Nah, I think 16 is a fine age of consent. It's our age of consent here in the UK... Here, kids can get sex ed from the age of 10 and from the age of 11, it's compulsory, that's up until 16 years old. So yeah, minimum of five years of learning about protection and diseases and stuff like that, I think that at 16, they're equipped to know how to keep themselves safe. I mean, after five years of learning about it, if you haven't gotten it by that point, you're probably never gonna gt it :P I dunno, I just felt totally prepared to have sex at that age and I don't think that waiting a couple of extra years would have changed anything for me, like I haven't really matured all that much from 16 to 21, I think I did all my maturing from 11 to 15 :P
Most Helpful Opinions
It's definitely an interesting subject. I mean we could fix it by most people's standards if we set a maximum age gap instead of a consent age, but then what about those that are only Sexual lyrics attracted to older people?
A 16 year old fucking a 50 year old is gross for sure, but she's old enough to make that decision and face the repercussions. So I don't think there's a problem
So basically what your suggesting is that women need us to make special laws to protect them from their own decisions? If I was a woman I would be furious at the suggestion that I'm incapable of deciding for myself.
What other decisions should women have forced upon them by society?
Maybe it is disgusting, but raising the age of consent to 21 wouldn't just make it illegal - it would make it rape. And that is absolutely retarded. It's bad enough when that's the law for 18 year olds. Make it illegal if you want, but for Pete's sake don't change the age of consent
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
24Opinion
I think it should be 18 at least.
Where I live it used to be 14 when I was growing up. Now it's 16. There's a near age exception for under 16s. There's also a law against 16-17 with older figures of authority. (Ie their teachers or doctors).
I don't have a strong opinion between 14-16 but I think 18 is nuts. A majority of 18 year old girls are already sexually active. I don't see compelling arguments why a 17 year old should be able to sleep with a 17 year old but not a 25 year old. Why don't they have the legal right?Raising the age of consent passed the age of 16 will do nothing.
Sex drive is a thing, you will just be throwing men and women in jail in the name of protect the womenzz.
And also I see nothing wrong or disgusting with two people having sex from two large age differences that needs any legal attention.There is nothing disgusting about that, you are just being brainwashed by your horrifically sexually repressed and conservative country.
Age of consent of 16 is already too high.
Every piece of evidence suggests that sexually liberal countries with low ages of consent have the best sexual health and the lowest teen pregnancy rates.Age of consent laws are that low because people in school, say a freshman could date a senior. come that next year it's now illegal for them to have sex. These laws are in place that low mostly to decriminalize those situations.
Although many places have a 40-60 month age difference maximum for minors to prevent 40 year olds from having sex with 17 year oldsExcept that would be unrealistic and cause more problems. The only reason the age is that low is because puberty makes humans horny as fuck. Besides it's with consent. Anything outside of that is rape. Also it's for 16-17 if you're under 18 in my state at least.
If she's not coerced, or in any way forced into it, I fail to see how the age difference would change anything assuming both parties are mature enough to make that decision.
The world is a nut house either way... raise or don't raise - what does it really change...
A girl 16 that wants to do it is going to do it with it's legal or not...I don't think that is true. Even though the age of consent might be 16, the guy/woman have to be within a certain age bracket (4 years I believe) or else it would be consider rape. The law varies from state to state and country
As long as the woman is consenting what's the problem?
yes, cuz 18 year old girls are still soooooo dumb and most no mature enough, relationship wise
It should be thirty or unless married. Sounds about right in this moraless society not like back in my days.
The age of consent laws in the UK work a bit differently
16s can consent with 16-18
17 with 16-19
18+ anyone
I'm not sure this is 100% correct but please correct me if i'm wrongNah at 16 they should know what theyre getting into, no matter the gender.
No I believe 16 years old is just fine.
It should not be raised a day olderI'm not arrogant enough to dictate the terms of someone else's private sexual activity.
sixteen in Massachusetts
No. I want to bang 16 year olds.
Yes. The adult age should be 21.
No that would suck i like fucking 18-20 year olds
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions