Delineating Humans And Apes (Page 2)

[TacocaT6969]

Was that a question or a statement?

[Ad_Quid_Orator]

A statement (which is why it's a my-take).

[ladsin]

@Ad_Quid_Orator thanks

[Deathraider]

Yas! Good.

[ladsin]

Fast reader I see.

[goaded]

Firefox's reader view estimates 3-4 minues. :)

[ladsin]

@goaded shockingly fast I admit

[humanearth]

I would say human first then ape

[ladsin]

Hmm?

[Anonymous]

>I wrote a rather long response which I’m decently proud of and don’t want to waste
>Has a political compass avatar

The cringe is enough to kill any interest to take you seriously from this point.

[ladsin]

>Goes anony
> finds joy in ridiculing people’s interests.

Garbage human

[Opinion Owner]

Where in the world are you being ridiculed? Way to play the victim card for a libertarianesque moron who's gonna preach later about personal responsibilities.

Learn to properly write in your language as well.

[ladsin]

Saying it’s cringe-y to demonstrate interest in science certainly seems to be a form of ridicule.

Also if you want to critique my grammar in the comment section of an online forum you’re welcome to. It’s just not an interesting use of my time.

What my political beliefs has to do with science is rather unbeknownst to me, but you can explain if you’d like.

[Opinion Owner]

I can see you haven't even self improved your comprehension skills to realize I said what is cringesome is your self-flattering narrative, retard.

Educated people won't take your content seriously with this poor grammar. You're harming your own purpose, you can decide between feeling the personal butthurt or helping yourself minding about the format as much as the content.

You're not being consequent between any libertarianesque mindset with your self indulgent, merit-devoid essay.

[ladsin]

Lol you know what they say about those who live in glass houses?

I didn’t say anything self-flattering here dumbass. Being proud of something isn’t flattering. I’m proud that I’m not a meth addict. Hardly self aggrandazing or flattering.

“or helping yourself minding about the format”- “You're not being consequent” fucking dumbass. A true grammar Nazi who forgets to make sense when speaking 😂

Alas, this isn’t going anywhere. Have a nice day bud.

[Opinion Owner]

I'm not the one full of myself, try again.

You might be an autistic clueless idiot, but it actually is retarded you go to the point of directly stating it. Unwarranted self-validation is cringe.

[Secretgardenblood]

Good take

[Joker_]

I agree

[needadvice1245]

Adam and eve.

[ladsin]

*Lilith

[needadvice1245]

Wtf does that mean and I take it your a science nerd

[ladsin]

So Genesis has two creation accounts of woman. The first in Genesis 1:27 and the second in Genesis 2:22. In the first woman is made at the same time as man, but in the second Adam is knocked out and a rib is taken from him to make Eve. The Genesis Rabbah and Alphabet of Ben Sira claims the first woman was Lilith. Ben Sira, Midrash Abkir, Zohar and Kabbalistic traditions hold that Lilith being made at the same time and of the same dust refused to be subservient to man and thus due to her disobedience was cast out of the garden. She later was believed to have come back as the serpent which tempted Eve, is the cause of nocturnal emissions, was the mother of demons, etc. it’s also believed that she’s the woman being referenced in the Christian Bible’s Proverbs 2 “16 Wisdom will save you also from the adulterous woman, from the wayward woman with her seductive words, 17 who has left the partner of her youth and ignored the covenant she made before God. 18 Surely her house leads down to death and her paths to the spirits of the dead. 19 None who go to her return or attain the paths of life.” There are a few other references to her, but that sums up most of it.

[monkeynutts]

Yeah I'm a real ape.

[ladsin]

I can tell from the pic.