Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI am a woman and I believe women can do the same jobs as men. However, scientifically speaking men are more logical and stronger than women and dont scare easily.No women can't do the same jobs as men. They like to think they can but 7.5 / 8 out of 10 times they make themselves look like fools. Take it from someone who is ex-military, who is law enforcement & who works in construction. The average women I encounter in these fields are more interested in the on-site dating game than doing their actual job. Yesterday as an example over the radio a flag girl for the construction team goes X is such a cutie, etc., etc., etc but he's married & does a nervous/guilty laugh.
With police muscle isn't always needed. But women are more prone to blind panic. That's useless in policing. Women are more prone to thinking they're the best of the best with a tidbit of training. That's useless in policing. Women are more emotional. That's useless in policing.41 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yAs I see it, if a job requires you to perform certain tasks, you should be able to perform those tasks- with reasonable accommodation, if necessary, but still. Setting lower standards for people based on uncontrollable characteristics is just asking for trouble- particularly in jobs like police or firefighters or soldiers. If she needs to ask for help to lift the water-cooler bottle into place, that's probably not a big deal, but if she can't pull you to safety when you've been shot and you get left behind and die, you're going to be pissed- and rightly so.
Yes, this means that most people who do the most physically demanding jobs will be men. That's okay. People have different ideas and interests, and even wildly varying gender disparities are not necessarily the result of active bigotry. The average woman is going to have work much harder than the average man to meet the standards of a physically demanding job- but the kind of woman who does is exactly the kind of person you want watching your back in a life-or-death situation.00 Reply
Hard to answer.
For some reason women cops tend to be harsher. Not sure if it's because they need to prove themselves, or they need to assert their authority so they don't get disrespected by others.
But many times that I come across women in positions of authority, they tend to be VERY harsh. :(
Like parking-meter controllers/cops/security-officers/managers.
I have come across one or two female managers that were nice, but then they get screwed by the rest of the organization because they are too nice to say "no". So their teams end up having to deal with unwanted situations.
Strange inbalance.
The sad part about telling you all this is... women ARE better at dealing with multiple little situations happening at the same time, while men tend to go for 1 problem at the time.
(no! i am not saying they are multitasking. I'm saying they are better at keeping track of multiple things happening at the same time.)00 Reply
+1 yWomen can definitely be police officers and should be if they want to. One of my very best friends that I've grown up with, as in known since around kindergarten or first grade, all the way until now is a female police officer and she does a great job. Many female police officers have proven that they are more than capable of doing the job. By the way, I wouldn't say that men are scientifically more logical than women. I would say that is more of a sociological thing, considering that women aren't exactly taught in society to think logically. We're mostly taught to follow our intuition and emotions. Being the "outspoken free thinker" was always considered a masculine thing. However, men are definitely scientifically stronger on average, but that doesn't mean that women can't be strong in their own right. Women can still master all the techniques used to bring down suspects if needed, regardless of how strong they are. They also can always call for backup if they're struggling. Male cops do it all the time.
20 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
77Opinion
+1 yNo, because cops shouldn't exist in the first place, male or female. We did quite fine without cops for most of Human history prior to the 1800s when modern policing came into existence as a way to break up strikes and catch runaway slaves. Police as an institution need to be replaced with something that's actually transparent and accountable to the community that they're supposed to serve (a lot of policing where I live is centered in the regional capital a hundred kilometers away and my home municipality doesn't have a police station of its own.) and less prone to abuse and careerism than the police force is in its current form. I don't really care about individual cops, they can be good or bad regardless of whether they are a cop or not. Its the system of policing itself that is the problem here, not the individual. Policing by its very nature is meant to enforce ALL laws, doesn't matter if the law in question is popular or even whether its one that's just to enforce (Arresting individual prostitutes to curb prostitution, non-violent drug offenders to curb drug use, whistleblowers to hide abuse under the guise of national security etc.), its the job of the police to enforce it regardless of their personal feelings, their moral/ethical hangups towards it or the potential harm that it will cause to the people that are on the receiving end of the enforcement because otherwise they're gonna be reprimanded or even fired from the job.
03 Reply- +1 y
I agree that the war on drugs should end and prostitution should be legal, but dont pretend like cops dont save lives on a daily basis. there's currently 130,000 people behind bars for sexual and violent crimes - would you rather no one arrested them?
- +1 y
@TienShenhan I'm assuming you're talking from a US perspective, which already makes this discussion hard to have given the current circumstances across the Atlantic since people tend to be quite strongly opinionated about American policing. I am not American so I can only speak in general terms and in terms of my own country Finland.
I'm not gonna argue about the efficiency of the police because that wasn't even an argument I was making. My overall point was that policing as it currently is as an institution worldwide requires multiple legal safeguards and watchdog organizations to even be functional because the profession as it exists is rife for abuse. The lack of accountability, the often lifelong careerism, and the power imbalance that exists between the citizen and the police officer because of the latter's monopoly on the legitimate use of violence are just some of the things that help fester a sense of "us vs them" mentality within the police, making it so cops will look the other way if one of their own abuses the power vested to them. Do good cops exist that just want to help people? Of course they do. But, again, individual cops are not the point here.
Nice attempt at a strawman there by the way with the 130,000 criminals. I suggest you read my initial post again. I never said that criminals shouldn't be punished or that there shouldn't be anyone enforcing laws that have been agreed upon. I'm only saying that the current way we do things is not the only way, the most just way or even the most efficient way and that we can do better than this. - +1 y
Whats your idea for a more functioning method with safeguards against corruption? I'll say that any good idea I've heard calls for more funding and not less, are you or others in your Country calling for defunding of your police?
In the US your cops have guns, and in that case maybe, because that evens out the strength difference.
Over here in the UK they don't, so they're pretty much useless. I used to work on the doors, I saw a lot of violence. There were always female police officers walking around, not men. Whenever anything kicked off the guys would be beating the shit out of each other, and the female police officers would have to call male police officers to come and arrest them, and by the time they got there the guys fighting had usually left already. Meanwhile the women were stood there shouting in squeaky voices "stop it right now you're under arrest" while being completely ignored, which was always comical. A woman can't arrest a grown man who doesn't want to be arrested and doesn't give a shit.20 Reply
+1 yI've recently gotten a apprenticeship in the British Army, in telecommunications but i still have to go through military training like everyone else.
Yes the risk of danger is more for a woman in certain cases but they can also be a great in certain roles especially in the police. For example rape and domestic abuse victims might feel more comfortable talking to a woman as women tend to be easier to open up to and are usually better at dealing with crimes involving children too as we just have that instincts to protect children not saying men don't but women tend to have stronger instincts in certain situations.
We can usually sense danger and can tell insistently if someones a bit dodgy. Women have had to learn the signs of a wrongen to protect are selfs so were better at knowing what to look for sometimes.
Men and women both have unique qualities that can help work together in a team.23 Reply- +1 y
"Military training like everyone else" - U
... Women have drastically lower physical fitness standards in the military. [Real gun show intensifies] - +1 y
@havingfun101 yes im aware of that and i don't really agree if it. If we go to war ever which i doubt but still don't think the enemy would take it easier on me because im a women if anything they'd probably do worse to me because im a woman.
Thats why i choose a job were i wouldn't be on the front line. - +1 y
Special treatment for special people. You see, I might only be half English, but I'm hearty, like a full English!
Women are nearly five times more likely to show an automatic preference for their own gender than men are to show such favoritism for their own gender, according to a study in the October issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 87, No. 4). https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women
Phantogram - When I'm Small: https://youtu.be/28tZ-S1LFok
+1 yI’ll be perfectly honest. And I know I will offend some people. But law enforcement is not a job designed for women.
Realistically what the job of a police officer entails is:
taking down big guys who want to fight you,
be good at chasing men who can run much faster than you because they are taller
wrestling with people resisting arrest.
If you’re a 5’3” 135 lbs, there’s no way you can do any of this.
Usually females do the paper work or take notes while the men do the real work. If police encounter a guy who wants to fight police and resist arrest , they will always send a man to help take him down.20 Reply
+1 yFirstly I’d like to begin by saying, of course women can be cops and also you’re explanation as to why women are inferior basically definitely was you trying to defend why you don’t think women should be cops so saying you “never said women” can’t be cops doesn’t change that you definitely gave a description implying just that.
I also find it rather sad that as a women you believe you’re that much inferior to a man I can understand physically sure but logically? Really? 😩
All I have to say is believe in you girl and don’t think because of your gender you’re not capable and if you’re really not don’t blame being a female for it.
You can do anything a man can.10 ReplyI would say it is necessary.
The first thought that came in my mind was, women cops are necessary to handle a women. It would uncomfortable for a man to handle a women, and for the woman too.
Men are biologically strong and logical, ok.
Also when we are talking about the equaliy, it should be a personal choice, if anyone wants to join police. I know you aren't against a woman in police, but I think there are so many fields that can be segregated but think it should be left for individuals to decide.20 Reply
+1 yWomen offer a tremendous amount of utility in law enforcement. Having said that, this is dependent upon the situation, and the area in which they are patrolling. For example, female officers are much better at handling domestic issues as they are typically more compassionate and personable. They are also typically more effective at deescalating and calming situations down considering most people have ego issues with other men. I personally wouldn't feel safe having a 5'0" 120lb female deputy trying to back me up on an emergency call. She would most likely serve as a liability which further jeopardizes my chances of being injured or killed.
11 Reply- +1 y
"Female officers are better at" .. . [Citation needed]
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yShort answer- yes, why not?
Longer:
If you think that any woman can become equal to men in bearing police officer after some training you are delusional...
Yes there is some very strong women who could do it, but they are very small %.
And I'm talking about street cops who have to deal with beating, phisicaly fighting criminals, including SWAT.
Yes, there is a lot of positions where any women could do as a police officer with right mind set and training, but don't believe those action movie characters who do better job in betting guys all movie it is fiction...
Just how many women in real history books been able to do it? Not many.
If you considering to go for police officers job, I would say go for it, you might be one of this small % and it could be best think that could happen to you.
But consider both sides of job not just glamorous shown on TV part, real job is not that...20 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 ymen aren't more logical than women scientifically, that's a stereotype... but the rest is true. and yea of course they should, but not in the very physical posititons for obvious reasons. besides a lot of positions in the police aren't really physical at all (and it's mostly women who are in these anyways) like taking in complaints & charges. no force required. anyways women can do pretty much anything just as good as guys can do except when it's to do with physical strenghth. guys have the obvious upper hand on that one
11 Reply
Asker+1 yI retract that statement however. "This could mean, for example, that men tend to see issues and resolve them directly, due to the strong connections between the “perception” and “action” areas of their brains, while women might be more inclined to combine logic and intuition when solving a problem."
I think they should if they want as long as thet are able to keep up with the outhers in the fource (no spasical treatment or prefrance on sex)
I think its even importent for some cases for exsample communicating with a woman that is being dangrus to her self or ouhters20 Reply
+1 yI voted A, because I think women with the ability to be a cop are great cops, and even with the sensibility, it's possible to use it for good. There are women who could and women who couldn't. I wouldn't because I know myself, and it would be a lot of anxiety for me.
20 Reply
+1 yif they can preform the job to a similar level. without them requesting the level of entry to be lowered. so they have an easier time to do the job. while also going the training required. I see no issues with women in any job field.
22 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree 100 percent
- +1 y
typo *doing training required*
Men and women thing differently, having both view points is a good thing.
Men have an easier time getting stronger than women yes, but policing isn't about strength. And with the correct training, a smaller person can comfortably restrain a. much larger opponent. So no reason I can see why a woman should not be in the police force, as they would. lose a lot without the female influence.10 Reply
+1 y



A woman's ego is not worth a man's life.
10 Reply5.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. "However, scientifically speaking men are more logical and stronger than women and dont scare easily."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkMd2nLRzQ
Where the fuck did you get this? "Scientifically speaking", my ass! Show me a single peer-reviewed, refereed paper in a scientific journal showing this.
You've got some growing-up to do.16 Reply
Asker+1 yWow you're so pissed this app has gone to absolutely shit
Asker+1 yToo many sensitive fucks like you
- +1 y
I'm not sensitive.
I'm a STEM professional.
I get a lot - A LOT - of money to protect the population of the world from bullshit like this.
Unfortunately, when people say or believe things that aren't proven, it usually leads to disasters (Boeing 737 MAX crashes) and violence (wars like the US Civil War). You will learn this when you get older. - +1 y
FYI, you might be interested in this scene from the 1976 Dirty Harry movie, "The Enforcer".
I am not trying to make a point with this - just mentioning it since it is related to your question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rcIJIWqYmo - +1 y
@jahaims
Oh? Are you making a universal claim?
How do you measure "strength"?
Statistically, a healthy average man may have more strength than the average healthy woman, but statistics are irrelevant; people are not.
If the police establish strength requirements (like the military does), then all that matters is that the person who wants to be a cop can satisfy them, regardless of sex.
The late Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater who ran as a Republican against Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 Presidential Election wrote a famous 1993 article about homosexuals in the military which included this line:
www.washingtonpost.com/.../
THE GAY BAN: JUST PLAIN UN-AMERICAN
By Barry M. Goldwater
June 10, 1993
After more than 50 years in the military and politics, I am still amazed to see how upset people can get over nothing. Lifting the ban on gays in the military isn't exactly nothing, but it's pretty damned close.
Everyone knows that gays have served honorably in the military since at least the time of Julius Caesar. They'll still be serving long after we're all dead and buried. That should not surprise anyone.
But most Americans should be shocked to know that while the country's economy is going down the tubes, the military has wasted a half-billion dollars over the past decade chasing down gays and running them out of the armed services.
It's no great secret that military studies have proven again and again that there's no valid reason for keeping the ban on gays. Some thought gays were crazy, but then found that wasn't true.
...
>>>>>>
"You don't need to be "straight" to fight and die for your country. You just need to shoot straight."
<<<<<<
That same mentality applies to any physiological constraints for a job.
And that includes being a cop.
897 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Depens where you come from. I don´t know how the police in the USA works but here in Germany women are already police officers. But whereas I know the US police officers are alone in their car right? Because here in Germany there are also two police officers in the car. So it´s nowadays more often a man and a woman.
10 ReplyI believe so. I was wanting to be a cop for a long time. Still do. But health issues got in the way. We are all different and handle things differently. We can bring a different side to the situation. And I believe woman can relax more if there is a female cop. They speak the same language. Lol. Also, different situations call for different tact. Gender aside, I think anyone can bring positivity to the situation. No matter what gender you are or aren't.
10 ReplyThere may be areas in the police work were men aren't as efficient as women, or situations were they would be more useful.
Also, while it is true that men are stronger physically, women are normally more agile and faster. On hand-to-hand combat, make officers have the advantage; on pursue situations, the female officers are more suited for the job.
It's ask about finding the right balance and the right situation for reach one. Other than that, woman can be whatever they want to free.10 ReplyLaw enforcement doesn't necessarily rely on muscle strength, it can rely on tools such as tasers, batons, guns, etc. In fact: athletic ability already isn't taken heavily into account considering fat cop prominence: if they tried to apprehend a criminal without a projectile weapon, the criminal would just run away. As far as brain mentality goes some women are definitely better than some men.
10 Reply1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I can carry a lot of stuff, a woman can carry some stuff, both can carry, a woman just needs to be careful she doesn't hurt her back.
Does that make sense? Sure, a woman can do it, she might just need to be a bit more careful or train a bit longer.20 Reply12.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. You've not got much of an idea what it takes to be a cop, then.
From female convicts to female crime victims - the female demographic of policing has got so large that there is a shortage of female cops to deal with them.
A male cop cannot deal with women and their issues with as much relatability as a female cop could.11 Reply- +1 y
Only because of false accusations sexual discrimination or harrassment against men. They created the market from scratch. 🤔
Absolutely. With all the tools available to law enforcement, physical attributes do not play as big of a role in today's law enforcement. I served with women in the military who were true warriors and I would serve with again if given the chance. If women can handle the military, they can handle law enforcement.
10 Reply- 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIs she can meet the set standards then she should go for it.
22 Reply- +1 y
*if
But I think you knew what I meant
Asker+1 yI agree
+1 yI got respect for anybody who wants to be a police officer right now in the USA. They have the hardest most thankless job imaginable.
They are on par with active duty military members right now. Even above them because so many brainwashed morons hate them.11 Reply1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think some women are capable. But yes you are correct about the logic and strength part.
Women are far more emotional, like I get a feeling a female cop might let a criminal go just because he/she came up with a sad story.20 Reply5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think anyone who has a (reasonably) clean record and the will and health to serve should be afforded the opportunity to train. Period.
20 ReplyI said no and in most cases that should be the case as they are weaker and more emotional. But if they are over a certain height and know how to fight then yes. Other than that they're a massive liability to their partner on the field.
30 Reply1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I'm not opposed to them trying. If what you said is true, they might be less efficient at the job than men, but I certainly don't think they should be like disallowed from trying to be one. That would just seme oppressive and inequal.
20 Reply
+1 yCertain women make amazing cops, firefighters, even soldiers. Its not super common, but it happens. I'd say 95% of the women i fought fire with should not have been out there, but that other 5% kicked ass and I was glad they were next to me. It's not the gender, its the individual, because I also worked with some pussy ass men that should stay off of burning mountains too
187 Reply- +1 y
"...95% of the women I fought fire with should not have been there, but that other 5%..."
-- Diehard Simp, The Collateral Damage Chronicles - +1 y
@havingfun101 thats simping huh? Tell that to the countless women on here who hate and block me for saying the shit I say
- +1 y
Women have a care based morality; men have a justice based morality, thus the ongoing hypocrisy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_care - +1 y
Cool story bro
- +1 y
See what I mean? You're a matarchial male; thus your lack of rigor and relational aggression.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 I'm matriarchal because I observed that 5% of the women I fought fire with did an amazing job at it?
- +1 y
Not because, but it does show your disposition. E. g.: 1/4 homeless people are women; those poor people!
- +1 y
Whats your drug? Just curious
- +1 y
I have a natural high according to my younger brother; the body can't distinguish between drugs: it all translates into dopamine & other neurochemicals. Stop using relational aggression, ya wimp!
- +1 y
I'm not being aggressive, thats just how you feel about my words
- +1 y
You implied that I'm on drugs; attempting a character assassination thereby. I see you. Just tell me how you really feel, like a man!
Relational aggression or alternative aggression[1] is a type of aggression in which harm is caused by damaging someone's relationships or social status.[2][3] ... The attention relational aggression has received has been augmented by the help of popular media, including movies like Mean Girls and books like Odd Girl Out by Rachel Simmons (2002), Nesthäkchen and the World War by Else Ury (1916), and Queen Bees and Wannabes by R. Wiseman (2003).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_aggression - +1 y
No, your behavior revealed that you aren't in a normal state of mind and I asked a question meant to reveal a clue as to what's wrong with you, which is still anybody's guess with your brother having the most insight. Have you picked his brain for other theories?
- +1 y
It's called runners high; normal people are weak & dumb, like you & the average person is a woman, due to population demographics.
- +1 y
Oh I'm a normie now, hallelujah
- +1 y
That term was started ironically; by those to whom it applies. Also, sarcasm is beneath masculine men; say what you mean, softboi.
- +1 y
Some speakers deserve seriousness, others not so much. I can't imagine having a serious discussion with you yet
- +1 y
Well, matarchial cultures are neccesarily primitive, from an anthropological perspective; so it's no wonder you lack aggression, introspective honesty or creativity.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Look, I just reported this TienShenhan, but just saying, he made a good point. If the individual is qualified, men or women, then they should be there. So what is he quoted some book? Does it matter?
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl lol reported me for what, proving that CNN lies to viewers?
- +1 y
No, for you being so compelled to involve politics with a persons death. I was suggesting that people should watch a documentary about RBG, what does that have to do about Donald Trump? But no, you couldn't help yourself. You do realized I supported Donald Trump in 2016, right? I even decided to go Wharton because of him...
- +1 y
by the way.. u didn't prove anything. Fox lies as well. And I watch them too. But anyways, I'm not going to respond to you anymore. Please just end this discussion.
- +1 y
You end it coward. And what does your opinion of FOX mean to me? Other than Tucker I dont watch them, they've been lying my whole life. What did you put in your reason for reporting me? "He brought politics into a thread about the death of a politician!" You poor victim. Will the internet ever stop traumatizing your weak mind?
- +1 y
I never started it. Just a simple RBG comment got you started. Now, if u are interested in ending it, then just don't respond to this comment! Okay? End of story :)
- +1 y
I don't mind discussing important topics, you're the one who needs a safe space
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl you're a bully; using the same feminine relational aggression that Tien uses. No women are qualified with Affirmative Action giving them lower standards. The same goes for coloreds.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 No women are qualified for what? I've worked with women that could outwork you and break your arms in a fight, I guarantee it
- +1 y
I've been jumped over a dozen times, a number of times they were armed and men are twice as strong as women, pound for pound. Stop simpering and being hysterical. Affirmative Action = lower standards = disqualification.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 So? It's simple. Create a movement where the standards are the same? And, how am I a bully by saying that some men and women are of the same capability?
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Also, @TienShenhan was not being a bully. Just because someone does not agree with you or refutes u because they don't know something doesn't make them a bully. I was just getting mad at him for continuing a conversation that was talking about something opposite I was talking about. And he stopped. So... ya.
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl you tried to take away Tien's ability to speak because he disagreed with you; that's relational aggression and text but bully hypocrisy. You could've make him do anything in person, so your report before you asked him to leave you alone and before blocking him. You went straight for the nuclear option like a coward.
- +1 y
I was talking to you, thus my using your name. The movement you refer to is called abolishing Affirmative Action, which we'll do after we finish making women register for Selective Service. You girls will learn one way or another. As I like to say: marriage, cohabitation and childbirth are at all time lows and women lose 90% of their eggs by age 30.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 I take my response back. I had a bit clouded idea of affirmative action. I don't think u should abolish it. All I am saying is that not ALL Men making better firefighter/cops/soldiers than women.
- +1 y
Awww? 😍 so girlie! Of course you want to keep your special treatment, although it violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by discriminating against white men. You would be right about your "not all men" statement, except for the fact that ALL women receive Affirmative Action, so we can't tell who's qualified and who's not, unless we look only at white men. That's why I get to arm wave. I'm already trying to show my boy Tien the hypocrisy of the average woman, whom he holds in such high esteem.
- +1 y
@havingfun101All I am saying is that Not ALL women are as strong as some men. Not ALL men are as strong as some women. That is it. I wasn't taking away Tein's ability to speak. I was just talking about and RBG film and he took it on a completely different path. And like a coward, you just presumed that I reported him before asking him to stop. I did ask him to stop. He didn't. So I just reported him. I don't want to block @TienShenhan because he did not offend me or say something very rude to me. He just doesn't agree with me. Now had he went messaging me like rude nonsensical stuff, then I would have blocked him. Plus, he clearly is a person who's views are fogged up by biases.
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
Look, girl I read your comments and saw that you said you had reported him, BEFORE asking him to stop. Scroll up and do the same. Stop lying. You reported him, which leads to permanent deplatforming; ergo, you're a bully and dishonest to boot. ... Normally, the "not" argument works, but ALL women & coloreds & NO white men receive Affirmative Action, so you are objectively wrong, because we can't take any measurements. In other words: gets no help > gets help 🧐 ...
"We understand how dangerous a mask can be. We all become what we pretend to be."
-- Patrick Rothfuss, The Name of the Wind - +1 y
@havingfun101 Are u okay? This comment thread about ruth bader ginsburg did not start here. IT STARTED HERE! ---> Breaking: US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at age 87. Let's show our respects to this Wonderful lady. Thoughts? ↗
- +1 y
I asked Tein to stop, if you find his comment.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Also, women know what risks they are taking when they go into the forces. But yes, men should get more consideration. By the way, are you even reading my comments? I said that I made a simple comment of RBG and he started on a completely different topic. Why would I make a comment about RBG here?
- +1 y
I had no way of knowing what I had no access to, but you could've blocked him instead of reporting him, so my criticism is valid otherwise. Women force their way in with lower standards and they force white men to fund Affirmative Action, because women are the majority of the population and only men must register for Selective Service or become felons & lose voting rights. We're changing that, just check the news. Women are simply hypocritical to the bone or they'd change things. Circle back to the relationship statistics that I left; we're nonviolently attacking women directly, Tien notwithstanding.
"Sometimes you must hurt in order to know, fall in order to grow, lose in order to gain because life's greatest lessons are learned through pain."
-- Pain, Naruto Shippuden - +1 y
@havingfun101 okay, you do have a valid point. I'm just saying, why should I block him? He is not offending me. He obviously does make some good points. I just reported him for not being respectful to someone else and taking something off-topic. Nothing is going to even happen to him... he if they do see my report they will just take 7 xper away. Dat's it!
- +1 y
There are to possible outcomes for interaction with me. Their online equivalents are acknowledging my point or as just happened with another woman, blocking me. The funny thing is, offline, regardless of numbers or implements, I'm unblockable. You've earned my respect.
"Anyone can love a thing because. That's as easy as putting a penny in your pocket. But to love something despite. To know the flaws and love them too. That is rare and pure and perfect."
-- Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear - +1 y
@havingfun101 You like books, huh? :) If you don't mind me asking, why did the girl block u?
- +1 y
She implied that I needed to take medication. You know how girls are; it's more about saving face (or preserving reputation), than about who's what or why. I see being blocked as a victory, like the enemy fleeing.
"Books are a poor substitute for female companionship, but they are easier to find."
-- Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear - +1 y
@havingfun101 Okay. Sorry bout that. Yeah, some girls are def like that sometimes.
- +1 y
You're apologizing for other women; men tend to be more individualistic than women, though. The odds are against the average woman, statistically, but I think that you'll make a good wife & mother soon enough.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Ha! Who told you Im going to be a "mother" or "wife"? I have my career to achieve first.
- +1 y
I am only 18, if you did not notice. I would get out when I am 20. Like, is every women supposed to marry before the age of 30? That is ridiculous! What is soon enough even supposed to mean?
- +1 y
Me: offers you a compliment that your fore mothers would consider to be a blessing. You: [takes offense]
- +1 y
@havingfun101 my "fore mothers" were in a much different situation than I am in. I am not interested in being in the kitchen, Im interested in making an impact in this world! I am sorry if you think I can't.
- +1 y
Honey, I'm literally a genius and I don't see how your ancestors didn't make a difference or do work. Go ahead and play fertility chicken as a seller in a historically drastic buyer's market; but I warned you & gave you my personal blessing.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Uhm.. I have no idea what you just said.. I am just gonna say okay. Okay?
- +1 y
How are you this unintelligent? ... barren career women > mother's with or without jobs.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 I don't mean to be obnoxious or arrogant, but I got into Wharton when I was 16. I don't think I am unintelligent. I have never heard that before. Barren isn't used in the correct format. www.google.com/search
- +1 y
Women suck as cops, childless women are less valuable to society and..: barren [ bar-uhn ]
adjective
not producing or incapable of producing offspring; sterile: a barren woman. - +1 y
@havingfun101 Wow! You are a really hurtful person. Just so you know, Women have much more to contribute to society than to produce such cowards like you
- +1 y
I've been jumped by armed and unarmed men a dozen times; so your accusation amuses me. However, you know I'm right. You see, I'm a chronically unemployed N. E. E. T. on Social Security Disability Benefits and my IQ has been estimated to be at or near genius level, to say nothing of my other manifestations of genetic superiority. I like to do advanced mathematics and gymnastics for fun and I'm memorizing a book ironically. When you were in university, I was escaping being starved, beaten and tortured to live in the woods like an animal; because I didn't know about youth shelters and couldn't get into standard ones as a minor. Compare that to your own experiences.
"You are not wise enough to fear me as I should be feared. You do not know the first note of the music that moves me."
-- Patrick Rothfuss, The Name of the Wind
https://youtu.be/Qie9MscNwWY - +1 y
@havingfun101 @havingfun101 I take that back. You are an egotistical male chauvinist. I called you egotistical, because you are more interested in proving that you are not a coward rather than proving that you were not being hurtful. I called you a male chauvinist, because you have 0 respect women. You think they are total dumbasses. In your head, women's only job is to produce boys and some girls, so they can produce boys. If certain men could produce boys, then great! Let's use women as slaves for our pleasure. You are just like Donald Trump, does that make you feel better honey?
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Who's estimating your IQ? Your defeated combatants?
- +1 y
@TienShenhan Nobody with a high IQ, brags about a high IQ. If he really defeated combatants, then he would be employed by CIA or FBI. Let me tell you, no soldier says that women who do not produce children are of less value to the society. He literally said "Honey, I'm literally a genius and I don't see how your ancestors didn't make a difference or do work." He even called you a bully. I apologizing for saying you don't have any respect. This guy has no respect.
- +1 y
@TienShenhan
Standardized testing; I didn't take the SAT. - +1 y
Geniuses dont run around calling themselves smart and badasses dont run around calling themselves tough. I figured that out as a child, its sad that adults can't. If @havingfun101 wants to analyze this situation for me I'd like it: 2 officers, 1 male and 1 female get ambushed by a gunman and both are shot in the face. Both live, but the male is incapacitated and likely in shock. The female keeps her shit together and tends to the male while keeping an eye out for the gunman and attempting to call for backup despite having a ruined jaw. Most people, regardless of their genitalia, would not be capable of doing what she did and its god damned impressive and worthy of respect. Now with all this in mind do you think that the male should have became a cop but the female shouldn't have, because of her genitalia? All people should be judged and considered as individuals
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
Tien is employing relational aggression; I prefer to be direct. His combatants are my random orc mobs, although the FBI was looking for us back when I was the leader of a Thieves' Guild of sorts. Daffodil, I called you a bully for reporting Tien but not simply blocking or ignoring him.
"Nobody"... why don't they 'brag'; do they want the approval of the HERd?
Donny T. likes women better than men, which is standard issue for the average person; since both men and women have increased pro-female preference. I'm an outlier in this regard, which makes me even more attractive to dumber, weaker feemales! Hahahaha!
I do like that you called me honey! I happen to have it freakishly going on downstairs, since you were probably wondering! 😍
As for women, they don't invent or achieve nearly as much as men; the few exceptions have scientists & philosophers as husbands and fathers. 🤔
Smart women should have smart children, instead of pretending to be weaker, dumber men. Not only is the average man more intelligent than the average woman but also an imbalance emerges between the sexes at the high levels of intelligence that the most demanding jobs require. At the near-genius level (an IQ of 145), brilliant men outnumber brilliant women by 8 to one. That's statistics, not sexism.
en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Sex_differences_in_intelligence - +1 y
Way to change the subject. Contrary to all your claims, I think you've made it clear that you're a standard shit-talking kid, you're a dime a dozen. Not special, certainly not taking on groups of foes alone, unless you're referring to your ninja turtle action figure's encounters with Shredder's army
- +1 y
@TienShenhan
Taking cover late & playing medic doesn't make her a good cop, but a good target & part time nurse. Prevalence of anxiety disorders are significantly higher for women (23.4 percent) than men (14.3 percent). & army statistics indicate that feemales have twice the injury rate of males. Affirmative Action can't hide everything. ...
I've already illustrated that women are less capable firefighters & that you utilize relational aggression, so that's a wrap. However, I do like to show how similar matarchial males & females are, so as to make them see their own nature for themselves. Tien, you may want to decalcify your pineal gland by working some boron into your diet, because you're not seeing the light!
"No! You're just trying to confuse me! I won't listen to the ravings of a lunatic!"
-- Tien Shinhan, Dragon Ball Z - +1 y
Taking cover late? They werent in a shoot out, they were taking a break in their vehicle. Cops need sandwiches just like you. Yes males do make better firefighters, I already made that clear at the very beginning of this thread so there is no need to illustrate what essentially no one here has denied at any point. You are upset that I said that 5% of the women in my personal experienced belonged on that fire line next to me. To dispute this you dont need to keep reinforcing what everyone has already acknowledged as fact, and undermining my masculinity with assumptions while being a self-elevating speaker makes you look like a massive cuck. Honestly I'd bet my left testicle that you're a bitch and this is how you make yourself feel big and bad since no one else will. It's not "runner's high" it's probably brain damage from getting those beatdowns that fogged up your memory of events
- +1 y
Safety is an illusion; there's no excuse for putting one's life in another's hands. They were soft & selective pressures kicked them the bottom. I'm not upset, you're wrong, because women & coloreds are hired on a sliding scale of difficulty, starting at brown/vagina and ending at white/penis. Your opinion is subjective and also objectively inaccurate.
"Runner's high" was in reference to my mention of a natural high, on account of your implying that I was on drugs. You can choose to be a patriarchal male, but why would you?
In my all fights combined, I've been hit only a handful of times, but my dad has punched me in the face thousands of times, so you may have a point there. 🤣 He used to get so mad & say: you only have to go to school, but I have to go to work with a hurt hand, because of you... it's your fault! He used to call me a bitch, too. Were you raised by a single mother, like him? Ahahahaha! I remember my first spanking at 13 months old and learning to walk & talk with my twin brother Scott. I remember being scared and covered in yuck and wanting to be held; I also remember my first knife fight, at the age of three. You have no idea, sir, none. - +1 y
@havingfun101 You really make no sense. I bet sheryl sandberg is 50 times smarter than you. #1. NEVER USE WIKIPEDIA AS YOUR ONLY SOURCE WHEN PROVING A POINT. --> en.wikipedia.org/.../Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source
#2. Intelligence is not just measured by an IQ score. It is many things. Women's EQ score is a couple of points higher than Mens. For your information, Women have invented PLENTY of things. A women invented the dishwasher, you idiot. www.usatoday.com/.../\
inventionland.com/.../
#3. Wtf was with saying.."Women suck as cops, childless women are less valuable to society". onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/.../
Childless women are less valuable to society? You really have no heart. Why are they less valueable? I'd like you to bring a REPUTABLE resource for that. Something that ends with. edu and. org. - +1 y
@TienShenhan "Geniuses dont run around calling themselves smart and badasses dont run around calling themselves tough. I figured that out as a child, its sad that adults can't. If @havingfun101 wants to analyze this situation for me I'd like it: 2 officers, 1 male and 1 female get ambushed by a gunman and both are shot in the face. Both live, but the male is incapacitated and likely in shock. The female keeps her shit together and tends to the male while keeping an eye out for the gunman and attempting to call for backup despite having a ruined jaw. Most people, regardless of their genitalia, would not be capable of doing what she did and its god damned impressive and worthy of respect. Now with all this in mind do you think that the male should have became a cop but the female shouldn't have, because of her genitalia? All people should be judged and considered as individuals" --- You are a smart man. Thank you for having respect for us. :)
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
Prove me wrong, sunflower! Let's say that I was citing the studies that the wikipedia page cited, through those cutesy blue letters, okay lilac? ...
Yeah, but what if she's not as smart? Besides, just because I'm half German, doesn't mean I killed 90% of the white German jews, raising their IQ by two standard deviations due to survival of the fittest; that was the spawn of a single mother who was the bad, bad man from WW2. ... You know very well that EQ is the second fiddle consolation prize for women and soft boy's.
Women invent plenty... of excuses. Women make up only 7.7 percent of primary inventors who hold patents. Men invented the individual parts of the dishwasher and she easy bake oven'd them, pretty poinsettia. Oh, and 'we need more female cops' because "feelings" & "muh excessive force" & "scared, thus nonviolent" aren't exactly robust arguments. You're so adorable right now! 🥰
Research shows disparity between tax paid by women and men: phys.org/.../...-disparity-tax-paid-women-men.html
Women more than men adjust their careers for family life: www.pewresearch.org/.../
[Goes back to reviewing the colossal amount of information memorized this week]
"The energy of the mind is the essence of life."
-- Aristotle, The Philosophy of Aristotle - +1 y
P. S. 2bfair: I've been called both a genius by one woman & a 'badass with a nice ass' by two women at the same time, this very year. The details are fairly lit if you're intrested.
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Nope, I was raised by a real man, a badass that would never call himself as such because his actions speak loud enough that he doesn't need to compensate with a big mouth. You're right I don't know who you are, but my instincts about self elevating speakers and self-proclaimed badasses are usually spot on.
- +1 y
It was the girls who called me a badass, not me. Why did your dad raise you to be passive aggressive instead of just aggressive? I know: that's all you both know. What can I say, besides: that's what they all say! You're slightly more masculine in demeanor than when we first started, so I'll call our time together a great success. Here's the thing: if even a fraction of what I said is accurate, then it makes all of your assessments flop; that's good enough for me.
"When you fall off the horse, you get back up... and you Eat. That. Horse. Come eat that horse with me Vegeta!"
-- Goku, Dragon Ball Z Abridged - +1 y
I'd argue that any aggression online is passive. Should I be threatening to squeeze your neck? Your "aggression" is a bluff, and your self elevation is compensation for... who knows. I think my original theory holds water
- +1 y
I'm entirely honest with you; to me, deception is a product of weakness and I always have the the receipts on display. All I wanted was for you to let go of the need to make me feel bad, especially by indirect means. Even now, you're calling me a liar, but not overly. You'll get there eventually. Thank you for playing with me! I love you, now, believe it!
- +1 y
@havingfun101 Here are 5 things jeremy siegel (my econ prof.) wanted me to tell you instead of blasting at you. please note that this is quote-on-quote
#1. IQ IS NOT ACCURATE MEASURE OF INTELLIGENCE. --> www.discovermagazine.com/.../do-iq-tests-actually-measure-intelligence
#2. Men and Women are of the same intelligence. He is interested if you can pull up an reliable source that shows men and women are not of equal intelligence, and don't include IQ in it. --> www.newsweek.com/men-women-brain-structure-intelligence-996263
#3. 1/4 of homeless people are female. But.. what sex is the other 3/4 of homeless people? Pets?
#4. Women don't go into the workforce because of morons like you. Here is the process. First, they are encouraged to stay at home an produce children. Then, once they enter the workforce, they are 'less desirable." Take a look at Jessica Alba.
#5. The sources you used are quite old an not accurate. They don't date back to earlier than 2016.
Questions for you..
#1. If women call you badass and a genius, then why are you still single and "poor"?
#2, If you are such a genius, then why did you pick such a.. not very "genius" name?
#3. Camille over here got accepted into Wharton at age 16, with no costs associated. Completely free. Are you calling her not-intelligent?
#4. Joel Houghton invented the first dishwasher, but it was not useable. What men invented the other parts? Mr. Genius, please enlighten me.
My point for you.
Women are not smart, right? So, obviously for a women you are smart and badass. Because she has no brains, and you do. But just because you have brains doesn't make you smart.
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
You wrote a romantic story and mentioned me to your Nancy boy professor? Thank you for the early Valentine's Day gifts! I need dis, precious pansy!🌷... You laid down on the subjects of my citations, Sherl Noseberg, feemale inventors & police officers; the inefficiency of women in the workplace and subsequent tax disparities, so I'll be glad to move on with you. ...
#1 & #2 ...: there's no better metric for intelligence than IQ tests, because emotional intelligence is harder to measure and doesn't translate directly into academic achievement. In other words: you two are trying to compare deductive general factor intelligence measurement with inductive emotional intelligence measurement; it's apples to oranges, butterfly weed. Am I also smarter than your economics professor?
#3... if asked I'd have said the same thing; besides by me, no mention of homelessness has been made, so is it really even relevant?
#4 She's an actress; they rely on their looks. She was at her peak when I was hitting puberty. Women are 46.9% of the workforce, with lower standards, Affirmative Action lawyers and promotions & men are 57.1% of the workforce. I'll try to be more gentle with 10.2% of women for your sake, okay, carnation? - +1 y
@havingfun101 Okay. Let me ask you this. What does Intelligence result in.. achievement? Money?
- +1 y
@havingfun101 OHmy fricking lord!! havingfun101, why don't you take the sat's or act's. Let's see your academic success. What do you have to say about equal intelligence between men and women. Or childless women being of society? You did by the way talk about homeless with @TienShenhan. It was your 4th comment. "Not because, but it does show your disposition. E. g.: 1/4 homeless people are women; those poor people!" Correct, Jessica Alba WAS an actress. After giving birth to her child, she tried to go back to hollywood. But some moron like you told her she was less desirable because she was a mother. Guess where she went then? She co-founded the Honest company ( but I believe she manages everything there.). You didn't answer any of my professors questions, by the way. And if you were smarter than him, then you would be teaching finance at wharton and be advising traders on wall street on CNBC. And you aren't a genius, because a man with brains is a genius compared to a "not-smart" women. Would a mother call you badass or intelligent? I am just curious.. because it doesn't matter, does it. They aren't as valuable to society. But, I'm curious. In your head, I am not as valuable to society. So why are you sitting here wasting your time talking to me?
- +1 y
@TienShenhan "thats simping huh? Tell that to the countless women on here who hate and block me for saying the shit I say" Women block you because they don't agree with you?
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl I think it's more because I make them rethink things, and people want to be protected from that.
- +1 y
@TienShenhan. What to be protected from? Facts are Facts. Opinions are opinions. Someone may have thought of something they might have not. If they take that new fact into consideration, then it helps them make a more informed opinion. If they are so sure about their opinion, then they can sit there and debate it with you. What's the reason to block you, though?
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl youd have to ask them. But they'd likely lie about their reasoning
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
[Waggles index finger] Ah-ah-ah! Qq: How many tickles does it take to make an octopus laugh? ... Ten tickles!
I haven't decided what career to try and I haven't taken any university entrance exams. Until then, I'm very comfortable academically devouring like galactus, while imposing my will! I demonstrated already that a deep well of evidence for male intellectual superiority is available; if you forgot, just scroll up a ways. Speaking of which, can I bang on the philosophy professor, now that I've had my way with the economics professor? Unless the performing arts professor is available, because I've been cataloging hundreds of learned dance steps and it's so disorderly! Childless women are just less capable men, again, scroll up and do click on a thing or two. Balloon Flower, I was illustrating the prevailing paradigm of pro-female preference; due to my seeing a poster that said as much, not being sarcastic. Homeless people all need help, for the record. Interestingly, money talks & excuses walk; fanboys like fantasies, not married mothers. Personally, I got rustled when they canceled one of my favorite shows: Dark Angel! 😡 Hollyhock, statistics and physics are just mathematics of a higher order. I got this, yeah! I probably could teach his class, if I were interested, but a basic understanding of laissez faire capitalism has been covered by a mountain of meddling with which the professor spends most of his time. ... it's just math and rules, like most things. Look, you want me to not use IQ, to evidence intelligence. Such foolishness is beneath even a child, let alone an adult professor who serves subservient women.
(1/2) - +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
(2/2)
An intelligent man is not a genius until his IQ reaches the threshold, regardless of with whom he is compared; but the reality of intellectual sexual dimorphism is sinking in, based on your example. 😀
The blonde one was a mother; I've seen their group around before, whilst doing parkour. Does this raise my standing in your sight? ... Oh, shots fired! I've consistently implied that men are seen as less valuable than women and if certain studies count, they're approximately four times more valuable than men... before demographics or taxation are tallied. https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women
Why? ... because I get excited when I see your notifications in my inbox because you're smart, tough, funny and probably beautiful. That's way more than I'd need to take someone down through there!
"I like street fighting better than sparring in rival schools!"
-- Sakura, Street Fighter 5 - +1 y
@havingfun101 That's an interesting article you got there. I what mainly angers me is the fact that you said Childless women are of less value to society. I'd like to see a article on that from a reputable source. Also, you never answered our question. Which men created the different parts of the dishwasher, and what parts did they make?
- +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
Tell your professor that IQ is deductive measurement and EQ is inductive measurement, thus the two cannot be compared properly. This is a false equivalence informal logical fallacy. You're not being fair to me in this regard, trumpet vine.
I already told you twice to click that pew research center article and actually skim it. I also used the word demographics multiple times, which speaks to reproduction and especially, the lack thereof. Then, there's the net loss that is the female taxpayer. How many metrics do I need to point out the obvious?
The dishwasher thing is a new question, as I'd have addressed it on sight, foxglove.
"The first mechanical dishwashing device was registered in 1850 in the United States by Joel Houghton. This device was made of wood and was cranked by hand while water sprayed onto the dishes.[3] This device was both slow and unreliable. Another patent was granted to L. A. Alexander in 1865 that was similar to the first but featured a hand-cranked rack system. Neither device was practical or widely accepted.
The most successful of the hand-powered dishwashers was invented in 1886 by Josephine Cochrane together with mechanic George Butters in Josephine's tool shed in Shelbyville, Illinois[4] when Cochrane (a wealthy socialite) wanted to protect her china while it was being washed.[5]"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishwasher
"There's no advantage to hurrying through life."
-- Shikamaru Nara, Naruto - +1 y
@Superticklighgirl
Let me guess: trying to embarrass me in front of your professor was fine, but relaying my factually superior counter message was too much to ask. This is why I show men the blatant hypocrisy of women and remind them that we have advantage in the dating, but not marriage, market. I'd never do something like that to you in a million years.
- 9.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThere is a place for women police officers and female soldiers in combat. Considering them exactly the same as men would be a detriment to the effectiveness of the unit. Using everyone in a way that takes advantage of their strengths can only add to our effectiveness.
00 Reply hahaha Judy Hopps was and she was pretty cool lol🐰🦊
22 Reply
Asker+1 yThe best lmao
The role of a police officer should mainly be community service which would be better served with non-violent means. Women seem to do slightly better at not resorting to violence and escalation of force.
20 Reply
+1 yMeh you don't need a dick to have a gun. And I know many brave and strong women. So yeah women can and should be cops
30 Reply12K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The answer is yes but we are unequally abled and the criminal world tends to be sexist. Certain functions are fine. Others are not.
24 Reply- +1 y
Exactly. They can be dispatchers or community outreach or even internal affairs, but putting them on the street and expecting them to catch petty criminals is ridiculous and absurd. This has been shown clearly in loss of weapon rates. Female officers either lose or have their guns taken from them at 3 times the rate of male officers. This isn't a brand new experiment that has never been tried before, we've been trying to integrate for about 40 years and we have PLENTY of data. It shows clearly that men and women are not equal, not even close to being equal, and that besides being roughly 50-90% less effective than men, they make men less effective just by being there.
You know where women should be cops? On TV shows. Let the women cheer "yay, girl power" for their made-up dramas and not try to actually implement Hollywood fantasy nonsense in real life. - +1 y
Or worse, get somebody else killed trying to "rescue" them from a situation where they simply don't belong in the first place.
Why didn't we send a bunch of women down to Ground Zero on 9/11 to dig screaming kids out of the rubble? There were a few who were caught there on the first day, but not on the rescue crews that stayed on down there for weeks afterwards.
Women HAVE a role, Jesus, they don't NEED to take on men's roles, and we don't need men trying to take on women's roles either.
1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. 21% of cops are female and were not on the verge of civil war like are southern neighbors so they must be doing something right
41 Reply- 4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yOf course they should. We have a female office that is the school liaison and has been in the department over 20 years. She is one of the highest paid officers in our city's force.
10 Reply
+1 yI don't know if men are more logical or harder to scare but given how fit the average police officer is I don't know if it would be that hard for the average woman to get to their level
10 ReplyIn the world that we live in, yes.
Imagine a male police officer searching a female down, there would be an uproar.
The same for female officers on men.
There is also a lot of other reasons to it.20 ReplyI wrk around men evryday on construction sites soooooo its algood!! Women cn get shit done too 👌👌
10 Reply
+1 yPersonally, I don't think it would require strength and physical force to the capacity of a Guy. I think Women could be Officers just fine.
30 Reply- 551 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySure... Just like anyone. If they have the personality for it and are physically capable.
10 Reply - 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yAbsolutely why not? Woman can do any jobs that a man can do.
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yOnly.. And i do mean ONLY if they can pass the EXACT same tests and requirements as the male police officers.. I feel the same about fire fighters and women in the military.. The only way women get into these is by greatly reduced requirements.
20 Reply10.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes of course it’s a nice payday and some like doing that kind of work
40 ReplyYes. I'm 10000 times more comfortable with a woman officer. Men are always just dicking about stopping you for not being white and misrepresenting law big time.
20 Reply543 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Lol right bc logic and Intuition are horrible traits to possess when trying to solve problems involving humans. Go away.🙄
04 Reply
Asker+1 ySomeone's offended lol
Asker+1 yAlso this is my thread so you leave hoe
- +1 y
No not at all 😊
It’s an expression meaning you’re talking nonsense. It wasn’t literal. Go away with this poorly thought out - possibly agenda driven but maybe Innocent 🤔🤷♀️- assertion. I was not telling you to go away. 😊
It’s like if a kid says “the moon is made of cheese, I saw it” someone laughs and says ehh get outta here 😂 “
They don’t mean leave. Its not mean spirited.. It’s a friendly way of saying that is silly.
- 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIf they can fight hand to hand whit a criminal who have a knife then yes.
I sugest only the womans that pass the test and phisical competitions in order to show us they can handle the dancer.10 Reply
+1 yMen, more than women, tend to be bullies and physically aggressive. Should they be allowed to be cops?
10 Reply
+1 yNo, there are uncountable instances where a female police officer was overpowered by a man. The role of a police-officer is more suitable for a man.
10 Reply
+1 yAs long as they pass the pt requirements then sure but should be equal right so women should have the same pt requirements
028 Reply- +1 y
The pt requirements are drastically lower for women. 🤡
- +1 y
Shit and people complain the Marines still sperate recruits by gender 🙄 last I heard fuck imma sound like a dick but last I heard women don't even have complete pt the lowered pt to become firefighters
- +1 y
- +1 y
😂🤣 that's a combination of funny, saddening, and 💯 truth, you sure last I heard from my buddy it was pt reasons and yeah he did mention the accusations now that I think about it never mind on that
- +1 y
"Shut up baby, I know it!"
-- Bender B. Rodriguez
A 2004 meta-analysis by Richard Lynn and Paul Irwing published in 2005 found that the mean IQ of men exceeded that of women by up to 5 points on the Raven's Progressive Matrices test.[18][19] Lynn's findings were debated in a series of articles for Nature.[20] He argued that there is a greater male advantage than most tests indicate, stating that because girls mature faster than boys, and that cognitive competence increases with physiological age, rather than with calendar age, the male-female difference is small or negative prior to puberty, but males have an advantage after adolescence and this advantage continues into adulthood.[3]
en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Sex_differences_in_intelligence - +1 y
Definitely going to read that but he's right I can't remember her name but she had an interview on freaking some news channel before they all went ape shit she tried out for seals she said women just can't keep up with men and we have major biological advantages to women there
- +1 y
🤣🤣 misread what you said there disregard my bs 🤣🤣
- +1 y
I don't know aoc pelosi and the brother fu... Omar seem unfit for politicians 🤣 Freud had interesting opinions especially the nose 🤣🤣
- +1 y
You're all over the place buttercup... abdominal breathing, k? It says women are dumber, yes? Women don't belong in politics; you know that. I'm Forgotten FuRyan on the YouTubez if you need some smActRight. ... News: Requiring only men to register for the draft is unconstitutional, a federal judge has ruled.
[pets you vigorously-continues dancing] - +1 y
Only thins I don't agree with there are kinda the women in the draft if she's married when kids then nah other wise I agree there and the politician thing and was just doing research on Freud just random connections happens to me a lot sorry about that
- +1 y
So, you advise hypocrisy in the favor of women? Not surprised! Freud was a matarchial male so he ascribed the softness of men to the feminine. As a twin, this is as inaccurate as it is simpering, but such is the nature of beta males, threated by male sexuality and affection as they are.
- +1 y
Huh tf you doing twisting my words
- +1 y
Women registering for Selective Service, except if they have families, isn't a provision given to men. I was simply making a logical inference & pointing out the feminine disposition.
"Care ethics contrasts with more well-known ethical models, such as consequentialist theories (e. g. utilitarianism) and deontological theories (e. g. Kantian ethics) in that it seeks to incorporate traditionally feminized virtues and values which, proponents of care ethics contend, are absent in such traditional models of ethics.[8] One of these values is the placement of caring and relationship over that of logic and reason. In care ethics reason and logic are subservient to natural care, that is care that is done out of inclination, which is contrary to deontology where actions taken out of inclination are unethical. [9]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_care - +1 y
Bruh children are the future and losing both parents bruh nah
- +1 y
"One rule for me, another for thee!" -- Feemales
- +1 y
Kinda they originally didn't want to vote
- +1 y
False. First wave Feminism demanded a mandatory draft for men, then years later, demanded that they be allowed to vote without being eligible for the draft. Women are simply hypocritical and we all know as much. Fortunately, marriage, child birth and cohabitation are at all time lows. Darwin Awards for all!
"A smile is the best way to get away with trouble even if it’s a fake one."
-- Masashi Kishimoto, Naruto - +1 y
You're half way there bude the majority of women didn't want the required firefighting duty voting rights came with so
- +1 y
But they did want the vote, without the responsibility. "I'm against women's liberation because I don't want to lose my privileges as a woman." -- My Great Grandmother, 191-something
Listen porn, you can't fool me. 😍 - +1 y
A handful did not the mass majority of women remember you brought the draft reason 1 mandatory volunteer firefighter reason 2
- +1 y
Objectively false or women wouldn't choose to vote, regardless of enfranchisement, to this very day. Women provably lobbied to have men drafted, so they brought it up originally and "mandatory voluntary firefighter" is an incoherent statement, regardless of drastically lower standards for princesses. You girls lack the willingness to see things objectively, so we're attacking women's childbearing, finances and happiness directly.
"I am the hope of the universe. I am the answer to all living things that cry out for peace. I am protector of the innocent. I am the light in the darkness. I am truth. Ally to good! Nightmare to you!"
-- Akira Toriyama, Dragon Ball Z, Vol. 10 - +1 y
Sorry dude you're wrong now men we're active in the cause and well shit we had to vote to approve it
- +1 y
Men wanted women to be able to vote years before the bill even got drafted
- +1 y
That was Woodrow Wilson, Congress and a few beta cucks. Women could wake up tomorrow and not go to work or vote and men would immediately pick up the slack, as we have historically. When the ladies are older, childless & alone; but the men are playing with younger women... she'll have only herself to blame. I warned you personally, my dove. Oh, and thank you for all the free adult entertainment! Love you!
"They were satisfied with their lives which had none of the vibrance his own was taking on. And he was angry at himself, that he could not change that for them."
-- Lois Lowry, The Giver - +1 y
😂😂😂😂 fuck outta with that kool aid shit now we're talking roe v wade then yeah you can call them beta cucks
- +1 y
Babe, a beta cuck is still that before he's literally cucked. Abortion is the number one cause of death, above homicide, cancer and heart disease combined; but it's unrelated to our current conversation. Girls wanted this and they're getting more than they bargained for... no refunds. The odds are literally that the average woman will end up alone... do I need to hyperlink more statistics on the subject? You won't take responsibility, because women have a care based (subjective) ethical stance, whereas men have a justice based ethical stance. I understand that, however, I won't let it go unnoticed or unpunished. One man like me can reach hundreds of thousands of men. Oh, and do you not see these muscles? I'm in charge, not you.
Aristotle, Politics: "The relation of male to female is by nature a relation of superior to inferior and ruler to ruled." - +1 y
Yeah I'm good like enough is enough 🤣 some people just like talking to a wall avoiding any further stupid here
- +1 y
I'm a genius and you can hardly string together a sentence.
8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes, there are plenty of good female cops
41 Reply
Asker+1 yI agree
4.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes I am making a universal claim that on average a male is physical stronger than a female. I literally said nothing else. That little book you wrote is just an argument you are having with yourself bud.
02 Reply- +1 y
This is what you wrote:
"It is for sure scientifically proven men are physically stronger."
To a machine or anyone versed in logic, that is a universal statement.
Your amended statement:
"Yes I am making a universal claim that on average a male is physical stronger than a female."
is oxymoronic.
It's not universal if the word "average" is involved.
So, I will correct it (and the grammar) with what we agree upon:
"Yes, I am making a claim that, on average, a male is physically stronger than a female."
Nonetheless, it is irrelevant to @asker's question.
What is important is not average capabilities but the individual applicant's capabilities.
I would appreciate a policeman when I give out a stress call 😆
10 ReplyYou can do well. Intelligence and personality will take you much further than brute strength.
20 Reply- 3.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yNot many of them.
We do not need many small, weak cops.10 Reply - 1.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYes, women can be effective police officers just like men, maybe more so.
10 Reply
+1 yOf course! To protect and serve crosses both genders.
10 Reply- 455 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yThe strength factor is true. Many police officers are injured arresting suspects. Women do add a different perspective and probably would use morereaspning instead of brawn. Which can be a good thing.
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yYes. Certian situations are actually better with a female cop. Do you really want dude patting down women who are arrested?
10 ReplyA few studies claim they ate better at "de-escalating" violence so i say yes. But they still could be regardless
21 Reply- Show More (35)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 


