Since married women can f**k the best, in the best interest of their children should they select the best available genes for their eggs?

[Kelley1]

The best produce the best

There are exceptions so nothing is guaranteed but anyone who has followed college sports is aware that a high percent of scholarship athletes have parents that were elite athletes. What applies for athletes also applies for intelligence and good looks.

[lightbulb27]

of course they should.

if mate with say... lance armstrong, going to get exceptional cardio capacity.

But then again, you get his emotional development issues related to his father, which means... difficult to be around and leaves and finds other women.

but then again, has $. So there's tradeoffs.

It's not easy being a woman is it... since there are various criteria to consider and the choices are all yours.

At some point... the clock becomes determinant and you select what you can amoungst what is available... sometimes... aggressively.

As some wise woman said..."each to her own, get out there and find mate... lest soon... you will surely die".

[molonski2]

I think for the most part they do , but its how you select the genes , as many things can contribute to the outcome , including the mix , they should be aware of all that , but also providing..

But Yes , sure they certainly should do that.

[Kelley1]

During the 3 million-year-long Stone Age, women would mate with a dependable and good provider then when ovulating would have sneaky sex with the Alpha male. Since even a 1% advantage per generation of producing surviving children that in turn produce surviving children over only a thousand generations is a 1.01^1000 (21,000) to 1 advantage, women who did not do that are not our ancestors. Since the advantage over 1000 generations (25,000) years is that great, imagine how great the advantage is over the more than 100,000 generations of the Stone Age.

[molonski2]

What happened in the most part was the Alpha would mate with at least 5 women , never ever just one , ovulation used to change to coincide with the return of the best hunter provider which was the Alpha or closest there too , we would never achieved what we have as a species had the ludicrous idea of monosomy existed..
Women were often simply raped , pulled , bashed on occasion , all positions existed for a reason , just as it is still with monkeys and Apes..
But , all occurred for a reason , as no one lived too long , if Alpha got one or two extra years okey , but often he was also killed in battle , life expectancy was low.

[Summeroflove]

Well if you’re a Christian you should know cheating on a spouse is a sin and it is extremely destructive to both persons. I will say marrying someone is a huge decision that you can make don’t waste someone’s time that you’re not genuinely attracted to let them find someone who genuinely wants them.

I will say that it generally goes both ways where men who have super good genes marry women who also do so I see these women sitting around crying that they cannot find a real man but you look at these women and… You can tell why they are frustrated.

Another major thing about physical strength is how much time someone chooses to spend in activities such as going to the gym, eating right, and the list goes on. So part of that is definitely a personal choice.

But marriage shouldn’t just be about how someone is born it should be about loving someone for who they genuinely are. Many people get into relationships that aren’t built on anything genuine or of any value. It’s built on superficial unrealistic demands, transactional, or worse then transactional one sided.

Most relationships fail because of simply the fact there is no genuine love. I feel bad for the kids someone can argue that two people picked one another children cannot help they are born into broken homes.

So make sure you’re building a relationship based on a genuine love, connection, bond, etc. Not just how good someone looks among other things like that or you might deserve what you get.

[Finchie40]

That’s kind of silly if you really think about it. Just because someone is attractive, it doesn’t mean they are going to make beautiful attractive babies , I know ugly peoples that made beautiful babies , and I know attractive people that made ugly babies. So that’s silly to think that way.

[Avicenna]

The outcomes won't be good if there isn't an intact family unit because she cheated on her husband and got knocked up by some other guy (who, by the way, isn't perfect) causing him to leave her.

The best strategy is for her to find someone compatible who actually has a better chance of sticking around and actually raise the kids he fathers.

[AviatorTom]

Without consciously realizing it, most women select attractiveness for just that reason, it's embedded in their basic biology.

Most men, by the way, do a similar thing, without thinking about it.

[blueonblack22]

There is a lot more then just good looks and athleticism that goes into genetic makeup. This includes (but is not limited to).

• Different forms of intelligence: are you book smart, creative, emotionally intelligent, etc?
• Are you prone or resistant to different forms of mental health issues (depression, ADHD, etc.).
• Are you prone medical conditions that lead to higher morbidity rates (heart issues, obesity, high blood pressure, etc).
• Are they introverted or extroverted? Nothing wrong with being introverted but some people are genetically more pre-disposed to social anxiety then others.

Now obviously if you are lucky to win the “genetic” lottery there are some benefits that impact things. But it’s no guarantee you will inherit your parents positive genetic attributes and/or dodge the negative ones. And even if you inherit positive attributes it’s only on the surface. There can be other major drawbacks that aren’t visible.

I will give a perfect example: Luigi Mangonie (United Healthcare CEO murderer). He was seemingly perfect when he was younger. Very intelligent and attractive. He was reputed to have a good personality as well.

But he had two major drawbacks. First was his spinal condition. While anybody is prone to freak accidents his spinal column might of been fragile then others which can be genetically influenced.

But his second major drawback was definitely his mental instability. How people react to life catastrophe’s (e. g. spinal injury) is obviously impacted by their environment but also their preset cognitive patterns can impact that as well.

Luigi wasn’t able to cope with effectively with his ailment. People usually get (understandably) depressed when they experience challenges like this but how often do they go full psycho and harm others? Despite his affluent supportive environment he decided to get violent. He was genetically pre-disposed to that.

[Surely]

I would think that your athletic abilities could be a product of your surroundings. If the parents were into physical activities. Then their offspring would be encouraged to participate also. Probably intelligence also. When parents or someone spends time and interact with their children while going up. They will have a head start on the ones dropped off at a babysitter. I have met people that would have a hard time tying their shoes. Unless they had a semester in shoe tying.
Don’t forget those recessive genes that can rear their ugly heads from time to time. Creating a child that can not do for themselves. I am sure we all have them.
Who is more important in society. The high school dropouts that can fix your BMW. Or the valedictorian that can’t change a flat tire? Both have their place in the world!

[SeriouslyNotSerious]

Elite athletes got athlete children 'cause they train them while they're young. Being athletic and skilled in sports is not solely a genetic trait. Most of the time, you get trained young and grow up mastering that skill. No one is automatically born with skills without proper training first.

[Stevepro68]

Wow since we only express about 1\8 of our closest relatives genome they would have to have some extraordinary super powers when they get married. My ex wife only developed the skills to make me miserable.

[WhitneySnow]

I guess it’s a good idea to marry a guy with good genes if you’re concerned about the genetics of your future children. I never really thought about it that much.

[AmeerX]

🤔you again. First men don't get that chance and neither do most women. Because if they both think of best genes they will never decide on the best.

And your questions are getting weirder and weirder lol 😂

[AmeerX]

Doesn't really matter if he is a guy or girl. This is ridiculous

[PrettyCrumblBb]

True

[Loki97]

I see nothing wrong with it, biology tends to state it’s natural for women to seek out the best mates for them however sometimes settling is the only option survival of the fit isn’t and all that.

[XXTruthfulOgrexx]

Then they should marry the person they intend to have those children with.

[LaurenM1997]

I would never have sex with my best friend or my partners best friend it’s not girl code at all

[Jakefromstatefarm6]

Gene pools, are random AF, you guarantee beauty, athletics, intelligence. The athletic parents probably just raised the kids in an athletic home.

[exitseven]

Hitler started this sort of stuff a long time ago. He wanted to create the master race.

[beefcakebradybatson]

As in a GQ cover boy handsome black man with a 160+ IQ, though at 71, I'm WAY TOO OLD to be a father !!!

[ehatsham_hussain]

Hmm your thoughts are sensable..
And facts..
Might be possible

[Rockey_the_bicker]

Hmmmm great research 👍
You must be scientist lol 😅

[msc545]

You need to take a course in genetics. Things do not work as you seem to think they do...

[Kelley1]

They work exactly as I think. Of course, there is variability, but on average, the best produces the best. They always have and always will. You believe in political correctness, notwithstanding.

[Pete671]

Perhaps they already do?

[Ironco]

Holy shit, is this post sexist.

[eagle1951]

who filled your head with this bull

[DrPepper12]

Um yes?

[DtMe89]

Are you nuts?

[ContactLight]

Nope

[QuietRunner]

yes I agree