We know how this is gonna turn out if SCOTUS gets involved - who is taking bets?

[legalboxers]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-decide-white-house-091101770.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=0_00
Supreme Court to decide if White House went too far fighting social media misinformation

After Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested without evidence that baseball legend Hank Aaron’s death in 2021 was caused by a COVID-19 vaccine, the Biden administration pounced.

“Wanted to flag the below tweet and am wondering if we can get moving on the process for having it removed ASAP,” the digital director for the White House’s COVID response team wrote in an email to an official at Twitter.

What the White House viewed as an effort to correct misinformation about a life-saving vaccine during a pandemic, critics called an example of a broad pressure campaign by the federal government to quash views it doesn’t like.

Now the Supreme Court is being asked what boundaries to set.

If the justices place too many restrictions on how the government can work with private social media companies in areas such as public health, election integrity and foreign interference, it could impede efforts to stop harmful misinformation, experts say.

But if there aren’t enough guardrails, the government – whether a Democratic or Republican administration – could have too much power to influence debate in a public square dominated by social media.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Yeah, Trump will do anything to try winning. Also, he does anything to bring the other party down.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Thanks for Mho :)

[OtterMan68]

SCOTUS needs to rein in congress and POTUS over their attempts to control social media