Search Results: hard to get

Even before I took the red pill, I noticed something: women seem drawn to chaos. They ridicule men who value peace by calling them:

• Boring
• Selfish
• Lame
• And more...

It’s not hard to figure out — if you value your peace, then finding a partner who feels the same should be a win. But instead, we’ve got the vast majority of women acting like peace is something shameful. Like calm is a disease. If you mock people for wanting peace, then let’s call it what it is: you don’t value peace. You thrive in chaos.

This isn’t new for me. Middle school was when I first noticed how manipulative girls could be. High school only proved the point. Most of the fights I saw? Girls. And I’d skip lunch some days just to avoid sitting near girls who spent the whole time gossiping, scheming, and planning drama like it was a group project.

That’s when I accepted it: peace doesn’t exist in a woman’s world. If she’s not starting chaos, she’s stuck in the middle of it. And the kicker? She’ll act like it just “happened” to her — like she’s the victim, not the one lighting the fuse.

It’s not about avoiding conflict — it’s about needing it. Needing the attention, the validation, the spotlight. That’s the real addiction.

I believe we are on the verge of an extremely dangerous totalitarian big-tech oligarchy.

By the end of this year, AI advancements are projected to be so good they will replace mid-level software engineers. Whatever can be automated will be automated.

Here are some concerns:

1. Societal value as an individual for most will likely level out or decrease, and opportunities to gain higher or unique statusus among peers will fade.
2. Many who thrive on possessing a distinguishable hard skillset will be impacted
3. Societal value as an individual will grow based upon soft skills, socioemotional skills, and roles that rely on such. Those with deficits in these may struggle to find their niche and footing among those who possess these traits.
4. Human resources may still be needed, but may be more valued collectively than individually
5. The gap will widen between the elite and everyone else, paving the way towards oligarchy
6. Negotiating power as an individual will decrease, and individual employees will be much more disposable.

AI entrepreneurs have spoken about universal income, but these are handouts that we will be reliant on, thus giving more power to the hands that feed us. Imagine if we strayed from their rules? Could this income be reduced or eliminated? Is there a likelihood we will have some social credit system?

If you thought this was bad, it gets nightmarishly WORSE! We also have nanotechnology advancements. Coupled with AI, this becomes much more dangerous. Imagine AI controlled nanobots being released into our water supply and we consume them. Could this open doors for technological terrorism? If we were to displease our rulers, could they decide to end our lives with a click of a button?