- 552 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWell, the fact is, the WORLD is racist because of the colonialization of the planet by white Europeans. So anyone NOT a white European has been considered "less than."
This is obvious in all cultures around the globe. Koreans get plastic surgery to make their eyes "round". In India, fair-skinned Indians are considered more beautiful, especially women. Because white Europeans imported Africans as slaves, the world has negated African-based beauty: dark skins, kinky hair, wide noses, big lips.
Native Americans were ON the land Europeans coveted, weren't Christian, weren't cooperative, in general, so the Spanish, French, Portugese, Dutch then the Americans wiped them out, first by the sword and gun, then by the diseases they carried to the natives who had never been exposed to and had no natural immunity to.
Africans were glorified dray-animals since the 1500s. It has only been 158 years since the Emancipation Proclamation, and 66 years since Brown vs. the Board of Education.
Chinese laborers on the railroads of the 1860s West were paid less and treated marginably better than blacks. Japanese Americans were put in internment camps during WWII and their homes, businesses and properties confiscated 80 odd years ago. No German Americans were interned. Or Italian Americans. Because, again, they were European descendents. Not "others."
Eventually, these historic issues will blur into the melting pot and people will see people as human and their differences as unique, not "other" or "less than."
But, choosing someone of your own racial, cultural and religious backgrounds is "safe." THAT is a giant factor behind such choices. You don't buck tradition, parents or baffle friends.
And everyone practices this "racism" because of the history of colonization. It surfaces in colorism, hair texture preferences and so on. It will only die off as people choose each other less because of tradition and more because of attraction. There are more intercultural/interracial/pan-religious couples now than there have ever been.
The wheels of change turn slowly. Remember in the early '60s in the South there were separate bathrooms and WATER FOUNTAINS; few people of any color went to college. The "Loving" couple were hounded by authorities and run out of town because they were married. Those things don't happen anymore. It's bit by bit.
It won't happen in our lifetimes. Maybe by the time our great-grandchildren come around. Look how much it's changed already.14 Reply- +1 y
@Juxtapose Colonizers went to every continent. Who colonized India? That's part of Asia. The Brits colonized parts of China, Taiwan. They've exploited a large part of Asia, including the Phillippines. Xenophobia is called for, wouldn't you say?
Wouldn't you fear and mistrust people who've used your people and land? A lot like Native Americans' land was co-opted and used by Euro Americans. The same way Australian natives' land was co-opted and Pacific Islanders' land was used, again, by the sailing Brits, French, Dutch, Spanish and Portuguese. - +1 y
Westerners aren't any different from other civilizations. China is trying to take over Taiwan and Japan helped Germany try to take over the world.
Xenophobia isn't from victimization, it is because Asian cultures, especially Japan, want to maintain their way of life. They are just as xenophobic towards Africans as they are towards those from Norway. - +1 y
@Juxtapose Xenophobia is fear of/prejudice against foreigners. It's not about race. The Germans don't like the French, the French don't like the Dutch, the Dutch don't like the Norwegians. That is about cultural differences and behaviors in certain necks of the woods.
Racism is about groups of people being clumped together because of skin color, hair texture, facial features, eye shape and those people being treated as less than the dominant culture. Even though there are more "technical" Asians on the planet, the subcontinent of India has been handled differently from Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan and Malaysia and the Philippines. Also because of " appearance."
The cultures of all those areas are different and can't be clumped together simply because of the way the people look or the section of the planet they come from. But this is what racism does. Africa IS a continent, but though the people there have darker skins, somewhat like India, again, the cultures, reilgious practices vary broadly from tribal groups to tribal groups, from city to rural areas. Calling the people who look similar as one thing is as foolish as calling Russians Swedes. On the surface they might look similar, but culturally they are as different as black and white.
So racism involves much more than and is more complicated than racial preference. It is an over simplification of human differences and a denigration of human value. Why? Because it benefits the dominant culture. So, people develop racial preferences based on the dominant world culture. Since thte 1400s that has been white Europeans who developed sea power and claimed land after land and dominated people after people.
And to survive they imposed their w ill a nd culture OVER everyone else's.
Most Helpful Opinions
311 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I consider racial preferences and fetish to be the same.
Most things around us are build on racism. Accept it and move on20 Reply
Because they refuse to understand the difference between "preference" and "prejudice". Here is an example:
In a choice between Coca Cola and Pepsi, we each have a "preference" for one or the other. In most cases though, if someone who prefers Pepsi can't get it, they will get a Coca Cola instead. This is preference; you favour one thing/feature in something/someone more, but this doesn't prevent you from enjoying the other for some other reason e. g. I prefer Pepsi, but I'd rather drink a cold can of Coca Cola than drink a warm can of Pepsi.
Using the above example again; "prejudice" is when the person who likes Pepsi would rather drink nothing than drink Coca Cola (or something else). This kind of stance is usually taken because of (strongly) held beliefs about the alternative. Prejudice is almost always supported by stereotypes.
Let's bring it back to dating. Dating is not as simple as choosing a drink. There are a large number of features to consider in a potential partner. As such, we tend to have a number of preferences and prejudices.
It is preference when you want to date someone of a specific "race", but would be just as willing to date from a different "race" after considering other factors e. g. personality, other physical features.
It is prejudice (i. e. racist in this case) when one chooses to ignore every other feature of a person in order to disqualify them solely based on their "race"; Essentially implying that no one of that specific "race" could ever possibly have a combination of physical and personality features that would make them attractive as long as they are of that "race". Doesn't that sound sick? Each "race" has hundreds of millions of representatives and yet someone believes that "race" alone cancels out every other possible attractive feature about someone else (including people he/she has never met).
People who keep insisting that their racism is "preference" either do not understand the term, or they want to be racist without being called so (as that is held in a negative view).53 Reply- +1 y
Based on a few of the comments I've read, I feel that this goes beyond a mere misunderstanding of the term "preference" and in many cases is also due to blatant stereotyping in general:
The problem here (at least for me) is far from some silly insistence that someone who doesn't find me attractive should suck it up and date me. That is an absurd expectation, and not too different from nice guy/girl mentality. The problem is with generalization; the implication that simply being part of a "race" (or any large group of human beings for that matter) automatically makes you unattractive.
Let me use an example; Suppose I had claimed that I only found white girls attractive. What does it say about me if I started claiming that Meghan Markle (whom I had previously thought was white, and thus attractive), was now unattractive just from learning that she was Black? What if I had been dating a black or Asian girl who looked white to me? How is it not racist if a harmless piece of information about her DNA is enough to immediately kill off any attraction I had for her? If her physical features and personality that I had found attractive didn't change, doesn't that mean that my only problem is with her DNA? - +1 y
What makes "racial preference" racist is the false and ignorant generalization implied in the common reason for the statement "I don't date X or Y race". The reason of "I don't find members of X race attractive" implies that despite the unique physical and mental characteristics of a person, the mere fact of them being a member of a specific "race" (and this can even be extended to membership in specific nationalities, religions, political views, etc.) makes them unattractive by default. Doesn't that sound ridiculous? If someone made one of the statements below and claimed it was "preference", would you feel that was right?:
- "I don't date Germans because their country was responsible for the holocaust"
- "I don't date Americans because they voted for Trump"
- "I don't date Muslims because they are terrorists"
- "I'm not attracted to people with the letter S in their surname"
In my opinion; passing automatic judgement on someone (you've never met) based on something they are not responsible for, is untrue, and/or that does not take away from their value as a human being is discriminatory. It will never be "just preference".
I will reiterate my original answer: Preference has an open mind, Prejudice does not. - +1 y
This has some traction. But racism is so embedded, so supported by institutions people do not even recognize it as such. This is what critical racial theory discusses. I've been reading a selection of the works for about a week or so now. It's pretty heady, stirring scholarship.
People have been batting around about how racist CRT is, which is rather sad and amusing and I'm sure those who are saying this haven't been reading about CRT. I urge all those who are thinking about he discussing these issues to open your brain cells up for some fresh air and scholarship. I'm ready to take a college course on it. It is fascinating! Cheers all!
1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I look at it like this God made us all with 97% of the same DNA the last 3% adapt with our parents genes with extreme weather conditions harsh elements on this planet Earth that last 3% that God gave us was a common sense type thing so we can adapt to any surroundings on this planet Earth and if you think about it not one of us probably has the same skin pigment as the other we are probably all different just because we're white or black doesn't mean we'll wait or black every color is different so that means we are all individually different every single one of us it's winter time I will start getting whiter and whiter when summer time comes I will start getting darker and darker and to anybody that's racist out there get a life. Or get the fuck off the planet
47 Reply- +1 y
Wouldn't it be funny if we got to come to Earth to live out a fantasy is not all being the same that we were being rewarded because we are good little aliens and everybody looks the same so we get to come to Earth for this longevity of life we learned what we learned. we d i e, and then we go back to where we came from where everybody looks the same. Is the shameful if this was the truth. And everybody that wish they were different color I wish they were different people are were part of the problem and not the solution what a waste of time you could have been living life happy and experiencing what it is like to be different from each other but now you get to go back being all one color everybody looks the same. there is no individuality it's like no matter where you go are each person that you see. It's as if you look into the mirror with every person it's in front of you. We are all made of water and atoms. Atoms broke down equals Energy energy Never Dies. So when we leave this planet our Temple our body close to the ground but our energy gathers everything we've ever said and then on Earth it gathers our soul or spirit and we become this little ball of energy and it takes us to wherever we go next
- +1 y
@DiegoO and @Hangry06 And we’re 99% similar to chimps — see how much a 1% difference makes — we’re likely 80% similar to dogs. The 1% is not just pigmentation — race is more than pigmentation. There’s differing levels of intelligence and creativity in that 1%, which explains why some continents are basket cases. It also explains why the 3rd world, while disdaining those of European ancestry, seem to really love moving to European nations - Australia, NZ, US, Canada and Europe.
- +1 y
@joesheks Um. Let me clarify, my bad. We are 99.9% identical to each other as humans, and we share a 99.0% of genes with chimps and bonobos.
Your notion ignores lot of things. Europe and Asia are in reality one continent. We can even include Africa in that huge land mass. If you analyze well the history of humanity, those societies that stayed in touch (peacefuly or not) with several other societies, evolved more because of the exchanges of knowledge, technology and culture they experienced.
No society ever evolved that much, in isolation. For example, The Americas was almost isolated from the rest of the world. Because of that isolation the European empires took over easily, with the help of native tribes that were their allies. Those empires didn't build up alone, they were a result of historical events that involved wars and comercial trading. Plus, the latitude of Europe and Asia, doesn't varie much; it goes from west to east, east to west. It means, chinese farming plants, could have been transported to what's Turkey, and from there to the rest of Europe. So there is a nutritional aspect, that helped raise up the western and eastern civilization.
The Americas migration always have went from north to south or south to north. In that order the geographical and enviormental variation can be easily noticed. In the Americas, the population wasn't able to interconected like how euroasia did.
I'll done there, insisting that we are all equaly humans, with no one superior than the other because of ethnic differences.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
123Opinion
- 9.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u +1 yIf someone is not attracted to people outside of their race, that means they are racist? So, if someone of another race is not attracted to you, you can call them racist instead of just dealing with the fact that they weren't attracted to you. How easy that makes your life.
You need to define how you are using the word "racism." I believe that racism is a conscious attitude that one race is inferior than another simply because of their race. If I see girls from another race and I am not attracted, I am not thinking that they are inferior. Hell, I think Angelina Jolie is unattractive, but that just means I am not attracted to her. It doesn't mean I have passed judgment on her in any way.
Should I pretend that I am attracted if I am not? If you like guys who are tall, can you consciously make yourself become attracted to guys who are short?
This is just bullshit from the woke crowd attempting to instill social conformity as a part of their dystopian vision for the future.
PS I am Caucasian and living with my Chinese girlfriend. Call me racist and I'll call you names, okay?246 Reply- +1 y
I applaud you, my guy. The woke crowd is bullshit and should be quashed
- +1 y
@SparklyMop7 The woke crowd need to be all put in a slaughterhouse then fed to pigs
- +1 y
Agreed!
- +1 y
my favourite commenter strikes again with the hard truth. respect 🙏
- +1 y
His username lives up to its meaning!
- +1 y
@Physics-Man @friendlypelican I appreciate your kind comments!
It's discriminatory but not racist. Me being black and being rejected OFTEN by women o all races, I used to think it was, too.
People are not obligated to date or sleep with you. And if any MAN said this, they'd instantly be labeled an incel. Yes, people saying they would NEVER date someone of race X is discrimination, but "racism" would be saying they think all people of race X are inferior, disgusting, and "beneath" them. It involves hate and malice.
Me, for example am not attracted to men. That doesn't make me homophobic. Me not being attracted to transpeople doesn't make me transphobic either (not that that term even means anything anymore; everything is "transphobic" nowadays). And me not wanting to date Muslim women because I think Islam is a horrible and violent ideology may or may not make me "Islamophobic", but I don't think it does, because I condemn the ideology, not the people practicing it since birth who don't know anything else but what they've been taught since childhood.
But like I said, it's some real Femcel level energy to think anyone is obligated to sleep with or date you. Men who'd think this would get shamed and harassed into oblivion. Besides, women are the ones who re more selective and picky with their partners, anyway. A man is under 6'0" tall and you could easily claim women for being Heightist or "Shortphobic" for not being interested in them. Well, I identify as 6'5", bitches! Now have sex with me or you're a bigot, LOL!
Anyway, I'm pretty sure I know what Lv. 2 "woman of color" posted this.70 Reply
+1 yBy racial preference do you mean sexual attraction or laboral and social preference?
If you talk about sexuality, well, every person has his own preferences. There are people who are attracted to blonde or dark haired people, to blue or brown eyed people, to black or Asian or caucasian people, to short or tall people. Sexual attraction has NOTHING to do with respect! Although I would say most people are very open tastes. I have been attracted to women from all races, because they were sexy as hell, no matter their hair, eye or skin colour.
Now, if you are talking about social preference (p. ex. excluding a person of different race or origin from the group of friends, without any reason other than their appearance) or laboral discrimination (not hiring a person of different race for that same reason) in that case it certainly is racism.
Finally, I remember a question in some social media asking if black women would date a white man. Most of them were positive, however, there were others who found it a terrible idea, assuring that they would never find a white man attractive enough. As a white man I felt excluded, specially because there are many black women I find attractive and I would date them, but, you know, at the same time I reminded to myself that every person has the right to make his/her own choices without being discriminated for that.10 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yThat's not being racist. I look at it like this. You are not God. You don't know who you're going to end up with. Although some people don't listen to Him. You can say "My type is Asians" or "I don't like white girls because they are basic".
When you are referring to people of color you need to say America or the place YOU live. Where I'm from we respect people's choice of dating. I live in a country where every person is black and about 20% white. I'm black but I'm not african-American because I'm not from the USA. That's why I said you need to be specific on America or anywhere else.
Like the thing with cultural appropriation. Where I'm from (AGAIN NOT THE USA) when we see a white girl with braids we actually love to see it. We think it's cute and they look cute as well with it. WE don't have a problem with it. Same with white boys rocking dreads we don't have a problem with it. We don't mind and we don't care. Again where I reside there is no form of bashing towards people of color. if a boy simply may prefer Latinas or black girls or anything like that. We just mind our business that's all.
In America though, social media has shown me exactly what you're speaking about. To conclude I don't think it's racist if you prefer Brazilians or Black girls or black girls over white girls unless you make any racial comments about either race. If not, then I don't think it's racist.45 Reply- +1 y
You are a wise teenager. Yes, all this "everything is racist" BS is exclusively a Western thing. Specifically, the US. These people are so isolated from the rest of the world and don't know how good they have it. It's embarrassing to see my fellow Americans say such idiotic ignorant crap like OP.
Asker+1 yIt's impossible for people to not have racist opinions about other races and have a racial preference. Racial preferences occur because of racism.
Opinion Owner+1 yif a guy says "I don't like black girls (Bashes them) because I like white girls instead (Uplifts)" Your say that's racist.
Oh I see, but it's okay to say "I don't like Asian girls (And bashes them) But I like black girls (Uplifts them)? That's how social media paints it out to be.
Either way, it's wrong. And for you to say it's impossible for people to not have racist opinions about other races is you painting every male and female to be the bad guy when being attracted to a race which they are not in. Because some black girls do prefer black guys over white guys because black guys are more "Spicy" don't think I haven't seen IT on social media. This leads me to my last point. y'all seem to be okay with interracial relationships when it's a Black woman and a White man but it's a problem when it's a white woman and a black man. Painting white women to only want black men for Biracial babies when it's not true. like love doesn't exist and he didn't actually fall in love with her and she didn't actually fall in love and love him for who he is.
Asker+1 yI don't like when any race is bashed because that is racist but mostly it's black women who get bashed so sometimes when they're praised people like it because it is a rare thing to see that.
Opinion Owner+1 yI don't think so. I think all races get bashed equally. Sadly. In parts of the world, which is not the USA, people other than black women or black people, in general, get bashed and stereotyped. You can't just say that ''Black women get bashed more" Speak for your country. What may happen in America will not happen anywhere else. That's why speak on behalf of where YOU are from. This ends the discussion.
1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I don't find some women attractive. I'm not racist because I don't find female Australian aboriginal women physically attractive. My wife has a friend who's Indian. She's a nice enough person but I don't find her physically attractive. It's not because I'm racist. I'm just not sexually attracted to those women who share certain stereotypically Indian features.
Racial preference in attraction has fuck all to do with being racist. One is how you're biologically wired while the other is how you've been brainwashed by the people and culture you're around.
Cite all the bullshit studies you like. They still won't get me turned on looking at stereotypically Indian women. Or aboriginal.
Racism is a school of thought. A totally fucked up one that suggests melanin in the skin makes someone more or less worthy of a higher rung on a social ladder.
Not getting a hard-on looking at Asian porn just means you're not attracted to those women sexually. That doesn't make you a racist any more than going to church makes you a Christian or sitting in a garage makes you a car.10 ReplyTbf I have seen some really good looking Black, Asian and White men. I am generally more drawn towards Indian (all south Asians - includes Afghanistan/India etc) simply for the look but probably because they’re familiar and look like me and what’s familiar is what we find comfort in.
However that is not to say I have never found other types of men good looking. I think some Black men I have seen around were very good looking (no famous examples I can think of) just people I know of personally.
I find White men attractive if they have dark hair and preferably brown or grey eyes and an olive undertone/light-medium skin tone that is similar to my own. I don’t find pale men attractive though in general. And I don’t like blonde hair in men especially.20 Reply- 704 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yActually no.
1. People treat friends and family different than others and thats normal, being attracted to a person usually means you would like them to be added into one of those catagories.
2. The assumption that only dark skinned women are effected by sexual preference, is racist and sexist, as it assumes innate inferiority based on race and gender, which is incorrect.
3. The facial and body features of each race are present in individuals of each other race. Human sub species are not as drastically different from eachother as you claim.
4. Sexual preference is not a choice, it is a response to an individual's genetics interacting with stimuli, ie no one gets to choose who they find attractive, anymore than they get to choose what food tastes good in their mouth. Which means sexual preference can't be racist.515 Reply
Asker+1 yRacial preference generally rules out women of color particularly those with darker skin.
- +1 y
You keep saying that, but it's not accurate.
Asker+1 yGenerally people prefer white and Asians which are both lighter skinned than others so it is accurate.
- +1 y
Also not accurate, generally speaking most people have pretty varied tastes in features.
Asker+1 yThey don't have varied tastes. Asian and white women are preferred.
- +1 y
Incorrect.
Asker+1 yGet your racist ass fucked @rcljr
Asker+1 y@rcljr Racist old piece of shit is what you are.
Asker+1 yOld as a raisin haha
- 427 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHold on just a second... so having a preference on what you find attractive is sexual racism? So wanting a man who is taller than me with green eyes makes me racist against everyone who doesn't look like that... I mean that would makes sexist too then since I am not into women...
100 Reply 671 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Partiality is always around us. Every day, we use it in even the tiniest of micro-actions. So "preference" always implies that unfairness is involved. How else would we distinguish between what we like and what we don't like?
And such things aren't fixed, black-and-white, linear, or otherwise. There's a range and things can be dynamic relative to what they're being compared to. Which opens the possibility of someone having a preference & not being racist.
I believe they can be mutually exclusive because someone can have a preference and not be prejudiced. So if they don't have any unfair opinions or actions based on unfounded beliefs, then I believe that the preference is justifiable and should not be considered immoral or illegal.27 Reply
Asker+1 yDoesn't having a preference mean a person is prejudiced?
- +1 y
I believe that it can, but not in every circumstance.
For instance, having a preference for broccoli doesn't mean that you have any unfounded opinions of all other differently flavored vegetables. It also doesn't mean you have any irrational beliefs/unfounded opinions, as if the broccoli's intrinsic worth or value was judged to be higher simply because you prefer it.
As a result, you can have a solid foundation/reasoning for having a preference/conclusion. Though these can be involved, it's not only limited to having prejudiced reasoning or none at all.
Asker+1 yPeople who have a racial preference generally don't treat everyone equally. They frequently say others are inferior.
- +1 y
Now you can use people like me as an exception. I'm an African American guy & I have had many crushes on black or brown girls & women over the years, but I notice I have a preference for lightskinned or mixed hispanic women & white women. Specifically ones with brown or black hair. So most of my crushes tended to fit that standard over the years without me realizing it for a while. But even with that preference, if I was into the whole dating thing, I'd be open to dating a black woman. I don't see anyone as innately inferior or superior because of my preference.
Asker+1 yYou think they're inferior that's why you don't prefer them.
- +1 y
Not innately or objectively. As I said above, making any kind of decision is unfair. So if one chooses to have those negative connotative words, then it's best to fill in what's left out. Add the context. Which would be that I only personally view them (not of my own free will) as inferior to others only in relation to my personal mate selection preferences. But since I'd date one (if I was into the dating games) I technically don't view them as being that inferior or lower on the spectrum (of my dating preferences)
Were biological creatures that don't exactly have the most free will so I really don't know why I have these preferences. But it doesn't mean that I view anyone as being innately inferior. For instance, if there were two women left on earth. One that was my type & one that was. There are still many other factors that play a role. Things like social compatability or if I'm attracted to their face or body. So I could easily find the girl that's not really my type far more attractive than the other girl in many circumstances. Which reminds me exactly what I said above about things not being linear, fixed, black and white, etc.
Because it is not.
By your logic, we could start saying that heterosexuals are sexually discriminating against their own sex because they are attracted to the opposite sex. And that we are discriminating against carrots when we prefer eating (and thus killing) carrots instead of cauliflower.
You can't force people to eat food according to some quota. You can't force homosexual to pretend to be heterosexual and vice versa. And you can't force someone to date people they feel no attraction to, just because of some quota.30 ReplyIf it's considered racist then it's a form of racism which is acceptable. Tuff.
Also what' s the end game? You date someone of a certain race, that makes you racist? Do I need to meet a quota and report it to some kinda authority, or else? The only people who think this is a legitimate problem are bitter and looking for some way to cancel people who don't want them, and people who have so few problems they have to create create conflict so they have something to save people from; like an arsonist fireman or God.21 Reply
+1 yIt's not racist. One can't choose who's he less or more attracted to. If I don't like that or that hairstyle, type of body, face etc is that chauvinistic? Or I just can't control what I am naturally more attracted to? So that's a preference. Same thing with race. Some white men prefer women of colour. Some prefer white. What is there to blame? What is there to poke politics or judgment onto? That's a private inner thing, like what kind of scent, colour, things, food, style or whatever else, person prefers. It has nothing to do with intentional chauvinism or racism. Don't do that, don't stirr conflicts over something very irrelevant.
20 Reply1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Nope. But why is it only butt ugly women who make these kinds of arguments? And I'm not saying they have to be ugly on the outside. They might just be ugly on the inside. Either way they're not attractive to a huge percentage of the male gender. Then she has to find something to blame this lack of attraction on. Culture plays a huge role in compatibility. Just for one example: If you have a hardcore loud mouthed feminist tude, don't expect a guy who didn't grow up with a mom like that to be into it. And even a lot of the guys who had moms like that aren't into it.
20 Reply- 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ypeople don't want to be labeled as "a bad person" or doing something illegal. reality is, most people have biases and preferences. It isn't just against people of color, but everyone to some degree. I think people of color... maybe because of the color contrast, social behaviors, recent history, or media... I'm not sure which... are more aware of the issues... and it is appears more severe. Culture is a stronger factor in preference.
"race" is a factor, but it's not the only factor... is one among many in assessing qualities of a person.10 Reply Because they don't understand what racism fully means. People focus solely on the nightmare side of racism and they never understand fully what racism is. We know most people are racist in some manner because through testing we have found this to be true. But a lot of people will reject what I am saying and never go search for a deeper understanding of racism. There are many words in the dictionary that you understand but have never seen the definition to. There are many words you have seen the definition too but don't understand or fully understand.
00 ReplyA lot of the replies are trashing the asker, but I think I get what she’s saying here. The point she’s trying to make is that racism is sometimes OK.
We’ve developed a knee-jerk opposition to racism because some very bad historical figures were racists, like Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler. But you know what? Some really awesome historical figures were racist too, like Ben Franklin and Abraham Lincoln.
Yeah, sometimes racism is used to justify bad things, like school segregation or ethnic cleansing. But sometimes it’s as harmless as preferring to date white women, or to patronize black-owned businesses.
So don’t assume that racism is always bad. As the asker points out, it can sometimes be fine.00 Reply
+1 yAlthough I would say kinda is... technically it is!
I don't have a preference when it comes to my future boyfriend/husband. Although I wouldn't mind dating the same race, I'd prefer to date/marry outside my own. I grew up in a diverse community/neighborhood and I've always been exposed to different cultures.
Now, although I'd prefer my man to be olive/tan skin complected, have ocean/sky blue eyes and curly dark hair, that doesn't mean that I won't be attracted to anyone else who doesn't possess these features.00 ReplyBecause most people only recognize racism on an individual level and not the social/political/eve mimic/systemic level that is reality. Racial preferences are usually rooted in a bigger issue, but no one wants to address that in fear of being labeled a racist
20 Reply- 5.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yif racial preferences are racist, then gender preferences are sexist.
it's just shocking to me to see those low points in ideology driven science.
i don't know if you've feeling that way. but i feel like in recent years, science has been slowly dying. it's more about people trying to confirm theories that they came up with to stroke their own ego or to please their investors with a paper stating their agenda as fact, rather than finding out what's actually true.63 Reply- +1 y
by the way: if you actually read the study (you can find it here scihub.yncjkj.com/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.004 ), it's about peoples perception. what they find is that the disclosure of racial preferences are "percieved" by people to be racist.
it does by no means mean that they "are" racist. i don't know why you made that up. - +1 y
just cause someone "percieves" a choice i make as racist, doesn't mean i'm a racist. perception and reality aren't the same.
- +1 y
what you displayed there is a problem that massively fucks us over globally currently. people quoting science to say shit that the science they quoted actually doesn't say.
+1 yMost people are idiots. And I mean it with conviction.
The term race means competition.
The term -ism means the study of or doctrine.
Anything else that’s affiliated to the term and spelling is used improperly. Some people don’t know what they’re talking about but uses certain words to one up eachother. Society is filled with imbeciles and ignorant people who want to feel better by talking down on others by using the level of skin color, ethnicities, and dialects of a person or people to their selfish advantage.
Those who live by the sword die by the sword.
Nothing outside of yourself will make you smarter, stronger, attractive, wiser, or richer. It all comes from within. So don’t let nobody else tell you you’re not attractive. On this planet, there is always someone for somebody.00 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yYou know as a white man there are some black women I’m more attracted to vs. other white women. Notice how I said “some”.
With that said attraction is not a choice. You either feel attracted to someone (to varying levels) or you don’t. If you try to force yourself into dating someone you are not attracted to it’s going to be a miserable relationship.
So saying it’s “racist” that some men aren’t attracted to black women is a huge stretch. If can justify that then how about trans women trying to force cis gendered men into dating them (there is already a push behind that crap). Or worse about someone trying to force you into a homosexual relationship?
Just don’t go there with the “racism” angle. It’s a cheap shot. I actually had a very bad (and scary) experience with this last year. It would of had “metoo” written all over it if the genders were reversed.20 Reply
+1 yI don't agree.
If I prefer white men over black men that's a preference based upon what I find attractive.
What would make me racist would be insulting black men for all the prejudice/stereotypical reasons whilst upholding white men.52 Reply
Asker+1 yThat is exactly what people with preferences mostly do.
- +1 y
That's not true. A man that doesn't meet my preferences just isn't on my radar. I might pass on opinion of a celebrity that doesn't meet my preference especially if he's listed as sexiest man etc...
But I'm sure most people would share an opinion in these circumstances. Or hideous trends that make more men stand out like the Johnny bravo shaped guys in super skinny jeans and boat shoes yikes!
- 336 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYou can date anyone you want but there may come consequences. If you want to call it a fetish to only date someone of the same race fine. But it is not racist. I only date white, Asian and Hispanic. I am white so what. There are some very beautiful African women, but I feel that their families would dissaprove of me more than the races I mentioned. I would not date a Muslim woman for the same reason. Also our children may be rejected. So why take the chance on something that's probably never going to work. I love redheads too.
00 Reply 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That's like saying "it's racist for makeup brands to make makeup with different shades of natural skin tones because they're making certain tones for some races and different tones for other races, thus, they're treating races differently, thus, they're racist. If they weren't racist they wouldn't treat the races differently and they woulf sell the same shade to all races."
But we both know how silly this is, we both know it's an incredibly loose interpretation of "racism."00 Reply590 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. People can't control who they're attracted to and who they're not attracted to. Just because someone has a preference for a particular race doesn't make that person a racist. I'm not attracted to guys that are significantly shorter than me. Does that make me a heightist? No
31 Reply- +1 y
But if you're treating someone poorly because of skin color that is racist
3.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It is.
But it don't hurt anyone and it's personal choice for a person to date who they want therefore no one calls it racist because it don't have the connotation to bullying with it.
Example, Your not belittling someone just cause you have had more Asian girlfriend's because you are more attracted to them. Therefore no one see's it as a problem which it isn't.13 Reply
Asker+1 yIt hurts those who like someone who has a preference.
Asker+1 yIf you had more Asian girlfriends there is NO WAY you won't belittle others when you get a chance. So it is racism.
Racism is treating another person differently because of the colour of their skin, it has nothing to do with if you are attracted to them or not. What you are saying is that because I married a white man instead of somebody of a different race I am racist. I call bullshit on that one. Also, because I married a man and not a woman does that mean I am also sexist? I will stop feeding the troll now.
20 Reply
+1 ySo if someone is a-sexual they are racist to all humans?
If someone has a fetish for cars but not humans, they hate the whole human race?
You can't help what you prefer sexually... Shut the fuck up.. sure there might be some people who are using "sexual preferences" to let out some of their secret racism.. but some people jus can't help not being attracted to what they're not attracted to.. would you force someone to fuck dogs and say they're dog racist if they don't want to? Come on... I don't find fat woman hot but that's doesn't mean I'm fat phobic21 Reply- +1 y
You can't force people to be attracted to something they are not... If a white woman doesn't find white men hot what you gonna do?
Chain her up and force her to suck a white dick?
You jus gotta let people like what they want, Snowflake
- 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yYou have got to be one of the better trolls out there or fully retarded.
Things that are also racist: gloves, Pepsi, cell phones, grass, trees, concrete, chain saws, hammerhead sharks, seagulls, clouds, the andromeda galaxy, the Great Lakes, words, letters, baseball and the Empire State Building.
I’m so sick of this crap. I hope people realize the more they beat the racist drum the less people care. It’s a tired old song.30 Reply 335 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Most dating aspects have a concept of selfishness/shallowness about them. Same as not wanting to date an overly over-weight person.
Doesn't make them a bad person, just makes them a person who knows what they want in a relationship.
Not everything needs to be screamed about as being racist and blah blah blah. A lot of snowflakes need to get a bit over themselves.30 Reply
+1 yThis has to be a Troll lol. Having a preference is not racist. You are attracted to who you are attracted to. I’m a light skinned African American female but I am not attracted to light skinned (black) men, People have a type and it’s just that persons preference.
10 Reply5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. If you treat someone differently just because of their skin color, then yes I would say you're racist. However if you're more attracted to people of your race I don't see that as being racist. To me it's a normal thing since most people usually date or marry within their race. They go for what's familiar and comfortable.
66 Reply
Asker+1 ySo you agree that someone being a different race causes you discomfort? This is racism.
Asker+1 yThere are many people from different races who live in the same country.
Asker+1 yRacial preference is not about choosing someone from the same country or culture. It is about preference for a race.
12K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
"sexual racism" You have created a new term. And you are contributing negatively to the current CRT narrative. Racial preference is, at worst, "discrimination"... like selecting which fast food restaurant you want to go to today.20 ReplyThen just date someone your race, are mad that a certain race 9f guy won't dare you?
Sorry ypu almost have it as bad as most guys, shit no one, ok, 4 girls in my whole life have asked me out, and I've slept with 2, so sorry if I don't have to much empathy.20 Reply- 305 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yOkay. What should we do about it?
To change the behavior based on attraction, we would have to change the attraction. But attraction is not quick, or simple, or easy to change. It is mostly formed in childhood, and it is even partly genetic.
How would you suggest that adults change their attraction, and what should they change it to?20 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI don't know why you're making it seem like people of color don't have their preferences also. Are THEY racist?
I also don't see why not being attracted to a particular race will make them worse off. It's not like they're going to suffer an injustice just because someone of another skin color isn't attracted to them.
What am I missing here?21 Reply
Asker+1 yBecause people are not nice to the ones they aren't attracted to so that leads to racism.
897 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Because if it was everybody would be racist in some and there would be no possibility of fighting racism because that would mean you need to change humanity at its core. Because if that´s racism than everybody is racist and there´s no way of changing that.
00 Reply
+1 yHaving a preference isn’t what may lead to that preference can be 💯. So the reasons can be racist but having a type isn’t. Sucks for black women cause we get fetishized so much or we are seen as items then actual people. ( from own experience men like to act like they already own me and act like we are already together after one conversation)
00 Reply- 891 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yI’m so tired of people searching for ways to turn ordinary people into racists.
100 Reply - 620 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 ySee the unwanted woman wants to be wanted and thinks it because people are racist she’s unwanted… so sad.
61 Reply- +1 y
Yes. I've definitely seen some black woman I find hot. So if I choose not to date a black woman Cos I find her ugly.. it's nothing to do with her race cos some white woman are ugly too
It's not racist, how is racist? We all prefer dating different people and we're attracted to different people. Race is just one of the many variables.
60 Reply
+1 yThe fact you went Anonymous for this goes to show that you already know how dumb this statement of yours is. Given that you have the brains to realize this, which I starting to doubt.
40 Reply
+1 yOne would think that forcing someone to have sex with someone they don't want to is rape.
90 Reply1. Because it is el stupido!
2. Because taking this way leads to every preference being racist. This further leads to a robot-like society where you are pressed against your will into being a couple with some random human number #132425. Hope, you like it's gender, look, personality, interests, etc... because if not, then you are racist like Adolf Hitler himself!!!
This is just a terrible future! Don't go that way!10 Reply- 3.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yWell, if the that's the case, then the real issue is people treating people differently based on whether or not they want to have sex with them.
I treat everyone with respect. I don't care if they're a guy or a girl, straight or gay, attractive or unattractive.20 Reply Gay men must all be misogynists then because they aren't attracted to women.
80 ReplyOkay, so OP wants to fuck Brad and Chad, but they are not interested.
The result is the simple-minded lunacy that can be read here.
It is interesting how what was said to be (gasp) wacist progressed from not letting Rosa Parks sit where she wanted to refusing to miscegenate the ubermensch into extinction.
Everyone, stay with your own race. That is the natural order.10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yYou have a chance of being correct ONLY IF a person rules out an entire race or group from being "acceptably attractive" to them AND treats them as inferior because of it !!
I'm not attracted to every woman from every race, but that doesn't mean I treat them with prejudice, OR LESS than equal, nor does it make me a racist. Racism has nothing to do with "attraction". Racism is based on ignorance, not biology or chemistry.24 Reply
Asker+1 yPeople are nicer to the ones they find attractive. So they treat their preferred races favorably.
Opinion Owner+1 yAnd what if their attractions are spread out over many races and they just treat individuals they prefer with more "favor", but don't treat others of that race with "less favor". What if they are blatantly neutral to all people of any race they don't find "individually attractive"? I admit that most people do not act in the above mode, but I do.
Asker+1 yThen they don't have a racial preference. Having a racial preference means you think all the people of a certain race are superior as sexual partners. This is sexual racism.
Opinion Owner+1 yAs I said before, that's just ignorance, and racism is born out of ignorance. You know, validating that kind of ignorance by giving it a "category" of its own (sexual racism), seems counter productive at best.
1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. What if I like green over blue eyes?
Perky little nose instead of wide fat nose?
Curly locks instead of straight hair?
Big butts and small boobs?
Shorter curvy women instead of tall women?
You're a self-righteous parasite, a fking cancer.
Take your militant victim-hood somewhere else.00 Reply
+1 yWell I think a man's perspective is obviously different from a woman's, but I don't necessarily feel it's racist. I have been turned down by women who tell me they only date black men. I think it's more sexist because when they say that my perception is that they look at men like we are service providers. Like we're just here to provide orgasms for them. Basically objectification. Anyway I'm glad that they reject me because I'm living for a real relationship.
09 Reply- +1 y
Not all women are like that, how's this any different to making huge generalisations on women?
- +1 y
Did I say all women are like that? Men get labeled as all kinds of things but I bet you don't put your cape on when men get objectified. Put whatever label on it that you want. I believe some women see men as objects. Some women want a family. Same thing with men. If a woman were prefer black men but are open too any possibility that's one thing but for a woman to say they only date black men there's a reason for that And it's a sexual reason. I'm saying it's the sexist not racist. I don't see you putting on your cape and objecting to the fact that she says it's racist. Let's just face facts you would have a problem with what I said no matter what because of what's between my legs. Standing up for the objectification of men is not wrong. And I'm not going to validate your pig headed perspective.
- +1 y
I'm my previous comment I meant to say, how's this any different from making huge generations on 'men'. My problem was that you said "a man's perspective is obviously different from a woman's" that's what I meant about generalisations.
And for your information I always stand up against objectifying men, there are so many songs which objectify men and I am completely against it as much as I am completely against objectifying women. I've had male friends who were sexually harassed by a female friend who tried to get away with it by saying "I'm a woman" and I stand up against it in real life too. People need to treat each-other as individuals and not by their gender as a whole. This goes both ways. - +1 y
*generalisations
- +1 y
Because from a man's perspective the only women who are at a disadvantage are fat and ugly. Here's a peak inside our mind.. if she has a nice ass it doesn't matter what color her skin is, and every race has women with big butts and flat butts. I don't think women of color are at a disadvantage but that's just my perspective, I was actually attempting to validate her which is a huge problem in a lot of relationships lack of validation as it were. And our perspectives are obviously different because there's not many men who say I refuse to date this kind of woman or that kind of woman. I haven't met everyman in the world but we don't think the way women do, we don't say I only date black women or white women or whomever, and if anything latin women (women of color) are regarded as the most attractive. I think it's normal to have an inside the box perspective on life and feel as if you have it harder than everyone else. I know I have felt like that but we gotta keep moving forward and have faith you will find someone that makes us happy.
- +1 y
Just because you think like that, it doesn't mean 'all men' do. a lot of men respect women for their individualism and not their bodies, and wouldn't blink an eye to promiscuous women. Racial preference goes for both men and women. What you are saying is disrespectful to men.
- +1 y
Yes ma'am I hear where you're coming from but you gotta understand men need a physical attraction, what one man finds physically attractive may differ from one another man finds physically attractive, if you (as a man) are with someone who's obese that's because you like that type or at least tolerate in in your spectrum of what someone would find attractive. We also might not become physically attracted to someone until after we become familiar with them I'm open to following in love with somebody who I wouldn't normally find attractive, but there would need to be physical attraction or it wouldn't work. I was talking about big butts because I was using that as an example. I could have said nice smile or not nice smile, smart not smart it doesn't matter. I think you're getting hung up on all these other things and not actually hearing what I'm saying. I understand all men don't think that way in terms of butts, but we all do think in terms of either attractive or not attractive. Unfortunately this is nature. You're right some men wouldn't blink and I towards a promiscuous woman But some men transcend that type of thinking we understand that just because someone is promiscuous doesn't mean they shouldn't be disqualified from consideration. I feel that's kind of judgmental. Maybe what's promiscuous to one person is sent considered promiscuous by the next. Maybe somebody would compare their body count with yours and think that you're promiscuous. I don't consider myself promiscuous but it would really suck if I met somebody that I really liked and she wouldn't give me a chance because of how many people I've been with. If you're going to be that way with promiscuous people sticking your nose up in the air at them and such, I suppose you would be that way with somebody who doesn't make that much money which would be messed up in the same way. We should be above labels. This is what I'm talking about when I say we don't think that way.
- +1 y
I certainly agree with what you are saying, and if you're talking about attraction, it is both ways. I can't speak for someone else or another women, just like you can't speak for other men. But from a personal perspective, I obviously am attracted to certain type of guys and am not to others, and I will undoubtedly be attracted to a man with a beautiful/handsome face.
What I mean to say is that both men and women like are attracted to physical appearance. But when you said 'men' like butts, it is a huge generalisation. I'm not sure if you're aware but there are some men and women who are raised alittle more traditionally, and to people like them (myself included) there is a very limited appeal to another person's body, and it's more to do with the face.
When I say some men and women dress promiscuously, I am in no way implying that they deserve to be treated with disrespect in any way. Irrespective of one's clothing style, no-one is allowed to harass or intimidate another person, a person's clothing is their choice. However, I'm saying that we are certainly allowed to make judgements based on someone's clothing. - +1 y
By judgements I mean I'm allowed to think "this looks so bad" or "why would someone dress like this" or "why reveal so much".
This is nothing to do with how another person (a perpetrator) should act towards them, it's simply my thought on it.
+1 yPeople have the right to be attracted to who they are attracted to. That’s the entire reason our blood lines still exist. Nothing screams failure like going into a relationship you aren’t committed to. I’m very sorry people are racist and sexist and hateful and awful. However, at the end of the day, I’m going to bond with those I am comfortable bonding with.
00 Reply
+1 yCall it whatever you want, you're not going to make people fuck anybody they don't want. This reads like you recently got rejected, crying about it and trying to politicize your failure isn't going to move you past it any better.
20 Reply751 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. are some women baldists, and back hairists and shortists then?
Guess what, Life's not fair, all of us have disadvantages to overcome and blacks and women problems aren't any worse than anyone else's.
If you lost a leg in war come talk to me10 Reply
+1 yHow is it racist. I personally I'm attached to all races but I wouldn't say anyone who wasn't was a racist. Are gay people now sexist then?
37 Reply- +1 y
many women go for white men as they see them as desirable. i was rejected many times cause i was black/brown.
- +1 y
@johnyash1324 did them women actually say it was because if your skin colour? No offence but I wouldn't want to date a guy who assumed everytime he was rejected it was because I was racist and nothing else to do with your personality. Maybe have some self reflection instead of jumping on the victim train. Plus if it was because of your skin colour would you actually want to date a racist women... Clearly not so these women just aren't ment to be
- +1 y
Plus I know a lot of women who actually see black guys as more desirable then white guys. Slightly because of the a myth about black men but a lot of women do find them more attractive. I've dated black men before who I found highly attractive
- +1 y
she said it on my face and also in front of my other dark coloured friends that she doesn't find dark skin desirable
- +1 y
@johnyash1324 well then do you want to date her after that?
- +1 y
NO but i felt bad when you're defending her even though she said it on my face that she doesn't date dark skin no matter how perfect you're.
- +1 y
@johnyash1324 when was I defending her? I don't even know the girl.
I think beauty is beauty, but within some families and circles it’s a lot more work when you date someone outside your race. It’s usually a generational thing but at least in America it can be a regional thing as well. Like I don’t want to be the token white guy in a black family and wouldn’t want that on a significant other. There are plenty of exceptions but personally I’m just not looking for any hassle from anybody.
00 Reply
Anonymous(25-29)+1 yWe may be shallow or weird but racist is too much. Calling us racist, would belittle the real problems of people who face racism. In my experience it is the Asian, middleeastern and black people who mostly prefere their own race and ain't open to date white people for example. I dont Think white people mind it. I personally prefere turkish/kurdish/ white men.
21 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yWhy can't people accept that sexual preference is not deemed as racist, wanting to reproduce within your own race is not racist. They tried to pull that line on Muhammad Ali in the 1970s and it failed, as he said "There's nothing wrong with me wanting my children to look like me." Just because he said he wouldn't reproduce with a White, Asian or non-black woman, as a black man. This woke stuff is bullshit.
00 Reply
+1 yIt's not being racist. You act like having personal preferences is race related. Apply the same logic to eye color, or zodiac, or religious beliefs. People can decide if they don't want to date someone and they can decide what race they date
10 Reply11.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's not racist to have a preference. That's absolutely asinine.
51 Reply- 3.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u +1 y
Filler
40 Reply - Show More (94)
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions