Do you think Triumphal arch should be prevented?

[Anonymous]

Here’s a bit of information from the link below.

The D. C. government and the commonwealth of Virginia sued Saturday to block construction of President Donald Trump's planned triumphal arch, calling it a "flagrantly unlawful" project that will forever change the landscape of the nation's capital.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/articles/d-c-virginia-sue-block-133251710.html

[Lliam]

I am opposed to tax money being spent on a monument to Trump who wants to fashion himself after Caesar.
He tries to justify it as a security measure containing monitoring equipment and snipers, which I totally oppose. But it's true purpose is to serve as a monument to Trump like the Washington Monument, Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials. Trump doesn't rate that kind of tribute, not by a long shot. He's nothing but a boor with a massive ego.
For these reasons, I think the Arc d'Trump would be an embarrassment.

[slatyb]

Absolutely. He's spending money not appropriated by Congress for that purpose. Even if he gets it started, it will be demolished as soon as he leaves office.

[exitseven]

I think it could be a welcome addition to our nation's capitol. It reflects traditional American values.

[FreyaRed]

it needs to be much bigger and needs much more gold. It looks like an insult for a greatest man who lived in human history.

I'm kidding again.

[purplepoppy]

The arch isn't the problem. The problem is it's not celebrating a recent triumph, it's just to stroke Trumps own ego.

[OldGreyMare]

Everything's gonna be OK

[Danny_dan92]

The what?

[Anonymous]

No..