Well this myTake is the number one of the series of takes "bullshits feminists say" I probably post. These posts won't be well organized articles it's just me speaking my mind. There can be insults, most probably there won't be organized headlines and etc. and they are just for fun.
I will just first answer a question here fast so let's begin.
Why do males tend to not believe in marriage anymore?
Simple.
The working class male is under pressure. Feminists supported by their middle and upper class masters and supporters who through history had more privilege than the working male are creating continuous gender wars keeping the society in a state of war and in that state of chaos when the two sexes are separated and going their own way while they obviously naturally need each other and get forced by their nature to retreat back together time to time in their lives, they win the laws concerning relationships and especially marriage in their favour and take the high ground in there. So being in a chaotic society and men seeing their place they reject it. And this is affecting first and foremost the working class that are a major number of the people in the society.
The lower class problems or "women's" problems?
Now, the lower class always had these problems concerning marriage.
- Domestic abuse
- Rape inside the family
- The majority of the rape victims
- Rape pregnancies
- Abortion
- Irresponsible fathers or mothers
- Single mothers without financial or family support
- etc.
In fact, what feminists work on and accuse all the men to them and used/use as their "evidence" to win the laws in their own favour happened mostly between the lower class families and then the poorer side of the working class.
It wasn't "women's" problem at all, but it was a series of problems concerning BOTH men and women of the lower and a part of working classes. And as it came to upper classes of the society these issues became less and less. The female of the upper class was extremely privileged and supported.
And don't forget, the feminists were upper class and middle class educated women 200-150 years ago when the majority of the males of the society were illiterate or badly educated. Annestine Beyer, Eleanor Butler, Dorothea Erxleben, Jane fucking Addams, Sophie Adlersparre, Alfhild Agrell, Jules fucking Allix the original male socialist feminist, Ellen Anckarsvärd, Elizabeth Anderson, Hubertine Auclert, Edith Archibald, Alice Constance Austin the socialist. should I say more? These women were rich educated feminists and some of them are just recognized as "early feminists" by feminists because they had some education in an era when women didn't have education in general. and they were educated and had their places and privileges when the working class male was still illiterate and broken under the society. And these women had nothing better to do but to support other women. obviously because like the feminists of today they couldn't see the society as a whole and work in everybody's favour instead of just for one side.
And unsurprisingly those problems still exist and are still happening between the lower class after feminists won those legal advantages and it will always happen because their problem is not rooted in their "sexism" or "patriarchy" they aren't even able to create the patriarchal structure in its best shape their problems are rooted primarily in their economical state and then in many other cultural and individual issues.
Winning these laws aren't improving the life of the majority of the lower class women but it is making it even worse for many of them.
Now what are these feminists doing? by winning these legal advantages and then the social/cultural pressure and accusations and pressuring men they are unnaturally bringing the issues between men and women that mostly happened between the lower class people in a natural way as a result of their place in the society, to the working class and the middle class and even to some extent to upper classes. upper classes are more or less immune because of their financial power. But it affects the working class most because they are simply the closest to the lower class.
How does it work? by accusing men, brainwashing girls into believing in nonsenses like the rape culture, like "women need men like fish need bicycle" demonizing the system of the family and making women almost unconsciously militant against men they make the society chaotic and like I said a field of competition and a power struggle between men and women instead of a peaceful united body that works and lives in harmony.
And then in that chaos (that always existed between the lower class) they apply the accusations and cultural/social pressure (that again existed between parts of the society) and turn not just the legal advantages in their favour but take a social/cultural/political high ground and use it to force their ideas to the society more and more.
So when they win those advantages they simply get to rule in that chaos. But also as a result the society and the state of men and women and their relationship will have the looks of what 200 years ago you would only see between the lower classes.
- chaotic families
- poor emotional support
- and abusive materialistic behaviour everywhere.
These are almost relevant in our today society.
The society and the people of today have the opportunities that only the upper class had 100 years ago, and in everything else has everything that only the lower class had 100 years ago.
Only that the law now is there and keeps some people from tearing each other apart. Or Men and women scared of getting into problems concerning relationship and marriage are getting more and more separated and have to choose a single life in which they work and live and sometimes come together for mere sexual satisfaction.
It's not an advance it's a degeneration. It is the greatest degeneration that could ever happen to our society. and the cause is greatly the late first wave feminism, the second wave feminism, and the third wave of feminism.
Women could work and still live in harmony with men. women could be educated and still live in harmony. How? if there was only equal platforms in the society and a rational approach to every other issue instead of what happened and done in the last 50 years.
And that's it. This is feminism for you.
#AntiFeminismForYourEntertainment
Most Helpful Opinions