There was a professor who published woke pandering lies to prove that the education system was corrupt and not only did nobody challenge his claims the scientific community excepted it all as facts. When they started writing text books for students to study based on lies he admitted to what he did.
The picture in the description is great and yes i do believe humans are liars by default. But scientists has reasons to lie. Political pressure, financial pressure. They have every reason and many people pressuring them to lie whether for money gain or political and social gain
We trusted Fauci and look where that got us. And our Government lies all the time. It is hard to trust anyone anymore, especially Biden.
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
10 mo
Scientific research already goes through a peer review process to assess the validity of the research. In fact, the very process you criticize is responsible for uncovering the lies in the study that you link to. 🙄
from your article:
"However, in a blog published this month, three behavioral scientists under the name "DataColada" cataloged evidence of problems with Gino’s study. Upon analysis of data that "Dr. Gino and her co-authors had posted online, the scientists demonstrated that "that some of the data points had been tampered with, and that the tampering helped drive the result.""
So you found one article with fabricated data (which was caught!), and you want to question the validity of all science because of it. does right-wing paranoia ever make sense?
Brave blue anon, you are so eager to criticize that you didn't bother to read the article, or you skimmed the important parts and missed the details. Original study published in 2012 after peer review, results finally questioned in 2023.
Does left wing hatred ever let facts stand in the way of their argument?
I was a chemistry major in college and psychology minor. Yes, I know the way things are SUPPOSED to be done. I also know that some people take shortcuts and don't follow the rules. Anyone who fails to acknowledge that is naive.
Outright lie, not very often. Make errors in methodology, yes. Selectively distort or frame findings / time frames in order to support their contentions? Yes.
I don't trust individual scientists, but certainly peer reviewed research. That is the nature of the peer reviewed process "I have found this piece of information," and others then repeat and test the results.
As neither a scholar nor scientist, I never lie about the experiments I've conducted. It's usually others thinking that I lied. Good thing I have a YouTube channel!
Of course they lie - especially one who are University faculty and are rwequired to publlish on pain of job loss.
That said, watch this morph into "climate change is a hoax" by the right wing because any changes that need to be made to avoid the conseqences of climate change might impact the sacred profits of large corporations.
None of the above science is a process that it's job this to tell truth. Research has to be evaluated for quality, replication, and be supported my multiples lines of evidence. Research is not an answer or a lie or a truth, it is a peice of a puzzle.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
45Opinion
There was a professor who published woke pandering lies to prove that the education system was corrupt and not only did nobody challenge his claims the scientific community excepted it all as facts. When they started writing text books for students to study based on lies he admitted to what he did.
The picture in the description is great and yes i do believe humans are liars by default. But scientists has reasons to lie. Political pressure, financial pressure. They have every reason and many people pressuring them to lie whether for money gain or political and social gain
We trusted Fauci and look where that got us. And our Government lies all the time. It is hard to trust anyone anymore, especially Biden.
Scientific research already goes through a peer review process to assess the validity of the research. In fact, the very process you criticize is responsible for uncovering the lies in the study that you link to. 🙄
from your article:
"However, in a blog published this month, three behavioral scientists under the name "DataColada" cataloged evidence of problems with Gino’s study. Upon analysis of data that "Dr. Gino and her co-authors had posted online, the scientists demonstrated that "that some of the data points had been tampered with, and that the tampering helped drive the result.""
So you found one article with fabricated data (which was caught!), and you want to question the validity of all science because of it. does right-wing paranoia ever make sense?
Brave blue anon, you are so eager to criticize that you didn't bother to read the article, or you skimmed the important parts and missed the details. Original study published in 2012 after peer review, results finally questioned in 2023.
Does left wing hatred ever let facts stand in the way of their argument?
A lot of researcher's grant money depends on the results of what they find out. People will fudge the statistics to get the outcome that they wantt.
Apparently you never heard of Scientific Method? Studies and experiments are independently verifiable. If it's not verified, it's not science.
I was a chemistry major in college and psychology minor. Yes, I know the way things are SUPPOSED to be done. I also know that some people take shortcuts and don't follow the rules. Anyone who fails to acknowledge that is naive.
I don't know what you believe. My belief is that humans generally have an agenda.
Scientists twist all sorts of things to fit their premise. Everyone does.
Just look at Fauci. They moved the Covid lab to Thailand. Why?
What was wrong with staying in China?
I was wondering how long it would take for bullshit like this to appear.
@msc545
Your wish is my command.
How dare you question the priesthood of the regime!
I don't know how anyone in their right mind can believe the world is going to destroyed in 25 years time
Yes its happened before, but they usually get caught.
How would you know how many of them don't get caught?
I think they do... like what happened to Marie Curie... I guess they do
Outright lie, not very often. Make errors in methodology, yes. Selectively distort or frame findings / time frames in order to support their contentions? Yes.
Sure, if it disrupts the prevailing wisdom, then reputation is on the line.
I don't trust individual scientists, but certainly peer reviewed research. That is the nature of the peer reviewed process "I have found this piece of information," and others then repeat and test the results.
As neither a scholar nor scientist, I never lie about the experiments I've conducted. It's usually others thinking that I lied. Good thing I have a YouTube channel!
https://www.youtube.com/embed/BLr60-was70Of course they lie - especially one who are University faculty and are rwequired to publlish on pain of job loss.
That said, watch this morph into "climate change is a hoax" by the right wing because any changes that need to be made to avoid the conseqences of climate change might impact the sacred profits of large corporations.
Yes, I believe they do lie at times.
None of the above science is a process that it's job this to tell truth. Research has to be evaluated for quality, replication, and be supported my multiples lines of evidence. Research is not an answer or a lie or a truth, it is a peice of a puzzle.
They shouldn't lie but researcher's bias does exist and should be explored.