Why do some women think not having an education or a career is a good thing?

[Anonymous]

just remember... if you're relying on a man to feed you, he also has the power to starve you. If you're stuck in an abusive marriage, you wouldn't have the option to leave because you know won't be able to feed yourself without him. Without a way to make a decent income for yourself, your life is without options. You are powerless if you can't provide for yourself as a fully grown adult.

Updates

+1 y

If you can't provide for yourself, you "need" a man. If you can provide for yourself, you "want " a man. There is a big difference. You can definitely afford to have higher standards when you want a man but don't need one. Don't settle for a man just because you need one. Pick a man that you actually truly want to be with.

[love_conquers_lust]

Oh my god. MY primary complaint isn’t with an education. It’s that a lot of the dumb women on here and Democrat voters in general truly don’t have one, even if they have a fucking degree. They vote to their own detriment. It’s like they didn’t learn a fucking thing and didn’t learn how to think. They were fed Marxist bull shit and swallowed it like compliant sluts. Especially from sociologists. You think some flower child from the 60s who spent that entire decade high as a kite knows what the fuck they are talking about?

Your odds of getting married continue to shrink. It’s down to 60%, and it’s because those dumb shits vote the wrong people in office who actually have the power to fix all this shit. YOUR DEMOGRAPHIC DID IT. WOMEN AND MINORITIES DID IT. THAT’S the truth. You wanted to escape the very scenario you describe, fine. But you had to oppress guiltless white men to do it. YOU’RE THE OPPRESSORS AND THE CONTROLLING FUCKS. AND YOU WON’T ADMIT IT. Which means this country is fucked. And it will continue to circle the drain into mediocrity at best as we diversify. We keep dropping. We keep widening wealth inequality. I don’t give a shit if whites have more than minorities, learn to fucking live it. It’s not the majority of whites that are the problem. It’s the few WASPs, Jews, NWOs, whatever elite asshole, who are of any race, at the top.

Like, what do you want? You want to fix this shit it not? You want to keep warring with us because you won’t win. Nobody wins. Use your fucking brains, get the fuck rid of Affirmative Action and implement corporate codetermination. Fucking sick of this war. It’s going to turn physical if you guys don’t wake the fuck up.

And there are plenty of foreign trolls who want nothing more to see that.

[AviatorTom]

Some women want their man to be in charge, to realize that he has to take care of her. The less educated and independent they are, the more they become dependent on him, and some men like that.

[Asker]

understand that no man is obligated to take care of your forever. A man who can take care of you , can also NOT take care of you. You're in a very precarious situation when you expect someone else to feed you

[AviatorTom]

Thanks for MHO

[BlackBeauty90]

Bluntly. Nowadays most want a career or at least a job. The only real exceptions are:
- Women who are content to sit on welfare with a half dozen different-father children,

- Who grew up psychologically beaten down/abused as a child, just like her mother, by a "man" who took pleasure in targeting those weaker than him & couldn't escape (so she thinks she is supposed to be jobless / careerless and as weak/vulnerable as mum)

- Who come from poorer background. Not necessarily because they can't afford it but because they weren't raised in an educated household & thus it's an "alien" concept.

- Who have issues be they either severe mental issues, alcoholism or drug abuse. Sadly in America being raised to be an alcoholic or drug user - due to bad influence of parents or family - is far more common than is justified by any stretch of the imagination.

.

Nowadays the average woman WANTS to be educated and have a career. Even in so called 3rd world countries like Africa more and more girls are striving to, at least, attend basic education something that was almost never heard of just 20-30 years ago.

Because as you said very accurately when you rely & depend on someone else you are subject to their desires. Their control. And there is little one can do to get away from it.

.

And why women (and men too) who are abused report it far less than many think - because they know if the shit-stain who gave them 2 black eyes goes to jail there is almost nobody who can pay bills, buy food, etc.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

That last paragraph... 😂😂😂

[Asker]

i know some women who stay with their cheating husbands because they know that they would be far worse off if they left him.

[BlackBeauty90]

@Hispanic-Cool-Guy What's funny about reality?

[BlackBeauty90]

@Asker - "i know some women who stay with their cheating husbands because they know that they would be far worse off if they left him." - this is very accurate and why cheaters / losers / deadbeats / trash to be blunt target women who don't have a career or good job because they know they can treat her like shit and there's few other options for her.

[Asker]

@blackbeauty90

there was a coworker at my prior job who hit on every single mildly attractive woman he saw. he tried really hard to get me into bed with him and flirted with me all the time. I enjoyed the attention until I found out he had a girlfriend and a daughter at home. He told me he was not married to her- which he thought was a green light for him to have sex with other women.

he tried having sex with other coworkers too. Litreally almost every single young woman he came accross.

and I was like... wtf! how could anyone stay with someone like him.
i found out that she was just a stay home mom with a young daughter.
she wouldn't be able to leave even if she did find out he was cheating on her.

[Anonymous]

While I'm somewhat glad I went the route of getting my education, I would much rather have gone the route of being a stay at home wife and mom. Working is exhausting and I absolutely hate it. I want a man to take care of me. And now that I'm in my 30s, it's going to be hard to find a man to do that. The best years to have been chosen for that are long pass me unless I get a 60 or 70 year old man and even many of them look for 20 somethings. I had two opportunities to do it when I was in my 20s and I blew it. I'm now with a guy that I love but know he will never be able to make me a stay at home wife and mom. He just doesn't have that kind of money and probably never will have that kind of money.

I get what you are saying about having the option to leave whenever you want especially if it's an abusive marriage with having a degree but I also don't knock women who went for the man instead especially a wealthy man who can take care of you and you never having to worry about paying a God damn bill or being in debt.

My debt is colossal and it would have been absolved if I had went the sugar daddy route. RIP to my financial freedom which went out the window the moment I had to take out student loans to get my MA.

[Asker]

a wealthy man who pays everything for you, can also take away everything from you overnight once he stops fancying you.

[genericname85]

ok short and clear so everzone can understand: if you are in the sort of shitty relationship you've been describing, it will suck for you whether you're educated or not. being educated won't make such a relationship any better. so the relationship is the thing that needs fixing. not your education.

[Asker]

@genericname85

an educated woman can flee a bad relationship. an uneducated woman can't flee a bad relationship... thats the difference.

there is also studies that prove that more educated couples tend to have longer marriages.

[Asker]

@genericname85

money is also one of the top reasons for divorce

[genericname85]

My point is that you should go for a relationship that you don't have to flee from xD

[genericname85]

Like if being a house man that rises the children was a thing, I would keep my education basic so that I can do a low level job just in case but have the main focus on finding a good partner

[Summeroflove]

I don’t have a problem with someone who wants to be a stay at home mom or housewife. Though I think some have unreasonable expectations that makes them single and struggling in the end. “They can have whatever standards” that’s true but so can men.

I digress. The fact of the matter is. Many of them feel entitled. They really just demand everything and give little to nothing in return. No self respecting man wants that.

There are housewives and stay at home mothers who do most the housework, raise the kids, and do almost everything there is to do. Everyone wants something different. Doesn’t have to be what you or I are looking for. But we all have our own lives to live and we can’t be worried and focused on what other people are doing.

If someone finds what makes them happy. Then I’m happy for them. As long as it isn’t hurting someone

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Because life is too short to be brainwashed by people like you. Some women get satisfied and really happy with being a housewife making it their true career and passion and people like you are just taking it away from them. If you are talking about the risks then I tell you everything has risks. Even if you have to pursue your career, it has risks.

And I see you are only talking about women's side. What you dont not realize is that even if men have an education or a career, they can still get stuck in a loveless marriage because women still have the power even if they don't have any education or career because the family court biases are always on their sides. A man can lose 1/3 of his income on divorce and even potentially the house and the kids and even get jailed if he doesn't have enough left for the child support which is exactly why most men don't want to get married and if you think it is selfish then what's your selfish reason why you want to get married even if you do have a career?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

And sometimes the education system is pointless if what they teach you has nothing to do with your life. I'd rather be street smart than to be book smart which school don't really teach. The government only like to take advantage of education which is why they only have to make education are requirement to keep schools and universities active because money which makes people let college degree defy their intelligence. I learned more from Google than at school/universities.

[Asker]

why are you talking about men when this topic was only about women?

[Asker]

[Some women get satisfied and really happy with being a housewife making it their true career and passion and people like you are just taking it away from them.]

there's so many things can go wrong in a housewife situation. Its better to be safe with a career than to be sorry as a housewife. Once things go wrong as a housewife, there's nothing you can do to save yourself

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Since you're only talking about one side of the story, I'm talking about the other side. As I have said everything has risks and its not only for house wives. And I am using men having a career getting married as an example which also shows a housewife can still have power. And also who says a house wife can't survive on their own? It's just you making that kind of generalizations on housewives and you assume that housewives only need men to survive. And you know what else is better? To pursue their dreams which includes being a housewife if that is what they really want.

[Asker]

this question's topic was not about men.

whats so hard for you to understand?

[Asker]

housewives typically don't have power. Usually its the breadwinner that gets all the power because he's the one paying for everything. if she wants money for a pedicure, she needs to BEG him.

housewives usually are uneducated women who never had careers. even if she did have a career, its usually some very low paying job. Career women who invested into their education, pulled out loans don't tend to end up being housewives.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

The question topic is you being one sided so therefore I talk about the other side of the story. Why is that so hard to understand?

But the fact that she is still a female means there are family court biases that would still favor her.

"Usually" you say when you yourself have never met most housewives in the world. So I call that a hasty generalization. If she wants money for a pedicure and she has to ask his husband for it, You're the one who's seeing it as a problem but she don't. So you should just speak for yourself.

[DextroShade]

You are speaking out of fear and insecurity, it's pathetic.

[Asker]

@aiko_e_lara

[The question topic is you being one sided so therefore I talk about the other side of the story. Why is that so hard to understand?]

because you're not even discussing this topic... you're CHANGING the topic.
there is no other side to this story.

if a woman is getting abused by her husband... she should have the right to flee regardless of how the husband feels.

[But the fact that she is still a female means there are family court biases that would still favor her.]

of course the courts should favor her. she is the single mom raising 6 kids... the man isn't even raising any kids. why shouldn't the courts favor her? most kids prefer to stay with their moms over their dads.

the richest people in the world are men. the poorest people in the world are women.

there is no such thing as being fair in life.

[Asker]

["Usually" you say when you yourself have never met most housewives in the world. So I call that a hasty generalization. ]

no i have met plenty of housewives. only you have never met a housewife.

[If she wants money for a pedicure and she has to ask his husband for it, You're the one who's seeing it as a problem but she don't. So you should just speak for yourself.]

you don't see it as a problem because you hate women. you think women should beg for everything. and you like this

[Aiko_E_Lara]

If that is considered changing the topic then you haven't seen the relevancy. You're talking about power and you're talking about women which is a gender and men is also a gender which you're only talking about one of it. You're complaining about how unfair it is for housewives but when I talk about how unfair it is for the other side, it would be a threat for your agenda which is why you're trying to deny it because you know it's true. So what if that is irrelevant? That still doesn't make what I said untrue which would contradict your whole notion.

Nobody is saying a woman has no rights to fight or flee. As I have given an example, Even the woman being the abuser herself can still win in trials because of family court biases favoring her. So yes you don't realize you do have your rights after all even as a housewife. And if you do agree with the family court biases then therefore you should also agree that it isn't unfair to be a housewife. Now if you really want to be the man, that I would say take away those rights and start living like men.

If you have met plenty of housewives then so do I. But those are just anecdotes in the end. And even if you have said you have met a lot was true, that is far from the average housewives in the world so if you really do claim you have met most housewives in the world and you are still alive then you're lying.

And I have known too well, NastyB

[Asker]

@aiko_e_lara

housewives can't flee an abusive situation. career women can flee.

thats the difference.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then so does husbands in general. And even if they can flee, they can't hide forever. In case you don't realize, there are women's shelter available but men's shelter get shut down due to the lack of funding. And there are always morons like you hold justify punishing men even if theyre not at fault. Women don't get the same treatment.

[Daniela1982]

Because they are just playing the part of a fool. With marriages failing more than those which make it past 10 years, a person had better have a good job or career. She won't have any retirement and can't depend on anyone to help her. With no job she might not even get Social Security, if that is even around anymore the way things are going. With no education her job prospects might be dim also. Who knows if she will even get anything in a divorce. People may say the house, but can she afford the taxes and upkeep on one? So what's she gonna do, call Ghost Busters? Only in her dreams.

SHIT! I'M SCREWED!

[bingbongbangbung]

The women that choose to be corporate wage slaves are being just as exploited, if not more than if they chose to be housewives with kids. In the West, a woman can easily just divorce their husband and live off of child support and/or alimony, or just monkey branch to a higher status man. Your arguments only work for women that live outside the West and/or those living in extremely abusive relationships. Good thing I'm a man so it doesn't matter to me, and I skipped the corporate ladder entirely by creating my own AI startup a few months back.

[Asker]

you can't pay today's rent, feed 4 kids with just child support and alimony. historically alimony had never been enough. this is why its so important for a woman to have a decent career of her own so she will be safe when her husband abuses her or leaves her

[bingbongbangbung]

Yeah and historically a lot of policies considered centrist or even liberal a few decades ago can be considered conservative or even far right to SJWs

[Ozanne]

The only time I've met women who thought this was okay were the type of women who didn't know any better. They were raised by parents where her mother also didn't have any education or worked, and lived in a community where it was common that the women didn't work. They just went with the flow of what was expected of them.

I disagree with this, and think women should broaden their options just in case something happens, even if it means taking online courses or working from home just to establish something on their resume. You're right when you say if they rely on men, they are in a terrible situation if their man decides to take it all away.

[provokeesmokee]

Some women really do like being useless bimbos.

I met one and holy shit, she was as annoying and stupid as you'd expect sometime like that to be.

Thing is, parasites like that don't care if they can't support themselves. They don't want to. They want to be helpless so their victims are obligated to care for them.

The bimbo I knew couldn't cook, clean, or work. Her poor boyfriend did everything for her, it felt very uncomfortable to witness.

My friend group cut her out because she got way too whiney and stupid for us to tolerate.

[Lionman95]

Because they may come from a family where their mother stayed at home and it worked out well. I would say because they want to prioritise family and not see someone else raise their children. Having a career can also have its cons because it's stressful and hard for many people and it's not fulfilling for many. I knows quite a lot of people guys and girls that just work to make a living and see their life's fulfillment in their hobbies and family not in work. They so called work to live their life.

I think some women gave up on trying to make it in the corporate work force and get purpose so they prefer working at home, raising kids and create a healthy environment at home. I agree though that it comes with risks for her and that she should evaluate them especially what's the consequences of not having an education.

[CubsterShura]

Mainly because a lot of women are taught that the very natural and normal experience of going through stress in school and work in a capitalistic world is somehow us going against our nature and that this is not supposed to happen to us. They don't understand that this is just a normal human experiences and university is no cup of tea even for people who are passionate academics. They are sold the narrative that as long as they remain attractive and do a few chores they can keep a man when in reality you are not in control of others and you won't realistically be able to maintain a picture-perfect life especially after having kids.

[Anonymous]

Not having an education is neither good nor bad.

Not having a career is neither good nor bad.

Not knowing how to earn money is bad. If you think trading time for money is earning money you have a problem. If someone else is controlling how much you earn... you have a problem. You think not having an education and career is bad because you don't know how to earn money. It's written all over you the way you talk. People who know how to earn money don't worry about education. If you want one that's fine but you can go earn 6 figures right now with the proper direction. People need to learn how to earn money. That's one of the biggest problems.

[Asker]

That wasn't my point. My point was about women having no means to survive. This question was never about getting rich or owning a business

[Asker]

Usually you need to know a few things to earn money. The more you know, the more likely you earn more

[Unit1]

That is directly correlated with your point about not needing a man for money when you make your own to buy your food and rent a roof.

[Asker]

@Unit1

it has no correlation. this topic was not about "not having to work a job and still receive a check in the mail".

this was about women having the education and skills to survive on her own

[DextroShade]

You are just too insecure to trust a man. Most men will treat a woman well, but the reason you don't see this is because you let yourself get passed around by the guys who don't.

A woman's duty is to the home first, and career women make shitty wives and mothers. Also, women who don't have careers can still get alimony and child support if the marriage doesn't work out so they don't lack options. If anything the guy is taking the bigger risk because the woman can cheat on him or divorce him for no reason and he STILL has to pay her.

You had best get over your insecurities and fear of men or you will die alone.

[bingbongbangbung]

Well that mostly applies to Western women; outside of the West, men still have the complete upper hand over women in marriages

[Asker]

[Most men will treat a woman well, but the reason you don't see this is because you let yourself get passed around by the guys who don't.]

a bad man is a man who doesn't respect a woman. Bossing a woman around and saying that she should never be able to enjoy the option of having a career is one of the biggest red flags ever... A lot of these men who want housewives are the same men who just want ultimate control over their wives.

[ Also, women who don't have careers can still get alimony and child support if the marriage doesn't work out so they don't lack options. ]

child support is not nearly enough to pay for baby sitter fees, rent, food for 4 people. sounds more like you are dreaming than having the faintest clue to what reality is like.

[A woman's duty is to the home first, and career women make shitty wives and mothers. ]

you can't even be an adequate breadwinner... vast majority of men can't even afford housewives... you can't even give your wife and kids a good living... and you're complaining that your wife isn't a good enough housemaker or wife...

all men know how to do is complain, they have absolutely no substance

[Asker]

@dextroshade

[Asker]

@bingbongbangbung

exactly!!! the "upper hand" is something low quality men like you love to brag about. Trust me... men who love their "upper hand" will eventually find themselves in divorce court.

no decent man would want to control his wife or have the upper hand on his wife...

being married to a man like that is no different to being stuck in prison.

[DextroShade]

True, thanks to feminism fllooding the job market with women who don't need to be there wages and the power of labor have decreased a lot, but there is a big difference between a woman who is a wife and works some part-time job to help support the family and a boss bitch who puts herself and her career first. The former will end up happier than the latter, especially when she's older.

[genericname85]

is it a bad thing? i mean let's say you wanna be a stay at home wife and rise children. is that not a great thing? does that not help society repopulate and have a stable future? why are you buying the terrible propaganda that this is supposed to be a "bad" thing?

[Asker]

because clearly you haven't read the question

[genericname85]

I have and it draws the relationship type you were referring to in a very bad light. If you are in that type of relationship, you'd be unhappy if you're educated as well. So your question doesn't even make sense that way, which is why I focussed on the part that did make sense.

[Asker]

@genericname85

you can't even write... you don't make any sense. after reading all of that, i have no fucking idea what you are saying

[patrick994]

They are unintelligent girls, a career man as you say would have complete domination over them, they were probably brought up in a macho family where the man used to bring the money home, or they are simply women who do not want to work and aspire to be supported by the well-to-do guy, but if one day the well-to-do guy gets fed up with them, they will become poorer than before;

[jshm2]

Because they have more going for them?

Seriously, what's with your gatekeeping? Some women can be independently wealthy from an inheritance, some actually give a fuck and get along with their man.

You are seriously expecting changes because of a minority of women cannot maintain a relationship.

[Anonymous]

agreed. this is why i don't agree with stay at home moms... that dude leaves, you're left with nothing except a kid. no career started, no money (except the money you take from your ex), no support, no education degree to create a better life for you and your kid... just setting yourself up for failure, they are practically slaves that just don't know it yet.

[Unit1]

i believe those, that uphold this view in our current times are either old people, who are used to their old times previously or these "men" have the very intention of controlling women like women are their obedient and trapped servants or kids.

The latter don't give a F that you'll starve as a result of you adhering to their ideals.

[loveslongnails]

True that. You don't necessarily need a career to keep as a backup, but educating yourself should be a priority. Maybe some women are ok putting themselves in the position where they're wholly dependent on a man. Makes no sense to me.

[Asker]

i think many women are brainwashed at a young age that its ok for them to amount of nothing when they grow up because women aren't expected to provide for themselves and their families. It definitely doesn't train the female population to be very ambitious individuals.

sometimes making sandwiches and cleaning toilets won't pay the bills or feed you for life.

[loveslongnails]

No minimum wage job is enough to support YOURSELF, let alone a family. Educating yourself or having a career is not feminism, but Christian Nationalists want women to believe it is, and have been grooming them to, and now teach that all things having to do with real feminism are dirty words and against God.

It's practically impossible to raise a family on a single income in the USA, unless you're in the top 10% of wage earners.

[Asker]

yea... i agree its quite funny how people say the ability to survive in the real world, making a living is called "feminism".

[Anonymous]

If they want to be a traditional woman its not a problem because she will be at home with kids anyway. In america specifically its important to know if you want to be a trad wife because education costs so much there that for her to be at home would be an unnecessary dept for the family

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Hey, you used my line you saw on here? About "He who feeds you also has the power to starve you" 😂

Anyways, they are being naive or seriously hoping it doesn't turn out bad for them but they will mostly likely have a 75% chance it won't work for them and they gonna find out the hard way.

[Spongebobssocks]

Less than 1% of marrigaes failed in the 60's when tradiotion marriges was a thing. Now its 50%. So that risk is much higher nowadays.

[Spongebobssocks]

No actually women were much happier back then compared to now. By A LOT!

[Asker]

There was mens tank top shirt called "wife beaters" because men who whore those shirts commonly came home to beat their wives. It was so common that they had a shirt named after it

[Spongebobssocks]

Okay and? Im glad you are young lol. Anyone can make any shirt. I could make that shirt too. Do you have any accuare source showing most men during that time wore it and that they supported the message behind it?

[Asker]

The term was coined in 1947. There are several theories as to how it surfaced—one is that it originated in the wake of a horrific crime that went viral. The crime was committed by a man named James Hartford Jr., who beat his wife to death. A picture of Hartford wearing a sleeveless white undershirt swept the nation, captioned “The Wife–Beater.”

Another theory is that Marlon Brando’s portrayal of Stanley Kowalski in A Streetcar Named Desire inspired the term. His character is violent, angry, and hits his wife—while wearing a sleeveless undershirt.

Regardless of the true origin of the term, white, sleeveless, ribbed tank tops took on the identity of a shirt worn by a beer–guzzling, Newport–smoking, pot bellied, abusive man. The term has since become far past antiquated, yet it's still prevalent in our vocabulary and at retail stores, many of which label tank tops by the term to this day. In fact, if you search "wife beaters" on Amazon, you'll get several options of men's tank tops to choose from.

www.34st.com/.../wife-beater-tank-top-history-meaning-implications-antiquated-street-style

[Asker]

this wasn't the only example of a man wearing those "wife beaters" beating up his own wife. back then during the early 1900s, the government banned alcohol because husbands were too violent to their wives after coming home from a night of drinking.

[Asker]

They aimed to heal what they saw as an ill society beset by alcohol-related problems such as alcoholism, family violence, and saloon-based political corruption. Many communities introduced alcohol bans in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and enforcement of these new prohibition laws became a topic of debate.

en.wikipedia.org/.../Prohibition_in_the_United_States

[Spongebobssocks]

Thats not a valid source so you need to bring another source and theories haven't been PROVEN to be accurate

[Asker]

i have sources.. just because you didn't like those sources, it doesn't mean its not true.

[Asker]

these are REAL historical events

[Spongebobssocks]

The sources you provided aren't factual. You learn in school sources that ends with. com (company) are not to be trusted. Im not saying its not correct or not I just can't judge anything from those sources just like instagram

[Asker]

because if men never beat their wives back then, why would they name a shirt called wife beaters?

[Asker]

the prohibition era of alcohol established by the government was a real event.
it was created mainly because there was too much violence in families husbands beating their wives after drinking at bars.

you should have learned about this in history class in school if you paid any attention in class.

[Asker]

a simple google search of the term "Wife beaters" showed this:

www.google.com/search

[Spongebobssocks]

Yeah you need to ask a teacher how to check a souce and come back

[Asker]

The roots of what became Prohibition in 1920 started in the 19th century with the Temperance Movement, principally among women who protested against the abuse of alcohol and how it caused men to commit domestic violence against women.

prohibition.themobmuseum.org/.../

[Spongebobssocks]

A good source! Thank you! Well done!:)

And yes that is physical violoncell againts women it was legal back then but that doesn't change what I stated before

[Asker]

@spongebobssocks

women didn't go to college back then. women weren't educated and had no skills to sustain life. a woman's only way to survive was to marry a man. if she were to divorce, they usually found themselves in a way worse situation

[Spongebobssocks]

Then how do you explain women being much happier compared to today?

[Asker]

@spongebobssocks

people , both men and women, aren't happier today because life is significantly most expensive now than in the 60s.

back then it costed 10 cents for an ice cream, not its 7-8 dollars.

costs for college in 2023 almost doubled since the year 2000

[Spongebobssocks]

Okay, why do more marriges happier back then compared to now? Why were women happier in their marriges back then? If its all about money?

[Asker]

@spongebobssocks

you should really pay more attention in school.

its because inflation has surpassed wage growth.

if you don't know what this means, go study it.

[Spongebobssocks]

I was an A student baby girl:)

Your logic doesn't stand. You are much more likely to fail in your future marriage than I do with your male like approach. All studies goes against you. So goodluck with that! May God bless you!

[Asker]

@spongebobssocks

i know you're not an A student because you don't even know what prohibition era was

[Asker]

[You are much more likely to fail in your future marriage than I do with your male like approach.]

at least i get to leave a marriage that is abusive, you won't be able to leave due to your lack of ability to survive in the real world by yourself. you better pray to god everyday that your marriage works out, because your options are none if things go wrong

[Lliam]

I agree 100%. A woman who lacks the ability to support herself is either lazy or damaged in some way. She will end up a victim.

[AnusNdaPainus]

a career can’t satisfy her maternal instincts

also if work is optional then smart people don’t work

suckers work

that’s why it’s not called “The Real Working Bitches of Miami” it’s The Real Housewives.

[Asker]

there are plenty of career women with maternal instincts that birthed children and work full time jobs.
its my goal in life to have kids and im a career women.
what makes you think women can't do both?

[AnusNdaPainus]

I didn’t say she couldn’t do both but why would she want to?

Motherhood is a full time job that’s much more rewarding than a career because let’s be honest you are not solving world hunger or creating a new energy source

Most women don’t want to work after they’ve been pregnant with their second child and no one on their deathbed has ever wished they could have worked more they wished to have spent more time with their families

You’ll end up neglecting one or the other

[Asker]

@anusndapainus

because most men dont make enough money to support their wife and kids anyways. thats why housewives are almost non existent nowadays. most women only stay home for 2-3 years then get back to the workforce.

[AnusNdaPainus]

Of course men do the problem is women who choose careers over relationships don’t have the wifely skills that men who can take care of their families want

This is why career women struggle with dating because the men who can support their families don’t want them they need housewives

Housewives are in so few numbers because women aren’t raised to be wives in our culture they are instead taught to pursue a career instead of marriage

And also most women who do work make less than 30k a year the average Hispanic man in this country earns about 30k and their communities thrive and families live comfortably the problem with women today is they expect to live luxurious lifestyle

[ because most men dont make enough money to support their wife and kids anyways. ]

What are you implying? That if they did ( which they do ) you wouldn’t have to work? You still would because you take yourself out of the running when you choose a career and by the way most people don’t have careers they have jobs

[Asker]

@anusndapainus

It wouldn't matter if women didn't have wifey skills because VAST MAJORITY of men can't afford a housewife anyway

Why are you so obsessed with something you can't afford?

And no, most college educated men are married to other college educated women. Gainfully employed college educated men are not married to uneducated women. Data proves it

[AnusNdaPainus]

How is the Hispanic community thriving if they can’t afford to take care of their wife and children

The average Hispanic man makes about 30k

That’s the lowest earning ethnicity
It’s not that men don’t make enough because men hit our financial stride age 35 to 45 we absolutely can afford it the problem is women aren’t wives

This is why MGTOW and passport bros exist

Do you know how much the average man makes?

You don’t need a college education to be a wife many women only go to college to find a husband

The average global income is 12k so you saying men don’t make enough is not only untrue it’s disingenuous what you’re really saying is “ Men can’t afford the higher class lifestyle that you want “

[AnusNdaPainus]

And women are really screwing themselves by working

Men spend all of our money on our families because we are providers by nature

And what I don’t like about questions like this is if you gotta ask then you already answered your own question no one in their right mind would choose to work a career when they can be taken care of

And It just shows you don’t understand men or life

Life is a series of choices and trade offs you cannot have it all you can’t be a good wife , good mom and have a good career

You can’t expect wifely treatment when you aren’t a wife if you want to choose career that’s perfectly fine but you’ll lose the opportunities that come with being a wife and mother

What comes down to is what is more important to you? Career or Family

Im not telling you which one to pick but the women who choose family are much happier and better off over a lifetime

https://youtu.be/bJeQGXwQc5k?si=F4-6mgnPOHOeAv5B

[Asker]

[How is the Hispanic community thriving if they can’t afford to take care of their wife and children]

hispanic communities are not thriving. most of their kids fail in school , grow up under poverty. they have kids that they can't afford to raise. a lot of them end up being criminals. blacks and hispanics are known to live in the ghettos.

[Men spend all of our money on our families because we are providers by nature]

who the fuck cares about you wanting to be providers if you can't adequately provide for your family?

[AnusNdaPainus]

Latinos Over the past year, they have increased their share in professional occupations, raised their net worth faster than their non-Latino White counterparts, and shown their mettle as the fastest-growing minority entrepreneurial group

how is that not thriving?

They only make up 20% of the country and their average income is 30k a per year most of them do even finish highschool

This argument you are making “ that men can’t provide is bullshit “

Let me ask you two questions

how much does a man need to make?

And if men aren’t making enough then how are they finding wives and starting families with foreign women?

[AnusNdaPainus]

[ most of their kids fail in school , grow up under poverty. they have kids that they can't afford to raise. a lot of them end up being criminals. blacks and hispanics are known to live in the ghettos. ]

What FOX news article did you get that from?

Clearly you know nothing of these communities

[Asker]

@anusndapainus

take a look at the data.

hispanics are almost as poor as blacks according to this chart.

www.statista.com/.../

[Asker]

@anusndapainus

March of this year, real median household income increased 10.6% among Asian households (from $88,774 to $98,174),

8.5% among Black households (from $42,447 to $46,073),
7.1% among Hispanic households (from $52,382 to $56,113),

and 5.7% among non-Hispanic white households (from $71,922 to $76,057),

www.epi.org/.../

blacks and hispanics make the least money

while whites and Asians make the most

[AnusNdaPainus]

Hispanics make the least yet their population has not remained stagnant because they prioritize family

That’s how you build generational wealth you dingus

[A_Bell]

Why is it a bad thing?

Women have been duped into bring corporate drones.

[strateguy632]

but that is the REASON you do dating to know people before a commitment

[strateguy632]

this whole question is really nonsense not just "my opinion differe" it is almost a threat. even fearmongering

[BigDog1989]

At least be high school diploma'd, but you don't HAVE to have a college degree. I work with someone who doesn't have a degree. I don't either, yet, she has a better job than me

[no_feet_pics]

Doesn't matter to me, usually means she won't owe student loans on a degree she will never use...

[Asker]

Or maybe your life would end up being a living hell raising a family of 4 or 5 people with no money

[no_feet_pics]

I know countless people who make more money in a trade with no college, than the friends that went. With no ridiculous debt

[no_feet_pics]

Unless you're going to be a lawyer, or a doctor of some sort... it's not worth it.

[Asker]

Im a nurse. I work in the operating room with the surgeons. I make almost 100 an hr. My salary increases every year

[Asker]

You won't make any money in trade unless you own a business. Plus, often people retire very early in trades cuz their bodies can't keep up as they get older

[shades777]

men dont date women for their education for their looks 1st and personality 2nd, education is probably 9th on that list, women think what's important to them is the same as men thats the issue

[Anonymous]

A man is an optional extra at best. A career is far more important.

[LoverOfBooty23]

Because they realized if they are hot enough they can be lazy and stay home and get paid to play with their butthole all day

[OddBeMe]

Good q. But guys leech too. It’s best to have equal ambition, just for conversational relations honestly.

[Jkgordon]

Depending on a man or welfare simple as that

[Aphrodite801]

Dummies who will have to learn the hard way.