My body , My choice what does this mean to you?

Question

For me I get to choose what I want in my body because it’s based on my beliefs and what I stand for. It doesn’t mean others get to decide or choose for me because it’s based on someone else’s or their narrative.

Example :

I won’t put a non FDA clinical trial experimental gene altering therapy in my body because the president and government said so. My health isn’t the responsibility of others and their health isn’t the responsibility of me. You are responsible for your own health and how you take care of it. I don’t have to explain my medical or religious belief there is no law that says I must. If anyone tries , there will be deadly consequences to pay ( abiding citizens, government officials, family, and friends as no one is exempted at this point.)

I get to choose who I want to date , be intimate with, kiss , and be around when it comes to social circles. It’s not an act of discrimination, but it’s an act of safety health measures from those who decided to put a non FDA clinical trial experimental gene altering therapy in their body. Vaxxers made the medical choice and I’m making my own medical choice that doesn’t include vaxxers.

There is no guarantee, there is only uncertainty with this situation and what may come with it.

The wolves and the sheep have to separate we don’t mix as a society.

Lliam · Accepted Answer

What's funny is, those who choose not to have this experimental gene modification concoction injected into their bodies do so, for the most part, because they have sought out information. They have formulated their own informed opinions instead of simply going along with the manufactured consensus.

People who demonize those who choose not to get the jab have no clue what those people know. They merely assume that they have been misled by propaganda when it is they, themselves, who have been misled. They ignorantly repeat words like "anti-vaxer" and "conspiracy theorist" that they have heard in the media.

Those who do get the jab are the ones who are propagandized. They have bought into the true conspiracy narrative. They only know what the media manufactured consensus tells them. But the media doesn't go into any detail about "the science". In fact, it goes against science by banning, blocking and censoring information from top global experts in fields like virology, epidemiology, cellular biology, etc. Pharma profiteering organizations like the WHO, CDC, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, etc. collude to invent "cases" based on fraudulent PCR tests, inflate numbers of covid deaths, and minimize the number of vaccine deaths and injuries. All for the purpose of causing panic in order to sell their vaccines (which are not vaccines).

VAERS reports well over 9,000 deaths from the jab and studies indicate that only 1%-10% of deaths get reported and/or published by VAERS. That means that there could have already been between 93,000 and 930,000 vaccine related deaths in the U. S. alone. The same holds true for tens of thousands of serious vaccine injuries (many of them permanent) that have been reported by VAERS. In actuality, there could be millions.

Isn't it interesting that the powers that be claim that there is no proof of vaccine causation in the reported deaths. But when it came to covid deaths, it didn't matter what one died from, whether it was from a motor vehicle accident, a drug overdose, diabetes or congestive heart failure. If they tested positive for covid after death, they were reported to have died from covid. There was no concern about proof of causation.

The covid jab is admittedly an experiment. The general population are the lab rats. They will be studied for three years. But in an honest drug trial, there are double blind studies. Where are the double blind studies in this experiment? It seems to me that those who refuse the jab are the control group. We'll see who survives best in the long run.

It is against the Nuremberg Code to force or coerce anyone to be experimented upon.

I support everyone's right to decide what gets done to their body. I support a woman's right to choose and I support the right to choose which pharmaceuticals to take. It is not the public's or the government's decision.

Aethereal · Accepted Answer

I think it means what you said in your description, but to an extent. It is your choice to do what you want with your body. But there are consequences to doing that you MUST be willing to accept.

Here is an example; you have chosen to not get the Covid vaccine, as is your right to choose. However, the consequence is that you may now be unable to enter/go to certain places (as it is the choice and right of the people there to bar you entry because they do not share your view, and believe that the vaccine is an important safety measure).

Just as no one gets to decide for you, you don't get to demand they don't react, especially when lives could be endangered by doing so. You are perfectly free to distance yourself and home from vaccinated people because you believe they are a danger to you, but so also are vaccinated people free to distance themselves, homes and businesses because they believe you are a danger to them. This is a consequence of choice.

The problem I have often seen with people who vehemently argue freedom of choice is that they want to eat their cake and have it too i. e. they want to choose, but not suffer the consequences of their choice. I hope you aren't one of those.

I fully respect freedom of choice as a right, but believe a person loses that right when they try to deny others the same freedom, believe they are exceptional (only they should get to choose), or use their choice to harm other innocent people.

Smashingdoozy · Accepted Answer

My body my choice is deciding what to do with your body when it directly affects you. Getting an abortion doesn't have a flow on effect to anyone else.

Not getting vaccinated directly affects everyone around you.

nightdrot · Answer

It is a slogan masquerading as a principle. An assertion of willfulness affecting to be moral. It ignores Burke's famous aphorism, "The effect of liberty to individuals is that they may do as they please. We ought see what it will please them to do before we risk congratulations."

In fact, not even the freest democracy recognizes the principle - if such it can be called - in abstract purity. The law does not allow an individual to drive drunk - even though it is the individual doing the drinking and the driving. The law does not allow an individual to commit suicide. This affirming the sanctity of life in the ethos of law and also giving the state the legal authority to intervene to save the individual if he or she attempts suicide. The law does not allow to rob a bank. The law does indeed require that children be vaccinated for polio and other similar illnesses, for example, before they are allowed to begin kindergarten.

The list goes on. The problem with such abstract assertions of rights is - to recur to Burke again - "Government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it; and exist in much greater clearness, and in a much greater degree of abstract perfection: but their abstract perfection is their practical defect. By having a right to every thing they want every thing."

This is the essence of the phrase "my body, my choice." "By having a right to every thing they want everything." The assertion of rights thereby degenerating into mere willfulness. "I want, therefore I am."

In fact, government, and the moral life, is about more than mere willfulness. It is about balancing rights and obligations. It is about defining and refining and refining again in an endless discussion and debate, where the lines are to be drawn. Where autonomy is desirable and where restrictions on that autonomy are necessary.

Thus did Aristotle say that virtue is a mean. A center and not always obvious mid-point between extremes. It is also why he said that the first questions of politics are, "How ought we to live? What kind of a people do we wish to be?"

Thus what "My body, my choice" amounts to is little more than a child banging his (or her) spoon on her high chair. Believing that simply because the person exists, they are entitled to unlimited rights and free will. It is more complicated than that which is why the phrase is little more than a temper tantrum affecting to be moral principle. Perfectly characteristic of an age and a generation that is not nearly as mature and adult as it pretends to be.

MIJ0PAPl · Answer

Liberals wanna force inject people because it all became a political issue last year. They don't give a fuck about saving lives which the injection is harmful and never saved any lives anyway.

rcljr · Answer

It means if I don’t want to take bill gates fucking covid vaccine I’m not gonna take it, end of discussion.

Archerer · Answer

Should a doctor be able to tell you to fuck off when you show up in the ICU? Because then I agree with you. Also any business with a conscious should be able to tell you to fuck off too. Also travel companies, and schools, and your place of work. If you answer yes to all those then I agree with you, but if you think you can choose not to vaccinate and still walk around freely imposing on other people’s lives then you are a fucking retard, and retards shouldn’t be able to make health decisions for themselves and therefore should be vaccinated 🤣

mrkdvsn · Answer

It means that *I* decide whether or not to accept a risky experimental drug to be injected into me. If the pro-aborts can WRONGLY use this phrase, then I can RIGHTFULLY use the same phrase

Starman5 · Answer

I agree with you. If the body belongs to us, we must decide what happens to it.

Makeushiver · Answer

But it also doesn't mean that everyone with you has to be sure to be. in compliance. with your dietary. prefences.

Minamikun · Answer

A very shit excuse to let women do any shit that she wants without thinking in consequences, like abortion (Even if she wasn't raped)

AmeerX · Answer

It was used here for prostitution and fornication promotion and rights by the feminist movement

Twalli · Answer

There is a guarantee. The vaccine makes it 800% less likely tou will get COVID-19. It also makes you 2,500% less likely to die from it if you di get it. That sounds like a pretty good thing.

My body , My choice what does this mean to you?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

My body , My choice what does this mean to you?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.