Considering how many political staffers are writing damning books about the politicians that employed them, should politicians have staff sign NDAs?

Question

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

The use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in political settings is a matter of debate and can have both advantages and disadvantages. Here are some points to consider:

**Advantages:**
1. **Confidentiality:** NDAs can help maintain confidentiality and protect sensitive information within a political team.
2. **Preventing Leaks:** They can discourage staffers from disclosing confidential information to the public, which could potentially harm the political campaign or official work.
3. **Privacy:** Politicians may have legitimate concerns about their personal lives and may use NDAs to protect their privacy.

**Disadvantages:**
1. **Transparency:** The use of NDAs can be seen as a lack of transparency, which is crucial in politics to maintain public trust.
2. **Free Speech:** Some argue that NDAs infringe on freedom of speech and the public's right to know about matters of public interest.
3. **Chilling Effect:** NDAs may discourage whistleblowers from coming forward with information about misconduct or unethical behavior.

Ultimately, whether politicians should have staff sign NDAs depends on their specific needs and circumstances. However, it's essential to strike a balance between protecting confidential information and ensuring transparency and accountability, especially in the realm of politics where public trust is paramount. Additionally, laws and regulations regarding NDAs can vary by jurisdiction, so it's essential to consult legal experts when drafting such agreements.

BoopBoopBeep · Accepted Answer

Many of them already try. The problems is when you're dealing with higher level staff, they don't always want to sign it. I've turned down NDAs before and was just like "F this I'm going home." They thought I was playing chicken with them til I got on the bird, then they came to get me and said it was optional and gave me a raise. I really doubt that's the only time that's ever happened.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

You should not need to pre-require an NDA if you were doing nothing wrong. The only thing someone in that position would need an NDA for is for suppressing things like military secrets that might harm the country or others in law enforcement.

provokeesmokee · Accepted Answer

Nah. Just be a politician whose book would be too boring and straight laced to sell. No one's writing books about Bernie but maybe they ought to.

Drewtate · Answer

It shouldn't be a problem as long as they don't lie or if you've something to hide. It's kinda like that trump accuser who wrote her book she was able to lie

coachTanthony · Answer

Well then they would be admitting they have a bunch of stuff to hide and that book would sell just as well.

AviatorTom · Answer

It wouldn't matter. Courts have ruled most NDAs as unenforceable in the US, a violation of the First Amendment.

jshm2 · Answer

They do, dumbass. But an NDA will have a limit, and stipulation.

WhitneySnow · Answer

I think a lot of them do, at least for like close personal staff

genericname85 · Answer

lol so they can be even more corrupt than they already are? i guess they would love that. but that would be terrible for the people.

disgustingweebtrash · Answer

Politicians more often than not support the rhetoric "You have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide" so they shouldn't be so concerned with privacy for themself.

exitseven · Answer

No, instead maybe they should not do stuff that will come back and bite them on the ass.

goaded · Answer

Sorry, what happened to freedom of speech, again?

strateguy632 · Answer

i hope not. what is the politicians planning?

rachel776 · Answer

they do sign NDAs

RedInnocent68 · Answer

No, but a lot do.

Considering how many political staffers are writing damning books about the politicians that employed them, should politicians have staff sign NDAs?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Considering how many political staffers are writing damning books about the politicians that employed them, should politicians have staff sign NDAs?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.