Would ww3 kill simping or make it worse?

[Anonymous]

I think itd kill it off especially if its anything like the korean war (for korea) where there's so many females:males that it became an uber-patriarchy with men being ultra privileged, treated like royalty

Right now it's the opposite in China. Chinese men have to at least have bought a house, be willing to get down on their knee and propose, and shit like that, just to get females attention. Since there's so many men:women there

[Brokenheartedx]

They have a shortage of females in china is because they killed off all the newborn females, they reaped what they sow. It should be the other way there should be more females to males, tamper with biology and it will fk you over.

[Asker]

there's not a "shortage of females". Only if you think every dude would end up with a girl anyway. That never happens.

[Anonymous]

I don’t need men to buy me anything. But I do require submission from him.

[Pohjolan]

WWIII would be a global thermonuclear war so it would certainly reduce simping just by most simps being dead or having radiation poisoning.

[Asker]

All the lgbt "they/them" shit would go out the window, cus theyd all be conquered and killed

[Asker]

Theyre weak

[lrina]

@asker uh that wouldn't stop just because of a war...

[Asker]

@lrina the strongest cultures dont tolerate gays or feminism

[lrina]

not necessarily.

[Asker]

China banned gays from tv. Russia banned gays in public and on tv. Iran and Afghanistan executes them. If u think those cultures are stronger than western ones you're a Moron

[lrina]

i never said who was stronger. i don't see why you're just jumping to random conclusions.

[OddBeMe]

It’s interesting to see what some guys masturbate to.

[Anonymous]

Let’s hope Ww3 doesn’t happen.

[Asker]

Its been in the works for years.