The Things I Hate About Men

[Chief16]

"To every guy who tries to say that we have already achieved equality for the sexes, if this were true, you wouldn't be told to "man up", "be a man", "stop being a p*#%y", "harden the fuck up", "toughen up", "boys don't cry", "don't be such a girl", "stop being a wimp". As long as this type of language still exists in our society, then gender equality, my friends, has in fact not been achieved after all."- Miya Yamanouichi

Disclaimer: This will be a somewhat lengthy MyTake. I especially don't write this out of a sense of entitlement, being a guy, after all. I write this Take in context to my other Take

https://www.girlsaskguys.com/girls-behavior/a25662-what-i-hate-about-women

What follows is what I feel is wrong with men today and somewhat has been for a long time coming. So sit back, read and enjoy.

Lol.

1) Ego.

There are two circumstances that lead to arrogance: one is when you're wrong and you can't face it; the other is when you're right and nobody else can face it.

I think men were great once upon a time. Unlike today, they shared a sense of true brotherhood, respected their women, and desired that the next generation exceed their own. But suddenly they had the feeling that being right was everything, and so they stopped listening to others and started listening to themselves. And became so obsessed with themselves and their views, they just shut others off. And became too isolated to really learn anything truly. With this loss of humility and mutual respect, everything became harder to do. To learn, to coexist, even admit they were wrong to the ones they love. And hence men were labeled stupid and simple minded by their fairer companions.

Obviously this has gotten worse through the ages. And now we have this.

On a serious note, I think a man's ego is his biggest problem by far. Some people mistake this with confidence, some with pride, some think its 'swag'. But I think its the true measure what man is truly capable of. But today we tightly embrace it as a means of self identity or individuality.

Time and time again does the pride of man influence his very own fall. While denying it, one gradually starts to believe that he is the authority, or that he possesses great moral dominion over others, yet it is spiritually unwarranted. By that point he loses steam; in result, he falsely begins trying to prove that unwarranted dominion by seizing the role of a condemner. This is not to say that women don't have ego, they do. But I think they're more tame than men.

This is the basis of all the other things I list out from here on out.

2) Traditional Double Standards.

This holds true that while women have more sexist double standards, men have traditional double standards. What is it? It is the ancient prejudices that men still entertain against women for a long, long time.

Do you really believe ... that everything historians tell us about men – or about women – is actually true? You ought to consider the fact that these histories have been written by men, who never tell the truth except by accident. The bitter truth is that most of the masses following are lead by men. Jesus Christ for Christianity, Prophet Mohammed for Islam, the two major religions in the world today. I don't think think the original intentions were to debase women, but through the flow of time, as faith was led by men who claimed to be men of god and were hence absolutely righteous have bent and twisted ideals and equality to actually enslave women.

Throughout the dark ages, middles ages and until the advent of modernization, the gradual development of women's rights and freedom was very slow, retarded even. I mean women could officialy only vote first in 1718 in Sweden and only in 1920 in the United States. Not even a century ago. Whereas men could vote way back dating to Ancient Greece, which birthed the first republic. It took millennia for women to vote and this is just how ridiculous the double standards were. And its just an example of the numerous double standards out there.

The only women who couldn't be completely touched by double standards were the rich or upper class women. Being in a position of power these women were practically untouchable. Then too. A majority of women had never got equal rights and more often than not even fundamental freedom.

Another example? Why was Polygamy only restricted to men? In some parts of the world, its still legal. These are the double standards that boggle my mind.

3) The MRA (Men's Right Activists)

Wait? What? I thought it was some WWE Tag Team Stable. Well...

Most MRA are people who join because of failed marriages or particularly misogynists, people who outright hate women.

Now to be fair, the MRA started out as a backlash to Feminism. And to an extent, its was valid. Seeing as how divorce skyrocketed during the peak of feminism.

That wave during the 70s and the 80s did cause a reason to panic. When Feminism was becoming more of a fashion statement than an ideal, which was how Feminism started declining in the first place.

But today as feminism has declined. Are MRAs really required? I mean this is still a patriarchal society. Has Feminism really changed the top order of society? Its my firm belief that the most capable should lead. Be it a man or a woman.

But some of the issues of Men's Right Activists are quite unreasonable. Things such as education measures for boys, owing to the better academic success of girls in general. Or the governments structured around men and boys. A radical notion to derail the women rights movement.

But like feminism's decay, there is no need for MRAs if we are to have a true Egalitarian society.

4) Pseudo Machismo

Now Macho or Machismo is a widely misused and misunderstood word. What it really means is

"a man’s responsibility to provide for, protect, and defend his family."

But what it has become, in the words of Celia Falicov, PhD, author of Latino Families in Therapy,

“the better man is the one who can drink the most, sire the most sons, defend himself the most, dominate his wife, and command the absolute respect of his children. It is also part of the configuration to have strong sexual drives and seek variety in sexual relationships, while being possessive and jealous toward the faithful wife.”

This isn't purely restricted to Latino ethnicity, this exists universally. Don't tell me you don't know any men like these. They're a minority, yes. But there's still many of them and I feel like its a growing culture in nations where women are still repressed. This is what leads to domestic violence in the first place.

Domestic abuse of men on women is widespread, all around the world. On the basis of physical strength alone, a man is capable of crushing a weaker woman physically, mentally and emotionally. To beat a person into submission is amongst the cruelest things to do a person. It can leave them scarred for life. Men are supposed to be assertive not aggressive.

5) Insecurity

While insecurity is somewhat a common trait among both sexes. It is more pronounced in men. An Insecure man is the biggest potential threat out there because he allows himself to be manipulated to do anything by a strong willed person.

Low self esteem, lack of self confidence and general disbelief in self causes a man to freefall to the bottom of the barrel. As you lose self identity, you're desperate to seek validation. Or you adopt an aggressive stance to show strength. If ego is the beginning of a circle then insecurity is what ego becomes when it makes a full round.

Insecurity makes a man do foolish things, like making his woman feel inferior to make him feel better about himself, severe insecurity even drives men to be obscure to reason. Obsessive cases often have fatal consequences. A crime of passion is not uncommon.

A man feels insecure when he feels his partner better than he is or if he doesn't feel he deserves them.

This is just insecurity about your partner. There are numerous other places in life that we feel we aren't worthy or we aren't just ready for something. And this causes quitting more than anything else or even giving up before trying. And that's something I can never accept. Of all the people I feel like I hate the quitters the most.

[ManOnFire]

The girls are certainly gonna eat this one up and agree to the roof, but cry out about sexism when vice versa is written.

Having said that, I do agree with some points you make. I myself am not even into that MRA stuff, I was when I was a teen, but eventually I saw that it's really no different than feminism and uses victim-osophy no less. But I disagree about the male ego because I personally think the female ego is far bigger than the male, which I plan on posting my own Take on at some point. But I certainly do agree that there are still some issues with our gender that I don't like either.

[idkwtftoputhere]

"The girls are certainly gonna eat this one up and agree to the roof, but cry out about sexism when vice versa is written."

LOL did you even see the female responses on his previous take regarding what he hates about women? Many of them agreed.

[Chief16]

Also you forgot to mention, I'm gonna get a lot of hate for this from men, particularly misogynists.

[ManOnFire]

@idkwtftoputhere I did see some of their agreement, yes. But if you put it in a different light, they would've hated it.

[idkwtftoputhere]

baseless assumption

[ManOnFire]

@idkwtftoputhere Not really. It's about how you present a subject. It's the same way with the theory that females can get sex easier than guys: if you present it in one particular way, a lot of females will feel offended by it and say it's not true. But present it in another way - particularly as what would be seen as a perk to being a woman - and most will agree and cheer that perk on.

[Dulcedulcexoxo]

im not eating this up at all. Its actually pretty sexist towards his own sex.

[ManOnFire]

@Dulcedulcexoxo What makes this sexist towards his own sex?

[Chief16]

@Dulcedulcexoxo pray tell me? What's so sexist?

[SilenRose]

Nice myTake. It was very interesting and I enjoyed reading it. ✌

[Chief16]

Only fair to hate equally.😂

[SilenRose]

Agreed. 8|

[hellionthesage]

1. EGO
No idea what your trying to get at, however I will say that women have egos just as men do, and that truth is actually more important then accepting a lie because its more convient then truth. So how do you dictate that men have greater egos then women? Why are women the fairer sex while where at it? Sounds like pandering to me to be perfectly blunt.
2. DOUBLE STANDARDS
Yes history is (usually) written by men however claiming that, to quote: "You ought to consider the fact that these histories have been written by men, who never tell the truth except by accident." is sexist and also illogical since its a presumption that cannot be verified. In fact when we look back at history we use multiple techniques to verify the veracity of written accounts like cross examination of events (who is writing it why they write it and who else is writing about the society/event) analysis of archeological evidence etc. further again, your claim is that men are sexist and we know this because they are the ones who wrote history and they never ever tell the truth because their sexist. Its circular reasoning and illogical. We know that women have been in positions of powe through out history we know that men died of violence to a far greater degree then women ever did (or have). We know by legal documents the responsibilites men had, for instance as you pointed out women where subserviant to men, but you conviently ignore the fact that the reason women where not allowed to control their husbands was because he was the one responsible for her well being, basicly it would be like a private having the power to argue and ignore an order from a general, it would defeat the purpose of the organization. So to with marriage a man could not be responsible for her while having no authority. As for religion, you also neglected to mention that the closest people to them where women (for jesus his mother mary, mary magdalene etc, for muhammad Fatima Maryam) www.inspiredbymuhammad.com/womens_rights.php
You also neglect to mention the extreme rigidity within which a man was forced to operate ie dying in the place of a woman.

[hellionthesage]

3. MRA
"Most MRA are people who join because of failed marriages or particularly misogynists, people who outright hate women." This is an attack and is presumptions plus it is by design meant to dismiss the arguments of the MRA by claiming they are "misogynist"(strange that every one knows this term and sees it as an insult yet its male counter part is ignored?) How are we a patriarchal society exactly? Women, in the U. S. are responsible for 80% of domestic spending (hence advertisers using the same tired trope of the idiot man and the smart women to pander to women, the ones with the buying power) Men make up 75% of all suicide victims 80% of all murder/assualt/mugging victims, over 70% of homeless are men, 80% of divorce is filed by women yet 80% of all alimony and childsupport is paid for by men. Men have no reproductive rights, women have all of them (and rights over the mans as well) we have laws that only benefit women, none that benefit men. So I think the claim that we have a

[hellionthesage]

"patriarchal" society is erroneous at best. If your going to claim their are more male politicians, thats true, they make up less then 1% of the population however so to say all men have power is like saying that since 1% of the population is filthy rich all people are ie its an illogical argument. Also it ignores the fact that women made the choice not to go into politics. Otherwise we would be screaming about the sexism of the educational system (almost entirely female and by its own admission designed for women hence the higher male drop out rate and the fact that 63% of all college graduates are women (and the number is rising)) and in phsyciatry and social work etc etc, all of which are dominated by women yet unlike all male dominated fields (except for all the dangerous and physically demanding ones) have female quotas, something of which we do not have for female dominated fields.

[hellionthesage]

4. PSEUDO MACHOISM
So your quoting some one who is himself making a fallacious argument, and attributing all negative aspects in society to men and men alone while praising women (seems hypocritical to claim that we are all equal but only men are bad and only women are good). If this was the cause of domestic violence then that would then mean that women would be the victims of domestic violence more then men. Yet every study has shown that this is actually the opposite that men are in fact more likely to be abused by a spouse then women are. 70% of non reciprocal violence in intimate relationships is perpetrated by the woman, in reciprocal violent relationships its 50/50 except while violent relationship is an indicator of past and future violent relationships for women it is not for men suggesting they instigate it with verbal and emotional abuse of which 80% of is perpetrated by women. So clearly the data does not match your conlcusion.

[hellionthesage]

5. Insecurity
You claim that its more prounounced in men, why? What evidence do you have to back up your claim? If you make a claim you have to prove it. You have as of yet not done that with anything you have said. You have claimed that men are essentially the worse thing to happen to the world and women are perfect and innocent (ironic considering all the data) yet you would state that women are the ones who are repressed despite as I have pointed out having more laws that benefit them, suffering less having more resources at their disposal and having men, like you, continously telling them they are the victims and men are worthless. This is why we ignore female on male rape (which is almost identical to the frequency of male on female rape). Its why we ignore the fact that women are actually more likely to abuse and kill children (60% of deaths due to child negligence where do to the mother only 20% due to the father. 50% for violence due to mother 40% due to father).

[hellionthesage]

90% of all sexual abuse and rape in juvenile deliquent centers was perpetrated by female staff frequently with threats of violence accustation of rape and drugs. Yet women rarely get any punishment short of house arrest (my favorite was when a texas teacher who raped a ten year old boy was after being brought to court forced to keep the door open when she taught to her students. Meanwhile a 19 year old boy was imprisoned for having sex with a fourteen year old girl who told him she was seventeen, having his life destroyed in the process). Its also why we have more domestic violence shelters and laws and resources going to women despite men being the primary victim. Its why women get a third of the sentencing then men for commiting the same crimes, also why we keep lying about how everything is the fault of men and women are completely innocent and helpless without any agency (yet strangely we are to treat them like equals?). In short this was bullshit. Try reading the facts first.

[Anpu23]

Wow, where do I start? I am a very vocal anti-feminist, as if you follow any of my my takes you probably know. But I will use each of your points and respond:
Ego, I'll give this one to you, as I do not know enough to argue inteligently
Double standards, there are more laws benefiting women then men thoughtcatalog.com/.../, and the concept of "male privilege" was disproved by a feminist who took on a man's appearance to experience it, and her conclusion: "women are much more privileged then men"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU

MRA's why is it that feminism feels that they are the only voice for gender issues? Why is it wrong for men to address their own issues and problems? What is wrong in pointing out problems for men (including the higher suicide rate for men)?
Psudo Machismo two separate issues first the concept of "primary aggressor" has been disproved, see www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ the second is this whole "toxic masculinity" come on, why is it so hard for people to understand that guys and women react to emotional stimuli differently see my my take about this for information and sources www.girlsaskguys.com/.../a24324-men-s-emotions-toxic-masculinity
Insecurity? Are you really telling me that men are more insecure then women? Do you even pay attention to the questions posted on this site? Both genders have insecurities, and are insecure about much of the same things.

[Chief16]

More men are insecure than women doesn't mean they're more insecure, more men, more secure, see the difference? How do you explain that 70% of the domestic abuse victimes are women? Emotional abuse could be met in kind. What escalates to physical abuse? Women are privileged than men? True. But if we want have equals, both MRA and Feminism have to go. And that's my point. I also said women have sexist double standards but men have traditional double standards. Am I wrong?

[Anpu23]

No 70% of all domestic abuse victims are not women (please state your source), in most every domestic abuse situation the fight is MUTUAL as in both parties fighting, and if one party is not fighting back, then 70% of those situations the victims are men not women.

[Chief16]

Now I'd like you to state sources.

[Chief16]

*your

[Anpu23]

I included them in my post... But here you go : goodmenproject.com/.../
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
thoughtcatalog.com/.../
jezebel.com/.../have-you-ever-beat-up-a-boyfriend-cause-uh-we-have
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtVHnZX8E50
www.facebook.com/.../
www.addictinggames.com/.../...end-trainer-game.jsp
en.wikipedia.org/.../Boys_are_stupid,_throw_rocks_at_them!_controversy
www.slate.com/.../...n_are_sexually_assaulted.html
I wasn't sure exactly what you wanted sources for, but here are a few.

[Chief16]

According to the Mirror UK.
i1.mirror.co.uk/.../jay-domestic-abuse-graph1.jpg

[Anpu23]

That's 63% and no discussion of mutual fighting. One of the keys here is the concept of "primary aggressor" this concept has been proven to be false. It's much more likely to be mutual rather then one party abusing the other.

[Chief16]

Yet you say if men didn't hit women, they'd be hurt instead?

[Anpu23]

no, what I am saying is in domestic violence the statistics show that it's usually both parties fighting each other and in the situations where it is just one party abusing the other the majority of those victims are men (70%). I do not think that any one should bring violence into a relationship, and the moment someone does the victim (either man or woman) should leave and NEVER come back. This includes a woman slapping her partner, a man emotionally abusing his partner, etc. But statistically it's hardly ever a woman being beat up by a guy and her not doing anything about it.

[Chief16]

So all a man has to do is stop fighting and leave right?

[Anpu23]

Or never fight at all, again usually if it's one sided it's the woman abusing him. Now if they are fighting, yes stop, and leave. It's a simple matter of self control, and emotional maturity. Part of the whole "toxic masculinity" is the ability to learn to control your emotions, the tools that are taught in rough and tumble play are the tools that you use to control you emotions.

[Chief16]

And yet men fail this test over and over again. I think words should match words, or the guy should just walk away instead of beating a woman into submission.

[Anpu23]

Again that is what usually happens, it's rarely a man beating a woman who is not hitting him. Most of the time it's her beating him or both of them beating each other. Let me put it this way in domestic violent relationships 15% of the victims are women who do not fight back, as opposed to 35% of victims who are men. Further 50% of the time it's both parties beating on each other, as only about 24% of all relationships are domestically violent that means that your scenario (a man beating on a woman who is not fighting back) it's only 3.6% of all relationships it's hardly "over and over again". The more likely scenario is women beating on some poor guy who does nothing to defend himself that's 8.4% of all relationships. (My sources are stated above) or nearly double the other.

[Chief16]

And its just wide media attention and Feminism that distort the validity of this fact?

[Anpu23]

I do not know why this fact is not well known, one of my sources was a feminist site. But honestly there is a movement in feminism to downplay male domestic violence victims, as in the case where they have tried to close down men's D. V. shelters, and have been openly derisive of domestic violence against men. I'm not a domestic violence expert, and my study is more on rape against men by women, but I do follow many sites that follow these topics. I think another part of it, is also the concept of "male privilege" and "One Woman" (if you beat a woman, you beat all women) and in the greater view these facts distort the message of patriarchal violence as an institution. It's easy to point out a victim and show that this is an ongoing problem especially if the truth is not released widely.

[Chief16]

Interesting, looks like I've my homework.

[Anpu23]

If you have questions feel free to PM me.

[Chief16]

Thank you. I just might.

[Privilege]

Love this myTake.
Experienced it personally many times both from men and women. I've been told I'm not manly enough. That I'm "best friend material". I've been rejected for the same reasons.
Why? Is it wrong for a man to have a sense of style? An opinion when it comes to fashion? A love for theatre? A preference of an emotional relationship before a physical one?

I want feminism because I won't have to act like someone I'm not to be "date-able".

[Chief16]

You mean the old feminism.

[Privilege]

Maybe. I believe that feminism today is not something as black or white as it used to be. It's more of a grey topic these days. With both its pros and cons.
Men and women still have room for progress and growth, but not as much as they used to.

[AmongTheApples]

Yeah, I didn't read that wall of text after your initial quote. Some people say the exact same things to women but just use different words (don't be a bitch, don't be so sensitive, just tell me how you feel already, why are you so cold, etc.)

Those people are called idiots, and there are plenty of them in both sexes and all races.

[Chief16]

Indeed. Exactly my point.

[bluenose1872]

You need a fanny pad. You sure your a guy? Idiots like you think the world's a fair place where there's a seat for everyone and justice for the masses where the good guy wins through and the baddy is shot by the sheriff and put in jail. It ain't like that pal. It's a dog eat dog world and men have bigger teeth. Women only get rights these days coz the politicians are wise enough to know they make up roughly half the votes. The money men behind the politicians lobby for equal rights as a popular platform for their horse (politician) so they can impose more money making laws and bylaws on the people. You honestly think the world is fair lol. The only reason you and I are alive is because they haven't figures out a profitable way to kill us yet. They will though. Wake up.

[Anonymous]

First, Timothy 2:11 does not state that , I wish atheist would stop googling Christian scriptures your going to get the old testament which was European washed. History hasn't been written, most things we consider history is just good guesses and they sound accurate. Yes, most history is told by males but we seem to forget a lot of history is told by stories and music Which generally women where in charge of. But wouldn't saying men are bsing all of you be sexist? Most scientist are male so would that also mean we shouldn't pay attention to them?

[Chief16]

Science and history aren't the same thing. Read the bible again.

[Opinion Owner]

lol, No duh science and history aren't the same thing did i say it is? And I actually looked in the bible and it says no such thing in my bible Timothy2:11 starts on page 333 to 334.

[Chief16]

Your bible. I have a version of the King James right here. You're comparing historians and scientists.

[Opinion Owner]

King james bible is of the old testament, it was the version of the bible that the late King allowed to be given to his people. It was changed so he could live a certain way without being questioned.

[Opinion Owner]

Im comparing males in both fields my friend

[Opinion Owner]

and it sounds like you got the old testament of king james.

[Chief16]

Sorry I don't get it.

[UtopianLobotomy]

Science and history "should" be the same thing, if humans were to be purely impartial and objective when studying history. The history of an object, its origins, its phases = is actually physical science as we are living in a physical world our human history should be studied as accurately and as wholly as any other scientific field. Your take started out okay, but it began to fall short of any grace or significant point rather quickly.

[Chief16]

@UtopianLobotomy history and science are not the same. History is objective, science is not. Details in history can be skewered by anyone, can you do that in science?

[UtopianLobotomy]

LOL history is NOT objective OMfG

I ate eggs for breakfast yesterday and that is a fact. Germany invaded Poland, etc etc
Once people start going around saying shit like "the study of history is objective" we might as well say goodbye peace.
A thing can not be both true and false in reality kid, law of non-contradiction, either understand teach and know your history or you are doomed to make the same mistakes - micro scale and macro.

Wow... just... wow.

[Chief16]

@UtopianLobotomy yeah, right. Because there's so no such thing as fiction right?

[Chief16]

@UtopianLobotomy www.enidnews.com/.../...c67-9238-49ce0681d564.html
That right there sums up what I'm saying.

[UtopianLobotomy]

semantics and diversions
History is nonfiction. Anyone who reads a journalists opinion and his narration and account of events must exercise some personal judgment and discernment - apply their knowledge of psychology and experience as well as take actual demographical statistics and known historical facts into account. So there is some objectivity involved, however a thing either happened in very finite way or did not happen in that particular finite way, either a thing is or isn't did or didn't, we are all in the same physical universe where the laws of thermodynamics and science should apply.

However, I am a Christian - that probably blows your mind, to me it doesn't. However my religion shouldn't be relevant to this conversation it would open up other arguments that are not pertaining to the is particular one, I divulged that information because of I suppose that is where this argument about history not being as pure of a science as other generally accepted fields that carr

[UtopianLobotomy]

y the label of being a field of science. Deeply existential arguments, but history is close to my heart and its importance should be revered way more than it is today, it has been polluted with derailing distractions such as civil rights and we are forgetting thousands of years of documented history and human psychology/evolution in this process that the left is utilizing to push their agendas. Civil rights are important, look I'll just write a damn book already... lol sorry

[Chief16]

@UtopianLobotomy you should. See history is an interpretation. I've no way of verifying the truth of what person says about the past. I wasn't there. Not everything about history is true. Because at best its an fact, at worst, its just propaganda. Science on the other hand, has no such thing as lies. There are only hypothesis and proof. They're incomparable. And this is a stupid argument.

[UtopianLobotomy]

History is science, or science will become history.

It is not a stupid argument and the same rules of logic apply when studying history. History has created what we perceive today, without the past we would have no knowledge in the present, this is definitely NOT a stupid argument but one of huge complexity.

[Chief16]

@UtopianLobotomy man I'm not doing this.

[jacquesvol]

www.biblegateway.com/.../?search=1+Timothy+2:11-12

[Opinion Owner]

@jacquesvol stop googling, Lol. it's not in my book

[IceEverest]

@Chief16
Loved the take but...
I am not a MRA but I think the education system should change.
Its all sedentary work and no creative skills needed and Women love sedentary work... so they outperform...
I want education system to be 50% practical creativity and 50% theory...
So will you call me sexist?

[IceEverest]

Hey give me some reply...

[Chief16]

No. I don't. But in life, men are actually more successful than women. You see, while women excel here, in academics. Men simple take risks, face rejection, overcome great obstacles to achieve something great. That's simply something the education system doesn't have. Its just too 'safe'. For men, I think, real education is self education. Educational systems will always be flawed. There's no reason for us to think outside the box. Think Bill Gates, Steve Jobs or Zuckerberg for that matter. They've done academically but at some point they must have felt there's a better way to do it.

[IceEverest]

Agree

[Chief16]

I'm talking about men who don't want to take risks and face rejection yet blame others for their problems.

[gaaxure]

https://i.imgur.com/8K48S05.jpg

Either this or you're a huge mangina and need to consider eating a bullet.

[Chief16]

I always eat the bullets. Thank you.

[Minxxie]

Oh my god this is GAG we are not allowed to talk about faults of men! This is a woman bashing only zone! lol

[Chief16]

But I tried my best.😢

[Minxxie]

hahaha it was a good take!

[OrdinaryGentleman]

Men are thoughtless aliens centering around the belief that if you are not alpha, you are not in the "in". Men don't have emotions and if you do you are considered a woman, but if you dont show much emotion they consider you a psychopath... fuuuuuuuu

[OrdinaryGentleman]

That like transformed from sarcasm to reality too damn quick... dammit, wish i could edit.

[Chief16]

Indeed. Sarcasm to reality isn't that bad either.

[OrdinaryGentleman]

True true

[Silver119]

I didn't read it all tbh. I will agree that once upon a time men shared a true brotherhood but these days there's so much competition between them concerning girls that ever "friends" end up turning on each other just because they think they're in with a chance of getting laid. Kinda pathetic really.

[Careless_Whisper]

I thought feminists were bad but white knights are just unbearable. The ignorant drivel that you have displayed is appalling and pitiful. This is probably the most stupid and most sinister mytake I have ever come across.

[Careless_Whisper]

@idkwtftoputhere I can't prove that he's a white knight but he sure sounds like one. Either way he has posted a load of sinister elephant dung and it doesn't surprise me that someone with your intelligence would embrace it.

[idkwtftoputhere]

And you come across as an idiot by throwing the words "white knight" and "feminist" at anybody and anything that gets you butthurt. I'm not embracing shit

[Careless_Whisper]

@idkwtftoputhere Go away feminist, you're annoying.

[Chief16]

So says the guy who thinks professional gynecologists are perverts. No thanks. Your opinion doesn't matter to me.

[Careless_Whisper]

I don't care what you think. Male gynecologists ARE perverts but the brainwashing of the media has made it almost impossible for people to use common sense.

[ClariceOwen23]

So you're calling him a white knight even though you're the one insecure? Okay

[Todd_Bundy]

@ClariceOwen23 So just because careless_whisper doesn't agree with the stupidity of feminists that makes him insecure? Do you actually have a brain?

[ClariceOwen23]

@Todd_Bundy Never said or implied that. Get back to me after you read my comment 10 more times.

[IndianGirl01]

Great mytake! Proud to live in a world where guys (that too an indian guy) like you exist. Thanks!

[Chief16]

Well, thanks haha.

[Notreallyhere]

That one was good too👌🏼

"It's your ego, he said calm your tits" bustin a gut ova herexD

[Chief16]

What I cannot deny is that most men on G@G are very aggressive. Not even defensive.

[Notreallyhere]

I don't guess I've been here long enough to notice. I do know that some people REALLY hate Muslims up in here, and that everyone is obsessed with sex.

[Chief16]

Lol.😂 You catch on real quick.

[ClariceOwen23]

I agree with both, this one and the one about women. This was well-written.

[Chief16]

Well, thank you. Its like 90% guys on G@G hate men for pointing stuff that's wrong with men.

[Anonymous]

Soooo I know you're getting hate from a lot of guys for writing this but thank you

[Chief16]

Why thank you.

[takumii]

Is it just me , or did everyone found the memes fucking hilarious !!

[Fugue]

Just you, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Things I hate about men :- Allowed on GAG. Promoted by moderators.

Things I hate about women :- Not Allowed on GAG. Instant warning or ban.

[Opinion Owner]

Wake up!!

Men are oppressed second class citizens in the west... we face daily discrimination like this... And you hate on people who say that men should have equality and rights?

Shame on you

[Chief16]

I wrote a things I hate about women. There's a link right there.

[Opinion Owner]

I'm impressed... in the past many milder posts about women were removed for being antagonistic, offensive or whatever... I don't know but they were removed.

Your statistics about domestic violence are way off, women have been shown to commit the majority of domestic violence in hundreds of studies. 40% is just the number of police reports

[Chief16]

Which I also stated. Mam if you bother to read anything correctly. I wouldn't have to reapeat myself. Read the damn thing.

[Opinion Owner]

You didn't state that hundreds of reports confirm that women commit the majority of domestic violence... You could have also said so many other things... but you're just another brainwashed FEMINAZI.

"I mean this is still a patriarchal society" -- UTTER FEMINIST CRAP. Men are oppressed 2nd class citizens by law and social standards. New laws also keep coming out aimed at men to imprison us for the sake of pleasing women.

Sexism FACTUALLY only goes one way in the west... against men... Shame on you for criticizing people who fight for the equality of men in such times of oppression and discrimination based on sex.

[Chief16]

It is a patriarchal society as long as men still buy women drinks.

[Opinion Owner]

But I don't blame YOU as such... rather the feminist society which you are merely a product of

[Opinion Owner]

No, but that's what you've been indoctrinated to "believe". The FACT is that buying a woman a drink is a FEMINIST thing. You're completely wrong. Calm down, it's ok. I don't blame you. Now listen...

Throw this crap out of your head.

In tradition (patriarchy) women are not supposed to have pre-marital sex or be seen in public much. Buying a drink is out of the question as almost all clubs BANNED WOMEN from entering until women's liberation. Women are to be married off by their father traditionally, and should be covered from head to toe. Women are not supposed to have a choice of partner (or very little choice) and pre-marital sex or adultery is punishable by execution, stoning, whipping or burning... the punishment almost certainly being public disgrace. Divorce for women is also a feminist affair and is strictly forbidden.

The term "date" is actually associated with prostitution, but has been perverted since women's liberation

[Opinion Owner]

Buying women drinks, opening doors, pulling chairs, getting down on the knees and proposing marriage... is ALL FEMINIST

And it should be completely abolished in the name of equality for men. I think you missed this FACT but -- Men are 2nd class citizens by law and social standards in feminist countries

[Chief16]

Um. Bruh. If you don't like women, screw them. Do what I do, and stay single. If you want one, don't expect them to change for you. But I've only listed what I felt are drawbacks to us. We could do with a little less ego and a lot more learning. We could be less impulsive. We could be less concerned. See, if men stopped chasing tail, this issue would never have come up. We kinda created the problem ourselves.

[Opinion Owner]

Typically feminist response... blaming men and not women even when women deserve the UTMOST condemnation for this. It is mainly women who hate the men's rights movement, I hope you haven't forgotten that. Support among men is growing and MGTOW is growing rapidly too. We don't want bullshit learning and lectures on ego.

This is just crazy-making and victim-blaming, both of which are acceptable for men only.

[Chief16]

Bruh, if you're butthurt over an ex or some girl who rejected you. I'm sorry I can't help you. But if it makes you feel better, you can rant all you want.

[Opinion Owner]

Women have always been hated... and rightfully so!

Men are waking up to their oppression and seeing how skewed society is against them. Men are actually going away from women... dating and relationships are feminist arrangements... I will have no part of it.

Not only do women suck resources, they also create a lot of emotional/mental problems. Without women, men are just fine. It is only since women's liberation that there has been a STEEP rise in mental illnesses. Women nag their spouses to an early death and cause all sorts of misery.

Women are synonymous with mental illness... no wonder half of them see psychiatrists by 21 and over a quarter of American women is on psychiatric medication!!

[Opinion Owner]

You don't seem to mind that men are second class citizens... that tells a lot about you. But not all men are trained slaves, and neither are we going to take it anymore.

"We could do with a little less ego and a lot more learning. We could be less impulsive. We could be less concerned" So basically we should change ourselves for women, but they shouldn't change for us? Do you realize how hypocritical you're being?

"butthurt" and "rant" are anger shaming like a typical feminist... we are justifiably VERY angry at the fact that we are oppressed. If women in Saudi Arabia protest, you will support that... but if men call for equality with women in the west... you will shame us.

Wake up!!

[Opinion Owner]

OMG SO SORRY!!

You're from India so obviously haven't felt the full effects of women's liberation... and are blindly following the west because you are still mentally colonized... You're still 20 years behind us.

But mark my words... this is NOT the road you want to go down. Have a great day! :)

[Chief16]

Lol. I don't care man. I don't live for others. If I have to make a point, I make a point. I don't care about the consequences. If women think they're better than men. They ought to prove it. If men think they're better than women, they've to prove that too. See why I wrote two takes? I hate everyone equally and that's what equality means to me. I don't discriminate. If a guy's wrong, he's wrong. If a woman is, she is. I'm not gonna be biased on sex. If that is second class to you, I'm fine where I am. Thank you.

[Opinion Owner]

Have a great day.

[jacquesvol]

Anonymous
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/34445224.jpg

[jacquesvol]

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/60654856.jpg
________________________

[Opinion Owner]

It would be a terrible offence to tell a woman to calm her tits or to calm her cunthole... while telling me to calm by balls is perfectly acceptable.

Not surprising since your generation has created a society in which kicking men in the balls is perfectly acceptable / sometimes funny... while even touching a woman unintentionally can land a man in prison for being a sexual abuser

[Opinion Owner]

Men are FACTUALLY an oppressed class in the west, and FACTUALLY face severe discrimination based on sex.

Your generation is the reason we are in this mess in the first place. No amount of shaming tactics can make us accept our 2nd class status. Don't men deserve equality? The sooner your generation dies, the sooner we will have equality with women.

[Zombie-Killa]

That's a lot of man bitching and man-ragging :|

[Chief16]

On some men.

[DizzyAster]

hhahahahahaha equal rights, hahahahaa... and lefts.