Boy looses testicles on being kicked by a girl?

[Larvonite]

This is from a terrifying case i read about in which a guy probably 17-18 years old groped and bullied a girl of the same age and the girl kicked him in his testicles so hard that he lost both his testicles (removed by surgery due to rupture) and also had to go through a urethral repairation surgery (8-12 hr long major surgery) to fix his broken penis. Now i feel very bad for that boy because even though what he did was very wrong but he certainly did not deserve that...
He can not have kids, Having no testicles will finish his sex life and problems like no body strength, male breast, no more masulanity and taking pills of testosterone for the rest of his life along with so many problems
Treatments and life long medicines + the surgery are aslo a lot of money he and his family has to pay now.
Where as the girl would walk away with nothing but just appreciated for her brave action.
But as i dived deeper into the case i also came across the fact that the girl knew karv maga (a form of martial arts) and could have used many other methods to run away.
As the definition of self defence is " to use the bare minimum amount of force required to run away from attacker and not harm the attacker more than he/she intended to hurt you"
Infact using exxesive force in self defence is a punishable crime.
Now i dont know what happened later on to that boy and the girl and i am very curious.
That is why i am asking you guys. What according to you should happen to them if you were in power
Ps. I really hope that the girl gets sued or at least is made to pay for his hospital bills.

I feel what the girl did was perfect and i am satisfied with the damage she did, even more damage would have been better. The boy should be sued too.

I am totally satisfied with what the girl did but i dont think that now the boy should face charges

I feel that the girl should have used less force so as to not damage his parts and the boy should face charges

I feel what she did was very wrong and should be charged of her crimes and face consequences.

No one should face charges just the girl's family should pay money to that guys family as a settlement

[igaveyouanickname]

They're both wrong and their actions are reprehensible. Laws and courts exist to keep people from dispensing "street justice" and cycles of revenge/feuds.

There is now reproductive technology where adult cells can be used to form viable sperm, so reproduction by males without testicles is a possibility.

I am saddened but not surprised that most girls think it's a free license to inflict disproportionate force, or murder, another human being without an imminent threat of death or harm. The law is based on the least amount of force to stop the threat. You cannot shoot someone for grabbing your butt. If you believe this is an okay response, then you need to look at your sense of proportionality and values in the mirror.

"Two wrongs don't a right, but three lefts do."

[RasmusAiken]

Most courts would say the girl's response should have been proportional to the force used in his attack. She was wrong to use a force capable of causing great bodily harm.

[Prettygurl12]

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. If you're being attacked, you have a right to defend yourself.

I don't blame the girl for not knowing the boy's background in fighting. Sucks for him that he made a piss poor choice in his victim. Maybe don't put your hands on people next time.

[Karate_Guy]

@Prettygurl12 So true! Bad luck for him (and his balls) that he picked the wrong girl to sexually assault, but she is allowed to defend herself. By the way, based on your avatar, I assume you also do martial arts?

[Agape93]

A. Thats what he gets for abusing and secually assaulting someone.

[Agape93]

Sexually

[AvaOneLasTime]

Considering all the hate towards the maimed person and all the victim blaming (and for which is more, the boy might have been underage too), in the poll, i will say, the girl deserves both her ovaries stabbed, because what she did was intentional.

Can i say that? Sure i can!

[SnakeBoop]

do not put unconsenting hands on folks if you cannot handle the repercussions.
If only every pervert had this sort of reaction done to them. Be easy to tell whos needed to be avoided.

[Catguy92]

It really is sad that adults think in such binary terms these days.

Two things can be true at once:

He was wrong for doing it but maiming someone over it was beyond stupid and over kill.

These is such a thing as excessive force.

[patrick994]

I agree, what do you think happened to the girl? I know it happened in the United States, specifically in Saint Paul

[Catguy92]

@patrick994 I don't know honestly but adults today are getting dumber and dumber.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

What she did was justifiable and enough. There's no need to sue him for that. So many girls voted for that guy to be sued despite getting his own consequences but lets say if the gender is swapped? I bet they'd give that girl who got kicked in the clit wouldn't give her a hard time.

[AvaOneLasTime]

Its not justifiable at all.

But sorry for commenting on this old post. Should not have

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime It wasn't even stated how long he had been doing that which he shouldn't in the first place. She's not right for doing it but sometimes you hit someone instinctively to defend yourself. Even if there's no intentions of hitting someone in the balls, it still can happen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHIHPxUjiio

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime Now should you charge that kid too?

[AvaOneLasTime]

I am pretty sure she was charged, so it doesn't matter what i would do :D
But i don't think anyone deserves castration, for a mistake she or he did. If people were getting castrated for mistakes, humans would have vanished long time ago.

[AvaOneLasTime]

she was punished*
Sorry

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime Maybe she's charged because he was also charged. If she isn't charged then that means he isn't also charged for harassing because him getting that nut shot is what he deserved. And harassing someone isn't even a mistake. It's done on purpose. Unless it was an accident then that would make it a mistake and would be wrong to retaliate.

[AvaOneLasTime]

unproportionate force or excessive force used, is punishable crime, according to laws. Especially towards underage people. I am pretty sure what she did was intentional.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime Then what if i'd say hitting him in the nuts was also a mistake? There for she shouldn't be charged because it was a "mistake" After all, isn't that a punishment for those sexual harassers? If he don't wanna be castrated then he shouldn't have done that in the first place. It's simple. If you're defending that guy so much then thankfully i'm against the idea of having him sued for that after being treated that way.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime Then he also intentionally harassed her. What else can she do to break free? Saying "im sure" doesn't really make the situation "sure" that's why i'm making it fair because this wouldn't never happened if he never started harassing anyone.

[AvaOneLasTime]

Alright, my boyfriend wants me to write this to you:
I wear a 11cm long pocket knife. I damn well know where the ovaries are. So if a girl/woman gropes me, i should pull out my knife and stab her in both her ovaries, castrating her, causing life-time problems... that of course, if she survives from the internal bleeding first. If you think this sounds justified, then you probably deserve the same treatment.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime You bringing a pocket knife is very different compared to someone bringing a leg. You bringing a pocket knife indicates you'd intentionally stab someone for gropping you. But if you think thesame for someone and their arms and legs, should everyone just cut it off whenever they're in public?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

@AvaOneLasTime The problem with your flawed comparison is you're comparing something that's purpose is to intentionally kill to something designed for something else. So you sure she's bringing her leg to intentionally kick his nuts?

[AvaOneLasTime]

He is bringing out the knife, for PROPORTIONATE damage. Because there is no other way to castrate a woman.
The fact you didn't like the example is entirely different story. But it IS a good example. Because we are still having a disproportionate force used.
When you kill someone with arms\legs or a knife, you still have murdered the person and you are still going to jail, unless it was justified self-defense or protecting family.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

I did explain how they are so different because an arms and a leg if you look for something else not just for killing. So there could still be a chance that it isn't done on purpose if that girl kicked him in the nuts I'm like using a knife to kill someone which is implied to be done intentionally. So you're talking about self defense here? But isn't the reason why she did it is because from self-defense? Because she was harassed?

[AvaOneLasTime]

You 'explained' but it just wasn't valid. When you hit someone, you are not supposed to maim or castrate the person, but you can do that, if you use excessive force, which you do, on intent. She wasn't in life threating situation, to have adrenaline pumping, in order to pull off that force. Mentioned she practiced Krav Maga, it seems she was taught how to damage the male groin, by some like-minded, wicked people, thinking its justifiable, as long as she is female.

That is why pretty much most countries are clear about unproportionate force or excessive force used on retaliation, during conflicts. Which seems is something, you have never read about.
The reason he also brought the knife example, is to create a bigger gap, in the retaliation force, which you were supposed to notice. However, you think its not justified to hurt a woman, BUT IT IS, if the person is underage boy. Gotcha.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Also another fact that you brought up a terrible comparison. You're comparing something that is done intentionally to something that could have been done unintentionally. Talking about killing someone with their bare hands like strangling, choking, punching and kicking repeatedly and more, those kind of act are done intentionally. One kick like that could just be a self defence and it is a much simpler thing to do than those act I talked about but only it him in the nuts. If someone will get in my way and intentionally block me and bullying me, I would push them aside if they don't listen but if he or she fell to the road and got hit by a car, then I wasn't meant to do that. Again different from killing someone purposely with a bare hands.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

I never said you are supposed to castrate someone but what I'm saying is it still could be unintentional and you cannot be so sure. After all again she did it out of self-defense and it could have been an accident.

[AvaOneLasTime]

Anyway, you are looking for right or wrong, and justice in a story, which seems to be fake. I have seen such story, with different variations and before. So the reason for arguing here is little to none.
The person who wrote this, registered and straight outta wrote the question, you can see the "First Question" mark/symbol up there in the left. Then the used has vanished.

[AvaOneLasTime]

You are just trying to excuse the girl, while ignoring laws, written long before your parents were born. And i am pretty sure the laws were written with more thought, than the one you have put there.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

If you say my explanation is invalid than your comparison isn't valid at all. You're comparing something that is done intentionally and purposely to something that is just a simple thing to do that could have been done accidentally. There's a big difference actually. She can hit him that's justifiable but I never said to castrate him purposely. Even the act of doing something that you are not supposed to do can leave you traumatized. A 9 year old killed a shooting trainer accidentally because she got a terrible aim. You think she was meant to do that? No she didn't she's going to remember is that she killed someone for almost the rest of her life. Yeah it maybe the instructor's fault for standing in front of her for the same reason its the harrasers fault for harrassing her.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

You're also trying to ignore the fact that people makes mistakes. You're also ignoring the fact that someone who killed someone accidentally can be have their case closed. That's what you should also take a look at

[AvaOneLasTime]

The force neccessary to castrate the boy has been huge. You are just playing stupid, hoping no one will notice. But we are two people reading your comments, and out of two, we both notice it.
Castrating someone with a leg or with a knife is just as intentional and leads to the same thing - the person is infertile. There is no significant difference between infertile male or female. They both can't have children.

If you say kicking someone so hard, with intent, leading to castration is accident, then simple stab, during self-defense is accident too. You try to defend the first example, then we will defend our example.
And from the story, the was doesn't seem to have been traumatised. She has been praised. For castrating another human being. If that's okay, i would gladly teach boys how to do the same to girls. You wanted equality? You will have one.

Many boys have been kicked there. Were all of them castrated? Cases like that are around 1% and always related with cruel intent from a woman. ALWAYS. She could have punched him or kicked him somewhere else. But the only thing she has done, was to kick him so hard, to castrate him.

Same with the case my boyfriend said, he could punch her, slap her. But the only thing he may do, is castrate her. Its justifiable to strike back, but retaliating with sheer force, enough to maim, cripple or castrate the other person, is way, way too much, when you are not in life or death situation. The boy wasn't hitting her, he was groping her. She wasn't hurt, he was castrated. Again - laws - which you like to ignore, in order to support your own argument.

But you can't use flat-earth theory as support to the "Earth is in center of Universe" theory. Not gonna be taken seriously.

[AvaOneLasTime]

And from the story, SHE* doesn't seem to have been traumatised.
Damned phone.

[AvaOneLasTime]

"You're also trying to ignore the fact that people makes mistakes."

No, this is what i said at the beginning, but you think i forgot. What the boy did was a mistake. What she did was a crime. I groped a boy once too. So i should have been castrated? How nice of you!

[Aiko_E_Lara]

The force may be for the testicle area because it is more sensitive in comparison but couldn't have really cause a lot of damage if she kicked him in the leg or me or anywhere else. And another thing would be not everybody has the same sensitivity of their testicles and chances are his testicles may be more sensitive compared to others. What is stupid is how you compared berserk acts over an act of self defence. What is also stupid is that you made an assumption that did it intentionally. You say she could have punch or kick him anywhere else, but that could also be her intention to kick him anywhere else not in the testicles. Again, you're also ignoring the fact that someone who harmed anyone accidentally can have their case closed. The law is not always one sided because if it is then that 9 year old kid would have been in prison right now. There are also many cases like that where it's not even only just the nine-year-old but an adult too such as running over someone accidentally when they just unpredictably cross the road proven by the dash cam.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

You're ignoring what I said something I did not make a mistake because it was in his intention to grop her and it would have been a mistake if it was. Bullying is also in that situation as well in case you forget. That wasn't a mistake because it is done on purpose and you're still talking about castrating someone purposely. She's not even bringing her own surgeon gears to have him castrated purposely. So how nice of you to assume.

[AvaOneLasTime]

I stopped reading straight at the beginning. Sensitivity has nothing to do with tissue durability.
Are you sure you know English well?

If you think another guys would not have lost his testicles, due excessive force with such malicious intent, then ask her to try on you.
As they say : "its easy to be biased, until it happens to you"

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then you should take your own advice. Along with your ad hominems and assumptions, it doesn't prove you anything either. If you cannot even read a single sentence then how do you expect anyone to read what you said? It doesn't even take a genius to read what I said. Nobody is saying they wouldn't lost their testicles due to an excessive force. However it's not guaranteed to be done on purpose because everybody has that instinctive defense mechanism to hit someone under pressure. It's not even stated that she purposely did that while you made an assumption she did.

And they say take your own advice

[AvaOneLasTime]

"This is from a terrifying case i read about in which a guy probably 17-18 years old groped and bullied a girl of the same age and the girl kicked him in his testicles so hard that he lost both his testicles
But as i dived deeper into the case i also came across the fact that the girl knew karv maga (a form of martial arts) and could have used many other methods to run away.
As the definition of self defence is " to use the bare minimum amount of force required to run away from attacker and not harm the attacker more than he/she intended to hurt you"
Infact using exxesive force in self defence is a punishable crime."

Have you read the question itself? :D :D :D

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Martial artist hit anyone anywhere not in the testicles. His testicles could just be in the way when she was supposed to hit him in the thighs. Have you ever analyzed things? And also you say you don't read anything but you're still replying, you sure you know what you're saying?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

A certified driver can still run through someone accidentally despite having a license but can still have their case closed. Another thing you failed to analyze.

[AvaOneLasTime]

My Boyfriend: then i will just aim for the intestines with the knife. The ovaries were just in the way. It can happen right? In 100% of cases, ovaries are where they are :D :D :D

[Aiko_E_Lara]

God: bringing up that terrible comparison again. If you like to compare bare hands or legs then everyone should cut it off when entering banks or airports.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

President of the world: you can up accidentally grab your knife and stab someone's intestines but you can accidentally kick someone's testicles with one hit.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

You can *not accidentally

[AvaOneLasTime]

Alright, you can damage the woman's ovaries during period or even kill her, with a hard knee, to the lower belly. You wanted better comparison, now you have it.

Now if such action, doesn't seem intended to you, i don't know what it does.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Well yeah anyone can do if she crosses the line but you cannot be so sure even they know she's on her period because it wouldn't have hurt in that much if she wasn't. But of course we all know the societal standards about guys hitting girls. While I justify the guy hitting her for hitting her for bullying and harassing him, I don't think it's easy for society to justify that guy

[AvaOneLasTime]

This was so wrong on so many levels. During period and knee to the lower belly, she won't die because of the pain alone, but ruptures and internal bleeding.

Also, you keep seeing men and women, but in the question, we have underage people. There is no MAN or WOMAN, while you are still a child. If you really think male children should be treated different than female children, then yeah... you are not ready to be a parent yet.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

* you cannot be so sure if they know she's on her period. If it was proven that it is intentional because she is on her period then thats a guaranteed act of muder. However, you never said he did it purposely, just like the original question never said she did it purposely. All it is said that she is a martial artist, but that doesn't prove her real intentions.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

What you're still doing you still like to imply if they did it purposely. Because again, none of it would wouldn't have really happen if they didn't harass. You wouldn't have been run over if you don't jaywalk unpredictablely. You wouldn't have been shot accidentally if you don't stand in front of a shooting range. Simple

[Aiko_E_Lara]

It's the same for you wouldn't have been kicked in the testicles/belly if you don't harass anyone. Especially on your period.

[AvaOneLasTime]

You force me back to my original comment = response to grope and harass should not be excessive force and castration. Yes, he deserved to be dealt with, but not this way.

On your same logic, we can't prove he didn't harass her = grope her accidentally. He might have touched her accidentally and she kicked him so hard, with the intent to damage him. There are always two side of a story, even if you pick up just one.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then you force me back to my original explanation about self defense. It wasn't also stated that it was done on purpose. Just like running over someone it's nothing done on purpose. I can also say it's his fault for not protecting his testicles just in case if she accidentally hit him there because he knows there's going to be a self-defense that could accidentally hit him in his weak area.

That's what I said how do you exactly know if that was her intention?

[AvaOneLasTime]

Therefore, she would not have been charged, if she didn't kick him, right? She might have been charged, or not. But this one was - www.reddit.com/.../
Did not play out well for her, didn't it?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

It says in the question he was bullying her. You cannot bully someone accidentally.

[AvaOneLasTime]

You don't castrate accidentally either. So it's her word versus his.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

There are two sides of the story really and because im not a proper witness, which is also why I'm not charging that guy for groping her. I am charging no one just in case you don't realize that I'm neutral in this situation.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Actually you can castrate anyone accidentally. If You Are Meant to hit him in the knee or in the thighs but you accidentally hit him in the testicles, that is an accidental castrate. Bullying is done on purpose. Explain how any one can bully someone accidentally?

[AvaOneLasTime]

"What she did was justifiable and enough."
"I am charging no one just in case you don't realize that I'm neutral in this situation."

Okay?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Yeah what she did was justifiable she just did was self-defense. However I'm not so sure if that was in her intention therefore I'm not charging her and also I am not charging the guy for gropping her because he already got his consequence. You still don't realize I'm not charging anyone in this situation. It doesn't take a genius

[Aiko_E_Lara]

I wasn't sure if it was in her intention *to castrate him.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

If you really say you can not castrate someone accidentally, why do accidental nutshots exist? What difference would it make if that was an accidental nut shot for just defending herself?

[Aiko_E_Lara]

https://youtu.be/-Th_SwhJIhU look at this they are professional fighters but are they really meant to castrate their opponent?

[AvaOneLasTime]

It doesn't take a genius to remember prevous comments -
" Bullying is done on purpose. Explain how any one can bully someone accidentally?"

"my original comment = response to grope and harass should not be excessive force and castration. Yes, he deserved to be dealt with, but not this way.

On your same logic, we can't prove he didn't harass her = grope her accidentally. He might have touched her accidentally and she kicked him so hard, with the intent to damage him. "

You can ask the question in 10 different ways, and you will still get the same response.

[AvaOneLasTime]

Organized fight and street conflict are two entirely different things, You can post as much as ball-busting videos as you like, but you will never change my opinion and you will never add credibility to yours.

You are discrediting yourself, by going to different route, just to excuse the girl, seeming like a white knight, while in the same time, disagreeing with a girl, again - demeaning yourself.

In MMA, this doesn't happen on purpose. Considering the case, she had done it on purpose.
You see purposeful harass from the boy and that is how you excuse that he was maimed for life, while ignoring established laws about unproportionate force used and child status.

I see purposefully damaging kick from the girl, because this is what she did, out of the dozen of options she had, despite knowing or not knowing about laws, doesn't matters, laws are still there.

disrespectful behavior (even if intended) does not equates to purposeful castration.
You can excuse her all day.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

It doesn't also take a genius to read how I debunked your explanation. About how you like to assume it was in her intention to castrate him. You're also forgetting the part that he had been bullying her and you cannot bully someone accidentally because its a subjective way to target someone. You can accidentally harassed anyone but bullying cannot be done accidentally and the fact that he is bullying her can imply with that the harassment is a part of it which he shouldn't have done.

Okay you can repeat that answer then I can repeat how I debunked your answer over 10 times

[AvaOneLasTime]

See above message. ignoring is not debunking, this is the stupidest thing i have read in 18 years of life.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then see my last reply. Ignoring explainations debunking your agenda is stupid

[AvaOneLasTime]

I couldn't have said to check up my response, if i haven;t saw your, could i? Are you digging up yourself deeper? You are doing great!

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then I could have said to analyze my response. If you cannot see it then it doesn't take a genius. You're proving some more of your ignorance and you're doing great

[AvaOneLasTime]

I have no agenda here, just talking about justice. You do, by covering up with - i am neutral, while your initial opinion starts very... NOT neutral.
Using strong words, doesn't contribute to your weak and invalid arguments. By the same logic i can say i debunked you 20 times (which i did, but hey) and thats it.

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then I'm talking about Justice here which you just like to interpret us not neutral. And I can also say you are so mean and just dodging things doesn't really contribute to your week argument. Is that a claim? because I've also debunk you like over 30 times which you just like to avoid because one time you said you just don't like to read anything which proves how you just like to stay ignorant of the situation

[AvaOneLasTime]

I will just leave this here -
https://imgur.com/a/POvqUlC

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Great you can show everyone how wrong you are. You can't blame me or anyone if your losing credibility

[patrick994]

@AvaOneLasTime Has the girl been punished? Do you know where the news can be read?

[Blackcupcake]

Sounds like a personal problem, gotta reap what you sow.

[Wise4myage]

When I was 6, I got kicked in the nuts so hard it gave me a hernia. But I didn't lose my balls.

[Larvonite]

Still thats bad you need a surgery to fix hernias
How did it happen anyway

[Wise4myage]

Some asshole kid just did it on purpose.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone happen to know how it turned out? Was the girl punished?

[Anonymous]

I would not judge her for kicking his balls in self defence. But she is a Krav Maga fighter and should be able to kick in such a way he doesn't loose his testicles presumably.

[KrakenAttackin]

She need to go to jail for felonious assault.

[katiesmuff]

Girl had every right to do what she did

[Larvonite]

Sexually assaulting someone and giving them organ damage is no ones right. Lady

[katiesmuff]

He fucking groped her and she has every right to kick him in his nuts. Now he will keep his creepy hands to himself

[Larvonite]

You girls are really incapable of thinking reversed gender same role

[Aiko_E_Lara]

Then in that case, should boys have the rights to do the same if a girl does that to him? Because it would be easy for you to say yes until society would've torture him for doing it.

[ThatNoUVAtYourEyes]

sounds like an urban myth to me

[Larvonite]

Accure. com is a website where you can read cases open to public but not all cases are posted with outcome, just the details
Go read for your self

[ThatNoUVAtYourEyes]

I don't have time - or maybe interest - in such things.
Humans are largely moronic - the variations of that are... probably better not known.

[Hallo626262]

Life in prison

[humanearth]

When did happen

[Iron_Man]

That’s a shame

[Larvonite]

Whats a shame?

[Anonymous]

Horrifying

[In_Trance]

gtfo troll