Why did the Democrats ever think this would work?

[Juxtapose]

"WASHINGTON, March 4 (Reuters) - The U. S. Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a major victory on Monday, barring states from disqualifying candidates for federal office under a constitutional provision involving insurrection and reversing Colorado's exclusion of him from its ballot."

"The 14th Amendment's Section 3 bars from office any "officer of the United States" who took an oath "to support the Constitution of the United States" and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

"We conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency," the unsigned opinion for the court stated."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-wins-colorado-ballot-disqualification-case-us-supreme-court-2024-03-04/

Better luck packing the court next time, bitches! You rat fucks even tried increasing how many Supreme Court justices are in the court just so you could fuck over Trump. Shameful!

[Dargil]

My theory only. The evidence has long emerged that election fraud in 2020 was elaborately planned with a combination of tactics. The SCOTUS attempted to stay out of it back then when Republicans sued. Most claims were never even heard. I think SCOTUS went through self examination and realized they had fukked up. Not only was their decision this time right but their unanimity even with Roberts was a measure of retribution. Their approach to the lawfare will be subtle. They will effectively delay cases so they won't affect the election, making the cases a waste of time and money.

[Juxtapose]

I think you're right. I hope the Supreme Court keeps helping any candidate that is targeted by lawfare bullshit 🐂💩

[Dargil]

My hope is that Congress will pass legislation under Trump that strongly limits the use of lawfare to affect elections, such tome thresholds where any cases must be decided in advance of campaigns, maybe 6 months. You know he will sign it. The man doesn't want revenge. He wants retribution.

[BoopBoopBeep]

9-0 at that. It would have been such a stupid decision to just allow states to disallow whoever and say F the will of the voters, even the ultra liberal justices were like "no this is too much." Think of the cycles of repercussions that would happen every 4 years?

[exitseven]

Democrats are throwing everything they can think of against President Trump. They know they are holding a losing hand with Biden and are expected to lose and lose big. They have stretched the law and shopped for democrat judges to preside over these indictments. They are rushing them through the court and even the one in New York where Trump was denied a jury trial will be overturned on appeal.

Republicans had 4 years to push for more secure elections and have gotten quite a few states to require voter ID and have limited mail in ballots. They have also organized their own ballot harvesting operations. It will be harder but not impossible for the democrats to cheat.

[NaultD]

It really reinforce vote blue no matter who. People like myself wanted burnie over Hillary and cost us the election to trump. Who didn't won the popular vote who won a narrower victory in 2016 compared to 2020 election.

Where obama was a tool and let turtle scrooge pack the supreme court. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. And here's just another kick in the teeth that the right has zero shame or dignity. Liberals are dumb and gullible but will learn one way or another. it's better on this shit then betting on everything on election day.

[Juxtapose]

"Vote blue no matter who" got you a segregationist that pushed a major crime bill that fucked over the black community into the presidency.

He bragged about how having a dime-size worth of cocaine would land you 5 years in prison minimum with nothing the judge could do.

He also compared integrated schools to racial jungles and said that poor kids are just as smart as white kids.

Make it make sense.

[lightbulb27]

Democrats have been rabid for years and trying everything via legal system to stop this one person. It's not working.

Do you think the are just gonna give up if/when he wins decisively? One can imagine how bad it's going to be inside the system...

[WindyandWarms]

Biden is the first president in history that doesn't have a brain. Even Obama said he was retarded.

[Juxtapose]

Yeah, Obama said not to underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up. You're absolutely right 👍

[WindyandWarms]

And Joe doesn't remember.

[gorydetails]

Now they want the Supreme Court disbanded. Proving that “threat to democracy” is their code phrase for “threat to democrat power”

[Juxtapose]

Yet they had no trouble abusing the power of the Supreme Court to force Roe v Wade at the time when it should have been a federal law. Now they are reaping the repercussions of trying to hamfest their agenda with abortion.

I can only hope there are consequences for this incredibly abhorrent election interference against Trump.

[Juxtapose]

And for the record I am for abortion rights so long as the fetus does not have a brain stem.

[Juxtapose]

(14-40 weeks of age)

[NYCQuestions1976]

Specifically "threat to far-left liberals and socialists in the Democratic party".

[NYCQuestions1976]

Why? Far-left liberals and socialists in this country (and everywhere on the planet) are deranged and stupid, and believe their feelings are more important than the law and the Constitution. That's why.

[DextroShade]

Even of they packed the court it wouldn't have worked because it was 9-0. The Democrat party is "democratic" in the sane sense as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

[Exterminatore]

It’s clear they will do anything to keep Trump from being reelected.

[AngryCarl]

I'd be the first person to admit that I don't understand the American Constitution but isn't this just a flawed decision by a politicized court?

[Jersey2]

No. The court has 3 very liberal judges and yet this was unanimous decision on 9-0 which is a rarity.

[Juxtapose]

@Jersey2 exactly 💯

[Telekinetic-Potato]

The thing that's important to remember about the whole insurrectionist rule is that it was made after the Civil War to stop people who fought with the south from getting to power.

People back then, it seems, anticipated something like this might happen because of the third ammendment.

The Supreme Court was very careful to say that the part of the case they were addressing was whether or not the state had the authority to make this decision.

A very plain reading of the last line in the 14th ammendment and the third shows that congress must vote on it.

As much as I want Trump to win, I thought congress had to vote for him to be allowed to run, but it seems the courts interperated it the other way around. I think considering how much time has passed since the Civil War, it was the appropriate decision all things considered.

Whether Trump engaged in insurrection or not is going to be a very complicated and long case. Many hours of footage would have to be sifted through, witnesses chosen, strewn, argued over, prepped deposition conducted etc.

The only thing that trial can do right now is interfere with the election and considering how much of a stretch it is to say he's an insurrectionist, bordering on the edge of being absurd especially considering twitters hand in the situation and the governments influence which very likely took place... It's a can of worms that is not worth going into.

[Dongie]

Because satan told them what to do. People aren't that smart.

[Twalli]

It's fine he won't win the immunity case.

[Juxtapose]

Haha they voted unanimously in his favor so we will see about that.

[Twalli]

You really want a totalitarian dictatorship don't you?

[OddBeMe]

Pills juxy…you missed a dose.

[Jersey2]

Were you the one who said Trump wouldn’t be allowed to run because of his role on Jan 6th some months back?

[OddBeMe]

@Jersey2 No actually I was saying scotus would prob toss the ballot thing. Should he? Probably, if he got convicted of inciting.

[Jersey2]

Ahh, I see.

[Juxtapose]

Aren't you the one on medication?

[OddBeMe]

Yes and I take my pills. Sometimes. The darker posts are my bad days.

[Juxtapose]

Yeah, glass house. I don't take pills, I smoke weed and drink coffee.

[OddBeMe]

So glass house noted, you probably should.