Why are white western leaders always the ones talking and invading?

[Anonymous]

In the below video the subject of discussion was the withdrawal of western troops from Afghanistan which immediately followed by a retakeover by the Taliban forces in a matter of a week.
This is an Asian country yet the only ones talking in this video are white western leaders. Talking and talking nothing of value.
They take people for fools if entirely honest, they knew exactly what would happen by withdrawing troops. They invaded Afghanistan simply to find Osama Bin Laden ie selfish reasons and then left 🤬😡🤬

The Taliban released all the Afghani prisoners because they were trialed by the western military. The idea that the Taliban are monsters and what not is incorrect, they took their country back.
See below what your western leaders have to say: your tax money was funding it for the last 20yrs just to find one man. Such a waste of time and the soldiers who died there did so for nothing.

[Lliam]

Western leaders are imperialists.

Thanks to the U. S. for recruiting, arming and training the fundamentalist Islamic Taliban hords in the 1970s in order to overthrow the government that was on friendly terms with the USSR. The U. S. didn't give one fuck about the Afghani people. It just wanted to give the USSR a taste of its own Viet Nam.

Before then, Afghanistan was progressive. Many people wore western-style clothing and had fun like normal people. Girls attended college wearing what we would consider to be normal clothing with no head coverings.

But after the Taliban pushed out the USSR and overthrew the government, they instituted Sharia law, forced women to wear full burkas, banned education and music, tortured and murdered thousands, and carried out a reign of terror. Afghanistan was plunged into the Dark Ages.

When the U. S. invaded Afghanistan after 911 to "defeat terrorism", it fucked up the country even more. Did the U. S. ever think it could colonize "the graveyard of empires"?

Now the Taliban are back.

I feel incredibly sorry for the wonderful Afghani people. Thanks to the USA. that has left nothing but death, destruction and misery in every country it has meddled in since 1953. It has destabilized the world and led to backlash. Fuck imperialism.

[Anonymous]

I think you're a little nutty. What would you say to convince me otherwise?

[Asker]

thanks for the compliment, i grow my hair out to look messy

[Opinion Owner]

I rest my case.

[Asker]

discrediting someone for speaking out about the hypocrisy of world order is hardly deserving of a medal

[Opinion Owner]

"I rest my case" isn't "what precedes is worthy of admiration," it's "my job is done, here, and my point has come to fruition."

Ironically, I was doing the opposite of merely discrediting you. Many people, if not most, would simply state that you're wrong, an idiot, or whatever people say on the internet. I didn't want to be that person. So rather than coming to some premature, definitive conclusion, I inquired about you stance and perspective before I passed any definitive judgment. And your response to this inquiry was "thanks for the compliment, i grow my hair out to look messy." A very silly and unsubstantial remark that does, in fact, make you look a little nutty.

[Asker]

whoops, i appreciate you explaining yourself.
Yeah it's part of coping with the things we all experience 😁 but now i grow fond of my hair

[Anonymous]

Westerns invade for a reason. The British in the last century had their hands in a lot of pots not to liberate but to gain. The British, France, Spain, Germany, Portugal, the US all invaded for resources. Afghanistan is rich in resources and West want it. Invading and putting a puppet on the thorn is the only way to gain easy access to exploit. The whole Bin Ladin thing is a mess on its own. But if that is their sole reason then they should have left 10 years ago but didn't. We never learn from our history he tend to make the same mistakes just in a different time with a different foe

[ZackBan]

It's a stretch to make the Taliban into heros. The afghan people were willing to hitch a flifht by hanging from a speeding plane if it meant escaping the worst faite imaginable. Taliban are hanging people from powerlines as we speak and there are pictures to prove it.

Now am I saying a western intervention is not a selfish one? No. It is clear that the US, UK, France, or any other powerhouse willing to commit resources to go fight a war in Afghanistan now has personal selfish motives but that doesn't mean that letting the taliban rule with terror is the right choice either. It's a slipery slope for sure and there is no right answer but there definitely is a lesser evil.

In this case I belive that western dominion over Afghanistan would be beneficial to the afghan people and naturally lucrative to the dominating nations but the only way the troubles end is by stopping with the whole "free world" BS and just taking the country as a vasal state

[Asker]

Evidence of the hitching a speeding aeroplane or im calling bs

[ZackBan]

www.instagram.com/.../?utm_medium=copy_link

[ZackBan]

Not only were they hitching. They were falling from the sky

[Asker]

Well damn, deaths are necessary evil during a re-takeover. You have to remember that some of these people have likely committed adultery and are fleeing their wives. Also typically the men decide to take this opportunity to claim asylum in other countries leaving the women to fend for themselves as seen previously when Syrians came in boats.

[jshm2]

The same reason they have done so for centuries. Does the word "colonialism" or "imperialism" ring a bell?

Yep. More "White people know best" nonsense.

[Asker]

i do wonder if the undisclosed resources have dissapeared from Afghanistan have dissapeared with the troops.

[Anonymous]

If you watch western media you are going to see western people. This is not rocket science, dude.

The problem here is the Taliban and the viciousness with which they rule, not the people trying to prevent it.

[Asker]

Everyone rules viciously, tell me different and where?

[Opinion Owner]

Do you think a woman would rather live in a Taliban ruled Afghanistan than England?

Get a clue man. There is no comparison.

[Asker]

Ill get back to you on that after I've listened to the 30minute interview with a Taliban spokesperson

[Opinion Owner]

Why would you care about an interview with the Taliban? All that matters is what they do.

en.wikipedia.org/.../Treatment_of_women_by_the_Taliban

[Asker]

in the west women and men get away with all kinds of things it's a bit of a safe haven for them to do whatever they like. The difference here is sharia law lol funnily enough i live in the west and id have no worry about such a law because I've not wronged someone.

[Smegskull]

Am I to take it from this post you believe Afghanistan rightfully belongs to the Taliban religious dictatorship and not the democratically elected Afghanistan government? "Took their country back"
If so I know a lot of christian churches you may wish to contact to replace your country's leader with.

[Asker]

Church or England pretty much took control. So whatever I'm not even white

[Anonymous]

The military industry in America worked together to get Trump out because he didn't want War. Isolationism is against intervening; it's not "White Men", it's globalists.

[Anonymous]

there's plenty of fighting that goes on in Africa and the Middle East, you just haven't noticed

[Asker]

no invasions though.

[Qdbrown]

Depends on where you live in Africa. A group of armed men coming into you town to slaughter people has the same effect.

[Asker]

@Qdbrown if an entire town was slaughtered wouldn't this be reported on the news?

[Qdbrown]

No. Rarely does African news hit the mainstream unless it's ebola or a bunch of girls are kidnapped and drug into the jungle.

[disgustingweebtrash]

You think they work for you or the people of the country they're invading? They work for whoever blows the most cash up their ass