RE: "Why don't men want strong independent career women? Why are men so 'intimidated' by a woman who makes her own money and doesn't need a man?"

This is asked so many times on GAG. One far-left, progressive, liberal, feminist female GAG user just asked this today, in-fact. "Why do people actually think it’s man hating and unfeminine for a woman to make her own money and choose not to have children?" As a guy, I am so sick of this BS strawman argument. So here's the last time I, and other men, are going to state it.

Make money and be a selfish career woman, if you want. But no one has to also like you, while doing it.
Make money and be a selfish career woman, if you want. But no one has to also like you, while doing it.

Men are not "intimidated" by career women who put their money and career over their love life and family. WE JUST DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU.

No man wants a woman who outright states she doesn't want him cause she's so "strong and independent." Women can be so feminist if they want, but no man is obligated to want to be with such a masculine man.

Also, earning money is only important to women, cause they expect the man to share his money with her. No man expects women to share her money with him, for very obvious reasons. Because women usually don't.

This is why.
This is why.

You also can't expect a traditional breadwinner, high-earning man, when you want to usurp his role in the household. This is yet ANOTHER thing men are sick of. Women who want to be feminists and girl-bosses, yet expect to be wined and dined by traditional men and want their man to out-earn even them, when these same women can't even act lady-like. The only reason guys are expected to make money, is to support their family. You know, the thing none of these girl-bosses even want in life, at their current age?

There's only room for one breadwinner in a household. And if you want to be that money-earning female so much, then the man out there for you would be a house-husband, male-feminist soyboy type, since you wanna wear the pants in the house, anyway. If you're the breadwinner, then expect the husband to be the house-sitter.

Either be a CEO or be a traditional lady, but no, men arent going to see you as both. Tough ti tties.
Either be a CEO or be a traditional lady, but no, men aren't going to see you as "both." Tough ti tties.

And no, there's a difference between a woman who has her own job and works for a living, and a woman who outright states "I DON'T NEED NO MAN." Well, it's like, sh*t, you've got your wish then. You can't have it both ways. You don't need no man, and we don't want you. We're not going to chase after you anyway, like you apparently want.

Let's put it this way. If you've got to outright state yourself as "being independent" and do all the "girl-boss" sh*t, then no, most men won't want you, won't feel appreciated, and won't waste their time with such a masculine "wanna-be Alpha Male" female who puts work and career over her love life and family. They also tend to be sh*tty mothers too, assuming they even want kids (most do not), which is another massive turn-off for most men.

No one hates independent career women. Were just not attracted to you because youre selfish.
No one hates "independent" career women. We're just not attracted to you because you're selfish.

Either be the "girl-boss" or don't. But don't complain about being the girl-boss and having no men (besides soy boys and weak submissive betas) desiring you, despite you "not needing no man." Cry about it like Drew Barrymore and Charlize Theron when you're 40-something, sitting on millions of dollars, down to your last egg, and no guy (in "your league") wants anything to do with you.

RE: "Why don't men want strong independent career women? Why are men so 'intimidated' by a woman who makes her own money and doesn't need a man?"
Post Opinion