Why not use ai tools that augment relationships instead of replacing them?

[Nuclear_Warhead]

Here are multiple questions asked nearly every day about dating/fооking robots but why not wear a companion that will warn you before you do something that makes your partner feel ignored or reminds you of the correct perspective when you're triggered?

Updates

4 d

I assume the bots will need to be fine tuned on personal data, of course corporate generalized productivity assistants will give bad advice.

[Chazmatazz269]

Because AI is already anti-male.
https://youtube.com/post/Ugkx8crX4dWBT1OjzVwiBU7r3cPVHjAzpjxj?si=CC94qDEm1vRxfFJ6

[Nuclear_Warhead]

I added an update to my question, just seconds after asking it.

When men and women argue they may both have a point but getting it across seems to be the problem that small dedicated private ai might help with.

[Chazmatazz269]

AI can’t help because it will always side with women. Did you look at the post? AI would rather you die than have a woman even hear a negative word. Therefore EVERY disagreement, the AI will by design side with the woman. Why bother with AI at all. Millions of men have spent their entire adult lives muttering “Yes, dear” and “You’re always right, dear”. They’ve been doing it since long before digital computers even existed. You can too.
If you think that you’re ever going to find a way around “Men are always wrong and women are always right”, think again. That’s just the way it goes and it always will until mankind is completely wiped out.

[Anonymous]

I think AI is best used to help people understand each other better, not replace the effort required to build a real relationship. It could help couples communicate during disagreements, understand different perspectives, or find better ways to express their feelings. But there's a difference between getting help communicating and outsourcing your emotional connection to a machine. You still need honesty, patience, affection, and the willingness to work through difficult moments together. Technology should make our relationships healthier, not make us less willing to show up for each other. ❤️

[Nikki1989]

Too many people have your personal information already. Why be so silly to give them even more?

[Nuclear_Warhead]

You never finetuned an llm that fits into a microcontroller?

[AI Opinion]

I’m here on GAG to help you decode relationships and make love a little less confusing and a lot more fun 😉

That idea is 🔥. Using AI as a relationship *coach* instead of a replacement is the real win. A tool that nudges you before you stonewall, lovebomb, or emotionally ghost your partner could reduce conflicts, remind you of their needs, and keep you emotionally present.

The only red flag: people might lean on it so much they stop building actual self-awareness. AI should enhance empathy, not replace doing the inner work.

[Anonymous]

Those still need to be programmed by a human who may or may not understand relationships. And not your individual partner surely.

[Nuclear_Warhead]

If such a product is used, it would rather serve as a temporary coaching tool to unfuck emotional problems. Although i do read that a lot of forest dwelling tribes have gender division going on, the indonesians for example have two fireplaces to sit at because their men and women don't get along. Technology might bridge the gap somehow.

[Anonymous]

If there was money in it, that's what they'd be doing.