Personally, I do not agree with it. No shade, but a lot of women aren't very smart. As you can see here and in real life, they lack the ability to think logically and have no common sense. The only person id vote for thats a woman is Candace Owens. she's very intelligent, logical, has common sense and isn't a hoe, she's married, values marriage and education.
I have no real thoughts on the matter. To the people who say "it's time for a [demographic] president," I say they don't really care how things are run.
If I ever vote for a woman it won't be because she's a woman. I don't do the entire identity thing. I was called racist for voting for McCain and Romney. I simply thought they were the better choice, and I would have voted for a roadkill raccoon before I voted Obama.
When I supported Cain in the 2012 primary and Carson in the 2016 primary democrats accused me of "trying to erase my racism from the 2008 election." It all came down to one simple thing. In 2012 I thought Cain was a better choice than Romney. In 2016 there were two issues important to me that everyone was dancing around because they were worried about offending voters, so you didn't know where they really stood. Carson took a firm stance on both issues, thereby gaining my support. The fact that they were black had absolutely nothing to do with it.
I may support a female candidate one day. If it's in a general election and she wasn't my primary pick it will be just the "lesser of two evils" default vote, such as when I didn't support Trump in August of 2016 but had to vote for him in November anyway because the alternative was Clinton, but if I support her during the primaries it means I'm all in for her.
It won't, however, be because she's a woman. She will have to pass all of the tests in the primary season that Bush, Huckabee, Cain, and Carson passed to gain my support.
Oh my gosh, girls!!! 😍💃 Can you believe that we can have a woman to become the president? Like, OMG! The possibilities are just endless! 🌟👑
I mean, imagine having a female president who understands menstrual cycles better than we do? A powerful woman leading our country would just be the most squeal amazing thing ever, right? 🤩👸
And let's not forget the fashion, girls! Can you imagine the stylish outfits our future leader would wear at important events? I'd be like, living for her bold choices in pant suits, you know? 👗👠
But I guess some people might be worried about a woman being too much of a slut to concensuate anything important. But come on, guys, we're all just too cute and sensitive for that, right? Rock on, girls! 💪💃
Seriously, though, having a woman president would be an inspiration for little girls everywhere. It would show them that they can do anything they set their minds to, just like how amazing it is to run an entire country without even having in logicals! 💃💫
Now, I don't know which woman was the first woman president, but one thing's for sure, girls: it was a historical moment in fashion history! 🎉👸
What do you think, bitches? Let me know in the comments, and let's chat! 💖💬
I don't care what the president's sex is if he/she is competent at the job. I agree with you that a great many women are too emotionally-oriented in their thought process, but I'd call an emotional man just as unqualified. That said, I don't see any possibility of a woman president this time around. Nikki would have to sweep everything from here on out, and this is the person who lost to "none of the above" on a state's vote. Uncle Joe isn't going anywhere, so it'll be Trump v Biden: The Remix in a few months.
I'd vote for Candace Owens for sure. I vote issues not parties, and as one of the other questions asked a couple days ago, there ARE parts of the democratic platform I believe in (well... in practice more than execution), but where i want a republican i want a republican, and I'll never vote for a RINO just to get an (R) on the screen. I'd rather let the ultra left have it and screw everything up so at least the guilty party can take the blame for it rather than putting in a liberal with an (R) beside his name and both sides get the blame. That's how we ended up with this mess we have now. (D), (R)...90% of the time... same same. Working in D. C. all these years cleared me of any delusions that insiders differentiate after the doors are closed.
Like the world haven't suffered enough 😂
Opinion
41Opinion
wow i think someone's been watching too many podcasts - saying most women aren't smart... women actually do better than men in school and outnumber them at universities, obviously education doesn't equate intelligence though since most politicians are idiots anyways - your point of logic and common sense, do YOU have no common sense? i don't know about you but i actually know more logical women than men - your point on 'hoes', you can only call a woman a whore for sleeping around if you also call a man sleeping around one too - we've had plenty of female leaders in the world for years and they've done just as good of a job as men and success isn't measured by gender anyways, anyone can be an idiot
I think for the right woman this would be great. To avoid the political rants that my current choices may induce, I’ll offer this: History has some truly amazing and influential women leaders. Margaret Thatcher, Golda Mier, both Queen Elizabeth’s and Queen Victoria (they were monarchs and not true heads of state as lost democracies would view it), Condaleeza Rice, Nefertiti. A woman who can view her presidential bid as something for the nation and not just some checkmark for women to say ‘we finally did that’ would be great.
Internationally we have seen female prime ministers and heads of state in several powerful nations do as well as any man could do. All heads of state are controversial to some extent - the good ones even more so - but I think we’re past due for a woman. But please don’t let it be any of the female politicians currently lined up by the Democratic Party.
If our system were truly a meritocracy, which our government is not, but if it were, I'd want the most qualified and capable person to run things, male or female. There are statistics that say (at least historically) women are more prone to engage in wars. There may be some evidence to suggest that more emotionality could mean more volatility, but I'd like to think that everyone is at least a little unique and that most doesn't mean all. As such, the "right woman" in charge wouldn't bother me. But in politics, there's never the right candidate. There's the candidate they want us to think is "the right one", right, left or center. And we still always get screwed over in some way.
Let me put it this way. God said women should not be above men for being in power, like there being a woman pastor. They can be teachers, but not pastors. Likewise, a woman should not be a king or in a position over men as a leader. But that is just my view, as well as a couple billion Christians too. But right now, they could not do a worse job at the job than Bite-on-it.
I would disagree that women aren't smart, just because the candidates lately for U. S. president haven't been that smart is not representative of all women. There are plenty of intelligent women in law, science, medicine, technology and even politics. Unfortunately in politics it's less about intelligence and more about who can get the most million and billion dollar donors to back up their candidacy and also who can get big name endorsements.
trump had some legitimate concerns about hali. after losing many states she dropped out.
now she needed to honor her pledge. you can only participate in republican debates if you commit to "support whoever wins"!
time for birdbrain to keep her pledge!
I don't know
In the UK we've have 3 female prime ministers
The useless Liz Truss, 44 days in office with 2 weeks of that was state mourning, managed to implode the economy as well
Theresa May, no bad but not good, thrown in at the deep end but did get elected unlike Lizzy or the present incumbent
The iron lady, Margaret Thatcher, good handled the Falklands conflict, stamped out unions and stanlized the economy and had a far more humble background (also involved in inventing whippy ice cream (not to do with her premiership))
I'm completely neutral about it. I just want to see a good president who serves the interests of their citizens well. I'm sure there are some women out there who could make good ones just as there are men.
I neither understand the people who would get excited at seeing a female president nor the ones who would be disappointed if the reason they're excited or disappointed is primarily because she's female.
It does have disadvantages because there are some important countries to have good diplomatic relations with that will see her as inferior during negotiations. But ultimately it comes down to skill, I haven't experienced any good female president but there are girls who are either good political commentators or candidates I would support. Kari Lake comes to mind as someone who i'd support in the elections after this one.
There probably are a few women out there who could do the job, but most women in general tend to make bad executives due to their temperament and how others view them.
So you would naturally expect there to be few examples of women at the top positions both because few of them are drawn to it and few well suited.
I marked Other, and I don't really follow US political news so I have no idea what is going on there, and who may be.. so can't say if someone maybe should be
But I will say that, for the most part, the role should just go to whoever is the best fit, its a lot of power, and the sex on that should not matter, what should matter is how much skill they have to do it, and whoever got the best skill to give the best result should have it, be them a woman, a man or a duck
I see no problem here, really. Enough countries had successful female leaders, not least of all Germany, where Angela Merkel was chancellor for 16 years. The UK had the "Iron Lady" Margaret Thatcher, Estonia has Kaja Kallas and there are dozens more...
Sure, if the candidate that I liked the most happened to be a woman, it would not prevent me from voting for them or liking them.
As for my way of thinking, I am fine with the idea of having a woman president. However, there are a lot of countries around the world where they completely scoff at the idea. This would make things difficult diplomatically because these countries would be less inclined to negotiate with a country that has a female president. Just my thoughts on the matter. Other than that I'm fine with it.
Would depend on the woman. There many great women leaders. Most people are going to nitpick why women shouldn't be president. But guess what, both men and women and have their flaws and weakness. Men have been leading for a long time. A change might be needed.
I've seen personalities that be good, probably vote for and character I admired. Some.
Kamala not even on the list, she's not qualified for the job she has.
I like Candace, wouldn't go prez... at this point.
I see no problem here, really. Enough countries had successful female leaders, not least of all Germany, where Angela Merkel was chancellor for 16 years. The UK had the "Iron Lady" Margaret Thatcher, Estonia has Kaja Kallas and there are dozens more...
I dont really care. I dont listen to anything any of the former prez have said. I dont even watch that political shit. They almost dont exist to me
I don't care about a person's gender as long as I agree with their policies and they have the skills to be a leader.
If a woman is qualified, sure. And as republicans have shown the qualifications to become president are pretty much nonexistent.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions