
Agree
Disagree
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age

I absolutely would do that and I have. Sometimes there are places I want to take my kids where a stroller simply doesn't work, but they need to be contained. Hiking trails, beaches, rough terrain, etc. It's helpful because the kid gets to move around instead of sitting and sitting and sitting and sitting... They sit in the carseat, they sit in the swing, they sit in the stroller, they sit in the sandbox, they sit on the slide, they sit for schoolwork. Kids were made to move and I think this is a wonderful (and safe) compromise. I've had parents walk up to me and ask where I got that harness! My child likes it far better than the stroller because he has more freedom. It's unusual and different, so people have to make an issue of it.
Kids need to be trained and that doesn't make them dogs. Kids need to eat and that doesn't make them dogs. Kids need fenced yards and that doesn't make them dogs. Kids need time and attention and that doesn't make them dogs. Kids need to go for walks and that doesn't make them dogs. Sheesh.
And people wonder why American kids are growing up with problems kids in other countries don't have... some parents LITERALLY treat their children like dogs.
@handsomelad70 Did you read what I wrote, or stop after the first sentence? :D
Read it all.
@handsomelad70 OK, just checking! :D
Children need to be taught, not trained;they aren't animals.
@handsomelad70 That's fair. How do you distinguish the two, from your perspective? I assume you probably have kids.
Nope, but I know when something doesn't look right to me. (I'm a man, not a woman, but I know women have kids.)
@handsomelad70 OK.
What's worse? The kid being on a leash or the kid darting into traffic and getting killed?
Some kids are perfectly capable of sticking by your side and not wondering off. Others take every opportunity to run as fast as they can when you aren't looking for a split second.
Honestly I'm for it. Buddy has to manage 5 kids that could potentially run off chasing a pigeon or seagull into a truck's path at any point. I think 5 kids is fully justifiable to have them on leashes. If anything, I'd call it responsible parenting.
Truthfully, I don't think I don't think I'd do it myself. How did people ever go about with 10 kids back in the day when they were popping them out like popcorn
Because the infant mortality rate was FAR higher in "the good old days." Bet this dude's name is actually "Buddy." If "Buddy" couldn't stop at two or three kids, maybe he should have had himself de-boyed.
Don't judge the Indian if you haven't walked in his moccasins.
lol,
Suppose he didn't have them on a leash, they are walking somewhere, and one of them runs out into the road and gets hit by a car. Then people would be saying he should have been more careful. How else do you control five toddlers at once?
I know exactly
I don't have to walk in any moccasins (or cowboy boots, since "Cowboy" is one of my nicknames) to know how off-putting having children on a leash looks, but it's Kentucky, so I wouldn't expect much more.(How many folk have five children in 2024?)
@handsomelad70 These are quintuplets. I doubt that he and his wife planned on having five children at the same time.
Thanks for MHO!
Opinion
16Opinion
Ok, so if it was ONE kid I would wonder why the kid was on a "leash"... but God only gave a human two hands and this guy has to manage five kids... so "leashes" aren't unreasonable. (Tbh, they're not really "leashes" but more like the stirrup vests they use to train ice skaters... By contrast, the WRIST LEASHES are very harmful to kids' hands and don't really help a parent prevent a rambunctious kid from running into traffic.)
An adorable looking pack of gingers and blondes from far away, but up close I bet they're much more than a handful to manage...
Why did this chap sire FIVE kids? Does he not know it's 2024, not 1924 ?
@handsomelad70 I guess he likes to canoodle his wife...
"Canoodle?" How 'bout "club?"
@handsomelad70 😂😂😂
he cares for the right things...
safety... and not whatever the fuck ignorant people have to say online
it's not like one day you just decide to put a leash on a kid that is NOT a runner, lol
and it can go crazier with a bunch of them, once one of them takes off... the other will want to follow or run on their own
Absolutely agree. Teaching independence while still being there and still in control of the situation. Also less likely to be kidnapped.
Anyone who voted disagree please see a doctor to get your reproductive bits closed off. We don't need more stupid people to breed
If he didn't have some semblance of control the Dad would be running around like a chicken with it's head cut off.
It's really for their own safety. He's a good Dad! At least he's still there and didn't flee when all those babies came out. Some men run from just one child!🤗
About 10 years ago I went to the county fair with my friend and his family. His 2 sons were crazy little bastards. One of them got impatient and took off running through the crowd. Now imagine you have 5 kids getting impatient and taking off running in different directions
I'm usually against the kid leash thing, but I guess when you have that many small children at once, it just makes sense. 😂
Anyone that disagrees should sign up to help him keep any eye on them wherever he goes. I'm sure those that disagree would eventually agree with what he has to do.
1. I don't think thous kids are all brothers, they seems to be same age or 1 yare diference.
2. I prefer the old stile (hold hands)
3. They are not my children and i can't tell him how to take care of his childrens.
If i have this nr of children i will not take them all togeder in big walk in order to lose them. When they will grow a little bit and show some understanding i will start to take them much more togeder.
In the same time i need to think of my life stile, if i have the time and posibilitis to manage 5 childrens (with 1yare diference between them).
I work in a nurcery and one time we go with 15 childrens to a shop, non of them whas hold in this kinde of stufs, but all of them whas requested to hold a special rope, whitch they did and nothing bad had happen. The childrens walk in a nice organizate line holding the rope to the shop and back and stay togeder in the shope because they all whas afraide to get lose and know is dangerous to stay expose to the roud as well, so non of them dare to get away from the group.
The moust dangerous part whas when some of them let go to the rope before the shop or nursery, in that moment us the teacher tell them strictly to hold it back, witch they immediately did because we told them how important will be to stay safe on our journey.
So is not that hard, but truly, an adult will need way more patience and perseverance and attention in order to apply the old stile methods
If you have 5 young kids what do you do if they all run in different directions? This keeps them all together and safe from say, running into the street.
Children should be kept under control, but not on a leash. That gives kids a false sense of security, which limits their ability to learn about their own safety.
Boo hoo, his kids look a little silly while being prevented from being kidnapped or running into the street. It’s perfectly fine
Nothing wrong with keeping brats on a lead.
Having 5 of them in the first place is the problem here... but since they came as a 5-for-1 deal I guess he didn't intend it.
I totally agree. If they are old enough that they don't need a stroller, this is the best way to keep them safe. I did that when my kids were younger.
It’s either that or the kids go play in traffic.
He has too many kids to watch. He just found the best solution in history.
Agree. It's better than one or 5 running out in the road.
I don't care how it looks if it keeps the from being harmed.
They were called reins when I was little. Don't they have them now?
yup! they're still very much around :)
Seems like a smart and responsible tactic to keep track of that many kids, especially if you're walking down a busy street where you couldn't possibly chase them all in different directions.
No they aren’t dogs that is wrong
Keeps them safe from running off and getting lost or worse kidnapped.
Yes but I don’t agree with it they aren’t dogs
Well at least when they get kidnapped you can tell their parents but thank god you didn't have them on a leash... geez that would be worse lol
I don’t have kids and will never can I have issues that’s why
Not with kids but just complications
Actually coming back to this I do agree
I’ve thought it over
The kids aren't dogs, but the dad is behaving like one.
Woof, woof, woof !!!11
I agree with the sentiment, ie, safeguarding his children. The methodology? Wellllllll - - - - - -
Wow! I'm shocked at the answers here. That guy looks like a dog walker. Instead of leasing you kids train them and if you can do that then maybe your not as good a parent as you think you are
Agree I have leashed my kiddos before
I don't see an issue with it
Especially with 5 kids
Never put a human being on a leash it’s disrespectful. It does makes look like a dog
I've seen this especially with grandparents. It's easier to keep the kids from running off.
No I don't find this right.
Dehumanising.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions