Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Yeah. Why wouldn't I be?
Working in the kitchen is so taxing on your body.
I'm in the military now and even at basic my body has never hurt like it did when I was working the kitchen at my college.
It’s ridiculous. It’s going to make businesses go out of business.
@StickStickity13 when the businesses close there goes the jobs. Your logic is ridiculous
There will be a place to replace them. No worries there.
@StickStickity13 you are wrong
Yeah, because that happens in Norway, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden.
Hell no! It's an entry level job. No one ever thought that you were supposed to support a family of four by flipping burgers.
Considering there are less and fewer jobs, you're gonna have to put aside your pride and use empathy & logic.
@AgentDearestZ There are "less and fewer" jobs, the population continues to grow, and unemployment is at record lows. You are telling ME to be logical? You aren't dealing in facts; you are dealing in fiction.
Must be a shit place if marketing managers are paid 15 dollars a hour, lmao
@OlderAndWiser Influencer its funny you say that because if you are really 63 then when you were growing up you had an entry level job that paid that much lmfao
@vald9inches No, when I was a kid, I had an entry level job that paid $1.25 per hour.
your forgetting inflation old man
@vald9inches When I was a child, gas was 19 cents per gallon. Why do you think that I have forgotten about inflation?
It's just people butthurt because their shit jobs don't pay well so they don't want people with even shittier jobs to make the same money. All so they can feel better about their depressing and shitty lives by having people below them. Instead of being mad at those who actually deserve it.
You can't run an entire industry on highschool kids.
@StickStickity13 No one made that claim.
@goaded I never said that the price of gas was 19 cents per gallon when I had my entry level job. Gas was 19¢/gallon when I was 5 years old. My first job happened when I was 16 years old.
More importantly, the reasonableness of minimum wage is not as simple as determining how many gallons of gas can be bought with one hour's wage.
Thanks for MHO!
Yes as long as my $16/he salary is instantly raised to $21/hr
Opinion
107Opinion
I'm all for it. I don't live in the US but shitty jobs like working in McDonalds is not fun and one of the biggest problems people face when they find themselves stuck in such a job is that its impossible to save enough money up to escape. They end up working month to month, struggling to pay bills and survive and so there is never an opportunity for them to quit the job in the hopes of finding something better paid and more fulfilling.
Some people state that these jobs are meant mostly for young adults and teenagers but not everyone has the luxury of being able to get a job that is any better. I think we have to understand that some people end up trapped in these jobs.
Absolutely fine with it.
Everyone should have a liveable wage and people in low end jobs work much worse conditions than educated ones.
So a doctor gets a lovely desk and a sit down all day as he deals with patients and earns thousands a week. He gets an air con environment, a decent lunch, and not panic about bills when he gets home.
A “burger flipper” or a barista or similar has spend their whole day on their feet cleaning and serving in hot conditions with no air con, dealing with a barriage of complaints from the likes of doctors. They’ve probably had a break skipped because of lack of staff (so 6 hours without sitting down) and they get to go home and count the pennies for the rent and work out how to eat for free.
A low end job has harsher conditions. I didn’t get to go to uni because I looked after my amputee Dad (how selfish of me) and I was welcomed with a shite job. I was the one of 2 people who didn’t pass out and need an ambulance because of the extreme heat we worked in (out of 28) and was rewarded with bullying, crap pay and brutal hours.
Everyone deserves a decent wage.
If they did things properly, I wouldn't have a problem. If the government could force employments to push up the wages they paid people that were higher than minumum wage, which the minimim will be 15 dollars accordingly. For example, say you make $20 an hr and the minimum wage if $10 an hr. You're 10 dollars more than minimum. Don't forget, with increased minumum wage, the increase price in everything else goes up, so it's essential for your higher paying job for your wage to go up too. So if minumum wage is 10 dollars an hour and bumps up to $15 an hr, then people making 20 an hr should be bumped to 25 an hr. But tha't not going to happen, so essentially everyone who makes over 15 dollars an hr is taking a pay cut. College degree, or whatever to work themselves up and make better, well seems like a wasted attempt because now that wage you thought was decent paying is only a little more than minimum wage and not you're paying for things that are pricier and your wage helps even less now.
I'm not okay with the federal minimum wage being $15/hr. I am most certainly okay with individual businesses deciding to pay their employees $15/hr of their own accord.
However, for the record, my criticism of a $15/hr minimum wage isn't because I believe $15/hr is excessive. In the current economic landscape, getting a degree just isn't realistic for a large amount of people, in conjunction with the cost of living in most areas being so high, so I think $15/hr is reasonable and in most cases needed. However, I am critical of the entire concept of a minimum wage, because I trust that in a free economy, businesses are incentivized by competition to pay their employees fair wages--without government intervention.
Yes, because it's a job that needs to be done and it's a market people use. The money they make means they can put it back into the community while making sure people get their beef and cheese.
We can look down at it all we want until we go through the drive-thru and realize there's no one there to make your Big Mac.
So eating animals is putting back into the community? eating beef is poison. Did you hear about the recall? that shit causes cancer
wow this SouthernGirl23 is a complete nut job!! like holy shit how dense can you be? lmfao xD
First of all she is not debating if eating meat vs being vegan is good or bad she is talking about the economics of simple jobs building up the middle class and putting back into the community. and 2nd of all while i agree eating more greens and reducing meat in your diet is better for the environment, there is absolutely nothing unhealthy about eating meat if anything being vegan is unhealthy lol and your claim that beef causes cancer is pure retardness that i am not even going to begin to entertain that idea. you might as well have said the earth is flat and is 1000 years old lmfao
@SouthernGirl23 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeDVNgsYy0k
Yes. It's a basic minimum wage. Meaning they can afford to live *and* save. They can save and get that car or apartment bond or college down payment and have a chance to make something of themselves. Instead of being almost homeless, unable to support themselves *or* save while still cleaning up your mess in one of the most thankless jobs in society.
People earn more in certain jobs because of the education needed to get the job and the demand for the service and when you think about it, who would you rather get a minimum wage; a burger flipper or a lawyer? The cost of living has changed and it *never* should have been $6. Even 'burger flippers' in Korea get paid more than that.
Last time I was at a McDonald's these bad boys were already taking my order. They are far more convenient than a person since they gave me a ton of options to choose from and then I just paid with my credit card.
They exist because it's cheaper than paying someone $15/h today and $17/h tomorrow or whatever the next desired minimum wage will be.
There are burger flipping robots as well. They're in their early stages but within 5 years your average McDonald's will have one.
Ehhhh it’s kinda unfair for people who do hard labor for less pay but I’d say fast food workers have to deal with a lot of bs
please help me figure out what this phrase means,
“Jenna is overly identified with her animus. She struggles with herself, trying to understand why Aiden does not act the way she expects. His sense of alienation and detachment disappoint her, but her need to respond to the challenges is constantly stimulated by his impartial position. She may lose a significant part of herself, trying to achieve the unachievable, since Aiden, who in the end turns out to be rather a friend than a lover, can not be the kind of man which she subconsciously tries to win.“
The actual dollar amount is irrelevant.
Leftists have been demanding a "living wage" for all jobs. In a few years, leftists will decide that living wage is now $20... and so on.
The question one should ask, is whether a no-skill job deserves a living wage. This is an important question because there are many jobs that require no skill. Burger flipper, cashier, stock person, Walmart greeter... etc.
If ALL jobs deserve a living wage, what incentive is there for any person to better themselves? Why would anyone finish high school, or go to university or actually contribute something more to society if the bare minimum is all that is needed to earn an income that could buy a home and raise a family?
If you paid a living wage for all jobs, you will have the majority of the population doing the bare minimum with their lives. The world is already overburdened with excessively lazy people. We do not need to incentivize more people to become useless.
You're assuming a lot of things, yet prove nothing. An increase in minimum wage actually helps tax payers more and creates an incentive to work more than a low minimum wage. Also with a higher wage, they can save more money and use it to actually better themselves rather than stay in the cycle of poverty.
@StickStickity13
You said "An increase in minimum wage actually helps taxpayers more and actually creates an incentive to work more than a low minimum wage". Are you kidding me? That makes no sense at all.
When you earn MW, you live a poor life. That in itself is the incentive to become more. To increase your skillset. So that you are not on the bottom rung of the ladder. If you increase MW to a living wage, that creates less incentive to work hard. Not more. Your logic is completely 180 degrees wrong. We already know this is true through welfare recipients. When you give them the bare minimum to live off, they will refuse to work - preferring a life of poverty + unemployment instead of a slightly better life that requires 8 hours work per day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oBaD7wL7Lo
Increasing the MW also does nothing in the long run. They are STILL earning MW no matter what you change the amount to. They STILL have no skills.
@StickStickity13
Your view is very narrow and short-term.
Think what will happen in 10 years later. These people will still have no skills, and will demand $20/hour because of inflation. However, I don't expect poor people to understand financials.
If you do not earn minimum wage, you should be outraged at Fight for 15.
Why? Because when the MW is raised significantly, so does the cost of everything else. All goods and services will increase in cost because inflation rises. It does not happen overnight, but it will creep up over months.
This means that if you are a financially responsible person who has money saved in the bank, the purchasing power of your saved cash... DROPS. Yes that's right. 2% inflation normally becomes 4% after the MW is raised. And your saved cash devalues twice the rate as normal.
@StickStickity13
just to demonstrate, imagine what happens when MW is increased to $100/hour. Work 8 hours a day and you earn $800. Wow... by your logic, everyone is rich right? Problem solved.
Except your loaf of bread can no longer be $1.99. It is now an $80 loaf of bread. So if you saved $10,000 over several years, your money is now worth the equivalent of 2.5 weeks worth of work. The principle is the same when increasing MW, regardless of the amount. Whether it is $100/hr or $15/hr, the effect is the same. The magnitude is different.
Socialists have tricked stupid poor people with no financial understanding, that Fight for 15 will better their lives. But if you truly think about it, its actual purpose is to reduce the financial value of the middle class while doing nothing for the poor. This is essentially the socialist goal (have everyone worth the same).
You realize that $10,000 will be worth less over time anyways? That's why investing in something with a return is the smarter option. You give an outlandish example at 100 dollars an hour, and price increases aren't that dramatic for stuff like food. Inflation will happen anyways, for someone who claims to understand economics that should be known. The minimum wage hasn't kept up with inflation, and neither has the pay of many other jobs.
@StickStickity13
I even said up front that the example of $100/hr was to DEMONSTRATE the effect of increasing MW, since you don't seem to get it. But you stupidly took that example as if I really meant it.
Minimum wage does not need to keep up with inflation. Nor should it. Minimum wage itself should be abolished, because people would be paid what their work is worth. When unskilled jobs have a mandated wage of $15/hr, that person's work must be worth MORE than $15/hr. Otherwise, those jobs will be gone.
This is why companies like fast food and groceries are moving towards automation and self-serve kiosks. Employers are not stupid. They do not move towards this direction unless it makes sense. When employee salaries cost $500k/year, and a new automation system costs $200k up front and 50k/year maintenance, it is the MW to blame for the permanent loss of those jobs.
Thanks for the insult on my intelligence. It really hurts my ego along with the MSc, MBA and $250k salary I have.
You realize that we need people to do these jobs right? You realize not everyone can have the high skill jobs, just on the basis that there's only so many of them. Basically it costs society more to not have a minimum wage than to have a decent one.
@StickStickity13
We only need people to do these jobs... until their work is worth less than their pay.
The necessity of a job does not merit a high pay.
Do we need people to sweep the floors? Absolutely.
But every able-bodied person (including children) can sweep floors. If you post this job, then everyone who applies is automatically qualified.
Are you going to pay top dollar for your janitor? You'd be an idiot if you said "yes"... and also bankrupt. When you need a mechanic for your car, or pay for gas, or buy groceries, the one constant factor in your decision is the PRICE. Everyone's behavior is the same in this manner, unless they are looking for something rare, desired, or unique.
A person's wage is essentially a reflection of their skill-set and the demand for their job. A low wage is the incentive for these people to get off their ass and improve themselves. Sadly, many in this position have no desire to do so.
@StickStickity13
I also don't think that it is mandatory for people to have a high skilled job.
We are talking about NO-SKILLED jobs.
To put it bluntly, if you are a healthy, intelligent 30-40 years old, and you're flipping burgers, I have no sympathy for you. When a 15 year old kid can work the same job as this 30-40 year old, nobody should have sympathy for them.
The exception I make is if a person is disabled in some manner. Whether born disabled, or injured later in life. I believe a prosperous society should take care of these people, when they are placed there from circumstances beyond their control.
But there's no denying that there are millions of people who are lazy, and lacking ambition. They WANT more money. They WANT WANT WANT, but they lack the motivation to do anything to reach their goal.
Did you notice the Fight for 15 movement never says anything about how increasing their wage will make them work harder? They just want more money. They don't want to work harder
You realize just because it's an easy job, doesn't mean there's no demand for it? This is a massive problem for many industries. Able bodied people can pick fruit, but in the USA we have no choice but to import migrants because the job doesn't pay enough. So just because it's a no skill job, doesn't mean there's not a high demand for it. You should know this Mr. MBA. Not everyone can be intelligent, there's a bell curve. Plus, if one grows up in poverty, how can they get better if they can't afford to better their lives? Sure some places give incentives, but most don't. Not everyone is born with the same opportunities that we have.
@StickStickity13
Everyone is of course born with the same opportunities. But equal opportunity and equal outcome are not the same thing.
Every person in this country has the opportunity to go to school. They have the opportunity to study to get good grades and go into higher education. They have the opportunity to pick their field of study. Despite stupid left-wing arguments like "There is a gender gap in the STEM field", the fact is that women choose different fields of study and different careers than men do.
So your OPPORTUNITY is the same as everyone else's. What you do with that opportunity relflects your outcome. The class clown in high school who is now flipping burgers? He made his choice in life long ago. The guy who though school was for losers? Guess what? He had the same opportunity we all did, and he didn't take it. That guy who studied hard and got all straight A's? He took the opportunity presented to him.
@StickStickity13
It is also a fact that those who are born into poverty are unlikely to remain in that same bracket in adulthood. This is why immigrants who come to the US, with $1 in their pocket can make a better life for themselves. This is why there are more and more young people (60-70%) with university degrees today vs 30 years ago where only 10-15% of people had a degree.
If you're born into poverty, and you study hard in school, and work hard in your job, you are almost guaranteed to move into the middle class unless you get into a horrible situation like family loss, or catastrophic event.
If you squander that opportunity, don't expect anyone to pay you a living wage for a low skilled job that anyone can perform.
There are a lot of problems that factor into people's lives. Increasing minimum wage would help account for the inflation over the years and at least help compare to the prosperity baby boomers had doing the same job. But there are a slew of problems in the economy to solve that would help account for that, like real estate. There are also ways to help small businesses that can't pay for a wage increase. It's a complicated question, but the fact that we have so much service industry jobs that need full time workers, they should at least be abel to afford live if they work full time. So it's not that we need to increase minimum wage but rather solve why people can't afford to live. Increasing minimum wage or certain state wages would be a solution, but it would come with a few problems that likewise would need to be dealt with.
15 dollars an hour is steep. However, if you are working full time, your wage should be enough to live. There's just too many minimum wage Jobs being worked for them not to be a sustainable source of livelihood. 700000 jobs are exactly 7.25 an hour, with many state minimum wages being too low to live of either. We're talking about a one bedroom apartment with food, water, and minimum to no electricity. People cannot physically live off of that paycheck in that life style. The minimum wage has to be a living wage, and has to be tied to inflation. It would most likely be wise to tie it to locational cost of living as being in a rural town like me is much cheaper than living in new york, so it's cost of living would skew my community and probably tank it as a whole. A flat 15 dollars would be dumb, and not get the job done. We need to do this in a way that fucking works.
This question is incomplete.
You must factor in what the wage is for all other activities. If other jobs that require the education, skill, and time equal to that which is required of a "burger flipper" are around $15/hr then yes, otherwise no.
Locality (cost of living) also plays a role in determining wages. The higher the costs the higher wages need to be.
For those making the "they have to make a living" argument you're saying that every job must command a wage singularly capable of supporting the living costs of an individual.
Burger flipping is one of those jobs traditionally meant to ween someone into the general workforce, provide basic experience, and fund the beginnings of a career. These aren't careers themselves, if you try and force them to be it won't work out, the industries can't support them and will do what they have to. Enter kiosks. Not many burger flipper equivalent jobs out there to engineer, program, and maintain kiosks.
Yup and it’s not easy to live on your own.
For those who are saying “just go to college and get a better degree “, and what if that career based on that degree is not exactly easy to get into it , what should the person do? Just sit and do nothing and pray for a miracle?
I’m in college, I work at retail pharmacy while living on my own, I get paid a couple dollars above of minimum wage because I took promotions despite the increased work load.
So for other people in similar positions like me or worse, they deserve it.
That sounds decent to me that's almost £11 pounds that's higher then the British minimum wage (£8) and the standard of living is cheaper in the US then in the UK so I'd be grateful earning that much I don't even get paid the minimum wage only the apprentices minimum wage which is half the actual minimum wage so I'd be living it up if I was earning that much
I've worked in fast food, it's horrid for sure, but it's a choice... Sometimes it's your best choice, even though it's a pretty shitty job. Even if you got paid 15 it'd be shitty, but that doesn't mean you're deserving of more. It's not a mentally or physically taxing job. It doesn't take much if any skill... It's not something worth rewarding in my eyes. It's not a job we should encourage people to take up. I think it's a perfect job for someone in college to earn a bit on the side. Or someone who is having a tough time to make some extra money.
The market should decide how much a job is worth. If there is high demand but not a lot of people are capable/willing to do the job then they can demand a higher hourly wage. If a job is in high demand but can replace the employee with just about anyone then they should be able to keep the hourly wage low. In case of fast food, despite being a shitty job it's a job any teenager can come off the street and do so there's no reason to raise it to $15 an hour. If you're valuable to the company they will give you the raise that you deserve. If you're not valuable (someone that can easily be replaced) then there is no incentive to give you the raise. So, if you become the best burger flipper in the world and are able to do a high volume of work equivalent of multiple employees and you bring in the numbers that wouldn't be there if you were gone then sure, $15 is justified.. Otherwise, no.
No, because those jobs are transitional and not meant to be a career unless you go into management which would then qualify you for the higher wages.
If everyone got a wage of $15/hr. then there would be much fewer jobs and more people would be struggling to get by. Also those with $15/hr burger flipping jobs would be worked to death by the managers to make sure they got good workers or threaten them with no job.
Inflation would in all likelihood go up as well since your now paying extra for the burgers. More than likely fewer people eating out.
If we lived in a society where 1/2 your paycheck went to taxes to pay for government provisions of food, shelter and free healthcare, then it wouldn't be much of an issue. Homeless shelters today depend a great deal upon private donations to feed and bed the homeless and there's always a bed shortage in most places if you don't show up early enough. Not a great way to live.
No. I'm all for making sure people have enough to pay their basic needs. But that's it. I have gone to all fast food joints in my area, and every time I've gone my orders have been messed up in one way or another. And it keeps happening. If they can't get the orders correct, then there's no need to reward them with higher pay. And don't tell me that they get busy. Sometimes, it wasn't that busy. So, they should've gotten the orders right, and yet they didn't. Also, working fast food is NOT a career choice. At least, it shouldn't be. I know not everyone can do certain jobs. But not even trying to get a career is ridiculous.
No, I'm not a monster, but I dont think flipping burgers is worth $15/hr. Yes, I understand that they need to make a living too, but raising the minimum wage hurts smaller businesses, creates job loss, and is overall more harmful to the poor (who it's supposed to help).
I'm surprised at the poverty in Chicago because there are so many programs here to help us, but many people refuse because they're lazy, unmotivated, or just content with the many welfare programs.
You do know wages went down right? Even 15/h isn't close to what it should have been if the USA kept up with inflation. 7/h isn't even a livable wage, If people would repair the economy then we won't have to worry about small businesses.
@AgentDearestZ how will they repair the economy?
@AgentDearestZ also, its not 7/hr everywhere in the u. s. In Chicago, I believe it's now 13$/hr. And it is livable, not a comfortable or luxurious life, but comfortable.
Of course they should. Everyone deserves a living wage for working. I know there's a lot of "but... socialism!" and "business will die!" claims rolling around but the labor market is much, much more complex than that. Those claims usually don't hold up under evaluation.
depends on the area. it a lot of places-this isn't a crazy number. in others, it is a lot for this sort of job.
people need more than food, they need a place to live, healthcare, transportation, they have utilities to pay, maybe even kids, a phone to communicate with the world. it costs money to have these things and 7 and some change will NOT allow one person to have all these things-it's just impossible. No, you should not be working 40 hours a week and not be able to take care of yourself.
But should you have all of those costs when you are doing an entry level job meant for high school kids. Again, it's an entry level position and not a career move planned on sustaining a family. You're right, you should be able to take care of yourself, but how far is that really going?
@knightly they aren't meant for high school kids. I reject that. If they were meant for high school kids, these companies would only hire high school kids. There are thousands of mcdonalds in the US, there aren't enough high school kids in America to even fully service all of those-add in all the other hundreds of fast food chains-someone has to work these.
Fair point, I concede that these jobs are not purely for high school students, but will not forfeit the fact that they are entry level positions into the workforce. However, these companies are not just comprised of burger flippers, they work on a much grander scale with offices and boards. Those people went to school to make a company far more money than someone flipping burgers. It comes down to skill and how much you can produce for a company. Yes, McDonald's wouldn't be anything without people at the stores, but that is a big hypothetical. This isn't on greed, this is someone being paid based on their skill set and competency to execute.
@knightly It's pay based on greed and the government not caring about its people over companies. Prices have increased in the US but pay has stayed very low. There is no way for someone to pay for rent, utilities, health insurance, a car, and food on even 10 dollars an hour.
I have a college degree and I don't think I'm better than someone twice my age working at McDonalds. Everyone deserves to be adequately paid for their services. Chump change, 7.25 or whatever else the minimum is in the more expensive states, is not being adequately paid...
Depends? Personally I work at Pizza Hut, which is the same concept, and I first hand no how crazy working in that envimoment can be. It depends on the area, but for what I do I don't expect $15/h. Maybe a little more than what I make now would be nice, but $15 is too much for a small town. Big city maybe it makes a little more sense.
Know* (how crazy)
The reality is, either the burger place pays $15 an hour, or we pay higher taxes, helping under paid workers get basic needs met. So, yes, $15 is a lot of money to pay a burger flipper, but either the burger place picks up the tab by paying them well, or we tax payers pick up the tab, because they aren't paid enough.
$15 per hour is plenty. If it's full time, that's triple what I need to live. I could do that and still put $12-14K per year in the bank.
As for the work itself, I'd have no problem flipping burgers. I'd much rather do that than a lot of other jobs.
I've never worked im fast food but I've seen the horrors they deal with and haves friends who have. People bang on drive through windows, scream, throw stuff and spit at the workers. They already are working in a sweltering hot enviorment in the summer or freezing in drive through during winter. And dont get me started on fast food bathrooms... I don't know what this mentality is that you get to treat fast good workers like animals.
@Rissyanne the workers they have usually are plenty skilled
@Rissyanne I've sern you on this site plenty of times, you dont agree with anything
Lol I remember all the hoopla. And when they won lol! After few days or month. All the lay-off and cashier was replaced by order machinery screens. Yeah. Now a burger place where a staff of 30 people dropped to 6-12. With a fast turnaround. Jobs like burger place was more designed as entree to the work world. But. Life is life.
If a burger joint decides that's what they want to pay their employees I genuinely do not care. Good for them. If it's a state mandate, then I take issue because now it effects everyone in varying degrees. How much money someone makes at a burger joint doesn't matter or effect anyone else. state mandate will.
What’s wrong with them getting paid more? Not everyone has the same opportunity as you and I. at least they’re trying to make an honest living.
Getting paid more, sure, but I still think that is too much. Speaking from the POV of someone who works in the food industry.
@AlienChickk if you live in a state where rent is $1500 a month to live in a shack. $15 still isn’t enough
Fair enough, I live in a small town where the cost of living isn't super expensive. I guess I was stating from my POV and expierence.
@Pink2000 I understand not everyone has the same opportunity as I already stated, but it doesn't mean that we should reward them equally. Going to college and getting an office job should not be paid the same as someone who didn't go through those tribulations. It is 8.25 where I am, and that is enough to support yourself, nothing lucrative, but that's because it's not meant to be lucrative!
@knightly do you not know how hard that is. I’ve worked fast food before and putting up with people shitty attitudes and working in a hot environment for $15 is much better than doing it for $7.25. Hell people have families to feed. You better stop thinking you’re better than them. Cause you aren’t. A job is a job.
@AlienChickk well it’d be different if rent was $300 and a sack of potatoes
@Pink2000 You act as if I never worked fast food. I have and I never wanted to again so I worked to go to school and get a better job. Saying working there for 15 instead of 7.25 is better but not necessary, again, this is not a career position! I've said again, if you're working in fast food you shouldn't be working in fast food as it's not meant to support multiple people. And you are wrong, a job is not a job. There are careers and then there are jobs. There are careers without going to college, but fast food isn't one. It's not about thinking I'm better than anyone, it's me understanding that this isn't a communist based economy that thinks everyone needs to be paid equally.
It's a livable wage. You're not gonna live a glamorous or luxurious life, but you can live off it, even with multiple people, though it's not their job to support bad decisions like having kids when you're not financially ready. I worked in fast food, and I supported my little brothers with it, it wasn't great, it was actually really stressful, but it gave me the ambition to strive for certifications or better paying jobs.
It's not these companies jobs to support people who pop out kids without being ready. Minimum wage is livable, it isn't meant to support a family. And it shouldn't because if people want better pay, they should improve their skills and values to employers to justify a higher pay.
@BuchitaBuchys In today’s world where things are expensive as hell $7.25 is nothing. The only way you can live off minimum wage is by barely making it. You’d have to have some other type of assistance.
You can make it, it won't be comfortable, I've already addressed that, but it's possible. With assistance you can get more, but it's doable without assistance as well.
@BuchitaBuchys so if you live in a state where your rent is $1500 plus all the other bills and necessities you can make it on $7.25 ?
@MysteriousDarkness Oklahoma
Minimum wage isn't based solely on federal wage. It's also what the state and cities decide. In Chicago, it's pretty expensive living here and our min wage is $13/hr.
Also, Oklahoma has a low wage because it's cheap living there. Very few places are 1500. I was looking to rent there, and I found places for like $500, $600. That's why the minimum wage is so low, y'all don't need much.
@BuchitaBuchys what place did you find for $500 $600 😂
There are many
www.zillow.com/.../
Again, it's not the best living arrangement, but it's livable
@BuchitaBuchys 500 sq ft my goodness that’s too small. Plus you gotta think of utilities
Again, its not gonna be glamorous or luxurious. Beggars can't be choosers and utilities won't be more than $300 for a single person. I can guarantee that.
@BuchitaBuchys I wouldn’t wanna live on that side of town either.
You are missing the point that @BuchitaBuchys is laying out. Working at these jobs shouldn't be able to sustain you for a life of luxury or in a mansion; it is solely meant to give you the basics, hence, why it's an entry level position for the work force.
I'm talking about single people. Minimum wage isn't meant to sustain a family. It's not their fault that people are irresponsible and have kids when they're not financially ready.
For a single person, it's enough. You want to care for your family? Get skills, certifications, a trade, or even the dreaded college degree to make yourself more valuable as an employee to justify a pay increase.
It's not business owners jobs to support people who can't keep their legs close or use birth control when they know they're poor.
Yes, you could say "well, what about those who were well off when they had kids but then fell through hard times? Emergencies happen!" Those people are rare, most poor people reproduce like rabbits while in poverty.
@knightly thank you. Minimum wage is just for very basics for one person. I don't know why people don't understand that.
@BuchitaBuchys so what is a kid in highschool supposed to do who has to come home to no water and electricity with a young sibling to feed but his check is only so much cause he’s still in highschool? Cause stuff like that is very very common
It's not very common to have children solely responsible for their siblings. That's actually pretty rare. I had to take care of my younger brothers while in high school but I was unique in that situation and it's pretty rare.
In that case, their parents should be responsible and contribute so that responsibility wouldn't be placed on the unfortunate older children.
It all boils down to parents being responsible and having children when they're financially ready only. Otherwise, use birth control, abstain from sex if they're uncomfortable using birth control etc. I feel that a lot of people, especially and unfortunately minorities take child rearing very lightly and think it's ok to have kids when you're on min wage. It isn't. We need to drill the idea that kids are fucking expensive and it shouldn't be the norm to support them off welfare.
@BuchitaBuchys oh no honey it’s very common. I don’t know where you come from but it is. You can’t say parents being responsible cause the parents are most like strung out on drugs somewhere. So like I said how the hell is a kid supposed to do all that on $7.25 an hour?
It's not common. I'm from Chicago, the poor side. And I've moved around a lot. I never met a single person who had to solely raise their siblings. In fact, the numbers are on my side. There's about 325 mil people in the US. And only about 140,000 are raised by siblings, which means it's about.04%, not even 1 percent, not even half of a percent.
Yes I can. Strung out, druggie parents are worse and extremely irresponsible, they should definitely not have kids. They should not have had kids in the first place. Go on birth control, abstain from sex etc.
And if those high schoolers are having such a hard time, which is understandable, they should be placed in foster care so more responsible and caring people can properly care for them. I had to solely support my younger brothers and I was also in foster, so don't say I don't know what I'm talking about.
@BuchitaBuchys apparently you don’t cause it’s more common than you think. I saw it all the time In highschool. Hell you’d think you’d be able to understand but you obviously don’t. $7.25 is nothing. And I stand by that. If you don’t think it should be raised to $15 then okay. That’s your opinion. I still say raise it to $15 😊. Especially here cause rent is increasing.
The facts don't favor your comment. Here's a source content.time.com/.../0,9171,108827,00.html, list yours if you feel so confident that it's more than.04%. If you're so confident that it's common for siblings solely, not working part time to help parents but SOLELY raising younger siblings, list your sources that back up your claim. I listed mine, it's extremely uncommon nationwide.
I don't believe it's anyone's responsibility to raise families for irresponsible people, no. I think min wage is fine as it is.
@BuchitaBuchys the people I know who struggle just take it to school on time cause they’re at home taking care of their siblings. Oh and the people who’s only meal is the meal they get at school. Oh shit I forgot about the ones who don’t even have transportation to get to school cause they can’t afford to put gas in the car cause they had to use their little hard earned money to keep the lights on cause their sorry ass parents couldn’t do it. I honestly don’t care about your sources. It’s sad. It really is. I volunteer at the homeless shelter every week and I see the same thing. If someone could survive on $7.25 then there shouldn’t be any homeless people cause there’s a fast food joint on every corner. :)
You dont care about sources because none will back up your claims. Lol
And if those kids are struggling that hard, their parents are irresponsible and they should be taken away from them. They should be placed in foster homes until the parents are financially ready to sustain their kids.
@BuchitaBuchys so an 18 year old should go to foster care? I don’t need sources to back up my claims. All I have to do is look around.
Anecdotal evidence is rarely used to back up claims on their own. You need more than that to prove a point. There are no sources that show that in the US, siblings raising siblings is common, because it isn't.
No, take the younger siblings that the 18yr old is caring for into foster. Then the 18yr old can sustain him or herself on min wage as a single person, because it is doable.
@BuchitaBuchys why the hell would I need to prove a point to YOU. you came on my opinion trying to prove YOUR point. When I go to the homeless shelter I’ll ask them why didn’t they just go work at McDonald’s so they wouldn’t be at the shelter.
It's not just me. you're proving it to the OP, since YOU came to HIS question and your point isn't being made since it's wrong. Again, no sources, weak argument. You know that no source will back up your claim that siblings taking care of siblings is common.
However, even if it were, that doesn't mean the wage should be raised. It means that the children should be taken away from irresponsible parents.
@BuchitaBuchys I don’t need to make a point. It’s my opinion. I see it everyday. If $7.25 was enough to survive on then there should be no homeless people in Oklahoma. Periodt.
Opinions aren't facts. And your opinion isn't even based on facts either. Period.
@BuchitaBuchys it is cause I said it is. I stated my opinion on a question I was invited to. If you don’t like it then you can gtfo somewhere else. 😊
They are shooting themselves in the foot. I can remember when they used to have the drink machine behind the counter and somebody filled your cup for you. Now you get an empty cup and do it yourself, because minimum wages already too high. They're already working on machines to flip burgers and fry fries. Soon there will be one guy in the store: to clean up. You'll talk your order into a machine, put your money in a slot, and it'll come out on a conveyor belt.
That's the future and it unavoidable. I don't believe it's due to wage demands. Maybe that's accelerated it a bit
I don't get why people bitch one side of the coin or the other about this.
Against it usually goes something like this "I have a college degree and i make 15 dollars an hr. so blah, blah, blah no.
For it you can't live off minimum wage these people are humans beings just like you and me blah, blah, blah
How bout we just let the market dictate.
The market would have people work slave wages like 7/h. There's a reason there are laws that made there be a minimum.
@AgentDearestZ oh i totally agree. I didn't mean we need to get rid of the minimum wage. and if our elected officials think we even need to raise it fine. But nobody is forcing anyone to work anywhere. If you feel you're underpaid don't work there. Enough people take that attitude and the employer eventually has to re-assess their payrate. problem solved.
I am okay with it. The thing that really upsets me about this debate though, is that People are getting so hung up on the idea of $15 an hour, that they aren't asking the real important question. The important question, in my opinion at least, is why it is that people who are flipping burgers need that much in the first place! People shouldn't be flipping burgers to put their kid through college, or looking at those jobs for longer term careers in the first place.
This is potentially 2400 dollars in a month or roughly $28k in a year *IF* you work full-time like I do (40 hours/week).
That's still more than I make as a software tester with my associates degree -_-
I think this price is fair. Students gotta start working somewhere sooner or later, right?
It's ok but keep in mind. the more a company must pay it's employees. the less employees they are willing to hire. The more work an employee must do..
If they do rite the same number, then the more the burger will cost.
Labor is s big expense. Companies want to keep their profits up. If labor costs more than something else must be cut.
Pure stupidity. The job is simply not worth that much, and business owners will instead speed up automation and eliminate those positions. This is what you get when imbeciles who know nothing about what it takes to run a business stick their ignorant noses in.
Ok, that's NZD$23.28. Minimum wage here is $16.50 and the living wage is $20.20 so that's A LOT higher than a lot of people with little to no experience get paid
minimum wage in Belgium= 1801.26 USD/month (converted from 1562.59 €)
@jacquesvol What is that per hour?
Before taxes, of course
Sure, they'll be fired soon and replaced with robots but whatever float their boats.
Boats that won't float for long. The most basic job paid more than most, what an insult to those who actually work their asses off to get something better.
Not to mention that a wage raise means a price raise. You think Mc D will just pay them out of their pockets? Nope, they'll lower their product quality to pay it less, and raise the price to pay the new wage. And get some money from it.
Of course, I've always wanted my 1/8" pattys of greasy horse meat to cost $8 a piece. Its gonna make everything much more affordable when nobody else gets a matching raise and suddenly half of the country makes minimum wage.
Yes. It sounds like a fairly good base to guarantee people enough money to survive and not be taken advantage off by businesses because they are not able to do better.
Yes minimum wage here is 7 something an hour and as someone who used to work there and now knows what its like to live on your own that is a very good wage
Yeah, because burger companies are making more than enough to still have a profit. Minimum wage was already raised to $12 an hour in my area and guess what? Prices didn't sky rocket and communists didn't take over.
In the absence of other moves to bring down the cost of providing a hamburger (taxes, overhead, utilities, etc) this will only lead to much more expensive hamburgers. Stagflation, here we come.
No. Here’s the thing
If you pay them $15 an hour there would be less people employed to compensate for the high prices you’re paying for workers. Look at McDonalds. They’ve already replaced cashiers with machines.
brilliant, i think the same.
Not really. I think it's somewhat unfair to the people who were working jobs that required more skill and were considered above minimum wage, but are now in the same pay grade as people who work at Burger King.
no i worked hard to get a job that pays me well now these people want to ruin it.. minimum wage jobs aren't meant to make a living off of so we shouldn't raise their wage its unfair for literally everyone who actually got that paycheck by working hard
It's not a particularly fun job, so I definitely think they should be paid properly.
I'd say they're better motivated to leave a particularly fun job and persue a career that is more for fulfilling, challaging, and nessisary if the amount they get reflects Thier worth in society...
As someone who has worked in fast food, it's not nice, it's rather depressing, it's not somewhere you want to be, not even for $15 an hour. It's extremely tiring, but not at all challaging mentally or physically. We as a society don't need this as a service as much as say, a doctor...
They should get paid what they are worth to the company. Minimum wage just shifts the problem away temporary until inflation hits.
Definitely. Wages must be increased for every job without layoffs or robot replacements. Almost half Americans can barely afford a normal life.
I think someone working 40 hours a week should make a wage that allows them to live in their own place and afford some basic luxuries in life. You know, like the baby boomers got to enjoy.
A starter high school kid cooking sandwiches should not make more money per hour than I do unloading trucks.
Not if someone is willing to do it for less, because that means the person who wants the job more won't have a job.
Yes why? Because I don't eat out much anyway so I wouldn't care if the prices at fast food places went up, only people who live off of McDonald's , Burger King instead of cooking learning how to cook etc would care
Any socialist measure like that will only emporish everyone. Small businesses will close and big businesses will just lay off people and make the ones who stay work insanely hard to make up for the lack of manpower.
Trust me socialism is retarded
Yes. Why would i complain about other people getting more money?
Thats literally none of my business
Because it does affect you. If you raise the price of the minimum wage, then you are practically saying you will raise the price of everything else. The issue above that is that you job isn't giving you a pay raise because of this, so you will actually be able to afford less because of it in time.
$15 is minimum wage where I live or about to be soon so that’s expected here.
I guess... I get paid 20 an hour usually... Ouch and I am a college drop out. hahahah I guess as long as your a value member of society than you need not worry.
Don’t feel bad. I make $26/ hr and only recently got an Associates.
It takes time. Where I work, I started at $15, took me six years to get where I’m at now.
Higher labor cost will just hasten the transition to automation that will replace these jobs. $15/hr makes to paypack period of investment in automation even shorter increasing the ROI.
Those are supposed to be beginning jobs. Jobs to teach work skills to kids in highschool or adults wanting to move up. Besides the issue is not the minimum wage it's that people at the top need maximum wages.
No.
My personal driver gets paid 10 a hour andni can be a bitch sometimes so why would a burger flipper need 15 lol they need 8 an hour and to fo back to college
What a shitty, entitled attitude. I bet your driver hates you.
Lol im pretty sure he do. but his broke and needs work so he has to listen to whatever i say
Why not? I’m sure most believe in the poor staying poor, but this way, the poor has a chance in getting an education where they can earn scholarships which isn’t on the dime of those who bellyache they are going on your dime
Burger flippers work hard. Long hours with a half hour break. 12 hour days back to back just so hoes like you can eat. If a job has market value then people should get paid whatever it takes to keep business going.
True, but it takes far less than $15 per hour for such menial labor, and if idiot politicians insist upon raising it then the big chains will speed up automation and the small mom and pops will go out of business or work only family members.
@JackJPershing people already do this. There's a high demand for food workers seeing as most people don't eat at home. Most Americans eat in their car before work
You are missing the point. Raising the costs of doing business will make businesses autiomate more quickly because it will cost less than paying $15 per hour. Those jobs will be gone and those workers will be making $0.
@JackJPershing how you automate burger flipping?
You can't seriously know that little about automation. Here is what is going on. Those jobs will be gone eventually anyway, but raising the pay will speed it up dramatically because businesses will do a cost-benefit analysis and realize that with the wages, matching taxes, benefits, extra added costs from government, and harassment lawsuits by crappy workers who are looking for a free ride, that automation will save them money. here is the future for burger flippers:
geekologie.com/.../...-making-machine-that-can.php
@JackJPershing I'm starving. I'd certainly take one of those robot burgers about now
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions