Taking notes. When I become a parent, need to level up my negotiation skill. Removing laptops and phones is a good way to prevent internet addiction for about one afternoon before a friend with a working laptop can be located. I may have to lock my children in the basement and chain them to a wall. Or explain that getting the vaccine is useless at 16, as it doesn't stop transmissions, only shortens the time during which you shed the virus. Or I could just accept my child has a useless and irrelevant vaccine that will provide possibly a year of fading protection against a disease that is not a threat to her in the first place. She could also change the color of her hair for about the same impact. Or I could go with her to the vaccine place to make sure the nurse knows to check for blood before injecting, since hitting blood vessels by accident is the main risk of complications. I will probably go with the chains though. Sounds like most fun. Mental note added: dont forget to install the chains before the first child grows an independent mind. They may have thoughts and that needs to be prevented early.
joke's crippled by the lingering belief in internet addiction by some. Lemme darken your satire a little bit. "Also, keep them as sheltered as possible from any knowledge of drugs" "NOTE: this may result in your child becoming a hopelessly addicted to opioids and potentially a 21 year old corpse."
That is not the right way for the parent to do it, you don't need the vaccine since your super young and have no decreased chance of dying of the disease and have an increased chance of severe side effects from the vaccine. We don't know if it makes you infertile but there have been reports of menstrual issues, the side effect rate and death rate of the vaccine is higher than all the other vaccines combined and in general it has no real benefits to you over these risks.
That is what your parent should have said, that your putting your future at risk by taking it for no real benefit to you because your immune system has no issues with this flu and anyone under 50 has a survival rate of 99,98% or higher.
If you still want to take it knowing that and you still think that its worth gambling your future then don't let the laptop deter you. But i would not take it if i were you.
Whether you tell your parents or not, just be prepared to handle a day of feeling weak after you get the vaccine. For example, if you have to do homework, then get it done before you get the vaccine because you wouldn't have the mood to do that. I would recommend getting the vaccine on a Friday or Saturday so that you could have the whole day for yourself to rest.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Don't get the vaccine & stay home. Some areas are mandating without vaccine proof you are not allowed int restaurants, gyms, small clothing / specialty stores, etc.
Get the vaccine & lose a laptop. Big whoop. You have a phone, right?
Anyone above the level of idiot can figure this out. Too bad you're an idiot.
You have a virtually zero chance of dying from covid. But the jab is designed to wreck your natural immune system.
The first shot destroys 25% of your ability to produce white blood cells. The second shot is more concentrated and removes another 50%. Your white blood cells are you main defense against infections. In addition the shots interfere with your body's electrical system. You brain and organs operate on electronic signals. That's a main reason why so many healthy young people are getting heart attacks.
The evidence is being cleverly concealed. But many thousands of people are dying as a result of the shots and many more thousands are suffering life-long injury.
The shot doesn't prevent you from contracting or transmitting the infection.
This thing isn't about protecting people. I urge you not to do it.
There an abundance of credible information from many of the world's top scientists, not to mention thousands of medical professionals. There is so much information that it would be difficult to pick one or two to prove a point. Besides, I find that those who are certain in their beliefs will disregard anything that isn't from a mainstream source. They don't realize that the mainstream is owned by a few multinational conglomerates who are unified in pushing one narrative and doing everything possible to censor all other information.
"As a scientist, it baffles me when people say things like 'trust the science.' Scientists are the most skeptical people on the planet, we absolutely would never "trust the science,' we doubt everything that our peers claim at every single step. Scientists don't trust other scientists so why the hell does everyone else? You shouldn't trust science, science isn't supposed to be based on trust."
Ah yes, Michael Yeadon, the disgraced scientific mind who has consistently been disproven. I do hope you have better resources that a guy who has lied about his own credentials or at best misrepresented them.
The post making the rounds on social media suggests that anyone who has already taken a COVID-19 vaccine might be doomed. It quotes Mike Yeadon, a man it identifies as the former chief scientist at Pfizer, warning that a small percentage of these folks will be dead within weeks and the rest will have an average life expectancy of two years. I’ll be honest. When I first saw the post, I thought it might be satire, a claim so absurd as to be beyond belief.
I had never heard of Yeadon, but a quick internet search revealed he was never the chief science officer at Pfizer. According to a fact check by Snopes. com, that job has been held by a man named Mikael Dolsten since 2010. Yeadon did work for Pfizer. He was vice president and chief scientific officer for Pfizer’s United Kingdom-based allergy and respiratory unit until that unit shut down in 2011. And just to be clear, the division had nothing to do with vaccines or infectious diseases. It was focused on developing drugs to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Snopes also took a look at Yeadon’s frequently cited pronouncements about the pandemic. All of them, it said, proved to be “alarmingly incorrect.”
Just saying, maybe take your medical advice from someone who doesn't have an axe to grind against a former employer or someone who doesn't stand to profit from alternative medicines like so many senators who bought up stock in companies who claimed to have cures just to send their sheep flocking to buy things and shove them into their bodies who actually did die from them.
@Ez-Bri-Z. It's hilarious that you would quote Snopes. And you'll spend time reading garbage by one of the main, corporate mainstream sources of propaganda, Reuters, but you only do that to find fuel to support your dogma. It's too bad that you refuse to spend as much energy doing actual research, you know, like a scientist.
Isn't it interesting that every single person who has information that doesn't support the desired narrative is slandered. It doesn't matter how expert they are, how many degrees they have, how qualified they are, how many eminent positions they have occupied, or how many awards they have received. If they challenge the official narrative, they WILL be banned, blocked, censored, mocked, slandered and threatened. Is that how science works? No. It's how propaganda works.
You don't even have any idea how much information is available. Yet you're certain that you know all there is to know. Why would you even think that? "The more you know, the more you realize you don't know." - Aristotle “The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.” - Einstein. “Sometimes we find ourselves walking through life blindfolded, and we try to deny that we're the ones who securely tied the knot.” - Jodi Picoult, Vanishing Acts
You did exactly what I expected of cultists like you. That's why, no matter how many of the hundreds of interviews or articles one shares, you people will do the work of the pharma censors. You act like proselytizing zealots, warning against heresy.
So... you basically just did what you said I would do which is immediately dismiss any source provided. Good to know you are a hypocrite as well as being incorrect and quoting a known liar as your scientific source, but you do you boo.
You talk about people who "have an ax to grind", yet you don't even ask the simple question "Who profits?" Is it those who have nothing to gain and everything to lose by sharing their evidence in an effort to save lives? Or is it those who profit from covid/vax narrative?
Go ahead and trust Gates, Fauci, government, and profit driven organizations the WHO, CDC, NIH, and AMA. They are completely infallible and trustworthy. LOL
Never, ever question. Do NOT use you own powers of reason to seek out all possible information and formulate your own opinions. Let your leaders do that for you.
Or I can just use my own experience and eyes. *shrug*
You like to play yourself as the educated wise man amongst the sheep, but honestly come off as the conspiracy theorist barking doomsday scenarios from a soapbox downtown. Ironically, this is how your source, Yeadon, also comes off when he talks about people having only 2 years to live if they get the vaccine.
@Ez-Bri-Z. You're "experience and eyes"? Flat Earthers do the same thing. Try actual research. Unfortunately you have swallowed the narrative hook, line and sinker without any thought or question.
You pick on Yeaton. I simply shared that one video because it was handy and covered a lot of ground. Fine. But you would do the same to ANYONE who questioned the official narrative. Why? Because, as I said, massive profits depend on lying to people. Tremendous efforts go into silencing any information that doesn't support the narrative.
Notice that all the hit pieces are by mainstream outlets. It's because there is desperation to maintain the official narrative, which has nothing to do with health or science.
Would you expect mainstream to publish hit pieces about Fauci, Gates, the WHO, CDC, NIH, or big pharma companies? Do you expect it to start publishing facts that contradict what it has been pushing for 20 months?
Just admit you are unable to accept the truth and let's move on. If the mass deaths he predicted from the vaccine were true then we would have already seen it. There isn't a mass conspiracy to discredit these guys, they are just simply wrong and have been disproven time and time again
Girl, 15, dies of Covid on day she was due to get vaccine [...] Preliminary results from the hospital’s medical examiner indicated Jorja had Covid myocarditis, heart inflammation caused by the virus. Halliday explained that Jorja had been booked to have a jab on Tuesday, but had tested positive the Saturday before. She had been planning to get the jab once the isolation period was over, but died on the day she had been scheduled to have the vaccine.
You should sit down and do a rational assessment of the situation. Remember rational assessments? They still exist; they've just become extremely unpopular in the past year and a half.
What the absolute fuck? Thats a hospital? It looks no bigger or better than the local ski lodge at whistler. Now i see why the NHS is in ruins compared to better healthcare systems. Also, 1. That laptop won't do you much good if your dead from covid and the negligence of antivaxxor parents. 2. Threatening to damage your belongings if you do something with your own body they dont approve of? Wow. Like i sincerely hope their not also abusuve cause thats a huge red flag, like you ok?
You might as well not get the vaccine since apparently it doesn’t even work and people can still catch COVID even after getting it. Plus, in most areas, vaccinated people still have to wear masks everywhere they go. I’d choose the laptop!
Doctors are saying that Those that vaccinated are spreading even more dangerous variants and many are dying from it… but their families can’t sue the medical companies that created it, a bit suspicious isn’t it?
Why would you be stupid enough to get injected with that poisonous vaccine that offers no protection when someone your age is under a near zero risk of death or severe illness from the virus? Typically, for someone your age the common cold is worse than the virus.
Sure, You can Get it and not Tell Them but if they See Side affects which there ARE----You won't get Far. For Now, Do as they Ask. I am Reading they are Coming out with a Great New Pill for This. Just mask it for the Time being. I am. xxoo
Is there a reason that your parents feel the way they do, other than just not trusting politicians or the vaccine? Do you know it's safe for you, not something your allergic to? I'm not telling you to or not to, just normally my parents would have a health reason to tell me not to do something like this. Would there be a way to get a doctor's advice if you feel strongly either way.
That's a tough one. Do you have a phone, or is the laptop your only means to going online? If the consequence of having the vaccine now means limited freedom, hold off. Get the vaccine when you're moved out in 2 years and can form your own independence.
Ultimately you have to make the right decision for you. I personally recommend getting vaccinated, especially if you're going to be dealing with a lot of people in school or are travelling. The facts are facts though; people your age aren't in much danger from this virus. Some schools have been mandating that students get vaccinated.
Dont get it. You can have a lot of other issues that people are having. Lupus, blood clots, reproductive harm, immune deficiency, to name a few people even die with the vax but no one is talking about it. Its not good. Its not even fda approved (only for emergencies) and when they did animal studys they all died of cardiac arrest. So its really not a good vax to take
Lubus can be caused as part of the auto immune deficiency. Sarcoidosis sounds likely but i know sars is definitely on the table and it not only attacks your lungs but your brain and reproductive organs
There are effective treatments against the virus aswell you just need the right doctor and there's thing you can take to prevent having a more severe case if you do get covid
Get vaccinated. If you're dead, you can't use your laptop anyway. BUT, you can say this: "Mom. Dad. I wanted to get vaccinated to protect you in case I got infected."
You could also go a step further with this approach and attempt to guilt trip them into joining you by asking if they dont care about you as much as you do them
have your doctor go over your medical history with you and see what they say. If they say it's safe and your parents are still acting that way and you want it then have the doctor talk to them?
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Don’t be a fool. There is absolutely no good reason for anyone under the age of 50 to take this vaccine. My parents aunt and uncle are all 60-75 age range and none of them have taken the vaxx and they are all fine. BETTER THAN FINE they are actually healthy people who care about real health and undestand that a fucking shot isn’t gunna save you from your bad habits
@litty yeah, but did they die from covid, or with it? Hard to even find that out given what’s going on. People under 30 are at way higher risk of harsh reactions from the vaxx than from covid
Tell me, what percentage of under 30 yr olds have died FROM not with, but FROM covid?
I think it’s healthy to smoke, because my grandfather smoked and lived to be 100!!! All those fear mongers against smoking are secret commies wanting to destroy our great tobacco industry!!!
Get vaccinated but don't tell them. As the people on that side say, it's your right to choose... your body, your freedoms and all that. It works both ways.
