Agree or Disagree: Should collective punishment be imposed as a deterrent for heinous crimes?

bzcxx
Discuss: Collective punishment as a deterrent. Should collective punishment be imposed for heinous crimes (eg. Murder, rape, terrorism, treason etc.)

Rationale: Some people posit that three generations of hard labour and imprisonment is a strong deterrent. Criminals are more likely to think of their families before committing a heinous crime.

Eg. The family members of suicide bombers who die during the act of terrorism will have to serve life-imprisonment in their place. Will this be a basis for potential criminals to rethink their action?

If you vote for it: Why? What crimes should warrant collective punishment (Three generations of Imprisonment and torture).

If you voted against it: Why?

“North Korea law specifies 'three generations of punishment'. If you commit a crime, your children and grandchildren will also receive the full brunt of punishment, which often involves a lifetime in prison. Children born in prison are raised as prisoners because their “blood is guilty”.” [1]




[1] photocontest.smithsonianmag.com/.../
Agree or Disagree: Should collective punishment be imposed as a deterrent for heinous crimes?
Agree or Disagree: Should collective punishment be imposed as a deterrent for heinous crimes?
11 Opinion