Society & Politics 1 mo Is 66 weeks in prison fair for sending a dick pic? (Page 2) purplepoppy Follow Master Age: 24 Follow FacebookTwitterWhatsApp 11 Is 66 weeks in prison fair for sending a dick pic? Post Opinion Like Share Follow 2 likes
Miah04 Follow Xper 6 Age: 22 1 mo It was originally only supposed to be a week, then they saw how little it was.So judge was like hell naw, he needs an extreme punishment for forcing someone to see something so tiny. 1 0 Reply
strateguy632 Follow Master Age: 48 , mho 31% 1 mo 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. prison? even rape gets "suspended" no jail how can this be worse. doesn't serve him right. nobody got injured physical pain. b 0 0 Reply
JacobJordan Follow Yoda Age: 39 1 mo 564 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Uh congrats England for just decimating speech. This is sure to set an ungodly awful precedent for things even less significant than that. 0 0 Reply
FreyaRed Follow Guru Age: 23 , mho 39% 1 mo 1.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I guess for a rape on a minor he would get less. 0 0 Reply
Dargil Follow Master Age: 33 1 mo 6.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Seems excessive. But don't do the crime if ya can't do the time. 0 0 Reply
patrick994 Follow Xper 6 Age: 29 1 mo It seems strange to me that he was only convicted for this, there must surely be more to it; 0 0 Reply
Dongie Follow Xper 6 Age: 61 1 mo Like the pun but consider what one sees on the streets. Tits and ass on display. Poor woman,"I need a psychologist, I saw a dick". 1 0 Reply
butterly248 Follow Yoda Age: 25 1 mo Idiot but this is extreme. If he was a repeat offender then that would be a different story 0 1 Reply butterly248 1 mo I didn't know she was 15. This is a deserved punishment Reply
Wiredone Follow Guru Age: 55 1 mo 408 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Maybe that would stop the unsolicited nude pictures 1 0 Reply
28ouc Follow Xper 7 Age: 38 1 mo Seems a little excessive but still not right. I would never send anything without being asked for it or 100% certain it was not a problem 0 0 Reply
Anonymous (25-29) 1 mo Yeah, dick pics are for fools who want to be blackmailedWell we can add jailed to that and hopefully stamp out the practice once and for all 0 0 Reply
AngryCarl Follow Explorer Age: 64 1 mo 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. But wait, I thought the prisons were already full? 1 0 Reply
Anonymous (25-29) 1 mo I think it's fair. Those guys need to stop making the rest of us look bad. 0 0 Reply
Anonymous (25-29) 1 mo I would understand prison time if the recipient was underage but this is overkill. 0 0 Reply
dustybiker2 Follow Explorer Age: 46 , mho 34% 1 mo That will set a precedent. Damn. 1 6 Reply DryGermanGuy 1 mo But maybe not a bad one. Reply dustybiker2 1 mo Yes and no. I think that is extreme. I wonder if there were unique extra details in this case. Devils in the details. Maybe he tattooed her name on the offending appendage. Reply DryGermanGuy 1 mo See poppy's reply to another answer - the guy already had previous related convictions. Reply dustybiker2 1 mo There is always more to the story, eh? Reply DryGermanGuy 1 mo Of course. And not that difficult to research for us people outside of the "Generation Facebook". Reply dustybiker2 1 mo This is true. Reply
Ms_Facesitter Follow Guru Age: 30 1 mo 310 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I think a fine would be good enough. 1 0 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
33Opinion
It was originally only supposed to be a week, then they saw how little it was.
So judge was like hell naw, he needs an extreme punishment for forcing someone to see something so tiny.
prison? even rape gets "suspended" no jail how can this be worse. doesn't serve him right. nobody got injured physical pain. b
Uh congrats England for just decimating speech. This is sure to set an ungodly awful precedent for things even less significant than that.
I guess for a rape on a minor he would get less.
Seems excessive. But don't do the crime if ya can't do the time.
It seems strange to me that he was only convicted for this, there must surely be more to it;
Like the pun but consider what one sees on the streets. Tits and ass on display. Poor woman,"I need a psychologist, I saw a dick".
Idiot but this is extreme. If he was a repeat offender then that would be a different story
I didn't know she was 15. This is a deserved punishment
Maybe that would stop the unsolicited nude pictures
Seems a little excessive but still not right. I would never send anything without being asked for it or 100% certain it was not a problem
Yeah, dick pics are for fools who want to be blackmailed
Well we can add jailed to that and hopefully stamp out the practice once and for all
But wait, I thought the prisons were already full?
um, no. people get less or no time for violent crime.
Unless he was stalking her, than that's absurd and totally unfair.
I think it's fair. Those guys need to stop making the rest of us look bad.
I would understand prison time if the recipient was underage but this is overkill.
That will set a precedent. Damn.
But maybe not a bad one.
Yes and no. I think that is extreme. I wonder if there were unique extra details in this case. Devils in the details.
Maybe he tattooed her name on the offending appendage.
See poppy's reply to another answer - the guy already had previous related convictions.
There is always more to the story, eh?
Of course. And not that difficult to research for us people outside of the "Generation Facebook".
This is true.
I think a fine would be good enough.
i airdropped so many dick pics
If it was unsolicited