To be interested vs To be interesting. Which one would you prefer and why?

[thegreenyogi]

[AgentG111]

As myself? Depending on the people I've met and been introduced to. It can be one or other or both depending on what that person (s) thoughts and feelings are and their want and desire is as well.

There are things I'm interested in as things and people or places nouns. That I want to become familiar with and possibly enjoy.

Being interesting to people can be a good thing when you want to be a public face. When you want to just be a human being who wants to just move about in his daily life and not bother or be bothered that can actually be very damning.!

[Zack-Bann]

to be interesting is my own problem


To be interested is the result of what others do


It’s hard to compare


I will always want to be interesting not boring


But if I’m not interested I don’t feel the need to be interesting

[FirePhoenixZ]

To be interesting because genuine interest flows naturally from that.

When your mind, depth, and energy are magnetic, curiosity becomes mutual.

You don’t chase attention, you command it effortlessly.

[HawkPerception]

Obviously it's best to be both, but for the sake of the question I'll pick a side. I think I'd choose to be interested because without interest, you're passionate about nothing in life. Being interesting is nice when it comes to engaging others, but it doesn't add value to your own life. And you know what they say. Prioritize yourself first.

[DryGermanGuy]

I'll take the large combo-meal, thank you very much. :-)

[Cidknee]

They fuck you in the drive-thru!

[Shiprex]

People to be interesting but about things interested.

[RedInnocent69]

I don’t know. I like to think I’m both, most of the time

[Xawyx-2]

Both is kinda good enough for me.

[Cidknee]

To be interesting.