Of the teens in the global warming debate, do you subscribe to the Liberal Greta Thunberg or the Conservative Naomi Seibt?

Question

ZeussLightningBolt · Accepted Answer

Seibt of course
And for some reason, Conservative girls are actually better looking.
And Seibt is an adult, Greta is still a child. So it's much easier to take Seibt seriously.
I'm glad to see someone speaking on behalf of the other side. I'd love to see these two debate.

That being said, I know the media won't give Naomi as much attention as they give Greta.

tartaarsaus · Accepted Answer

I mean, science is more on the side of Thunberg so I guess her. Is she overdramatizing things? Probably. But there still need to be more intensive efforts to slow down climate change

jakerson181 · Answer

From your N. Y. Post article's headline "Conservative Group hires Naomi Seibt" She's a hired spokesperson being paid to advance the political agenda of her sponsors and the people paying her. Greta wasn't "hired" by anyone. Tells you everything you need to know.

Again from the Post article..."Seibt, who is a former “climate alarmist” herself, said that watching people joining Thunberg-inspired “Fridays For Future” helped spark her opposition to climate change activism." Oops. Naomi... jealous much?

Kurαȷ · Answer

I subscribe to Greta.
It doesn't matter whether climate change is overstated.
What matters is that the consequences of doing nothing are potentially catastrophic for everyone while the consequences of doing something are that maybe a few billionaires will end up with fewer billions, and I sure as hell don't care about billionaires.

AlexanderBrunnrgaard · Answer

I only subscribe to reason and what the facts and data are. And there is no reason in taking either side with populist icons who only serve to enflame hysteria in complete negligence of what facts we have on the matter. It's not hard to delve into where we are on environemental research and the theory of global warming yourself, no juvinile, zealous climate preacher needed.

normalice · Answer

One is a genuine person who got attention through effort, and the other was bankrolled by those who profit off environmentally destructive conservatives to fabricate attention and to craft an illusion of validity for opposition to Greta.

MackToday · Answer

I take it a little further than Naomi

Regmorus · Answer

Greta, after having read what german sources write about Naomi... I don't think there is any choice.

Meropatrick · Answer

Probably send them both to work at mcdonalds. That what happens when teenagers dont work in summer

Anonymous · Answer

Greta, of course! Greta travels the world burning fossil fuels, while telling people not to travel the world burning fossil fuels.

Chthou95 · Answer

I'm all for the right most of the time. But if science can back up climate change theories or explain why it's real, then i guess i have to side with Climate change. Not Greta thunberg though

Waffles731 · Answer

Considering A. Has actual scientific evidence behind her claims

Anonymous · Answer

I can feel the blood rushing in my nether regions when Greta gives the stink face

supercutebutt · Answer

Nobody has ever heard of Naomi Seibt.

Mindwipe · Answer

I'll take whichever doesn't have mental issues.

ProfessionalMusician · Answer

Conservative Naomi Seibt

OfDeath · Answer

I don't know

Agape93 · Answer

Greta

Of the teens in the global warming debate, do you subscribe to the Liberal Greta Thunberg or the Conservative Naomi Seibt?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said