Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
That’s up to the people they trying to date🤷♀️
I have discovered that a lot of people get offended by some of my tattoos especially black people because down my back arms it asts WHITE PRIDE OVER NINTT PERCENT OF MY TATTATTRIOS I GOT WHILE I WAS IN PRISON
Tattoos I got while I was in prison I have only one tattoo that I got while not in prison
Don't they for the most part? I consider tattoos to be a big turnoff. I wouldn't automatically reject a woman who had them. But size and amount of them will play a considerable part in whether I even find her attractive. And why would she want to date me even if I thought her body mutilation ugly?
No. What possible benefit would this provide and to whom?
NOO! I don't have tattoos and I love me a tattooed man if that were the case I wouldn't be with my man and that would suck. If someone doesn't like tattoos than don't be with someone with tattoos it's that simple
Opinion
13Opinion
lol no.
should i only be a healthcare worker at a hospital with other tattooed people? or not treat anyone with no tattoos? 🤔 see where i am going with this...
I hope not.
my partner is covered head to toe and although I used to have a whole leg sleeve, I ended up lasering it off because I grew out of love.
@electromagnetic I knew a dermatologist years ago who was somewhat on the beginning of lasering off tattoos. I remember back then it was like $75 a square inch. Just curious, how big of a deal was it to laser off the whole leg sleeve? How many appointments was it? This was years ago and most people only had one to remove.
@ArrowheadSW it took 5 years to remove my leg sleeve and roughly $23k.
It was painful and because at that time it was still relatively new, quite expensive. (2012-2017,18) I don’t recall the exact number of appointments. The place I went to did package deal ( wasn’t inches) they quoted me based on saturations and the number of appointments it would take to remove that particular tattoo. I was basically quoted per tattoo. I didn’t have a full leg which was a bonus. Just most of my thigh and black and white with shading.
@electromagnetic Thanks for the reply as I was totally curious. Yeah this was quite some time back when I somewhat knew this dermatologist. He was on the cutting edge of this years before I even knew him. So the $75 per square inch was a quote from that long ago. And back then, people would basically come in to remove ONE tattoo, because usually that was all they had.
And they lasered them off in stripes, leaving a small gap of tattoo between stripes. Then in a followup appointment they would laser off the remaining stripes of tattoo.
The other thing he loved to laser off were "port wine stains". The natural red "birth marks" that some people have on their neck and face. A lot of people grow up thinking they are different than everyone else and are self-conscious over it. He got a good response from patients like that!
@ArrowheadSW
For me, it was individual artwork that was removed at a time. The strips idea sounds interesting.
Truthfully I didn’t know you can remove port wine stains.
@electromagnetic Ah OK I'm wondering if they don't use the stripe method any longer or if it just depends on how the doctor likes to do it. All the years I worked in medical I think maybe I talked to one other person who had the laser done. Although this doctor was totally into it. I'd imagine it is fairly common, but I just never met people who talked about it.
I looked online to see what the internet said about the pricing. Generally it looked like it cost $450 to remove a tattoo on the average. But that is probably for one that really isn't all that large. It made no mention of size.
@ArrowheadSW
I think removal is a lot more common now. People just don’t talk about it as much. Plus a lot of people opt for cover ups instead of removal as it’s cheaper and less painful.
That is the dumbest thing I have read all day on here.
LOL.
Uh no they can date anyone who meets there soul it shouldn't be about the body and crap like that like yes u can have ur preference but the body changes.. it should be about how the heart is and the personality as well.
no I think that is kinda silly but im not a tattooed person and its not really my thing , small tats are ok but im not into the really take over my body stuff like some people do its a turn off for me.. to each there own right.
No, why even bother with the restriction? If someone with tattoos likes someone without tattoos, (and vice versa) there's no reason to make falling in love any more difficult.
Why? My husband has tattoos but I don’t, so if that were the case, we wouldn’t be together lol
Who said that? Couples are just another bunch of couples. It's like saying are hillbillies allowed to date hillbillies 🤪
I have legit 25 more than my man 😭 close to dating someone without any 😂
LOL, girls with permanent tattoos... what a waste.
Im tattoo free but my wife has a tatt3that reaches from the top of her foit, to her wrist.
Allowed? What kind of communist bullshit is that?
LOL.
I have many tattoos and I am planning on getting more.. especially me and my wife we are going to get matching tattoos I keep telling her that I am going to get her name blasted in my neck
What is funny I only paid at the most five bucks for my tattoos and most of them are far better work than I seen that people got on the free eirt
Lol do you even have a life outside this site? Your questions are all over the place
What is the thinking behind this dumb question?
No. Some people like tattoos on their partner but don't have any of their own.
No, as I'm tattooed but I wish I wasn't, and prefer a relationship in which the other is not tattooed.
Yes, I don't have tatts and I don't like tatts
Lol, why?
Tattood people are so hot , i want everybody to date them
You can also add your opinion below!