I've been talking to a Spanish friend of mine about this, after an incident that had happened in his country has come to my attention: Feminists defaced a monument dedicated to a 8-yo boy in Almeria, Spain, who was murdered by his father's girlfriend (who happened to be an illegal immigrant, but it's just sheer coincidence, isn't it?), writing on it "be a feminist and abuse the male, whether man or boy". He said the media coverage has been very poor all this time, despite of the national uproar over this tragedy, and no one feminist group condemned that act of vandalism till now. https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2019/06/13/graffiti-daubed-on-gabriel-cruz-monument-in-almeria/
Also, he showed me an article about the murder of a 9-yo boy in Brazil by two feminist activists who castrated the boy because they wanted him to become a girl, but they ended up killing him in a gruesome way. The mere mention of what they did to the boy makes me disgusted. As I understood, they did it because they were feminist misandrists, a type every Liberal claims that "they don't hurt anyone", and they hated the 9-yo child for being a boy. It's clear that these people are actually dangerous, our lying media just doesn't want to report on crimes like that because it goes against the political correctness. http://www.outono.net/elentir/2019/06/10/two-lesbians-castrate-and-dismember-a-child-in-brazil-media-silence-in-europe/
After knowing it, I ask you: is Feminism about hating men and turning a blind eye to hate and violence perpetrated by their radical peers? How are these people not dangerous? Where are their "empathy"? #BeAFeminist #Misandry The defaced monument... My friend said it means something like "be a feminist, abuse the male, whether man or boy"Poor victims of Patriarchy?
Is FEMINISM about hating men? Why do FEMINISTS claim that misandry isn't harmful?
the following is things that those hateful less than human pigs say
I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them. Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. Linda Gordon I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig. Andrea Dworkin Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage. Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice. Andrea Dworkin The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist. Ti-Grace Atkinson Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear. Susan Brownmiller, Against Our Will p.6 When a woman reaches ****** with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression. Sheila Jeffrys Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated. Catherine MacKinnon The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men. Sharon Stone Ninety-five percent of women’s experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive… women didn’t go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo. Jodie Foster, quoted in The New York Times Magazine The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future – If There Is One – Is Female And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference. Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. Mary Daly If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them. David Angier Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience. Catherine Comins As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women…he can sexually molest his daughters… THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE. Marilyn French I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it. Barbara Jordan, former Congresswoman Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release. Germaine Greer Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence. Judith Levine Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do. Popular Feminist Graffiti
We are taught, encouraged, moulded by and lulled into accepting a range of false notions about the family. As a source of some of our most profound experiences, it continues to be such an integral part of our emotional lives that it appears beyond criticism. Yet hiding from the truth of family life leaves women and children vulnerable. Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women I do want to be able to explain to a 9-year-old boy in terms he will understand why I think it’s OK for girls to wear shirts that revel in their superiority over boys. Treena Shapiro
The way I see it, there are 2 types of feminists. The first set are women, and some men, who fight simply to give women a better way of life. This type does not seek to destroy men. For example, fighting for women to have the right to work and the right to vote. They are true equalists who just want women to have equal standing to men and work with men. These are your traditional feminists.
The second type are women who want to "destroy the patriarchy". They see the world as "men vs. women". They claim they want equality but they actually want women to rise above men. These women want women to lead everything and often share the sentiment that men should suffer for thousands of years in oppression so men know how women have felt. Whether they believe it or not, they are about hating men. They will spout stuff like "war is around because men are in charge".
Both are for role reversal of men and women and both want the same thing to a certain degree, but the first want true unity and equality while the second just spread hate.
I consider myself to be a progressive and a feminist... but I would never stoop to the level of hating all men and castrating all men and boys and turning them into women just because they were born male. As a gender, we need men. We need men to do the shit we can't do. Men seem to be more mechanically inclined than women. Men seem to be more able to build building and shit so we can enjoy ourselves. Men are more capable of doing heavy lifting. But men are also capable of helping us make life and helping us in making a better society. As much as I may think some men have done a great job of fucking up certain parts of our society... we need men, girls and fellow feminists. We just do.
I want to have a dialogue with you about some of the things you wrote if you don’t mind. An open and even tempered conversation.
You seem to realize many things that typically feminists don’t or at least won’t admit to or won’t elude to.
You said: “as a gender we need men.” I found that interesting as typically feminists will claim they don’t need a man for anything.
So you say you need men and “we need men to do the shit we can’t do. Men seem to be more mechanically inclined than women. Men seem to be more able to build building and shit so we can enjoy ourselves. Men are capable of doing heavy lifting.”
It’s good you realize those things. To take a page from feminist thought, are you aware of what you’re doing by saying those things? You’re objectifying men... as mechanics, builders, lifters of heavy objects, and doing things to help you build a better society. That’s straight up objectification of the utility a man can bring to the table. Now, feminists complain incessantly about men objectifying women as sex objects. Indeed we do. Sex is one of the main benefits we get from women. Are you aware utility is one of the main benefits women get from men, and hear you rightfully list some of those. You refer to our mechanical and building skills stating we seem to be better at those things and you are right. You also mention in a round about way we’re stronger physically because we can lift heavy objects. So that is objectification. It’s a theme that runs right through much feminist thought.
Now you mention twice “men are capable of helping us...” Yes. We are capable. However we are not slaves. Most men aren’t interested in helping women (us) to build a better society as THEY want it, but a better society that benefits everyone. This is often as it seems the goal of the modern women. To find a man to use like a pack animal to build the future SHE wants. To control her husband and get him to do things for HER agenda.
However no mention is made of this., especially from feminists.
A man, a real man, a good man, a man of morality and conscience is aware it’s his duty to take care of his family. How can he best take care of his family when his wife wants to lead, and put a bit in his mouth and drive him like a pack animal, using his utility and skills for her agenda?
See I think if you’re honest with yourself you can see men and women are naturally endowed by our creator with certain abilities and tendencies. I think you touched on some of them. Could it be another natural skill (that needs to be developed) is being leaders?
Maybe we should be less concerned with the rights of women and more concerned with building men and instructing them with in righteousness and goodness and truth, so they can and will lead, but do so with wisdom and virtue. No one is perfect. No man is perfect. Neither is any women. That said do you think it would be possible if we trained men in such a way they should maybe be the head of the household?
The problem is that the media has done such a biased job of covering leftist extremism and violence that they have normalized it and made it seem acceptable to too many people.
The position you hold based on the questions you asked are exactly correct. Feminism, all of it it is either about man hating or promoting the interests of women over those of men. It is not about equality. The media generally turns a blind eye to the wrongs of feminism and certainly conceals much of their wrong doings and agenda as well as putting a positive spin on feminism. They are absolutely dangerous. Those who did these things completely lack empathy and are complete reprobates.
I am a strict patriarchist. I am completely opposed to feminism regardless of what wave. I am also opposed to women voting or holding public office. In 1919 in America women won the right to vote. Immediately they used those privileges to advance the causes of women over men. This is generally speaking of course. They did not use that right for the betterment of society on the whole. They did not use those rights other than largely to vote for the interests of women only, to the detriment of the nation and to gather political power to promote the interests of women. Why would any rational person allow a creature that reasons primarily emotionally to vote and lead in government via holding office? I say let them be home makers and stay in their own lane as God best designed them for.
That's awful. I've never met a feminist that was violent except one girl, but she always avoids me for some reason and I never have to interact with her. I can't imagine anyone condoning that seriously sick of behavior. I hope the rest of feminists are actually against this but just don't want to speak up in case they get attacked by the misandrists. They need to be locked up.
Feminism is about making women into proxy warriors for the oligarchs. You "empower" women to become wage workers, effectively doubling the amount of labor, which drives down the value of labor. You then limit their ability to start a family, reduces number of future laborers so that you can make an excuse that we need more laborers, which leads to free-market justification for mass migration.
In order to have mass migration of labor you need "open borders" "open borders"= destruction of nations. Destruction of nations= end of identity lack of Identity= docile, malleable labor class
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
I wish women understood the damage feminism causes to men and especially little boys, with feminism now taught in schoolschool boys are brought up being told they are garbage humans and iheriently bad because they were born with male genitalia, feminism not only hates men, feminism seeks to destroy men
I 100% believe that both my ex and my current partner would use my kids as a weapon against me if they were so inclined (if I split up with my current partner), but can't really say that's related to feminism in this case.
They claim misandry don't exist because why fix something if it don't exist? They caim misandry isn't harmful because why fear something that won't cause harm? They claim it as revenge for misogyny because people will support a revenge scheme against a crime before they support a movement that is evil. The truth is these misandrists are nothing more than gender terrorists.
0
0 Reply
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
Most Helpful Opinions