I don't think it's repulsed, more like annoyed by... Especially if it turns out they had no interest from the start and have just been using you for money or other things. Been down that road too many times.
But I guess the best thing I can think of is "double standards" for that. Personally I don't care either way, I already know I have a better chance of having a snowball fight with the Devil than dating someone.
By generalizing a thing to half of the human population, you are bound to have absurd results from which this question originated from. Every man is different, some think one thing, some think the other, some think both and some think none. By generalizing this to all men, you get rid of all these nuances, you turn a grey spectrum into a black or white thing which won't bring you anything except results that don't make sense.
I myself play hard to get, and I love it when the woman that I'm interested in plays hard to get because I have to work 10 times as hard an it's like a great game of cat and mouse
If she behaves like everything she does for OUR common interest is a great favor, I think "spoiled princess again, I won't degrade myself to your servant". I never chased girls who discouraged me with their egocentric behavior.
Double edged sword my friend. Us men have them too. Like if we are chivalrous we are the nice guys all of a sudden and if we are never chivalrous we are douchebags.
nobody wants something most can get nor do people want to play games when figuring out their crush.
Whore - female that is highly sexual and with many partners (ofcourse she will still ego ugly and avg guys so just because a whore is a whore doesn't mean she will fuck you, just the guy next to you)
Because women should be easy to chat with. This isn't about having sex with but having relationships with. When women play like they don't want relationships, I move on.
Hard to get or easy to get are of no significance to me. I do prefer easy to keep though. I’ll do my part treating a girl like a queen but I want loyalty in return.
I do neither. I appreciate girls who act in accordance with what they feel and say what they want. I waste no time in either hard to getters or easy girls.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
71Opinion
I don't think it's repulsed, more like annoyed by... Especially if it turns out they had no interest from the start and have just been using you for money or other things. Been down that road too many times.
But I guess the best thing I can think of is "double standards" for that. Personally I don't care either way, I already know I have a better chance of having a snowball fight with the Devil than dating someone.
"Hard to get" is great as long as it isn't an act. If she is fake, manipulatively "choosy" then that is annoying.
"Easy" does not interest me personally. They probably feel the same way about me, which is fine. I don't criticize them.
By generalizing a thing to half of the human population, you are bound to have absurd results from which this question originated from. Every man is different, some think one thing, some think the other, some think both and some think none. By generalizing this to all men, you get rid of all these nuances, you turn a grey spectrum into a black or white thing which won't bring you anything except results that don't make sense.
I myself play hard to get, and I love it when the woman that I'm interested in plays hard to get because I have to work 10 times as hard an it's like a great game of cat and mouse
If she behaves like everything she does for OUR common interest is a great favor, I think "spoiled princess again, I won't degrade myself to your servant". I never chased girls who discouraged me with their egocentric behavior.
Double edged sword my friend. Us men have them too. Like if we are chivalrous we are the nice guys all of a sudden and if we are never chivalrous we are douchebags.
"perfectly balanced as all things should be" -Thanos
nobody wants something most can get nor do people want to play games when figuring out their crush.
Whore - female that is highly sexual and with many partners (ofcourse she will still ego ugly and avg guys so just because a whore is a whore doesn't mean she will fuck you, just the guy next to you)
Because most men are super hypocritical. I prefer someone in the middle. More so a woman who knows what she wants but won’t play games
Because women should be easy to chat with. This isn't about having sex with but having relationships with. When women play like they don't want relationships, I move on.
Hard to get or easy to get are of no significance to me. I do prefer easy to keep though. I’ll do my part treating a girl like a queen but I want loyalty in return.
We just wish women were as horny as us!
... PS i dont really care to slut shame.
I'm a virgin so easy girls would be great till i got my game up to challenge hard to get girls
Because the ones who are "hard to get" I don't want to actually "get". I just want to spend time with them.
It's not usually the same people in both cases. I never think a woman is a slut, ever. I wish that word was never used.
Because most guys are insecure hypocrite man childs
With 1” baby dicks
I do neither. I appreciate girls who act in accordance with what they feel and say what they want. I waste no time in either hard to getters or easy girls.
I’m so stupid I would translate hard to get into not interested, and go with that
I like to interact with women who are easy to approach. It's very difficult to impress hard to get girls specially if you're not so rich or famous.
I’m neither afraid of nor intimidated by hard to get women.