The boy looked as mature as this person and had the same amount of stubble.
Is this 17-year old a pedophile?
The boy looked as mature as this person and had the same amount of stubble.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia
Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[1]
Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent (early adolescent) children (especially those showing Tanner stages 2-3 of development), which is typically ages 11–14. It differs from pedophilia (the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children),[1][2][3] and from ephebophilia (the primary sexual interest in later adolescents, typically ages 15–19).[1][4]
Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.[1] The term was originally used in the late 19th to mid 20th century.[1] It is one of a number of sexual preferences across age groups subsumed under the technical term chronophilia
Pedophilia is the sexual attraction of prepubescent people so thats anyone who hasn't started puberty.
Now onto your question, why would you even think that? There is only a 2 year age gap and would be in the same school like seriously how would you even think this is pedophilia
Pedophiles are attracted to children, someone who hasn't gone through puberty, and a 15 boy has. No she isn't, she likes someone in her age range and it's okay for her to be attracted to him. Now, she legally couldn't do anything with him probably depending on where they live.
No? They're just 2 years apart
It's not like she likes a 5 year old boy... sexually
It’s certainly not pedophilia. Whether it’s a good idea or legal is a different matter. There’s nothing remotely unusual about a 17 year old finding a particular 15 year old attractive. On top of that an actual pedophile would be turned off by the stubble etc. (Someone focused on teens wouldn’t. Again though - a 17 year old highly attracted to post pubescent teens is... as normal as can be)
First, pedophile means "attracted to PREpubescent children" (generally under 12, and commonly much younger than 12). A 15 year old is several years past puberty.
Second, you are talking about a 2 year age gap. That's completely normal.
This very question strongly implies that you have an agenda.. .
Opinion
13Opinion
A 17 year old girl being attracted to a 15 year old boy isn't all that weird. She's not 18 yet, so I wouldn't class her as a pedophile. Don't know about the legality of it though.
she likes him because of the way he looks older (tall, broad shoulders)
how is that even close to pedophilia?
no i wouldn´t say so. i think they are in a pretty normal age range within each other. also it´s not even a pedophile if you go by definition at all xD but i get what you wanted to say.
Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children, which is typically considered to be the age of 11 and less.
So what is the person in this case then?
Hmmm... does she like him because of his age? If not, I'd lean towards her not being a pedophile. Though the law wouldn't make such a distinction.
It's not because of his age. Why she found him good looking was because he was tall (Ca. 180 cm), had a beard and was dark.
To the town of agua fria rode a stranger one fine day
I am dating a 16 year old. It fine. UK constant age is 16 .
Yes, that 17-year-old girl is a pedophile for liking an 15-year-old one. Just like the 77-year-old woman. Wake up.
Even if the 15-year old looks as old as this person?
cf.girlsaskguys.com/.../...6-8fb2-3ebbf5cdcb16.jpg
In my country, it's legal to date someone three years older or younger than you when you're a minor. So 18 and 15 is not exploitative.
As Kitten said, you need to educate yourself on what a pedophile actually is.
She is underaged which according to the law means she is not
She wouldn't really be a pedophile, but would be committing statutory rape.
That is absolutely incorrect.
www.cga.ct.gov/.../2003-R-0376.htm
She don't know him very well, she don't date him and never had sex with him.
I wouldn't say so. :|
No. If they're both under 18 it's fine
That's not t how it works
Not even close
How?
People are fucking paranoid these days...
No..
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions