Yes and no, I am against gay marriage because marriage has been a state rights, that the feds now have taken over since the SCOTUS ruled it legal. Thus it is no longer a state right, if a state wanted to make it legal, I'm okay with that.
That is, IF the government needs to be involved, it should fall under the 10th amendment for state rights.
That said, I'm actually against marriage being between people and the government. Having a three way relationship is bad. Historically, marriage did not need legal recognition from the government. There is ways to do the same thing without that could be done easier.
Legal benefits, without government involvement, and let religions or culture or whatever decide to allow gay marriage or not.
If your religion won't allow it, find one that does... problem solved.
I personally think that poly relationships should be allowed to, any kind... and the government is also interfering with that. If a woman wants to be married to another woman and a man at the same time and each of them married to the others, why not?
I'm fairly liberal on marriage, but people see that I'm against gay marriage and form opinions without understanding why.
Let anyone do whatever they want, and have non marriage easy legal ways to do so.
Most Helpful Opinions
I really don't care what conscenting people do for love and what they do behind closed doors.
That said, I am tired of gay going mainstream. Making it popular didn't seem like a bad idea, until I heard my daughter say her entire Freshman English class was either gay, bi or trans. That's a trend, and not normal.
Back in the day, gays and queer folks had their place. Now they want to open up and popularize the lifestyle. And I mean if you're truly gay, I understand. But the world cannot be entirely gay.
It's so bad now, there is a practically war on straight and cis. Especially with the younger generations. This is not healthy. This is not a society sustaining. This is a society sold on lust and sex. Instant gratification. Perversion, low character, weird fetishes and now pedophilia. Every five or so years it just keeps getting worse.
Studying Native Americans and the First Nations, I can see why they split the differnt people up. Effectively segregating the drunks and high people on one side of the camp that was miles away. Then another place for the two spirits. Another place for the mentals. Then a place for families. And a place to train warriors and post lookouts. If the tribe was ever attacked, they could come together as one. But on a daily basis, they didn't break bread together.
You can tell people are all ready begin to tribe up these days. It's getting to where the blue states are going pure blue and the red states are going ever so red, with things like making abortion illegal and consitutional carry becoming normal.
Now all the rage is to chase off all the drag queens doing shows for families. This is utterly weird, and more of a reason to push people to places they belong.
Oh course. I will let retired Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court Anthony Kennedy describe marriage in his Opinion of the Court for the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the case decided in June 2015 which allowed same-sex marriage throughout the US.
======
www.supremecourt.gov/.../14-556_3204.pdf
No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.
It is so ordered.
The very definition of the term "marriage" has always been a union of one man and one woman. Calling two men or two women who decide to live together "married", is like calling a tractor a tank, or a bicycle a motorbike; it makes no sense, because it isn't what people are calling it.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
71Opinion
In my ideal world, marriage is only between a man and a woman. I'm perfectly okay with same-sex partnerships, but I really don't like it being called marriage.
I neither support nor withdraw support for gay people to have a union in a certified form. How others live is not for me to manage unless they are family or best friends.
I don't care what consenting gays do with each other, but it's not a marriage. A marriage is a specific type of relationship established with the intent of starting a family through procreation, and that detail is not unique to just a handful of cultures or religions; it is universal. That is not physically possible to do, so the only way for say a gay man to be married is to marry a woman, which for what it's worth, is exactly what plausibly gay monarchs in history did.
In regards to the government, they shouldn't be involved outside of encouraging the creation of strong families. Western governments have largely done the opposite however, and are actively trying to undermine the family unit through actual policies and propaganda.
I support civil unions for gays for tax breaks, I don’t support calling a civil union marriage. Marriage has its definition which is a union between a man and a women with the interest of barring and raising children. That is the definition and purpose of marriage. Even older folk who can’t have children together there marriage is meaningless. A marriage between an 80 year old man and a 18 year old serves there more of a purpose then a 60 man and a 50 year old women. Doesn’t mean they shouldn’t get the tax breaks or there love is less valid then younger couples. The marriage itself is less valuable. This is why I settled on the idea of civil unions. Gay marriage isn’t marriage gays can’t get pregnant naturally so it’s not conducive of the definition of marriage. So just call it a civil union.
Yes.
To put it bluntly, marriage is fake made up nonsense and it doesn’t matter who decides to participate in it as long as it makes them happy.
I would support your right to marry a toaster if that’s what you wanted in life.
Not my life, not my toaster, not my problem.i do support the right for gay people to promise themself life long loyalty and live whatever life they want to live together in accordance with the law. though i do not support the use of the word "marriage" for the unification of 2 men or 2 women. i'm not opposed to it conceptually but we need a different word for it.
because marriage means the unification of 2 different things. like for example if a car frame is combined with it's motor, we call that marriage. what would be the point in "marrying" a motor with another motor or a frame with another frame? that's not a marriage. that's a combination of sorts but not a marriage. also marriage between humans was always conceptualized as an institution to protect young families. are gay people gonna have children? no. so i do think it would be best to call that differently consequently.
i do think that we could make exceptions for gay couples who're adopting childen tho.
The short and simple version in my mind is this - marriage in the USA is a legal contract, not necessarily a spiritual one, which is a private matter. For that reason alone, I agree with abc3643, that it falls under discrimination laws and not what your religious gut tells you. Marriage has tax benefits for the individuals, but also has serious financial consequences if you divorce (so can co-habitation). The states are in the game because it's big business, and they're not getting out of it anytime soon.
Fu*k yeah I do! LGBTQ+ members pay taxes, can go to prison, can buy a house, a car, get murdered just like cis gender and straight people can why should they be deemed special and denied the misfortune of marrying whoever the hell the choose to?🏳️🌈💍
I don't support gay marriage if that what you asking, even though I am a secular person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#Same-sex_marriage_around_the_world
Yes, I do.
However - if a certain religion or sect or group forbids it, we should not force them to change their ways just to accommodate people who are seeking to get married - with the exception of the government.
The government should legalize same-sex union, since it's not just marriage, there are also some benefits attached to it. Usually taxes, inheritance, medical coverage and so on. And the government should work to make everything as equal as possible.
Yes. As far as I'm concerned, people of legal age can love or marry anyone they want. It's none of my business.
There are legal benefits to marriage, such as financial, next of kin notifications and visitation rights, inheritance, etc. Same sex partners should not be denied those benefits.Sure. Let everybody be miserable and married!!! But this is long overdue.
People love who they love. It's hardwired. Nobody CHOOSES to be different from the mainstream. They just end up that way! So acceptance is due.
You don't have to like gay, transgender or bi people or their marriages, but you have to accept people as they are and hope they find love and happiness!
Yes, they’re not hurting anyone, anyone should be able to do whatever they like as long as they don’t hurt anybody, if 2 men/women love each other then why can’t they marry?
People being gay bi or trans has nothing to do with anyone only the gay, bi, trans people, why should other people get a say in other peoples lives?
If I wanted to marry a man then that’s my choice same as if I wanted to marry a woman it has nothing to do with anyone only me and my partner.yes. I think it's an issue of individual freedom.
I could be talked into it being... like clinton suggested... a different word. I think that makes sense since only male/female reproduce, but like/like can raise kids and don't want to diminish those kids.
I'm generally against the idea that the Government should dictate who can get married. It's really none of their business what two people agree to do. Marriage has been a cultural or religious ceremony. That's where it should stay. Culture and religion can set the rules.
I'm going with 'as much as they support me'
Never had a general problem with - but with a few persons (who might be LGBT+) I did - even for them - as long as they support (and enable/help) my relationship and marriage pursuit - I support theirs.
I'd rather have my girl date a gay/bi girl or transgender than any risk of her getting pregnant by another male.
Heck no, it is one of the most repulsive things on earth. And they even force us to watch f@gs kissing in commercials nowadays. The majority 90+% is appalled by all this disgusting shit forced down our throats nowadays. No normal sane society should accept that crap.
I don't understand how this is even a question thay is still brought up in the 21st century! Why shouldn't LGBT have the same rights as non LGBT? You are who you are and you can't help who you fall in love with. The lack of empathy and need to cast sin on a proud population of people is toxic yet so predicable and cunning in modern society. 🏳️🌈❤️
I do 😄 The reason people have an issue with gay couples is that they can’t reproduce. But, who the hell cares? We don’t need more humans on this shit hole planet. If literally everyone was straight, the planet would be overpopulated than it already is.
What 2 consenting adults do in the bedroom is their business.
BUT religious and personal liberty is a two way street. The government shouldn't be used to compel others to provide services for something they don't agree with
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!