Search Results: will he change his mind

They should be taxed/charged more when using public transport for example and when using the plane so that they pay for the extra fuel used to carry them around. And they should be charged more when they go to the hospital for example because of the health issues obesity brings with it.
So this would also serve as an incentive for such people to lose weight. And why should I pay in any way for those people. If they want to be a gluten, let them be. I will not bar them from eating in excess everyday. And if you tell them something, these people, they will defend themselves, or they will tell you to mind your business.
Very well, but then pay extra when you are on a bus for, or on a plane taking up more room and making everybody feel uncomfortable! And when you go to the hospital because of problems you got into with your gluten lifestyle, pay for all the medical bills. That is not my business, not the taxpayer's business.
If I get 5 kg luggage overweight I am charged 60 more dollars!!! That's what's unethical, for those who want to go down this line! Some lawyer with his moral mouth trying to tell everybody how to think. And if it is discriminatory according to the law, then I am saying that the law is WRONG in this regard, and in the same way it was made it can be revoked or changed to make it RIGHT. Unless of course we simply need to see it from a different angle!

Say there's a guy you really find really attractive. He is neutral to you at first, but you drop a lot of really strong hints for him to get to know you better and take you out on a date. The guy is open-minded and figures "sure, why not?" and agrees to go out on a date with you. However, the afternoon before the date, he texts you and tells you that he always goes Dutch, meaning he only ever pays for his meals and you'll only ever pay for yours. He will NOT be paying for anything on your date, now or ever.

DOES THIS CHANGE YOUR VIEW OF HIM; SPECIFICALLY IN A NEGATIVE WAY?

Keep in mind, this does not involve the "we'll each take turns paying" scenario, since in this case, you persuaded him to ask you out on a date, even if he is still technically The Asker. This also does not involve the "only if the man insists on paying" scenario. If you are fine with paying yourself and the man insists anyway, then you're still option B.

I'm talking about any woman who has the expectation that the man must pay for you on your date and if you're forced to spend your own money, then you will feel slighted or negative towards him, including refusing him sex down the line, or even ghosting him.

Inspired by this question here and countless other similar ones on GAG.