
Are we basing deportations on tatoos?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Yes, and with the usual amount of attention to detail we've come to expect from this mob.
"A tattoo belonging to a man from Derbyshire [England] has appeared in a US government document used to identify members of a notorious Venezuelan gang - despite the man having no connection to the group.
Pete Belton, 44, from Ilkeston says he was shocked to find his forearm featured in a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) document used to help identify alleged members of Tren de Aragua (TdA), a transnational criminal organisation."
You mention due process as regards deportation of people in the country illegally. What specifically does due process mean to you within the context of deportation? Don’t be vague. Please also specify the legal basis for your claims (that means don’t be vague).
Only reason he's not targeting the blacks yet is it costs more to ship them to Africa. But don't worry, Trump's an equal opportunity racist and he'll get around to them soon.
Trump deported Black Haitians illegal immigrants started on February 4th, 2025. Nice for you to express your views that all blacks are from Africa though.
Lol that would be pathetic of that's all it takes now. Looks like I'm off to the gulag
Opinion
15Opinion
No one is getting deported just for a tattoo. But when that tattoo is linked to MS-13 or a known gang—and the person entered the country illegally or has a violent record—then yes, it becomes relevant. This isn’t ‘stop and frisk’ for innocent citizens. This is removing criminals who should’ve never been here in the first place. Comparing this to racial profiling is disingenuous and dismissive of the real threat posed by violent gangs hiding behind our previously broken border system.
— Eva ❤️
Maybe criminals who want to blend in should always write it on the forehead, with no exceptions, and even carry membership cards in their wallets? Retard.
I don't know i only see his fuckable belly button and don't have enough of an intellect to think beyond doing acts of sodomy to him.
Maybe, it could just be, that forensic photographers always label things for clarity, especially when the targeted readers who need to see the evidence the most, have special needs?
Illegal aliens are not due due process. And I suspect the law permits deporting accessories. And if it doesn't, the Congress will fix that.
Why do leftists use the Constitution in the same manner as Atheists use the Bible? Its because you do not believe in anything. You just believe AGAINST the country.
Your guy had his visa revoked and he was deported. He wasn't convicted under American law and jailed without due process.
A visa is a privilege that can be revoked for a slew of reasons. If an applicant has their visa revoked, then it is their responsibility to make their case and submit a new DS-160 application and appear at an interview with a consular officer. If they have been deported to their home country and jailed by that country for crimes, then I guess they will probably have an issue with that. None the less, the state department has no obligation to maintain an applicants visa. It can be revoked on just a suspicion. It's up to the applicant to prove they didn't do what they were suspected of doing to regain the privilege of holding a visa. Check your privilege commie.
He's not a legal resident if his visa is revoked. He was notified that his visa was revoked and that he would be deported due to security matters. That's all it takes numb nuts. Technically they don;t even have to do that much, but it's more of a formality to send a letter and listen to their case in an interview. You could literally get a visa, book a flight, board the flight, and have your visa revoked before you land and be turned right around when you enter the airport. It's up to him and his legal counsel to dispute it and to make their case why they should be able to gain a new visa after they submit a new DS-160 application and appear at an interview with the consular officer.
Was he convicted in an American court to be housed in an American jail, was his property seized by the American government or was his life claimed by the American government? No. So due process of law need not apply. He had a visa revoked and he was deported. His location was moved. His home country may have convicted him and took away his liberty by jailing him, but the American government did not. It's pretty fucking basic, but you're too fuck stupid to process basic ideas.
*fucking
That's not what the constitution says dumbass. Learn to read.
If you are deported you are not deprived of "life, liberty, or property". I know that's too fucking hard for you to understand. America did not sentence him to the death penalty, confine him in an American jail without release, or seize his assets. America detained him temporarily while he was being deported. The allowance for this is well established in constitutional law, but you left-wing fanatics constantly think you know more than the Supreme Court about the Constitution for some wild reason. Anyone can confirm that "Congress may make rules as to aliens that would be unacceptable if applied to citizens" and that there is a "longstanding view that the Government may constitutionally detain deportable aliens during the limited period necessary for their removal proceedings" in Demore v. Kim, 538 U. S. 510 (2003). This case law specifically makes a distinction between a Person that has illegally enter the United States and a Citizen and confirms that illegal aliens can be detained without a need to criminally charge and process them. They can be held in detention and deported. This is not secret stuff. It's well established law.
@CalmUntilAbused checking…nope also deprived of freedom
@CalmUntilAbused what crime?
LOL, deportations are based on nothing but "feeling" by the ICA agent.
Hence why they've won nothing in court.
it's absolutely shameful and hilarious to see people sucking gang cock just because they HAVE to disagree with Trump. Maybe you can fly with the democrat "leaders" next time they go to foreign countries to pick up ms-13 members. the friendliest of all the gangs. 🤣
WTF are you talking about? Black orgs have been on the Frontlines since go.
And tattoos are good CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence of gang affiliation. Facts to be presented & ajudicated IN COURT!!
some gangs are just a gang without the criminal baggage. but yeah, a tattoo can definitely be used against someone. the he looked like a gangbanger excuse comes to mind.
No , we are basing them on whether or not the person entered the country illegally.
That is the biggest load of HS I have heard recently. He may have fled ElSalvador as a teenager but he was a gotaway thet snuck into the US and avoided the Border
patrol. He never gained legal permission to be here. He already had a deportation order against him from tow separate courts.
No, we are deporting violent gang bangers who also beat a woman he had a relationship with among other things.
Isn’t he white? Hispanics are white. For something like counting crime then they gone to the white bucket but not white if getting into an Ivy League.
It’s so application specific… hmmmm. Wife beating probably makes him white… unless he is being deported then it makes him Hispanic. Liberal logic. You people are silly :D
Should Alqueda members get to stay even though they chant death to America?
Yes. Protected speech. If thats the only thing
@DrPepper12 protected speech is for citizens not for those planning to blow up the country, just look at Europe
No. Speech is for everyone. If they sabotage their potential for citizenship then FAFO prevails.
As far as I know any country has the right to reject a visa or green card if said applicant is a member of a prescribed terror or criminal organisation, bring a member of outlawed groups such as MS13 or Alqueda is a crime in itself and having a criminal record of very minor crimes in your home country such as minor drug offences or a fight in a bar may be enough to prevent you ever gaining a visa to America. Coming out with anti American rhetoric may be enough to get you visa turned down of rejected, you are free to shput anti American hate speech in your own country.
Many gang tattoo can only be given after the person commited a murder.
Having such a tattoo is admiting to murder.
So yes
Can we please start with anyone with a neck or face tattoo, without a legitimate cultural reason (eg, Inuit, Polynesians)?
I did give examples, but I was being tongue-in-cheek
yeah dickhead, would you assume a person who has a Swaztika tattoo isn't a Nazi?
not even if he curbstomps a black dude like Edward Norton in American History X?
Then we’ll have to deport everyone with a tattoo
A lot of people get MS-13 tattoos on their knuckles, it doesn't mean a thing.
You can also add your opinion below!