in those bonobo groups most get laid, there's no male hierarchy. In the chimpanzee groups however, there are males who have sex with a number of the females (alphas), there are males who the females will sometimes allow to have sex with them if they provide resources for them (betas) and there are males who have no sexual access (omegas). People like to argue that this doesn't exist in our culture, but you see the exact same thing in the men here. Guys who have lots of sex with different women, the average guy who is able to have sex if he's good boyfriend/husband material, and incels.

      To add to that, there's evidence that only 40% of men throughout history managed to reproduce while 80% of men did. There are hunter-gatherer tribes still living today, and they follow a similar structure where the most skilled hunters have more women whereas the lesser ranking men have less or none.

    • Show All
  • I_Can_Help
    These days, most people I know date at the gloryhole.
    It's time for our date.
    It's time for our date.
  • bamesjond0069
    Relationships marriage etc as we know it are basically over. From an attractive mans perspective i can get married to a ho and most likely get cheated on or divorced or something and get ass raped financially OR i can have tons of sex with hot girls and do anything i want and stay rich and have an easy life.

    I mean id love to have a family but im not going to risk it with a ho and unfortunately i dont think girls that aren't hos exist anymore.

    The rare ones i meet are basically under their parents thumb and being forced through college to be a doctor or something equally unattractive and not allowed to date. So here i am. Waiting for a non slut to date.

    I haven't met a girl waiting for marriage in about a decade. I guess i should have married that one. 😥 i just thought there were other girls like that at the time.
    • AmandaYVR

      I don't even know what to say to you, James. (Obviously I know I don't have to say anything.)
      You are one of these guys who finds girls who will/want to sleep with you, and then instead of appreciating them for that, or looking at it neutrally as a mutual interest and passion for each other, you disparage them for being sluts. Your wording actually disparages the others as well - the ones who are not faithful, and the ones who marry for money or are vindictive and selfish about money (yes, they may deserve some disdain and strongly derogatory terms, but let's be realistic, a lot of shit happens in relationships and those are the endings you're talking about, and likely do not encapsulate the entirety.) But you also put down the girl who's educated or trying to have a strong career. They can't win. You've got every angle covered. You're feeding into the system, creating it, even, by confirming to them that there's no point trying to find a guy to settle down with. They only want girls for sex. They are objects of pleasure, and maybe little more.

    • AmandaYVR

      I'm not saying you're not finding girls who just want to 'have fun'. I'm sure there are some and you can find them. But hopping from person to person to person is what people do when they haven't found a person they really want to stay with for any extended time. If one doesn't have respect for another human being, and doesn't show patience in getting to know them, and one's standards and expectations are so high that no one who is flawed (and that's everybody) can measure up, then one will just keep bouncing from one to another to another. I get it. Why not have sex, when it's available and it feels fantastic. Why not meet a bunch of people and have experiences. But that desire doesn't last forever. Because then no one truly knows you. And no one really cares. And no one asks you how your day way. And no one brings you soup when you're sick in bed. Even Clooney eventually found someone that he wanted to come home to every night (and he says, "She's way out of my league, too good for me.")

    • The more men a woman sleeps with the more likely she is going to initiate a divorce, cheat, the works. Period. They have done plenty of studies on this. I personally know of not one person who married someone I consider a slut who did not cheat on them. Every single one did and I totally called it. Sorry, but that is life, women who sleep around are very high risks and I am not going to risk my financial future on someone that doesn't give a fuck if they are a shitty wife to me.

      The problem with career women is they don't believe in having kids or taking care of them and/or they are older with no benefit. Like men age but they get older and tend to make more money, and women really like men who make more money. But women age and make more money, but IDGAF how much money a woman makes, I want one to have a larger family with and who is good at taking care of a home. I don't want kids, I want a family. Huge fucking difference.

    • Show All
  • kim45456
    You want a arranged marriage like in the past? Why do people think that normal love relationships exist in the past? People marry for financial, political, religious or whatever purpose. Love marriages did not exist in the past. And if you want a long lasting relationships or marriages you should give up on the idea of love. Every married couple I know tell me that love no longer exist in their relationship and this is very normal. If you only seek for love, you can forget long lasting relationships.
    • AmandaYVR

      That's your takeaway, that you think I want arranged marriages and that will solve everything? Not even close.

      It is true that the current us has romanticized marriages of the past (via film, etc.) and that many were extremely pragmatic, but that doesn't mean that love marriage have never existed. They are the goal, the ideal, the carrot that many people hope for. They are also really effing challenging. No doubt about that. But what in life that is really worth achieving is easy? Not much. And we value things higher that we have to work hard for.
      The marriages of my parents' generations were often arranged or under duress (no birth control existed), etc. etc. but in North America most people have married for love. Yes 55% of them don't work out, so the odds suck. Almost like driving a car and hoping you don't ever get into a car accident, but you probably will. But will it be a fender bender that you can get past, or a complete wreck.
      I know many marriages that were/are real. They all have problems, friction, not every day is smooth, but they all love each other, and they have fought through the hard times and both chosen to be together. Love does exist.

    • @kim45456
      Love in relationships, engagements and marriages fo exist. My parent still love each other and they have been married for 45 or 46 years. I know couples that have been married for 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years or 60+ years that still love each other. Does that mean every day is without some difficulties no. Love is still around.

  • crmoore
    I'll admit, I only skimmed the first few paragraphs, but I'm interested in love and hookup culture doesn't interest me in the slightest.
  • Well... people do have sex because that is what they want. So, dunno about that part, but I appreciate the care you took in writing this.
    • AmandaYVR

      Yes, people want and like sex. I don't think it's reasonable to expect people to not have it or to give it up and feel content. But the rewards are short term. The more difficult question is what do people want long term, and what will make them happy.

    • Sure. And sex makes lots of people happy. It's fulfilling and exciting.

    • AmandaYVR

      If guys and girls are having sex with people that they don't really know, and they are happy, and they are not hurting anyone or being dishonest about their intentions, then more power to them. I think it's their choice and I don't believe in judging or standing in their way.
      But if people are doing this, and feel unhappy and unfulfilled, or if one of two people is doing this and the other person is hurt or upset by the lack of honesty about their intent, that's where it becomes a problem. Not just for the individual but for society. And that seems to be where things are at, or going, right now. If everyone was happy, great. But girls are being criticized for having sex too easily or with too many guys (and if and why is debatable), and many guys are complaining about feeling discarded and unappreciated (those are obviously not the same guys that are having fun having lots of casual sex.) I'm not judging, I'm just commenting on what seems to be happening, how people are feeling.

    • Show All
  • MannMitAntworten
    I have never created a poll here which begs the question... are the results broken down by age or just an aggregate?
    • AmandaYVR

      Just an aggregate, separated by gender only.

  • The_man_whol_aughs
    Men and women have a bane to each other since the beginning of life

    I say it's better for them to not start a relationship and just be friends with benefits
  • Boppy
    That is one sexy wall of text.
    • AmandaYVR

      Thank you, Boppy. Based on our previous exchanges, I'm going to figure that's not sarcasm. That is one damn fine compliment.

  • Liam_Hayden
    I don't do hookups and I do date, so dating will survive at least as long as I do.
    • AmandaYVR

      You should start replicating (ala some sci-fi movie) so that you even up the numbers. Proportions are a bit off these days.

  • up_64
    Scanned over it. Seems interesting I'll read later.
  • JRise25
    Ok, I am old school and I met someone that's close to my age. We aren't getting caught up in all that makes dating not what it is these days. Having said that, and I hope others can help me out here. The first date we had, I summed it all up by saying "it's a date" and at the end, we asked each other "was the date worth it", so the first time it constitutes as such. Now the woman I am seeing, she has a child and I work nights, so the only time we can see each other is during the day. We never used the words "date", but she asked me to one on one time a couple times to lunch. Each time, no alcohol, equal time talking, unfortunately we didn't talk about getting to know each other the whole time, at times we talked her personal matters. But each of the last two "dates", towards the end, I ended by massaging her knee and talking with her, which resulted to HER kissing ME on the cheek the second date and the third date, HER kissing ME on the lips. Thoughts?
    • AmandaYVR

      I don't understand what you're asking here.
      You don't like that she initiated the physical side, hey? Many men would be happy about this. You are an adult, as is she, and she has a child which she is responsible for. She spoke to you about some personal matter (s) bothering her. You are both respecting the process of getting to know one another (and without anything like late dates or alcohol, etc. to influence it.) What is the problem? Everything sounds like it is going well. Enjoy it?

  • UncleJessieRabbit
    I wonder if the 1950s were really as bad of a time to live compared to today?
    • AmandaYVR

      Well I've done done research about that, and I think many people would be surprised to hear it was not the bastion of idealism and happiness that was conveyed.
      Comparing peoples' ideas about marriage and fidelity in the 1950s to now, we are actually a more morally strict society today. There was infidelity back then (moreso with males, because they had opportunities and females did not, being tied to the home and kids), but there was also a certain amount of acceptance of it. Monogamy has been an ideal we tried to achieve for only about the past 50-60 years. Prior to that in history, it was known and common that people had side partners. Prior to birth control, women really couldn't and not get found out, but after that development, infidelity rates between the sexes have pretty much evened out. And yet...
      There was a lot of expectation which can be burdensome, but also it is said that clearly defined roles can be a sense of comfort and stability. Back then, the women didn't have nearly as much choice, as to work or not work, and when they did enter the workplace they were in subservient roles. But the ones who wanted their homemaker and mother role, for them and for the husbands and fathers who also wanted their roles, overall this probably created less anxiety. Uncertainty creates confusion and the inability to plan and predict, and this creates anxiety. As well, self-sufficiency, not being able to depend on others, as we once did... these all create anxiety, and eventually wears a person down (thus all the chronic unexplained medical conditions that seem to have one root in common - stress.) So some people idolize and romanticize the 1950s, and others condemn it for its strictness and limitations it placed on personal freedoms. I suppose both are correct.

  • mk200195
    Glad, i made it to the conclusion. 👀❤️
  • KaraAyna
    Good mytake
  • Jenna04
    I’m still coming to grips with my sexuality.
    • AmandaYVR

      Well good luck with that. In many ways it's not an easy time, the world feels in turmoil, but in others, you are growing up in the best time that has ever been - your generation is apparently the most progressive, inclusive, least focused on race, and most open to sexuality and all sorts of differences. You are growing up in a time when free expression reigns (for better or worse). As long as you continue to be a kind and good-hearted person, speak your mind and do your best to encourage positive change. The future is yours.

    • Jenna04

      Of course I’m starting get comfortable with who I am.

    • AmandaYVR

      Take it slow, don't rush it, be careful, and no matter what you hear on this site and anywhere else, don't let it get you down too much.
      I don't know what you're referring to specifically, but I'll just put this out there - NickiB is bi and open here. She's an absolute sweetheart, one of the nicest people on the site, and she's very positive about both girls and guys. There are many people who will condemn anything outside of traditional cultural norms but there are also many who will support.

    • Show All
  • lastwarriorpoet
    Chivalry is dying a slow tragic death...
  • sidhukumar
    Nothing
Loading...