I see so many guys who don't want to date women (long term dating/seeking marriage) that have great careers or really good earning potential. Does this have something to do with hypergame?
A more inaccurate, leading, and loaded question has never been asked. Does that sound like an exaggeration or misrepresentation? Good, because so was the original question.
While there are certainly some men out there who are legitimately intimidated by such women, it's less than 25% of men--probably far less (closer to 10% or fewer). What is actually going on is FAR more complicated. The main factor at play, however, is that smart and career-driven women either reject most guys (even good ones) and only go for men SMARTER and/or MORE CAREER-DRIVEN than themselves (which is a very small number of men), or they are seen as potential sugar mamas by sleazy guys.
Another thing that happens somewhat less often is that most guys won't bother with sucu women because they assume those women won't be interestwd in them. Be honest, I could be the smartest guy on this app and none of the smart, career driven women on here would actually go for me since I'm fresh out of college and haven't had time to establish a career.
Yet another reason that has nothing to do with intimidation is the fact that the vast majority of men aren't attracted to career-driven women because those women aren't going to be much help with kids or maintaining a family. Whether you think it's right or not, that's the reality for most men.
Keep in mind that ALL MEN, except for a few abusive assholes, love smart women. No one wants a complete moron. Even men who want to be smarter than their woman still want her to be smarter than a 5th grader. What women perceive as not wanting smart women is actually that men hate women who act like they're smart, especially since they usually think themselves smarter than they actually are. There is nothing sexoer than a smart woman who knows she's smart but doesn't rub it in everyone's faces, and there is nothing more repulsive than an idiot who thinks she's Marie Curie and broadcasts it to the world--it's embarassing to date someone like that.
In summation, women are often intimidated by women who are smarter or more career-driven than they are, so they assume that men must be too, which explains this misunderstanding. But really 9/10 men are not and never will be intimidated by women in any way. And gay men are no exception, for the record. This might be crushing to hear for someone with a big ego, but no real man is intimidated by women on any way. The only ones who are are the rare lowest rung incels because even the typical incel isn't intimidated (they are filled with disdain instead). Even abusers really aren't intimidated, they relish in abusing their power, as sick as that is.25 Reply- +1 y
This is the most important bit:
"What women perceive as not wanting smart women is actually that men hate women who act like they're smart, especially since they usually think themselves smarter than they actually are. There is nothing sexoer than a smart woman who knows she's smart but doesn't rub it in everyone's faces, and there is nothing more repulsive than an idiot who thinks she's Marie Curie and broadcasts it to the world--it's embarassing to date someone like that." - +1 y
@quaranta Agreed. I went to university with so many ladies who acted like they were the smartest, . ost accomplished ones there, while I was sitting next to girls who had accomplished more and were smarter than those other girls ever would be, yet they were humble and let their papers, projects, and results speak for themselves. Humility paired with confidence is irresistable. While arrogance paired with mediocrity is unbearable for men and women.
- +1 y
If you are dumb, just shut the fuck up. At least as method.
But you are so dumb you don't even realize that! - +1 y
Not speaking about you.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yShow me one that gives a damn about me and what I do, and isn't married already, and maybe I can fix this perception. Otherwise, I have always found more solace in the broken and the humble.
Met a woman who was robbed of her kids, and even branded a felon over a crime that never happened! Then denied the right to defend herself, with the court using covid as an excuse to deny her justice. (Translation: it was pure greed!)
She's got a warrior's heart, and would go thermonuclear on the corruption in the Florida system that even DeSantis is blind to, except she's poor, and invisible on her own.
If she weren't already married, I would've snatched her up quickly. She seemed like a woman of class in almost every respect, and had a fire for God too. Forced to work a menial cleaning job, because the BS felony charge meant no one else would hire her.
Her only flaw, that I could tell, was she was a vaper. Most men are shallow, and would see her as beneath them. I consider the corrupt who ruined her life to be the real sewer rats, however.
Again , I only didn't pursue, because she's already married. But she gained an ally that day, however small. The men that ruined her and her husband's lives, deserve to be hated. Deserve to dangle from a rope until they spill like Judas!
It'll be a long time before the filth gets washed away. Money buys it insurance from facing justice. But not forever.
Stories like these fulfill me more than any shallow hook up ever will.
A billionaire on a plane who can offer me neither love nor commonality of cause nor a job, is boring to me. Even if she has a pretty face.
A battered Amy Lee lookalike with a music note tattoo on her right eyebrow, struggling to deliver the local paper on time, who still finds time to find me interesting, and always has something to say that I can get behind, would have my attention for a lot longer. And if I can sympathize with her, even better!
I need to know I can matter. If I don't feel that, nothing else is ever going to be enough.
20 Reply
I am originally from what they say is a 3rd world country. I have a more traditional upbringing. I do have my own business but not pulling in the big bucks. I am about my man first and career is secondary.
In the beginning I asked my boyfriend why look for a woman outside your country. Why not just find a local woman. One of the reasons my boyfriend said he started to look for a woman from outside his country was many career women from his country want and feel they deserve everything. Not just money, security, possessions but also feel they deserve the hottest guy the most successful guy and one that is even more succesful then they are. Added not so noticeable in the younger ladies just getting started in life (under 30) but very noticable in women over 45. The ladies already been separated or divoreced etc. and experienced life. He added from his experienced it seemed half the women over 45 if succesful dont feel they really need a guy. I think it goes both ways and a successful guy dont need a successful woman or rather he has the choice. My boyfriend just wanted a traditional woman not a career first woman.
Where I come from men can find a woman in a more traditional sense.
I have no idea what hypergame is lol.
10 Reply
+1 yAmerican men with their backward ideologies & spinelessness towards women screaming about "feminism" when they're mostly loud-mouthed whores that make real/original feminists spin in their graves in absolute disgust... are intimidated.
Europe where modern feminism isn't a plague - where women have been treated with respect, as equals, etc. & original feminism is predominantly - and you'll find men prefer a strong independent woman not a sweep-the-floor achieve nothing maid.
13 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
Your response seems to be indicative as being emotionally charged rather than logically sound and grounded. If you don't possess the emotional bandwidth or capability to be able to discuss opposition on a pressing issue that holds within it a myriad of social and biological complexities, then you're going to continue to look at the world through a narrow lens. You're hindering your own growth and development. You will stay consistent with your mental stagnation and mental road blocks as long as this is your response to opposition. If we're considering the benefits of sound mental longevity, it's much healthier and intellectually stimulating to critically think through a challenge of our preconceived notions and ideas. Your response is at your own detriment rather than mine.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
70Opinion
2.1K opinions shared on Dating topic. Men are not intimidated by them - they are uninterested in them. Men don't want or need what they have to offer, and they don't offer (and have no interest in offering) what men want in a woman.
If you drove a diesel truck, does the fact that you ignore gas pumps mean they intimidate you? Of course not - they just have no utility to a person driving a diesel.
It's a feminist narrative that men are intimidated by "strong and independent women", because they don't want to face the realization that men simply don't WANT them.
Feminism teaches women NOT to be what men want, or NOT to attract the men they want, but instead to BECOME the men they want. And that seems fun to women in their 20s, when they still get lots of male attention anyway, but that comes at the expense of the rest of their lives. Such women will be ALONE, and most are not happy about it, but it is the consequence of their own choices. When women hit 35 and are single and have no family, and realize that all they have to look forward to is 30 more years of going to work, they tend to be depressed and often miserable - and of course, men are to blame for not wanting them...43 Reply- +1 y
ROFL. Inferior American man.
- +1 y
@MrOracle -
American men with their backward ideologies & spinelessness towards women screaming about "feminism" when they're mostly loud-mouthed whores that make real/original feminists spin in their graves in absolute disgust... are intimidated.
Europe where modern feminism isn't a plague - where women have been treated with respect, as equals, etc. & original feminism is predominantly - and you'll find men prefer a strong independent woman not a sweep-the-floor achieve nothing maid. - +1 y
The thing that men want to achieve with a woman is a FAMILY - which is far more important to them than achieving a nicer car or a better vacation or whatever. But women have been taught to avoid being a wife and mother and prioritize a career instead. They have every right to make that choice, but men in turn have every right to reject such women for a relationship, because those women don't bring anything to a man that he can't already achieve himself.
You can throw insults all you like, but the reality is that if you can't offer something of value to men, then you aren't going to get anything from men either. And you can't dictate to men what men should value - men KNOW what they value and why, and that's not going to change.
Ironically, the women who WANT to be mothers and who reject feminism are the ones reproducing - the feminists are literally going to go extinct because they aren't reproducing.
16.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. That's largely a myth. Think about it- the type of woman you're describing, would she want to "settle"? Most unlikely. That means the universe of potential partners for her is relatively small, especially if she's applying hypergamy. Most guys realize that such a woman will not be interested in dating them unless they make more money than her or have more status than her. And that's even before things like personal chemistry and compatibility are considered.
40 Reply920 opinions shared on Dating topic. I’d say because it makes a girl more independent and less willing to tolerate bullshit because she has what she needs already
671 Reply- +1 y
What would she have to tolerate?
- +1 y
I mean, it doesn't seem to be all that bad. Sure, running a household isn't easy, glamorous, or maybe fun... but it was a tradeoff. Men worked outside the home and brought home the $ and women usually worked inside. People were content then. Is that not fair?
- +1 y
I suppose. What "powertrip" would a man have with their money against his own wife?
- +1 y
Well yeah, but that doesn't happen often.
- +1 y
I have not.
- +1 y
They better be ready to work for the rest of their lives then.
- +1 y
@BloodCursedDeviant they get married to a man with more money and then divorce for no reason. Best of both worlds.
- +1 y
To another man that cheats? All top tier men are unloyal
- +1 y
Yet you realize how delusional that is. Or else you wouldn't work.
- +1 y
He shouldn't pay for anything if you're working but then guess what your pussy dries up. Thats why equality is ass backwards. Females only get turned on by men better than them.
- +1 y
@kylee2437 you're comparing a show about a criminal Mobster Don, with money & saying that's a GOOD COMPARISON to all men HAHAHAHA!!!
- +1 y
- +1 y
No you said the TV show "Sopranos" a man who does crime and runs a crime family as the Boss in the show & you're surprised a mobster who does racketeering & extortion, intimidating witnesses, murder, laundering and more is not a good guy with money? He's a mobster. Like I said if the FBI ever were to catch him he would do federal time. The comparison is EXTREME & very delusional.
What rich criminal is faithful? They're already taking things at their finger tips & then you told OP he must have not watched the Sopranos to understand, no you really didn't watch it if you didn't notice he was a CRIMINAL and not a average rich man who gets his money legally. Completely atrocious and EXTREME. - +1 y
@kylee2437 don't self project how you feel about yourself, seek help if you thinking making extreme points about fictional characters is a reaction to real rich men who live legal lifes lolololol!!!
- +1 y
@kylee2437 do you speak English? If not I will suggest you to use Google translate & figure out the meaning of the words you're trying to use. Because you clearly don't know what an analogie is a CRIMINAL & legal rich CEO are not the same thing at all & can't be used in comparison. One will do federal time the other will not if they're living legal.
- +1 y
You can't COMPARE CRIMINAL LIFE to a a man with money who lives LEGALLY. Again being a criminal leads you to PRISON. The criminal LIFE is not the same as a PERSON with money. Maybe you should actually go outside and experience life. A person who lives illegal and legal do not function in the same groups of people.
- +1 y
@kylee2437 you literally think that a guy who will murder you and is connected to a crime family is the same as a CEO who lives a legal life and comes into work and does all his meetings hold the same power HAHAHAHAHAHA !!! One of these men will get there money and bank account frozen when caught, get prosecuted to the fully extent, and sentenced by a judge harshly & go to prison and do time behind federal walls & get beat up by CO'S.
While the other will continue to work everyday and get more richer.
Who has more power the criminal or the CEO I know who my money is on lololol!!!
You ain't been to a subsection or hood in your life & you ain't seen a mobster, do you know why wait what happen oh yah history did. All 5 families have been arrested and defunct and most mobsters are very quiet and no longer loud and crime family's have been a thing of the past for decades. Look at what happen to John Gotti the OMERTA got exposed the government & Law Enforcement WON. Hahahahaha you think you can do crime and live in oeace forever Hahahahaha what street snarts do you have? NONE. - +1 y
@Fuentes did you even watch sopranos because I’m literally talking about him getting women in the first place. But you again obviously lack street smarts because Tony had the power because he also had all the money. I obviously have more street smarts than you since you can’t figure out this simple analogy
- +1 y
@Fuentes the whole point of this convo is back in the day because men had jobs and women did not , it was a huge power trip and they had power similar to criminals essentially because women NEEDED men to survive. Guys with regular jobs no longer have that power because women can now fend for themselves therefore no longer have any power. That’s why In a lot of guys eyes, a hard working woman is not a good quality because they no longer hold power in those circumstances
- +1 y
But you're comparing criminals to make a point to men who lived legally. Not everyone was a criminal back then and mobsters still got arrested back then. They have been since the early 1900's that's why Charlie Luciano who started the commission and fought for the country. Got arrested and then the Genovese took over his family and then Vito got arrested and then came Gigante. And what happen to him ARRESTED hahahahhahaha come on you can't say people who took whatever they wanted are a good comparison to LEGAL men hahahahahahahahha!!!
- +1 y
@kylee2437 that's a LIE and you know it & since you wanna openly speak about it makes you a rat. That tells me you're not from that life or ever seen it ever hahahahahahha stop the lies.
- +1 y
@Fuentes where did I openly talk about it? You are on an anon website and you don’t know my name. You don’t know who I associate with lol that’s not openly talking about it. You don’t know me, I don’t know you. I didn’t even say any details, I just said sopranos is a pretty on point show regardless if it’s fiction or not
- +1 y
Anon? Most people can be uncovered. You have a registered IP, Mac ID and IMEI serial device that you use if on a phone. That is registered to whatever company you bought the phone or computer from. The FBI or anyone in LAW enforcement would identify you in seconds nothing is spoof, whoever pays your net bill gives away your address & residence. That does not even take two seconds to figure out for most people. Oh buy your so street smart you think you can't be identified on the internet hahahahhaha! Especially when you use your full birth date on your last account.
Regardless you just got debunked once again and also anyone who is around real crime never speaks on it, why cause it still active theirs a reason for the term "lose lips, sink ships" is a meaning. But if you had real street smarts as you say, which we both know you do not. You would know this already from the gate. - +1 y
Just noticed that kylee is grabbing her pussy in her pic
- +1 y
Whsts the difference
- +1 y
- +1 y
If I grabbed you there it'd be sexual assault its the same thing
- +1 y
Life is assault
- +1 y
LOLOLOLOL i just listed everyday you can be found on the internet easily even by your old username with your birthdate in it. Your IP has state and city and is connected with your ISP who has the billing information. How else do LE arrest you through that info? Duhhhhh lol look at Kylee it's ok not to know things but you really don't know things and your trying to argue it into reality and it's not working out for you. If anyone reads this they would laugh at this point.
- +1 y
@Fuentes I’ve never used my real name in any usernames lmao secondly , the police probably know more than I do regarding this, I’ve just been around it my whole life. Doesn’t mean I know the big details however, all I said is sopranos is accurate in many ways. What I am saying literally says absolutely nothing about who I am talking about at all.
- +1 y
Yes it does if you know any type of federal crime on the federal level and you're speaking on it you're adding to any active case you may not even know is OPEN. Good way yo get your self subpoenaed in court and made to testify against whoever it is In an open investigation, go ahead and lie in court when they have proof you said you knew and know it's so "accurate" a shower based in the 90's and early 2000's is so accurate. Somehow we still have pay phones around huh hahahahahahhaha!!! Stop it
Also you don't need your first name a username is all that matters really, also your photos they have something called Metadata and when you have a photo if yourself it can be lead right back to you as well. That's not hard for the average Joe to even Do. I'm not sure why you feel the internet is such a safe space cause it actually really isn't but hey I'm starting to understand you really Don't know a lot. So it's mostly ignorance. Thar allows you to be this nieve about all your surroundings. - +1 y
This isn't a anon website the gov could easily get a warrant for all users info if needed to build a case. Nobody is anon on the net lololol!!!
I am not saying I am going to find you, i said the police can and even as far as the average Joe you're saying your ANON but your not & trust me I know your lying, we both know your lying. If you're afraid that's your own feeling I'm explaining how easy it is for LE to build a case on criminals for anything. You're the one claiming your anon, which is telling you nobody is lololol and that's facts. - +1 y
Mobster criminals go to prison and do federal time, that's a fact.
A legal CEO & a Criminal are not the same, Fact
Nobody is anonymous online, FACT ask Edward Snowden he proved that.
If you speak on any sort of crime or open investigation, It's telling, and if your found to be connected to said alleged crime, you can be made to testify in court, against whoever it was, that's a fact.
Literally you been debunked left a d right by facts. - +1 y
Where did I say anyone is actually anon online? Lmfao once again, the things that you stated literally have nothing to do with my statement. You literally assumed what I was referring to and started rambling, kind of like when I even mentioned sopranos to begin with regarding a simple analogy
- +1 y
Dude you and the English language just don't jive together does it. The fact you even feel your right is absolutely embarrassing to be this ignorant.
So I guess I really have be a teacher now.
The word you're using is "Analogy"
Meaning = a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
You compared a criminal who lives illegaly to a high value working man who earns his money legally. None of that is the something else in the same respects at ALL.
You use words and don't know the definitions to them and don't know how to use them. This is SAD. - +1 y
You don't know the English language if you're making up definitions to words you're using. See with words they hold value, they have meaning. You can't just change the definition up when you feel like it or FEEL it's the right word to use when it's incorrect. Again FACTS are FACTS.
Again you you can't compare a criminal like Tony to a man who held power working a legal job. That earns them legal income. - +1 y
Come on stop wasting your time arguing with trolls. They just wanted to waste your time and make you angry and they achieved that. Don't waste your time for such lowlifes
- +1 y
Girls with a fat ass can't get angry
1.3K opinions shared on Dating topic. Why does it have to mean a man is intimidated because he's not into those kinds of women? What about the men who are also career driven and make lots of money but still don't want those kinds of women? Are they intimidated too?
10 Reply- 6.4K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI think most men love intelligent women, they are just afraid of getting dumped or cheated on or mistreated if they choose somebody much higher in status.
00 Reply
+1 yI’m not. More for me. Right? But I don’t date for that either.
If she’s into me. Then she’s into me.
00 Reply1.4K opinions shared on Dating topic. hypergamy definitely plays a role. those type of women have historically made it clear they won't date down, so why would the vast majority of men bother when the result is already known.
those women also tend to be "strong and independent and need no man" so there's that also. men are simply giving those women their wish and leaving them alone.
even then, men aren't attracted to the same things in a woman that women find attractive in a man i. e. men don't care about a woman's height but women care about a man's height, same thing in regards to money.
looks and personality are really the 2 main things, men care about in a woman. doesn't matter what her job is, what her income is or how famous she is. the waitress at a small cafe can be just as attractive as a successful female lawyer.
for men's it's different. a plumber or janitor won't receive anywhere near the level of attraction a doctor or pro-athlete would receive from women (that is assuming all other factors are equal to one another)
20 ReplyI've never met any man that was against women having/making money. I have met men that joke about wanting to land a rich girl. That said, most guys don't really care about a girls money so long she is not creating financial stress for him. Men hate gold diggers because they are users. Men hate women, that tell them they need to be more ambitious and earn more or make 5 year plans because it’s controlling behavior and men like to run our own lives independently. Men hate women that are spendthrift that blow all their money on frivolous shit, wrack up debt, etc. and then expect the man to take care of the necessities of life because those women are being irresponsible. Men hate women that constantly want to travel, because that obligates men to also spend money on all those trips to jet set around to cater to her interests when he most likely would prefer to spend his hard earned money on things that interest him more rather than entertaining her with his money. She may be paying her own way, but she is still leaching his time and resources indirectly. If you ask women if they like men that use them, that are irresponsible, that are controlling, and that stress them out I’m sure most women will be like fuck that I don’t want anything to due with a man like that. Well, men feel the same way about women like that.
02 Reply- +1 y
When you actually examine a lot of those women you call “career driven”, they are often very money motivated and materialistic so you get gold digger traits. Many of them were Daddy’s little girl... They never really had to work growing up or going through school. They often had credit cards that to go shopping that their Dad paid off for them. This was so they could live a stress free life and succeed in school and get good grades so that they could land a good job. Some are even trust fund babbles. Often their Dad bought them a home to ensure they had a strong start in life and funny enough their Dad often still pays their property taxes, home owners insurance, mortgage, and utilities on their homes. They are typically very irresponsible and don’t know how to do anything themselves. They end up with a lot of disposable income that they blow on traveling and frivolous things. They think they are managing their money well when they never really have to pay their main bills... They know how to do their job well and earn a good living, but they are often clueless about running their own lives and are typically very pampered and entitled because they were never taught to be responsible.
- +1 y
In contrast middle class women that had to pay their own way through school, had jobs since middle or high school, and had a little struggle to get going in life, rented and lived on rice and beans for years or whatever end up learning how to manage the finances of a household, they are often more frugal, they pick up random life skills out of necessity because they couldn’t just afford to pay someone to do shit for them, they know the value of a dollar earned… They might not have the best paying career, but they tend to be better with money and less materialist.
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 ySimple math. Women, due to gender roles EXPECT guys to be more productive then them. Because traditionally it has always been a guys role to "bring home the bacon", so to speak. Over the past few generations feminism has pushed hard for "equality"🤣. But women have twisted the message into they deserve equal pay without equal expectations 🙄. On top of this a simple understanding of economics tells us that society has unlimited wants and needs but limited resources. By women competing with men for them resources reduces a man's earning potential. However it DOESN'T reduce a woman's EXPECTATIONS for that man. In simple terms if a woman makes 25k she expects him to make 50k, If she makes 50k she expects him to make 100k, etc. I'm all for a man working as hard as he can, and making as much as he can. But any guy with an I. Q. over 60 KNOWS that stereotypical, smart, career driven women is actually code for "unrealistic expectations".
This will change when women accept that they can't have it both ways. Embrace all of "equality" or none of it.
20 ReplyI don't know but maybe this can help you what I'm about to say. I have always wanted to be a house husband. So I would be willing to swap that part in a relationship. I'm confident in myself and what I do for a career, but if I found a woman who made more and treated me fairly I have no problem being the support role. Nothing is wrong with me either, like I'm educated (even though that doesn't mean I'm smart... but I am lol) and have a career in media. Now with me saying that, I think most women wouldn't find that a plus. Some would maybe find off putting. When a guy is smart and career driven, In most scenarios, his partner only has to be a good person or a good fit to him. Like a woman's finances or job is never a question at that point, she just needs to be able to fit him emotionally. A woman who is smart and career driven doesn't just want a man who fits her emotionally, spiritually, etc. She wants that plus a guy who makes the same amount as her, has the same level of education as her, and would be willing to give all that up potentially for her if the relationship goes down that road of having children. That type of woman wants a man that doesn't exist and all of that being known it's like whats the point of talking to her if you're a man at her level when it comes to career and smarts. Or for those who tried and aren't at her "level" she rejects. It's not intimidation. I didn't even bring up physical attraction which is another barrier. in my opinion of course.
00 Reply
+1 yIf you allow me to emit a hypothesis, all vanity set aside it's not really the plain fact those women earn a lot more money than me that is the problem, but their availability in a private relation. Those ladies just have no time left for a normal family. You know, private moments, kids, vacation all together, etc.
Many men are not aware of a similar problem about themselves when they let their professional life take all their time at the expense of a private life with a spouse and a family.
I hold no grudge against women giving their priority to an interesting career, but there's a price to pay. It's a choice depending on people's capabilities and tendencies.
10 ReplyIntimidated is the wrong word. Most career focused women with money have developed very masculine frames, in order to succeed in the corporate world as a woman. In most cases, these women have a hard time embracing their feminine essence, and simply aren't as attractive as women that haven't been indoctrinated into the corporate world. Also, most women that fall in this category, are quick to say they don't need a man, which is probably one of the biggest turn offs that I hear from women that make just as much as the average man most often. Far too often these are the extreme feminists that are really just bitter women that just hate all men. Now of course there are always exceptions, but based on what I've seen, there aren't many.
00 Reply2.1K opinions shared on Dating topic. They aren't. Quite the opposite in fact.
There have also been numerous studies and articles on the subject.
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2010/nov/10/internet-scam-female-victims
Most women conned and scammed by so called "Tinder Swindlers" are in fact smart and career driven women, professionals in their fields.
But they are absolute idiots in relationships and social interactions. Hence tend to fall easily for relationship scams.
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yIt have to do with traditions from centuries ago. Very sexist man-made traditions and ideals to be exact. Traditions that highlight women as men serving baby-making machines and men being, free minded breadwinners of what sexist men have influenced ‘family’ to mean and be.
Therefore, overall, I would say men who are intimidated by intelligence women are weak pathetic life sucking vultures. I mean seriously, how does women being respected, not raped, abused, and having equal rights negatively men? It’s doesn’t. All I see is men who have rapist mentalities, naturally abusive, and psychotic wanting control over women’s lives in ever aspect. It’s. . creepy I would say10 Reply
+1 yI wouldn't have a problem going out with a woman that makes more than me, the problem is that women call this "dating down". Despite the the fact that these women want a man that makes as much or more than they do but somehow don't consider it "dating down" for the man that makes more than her. In general, men do not care how much a woman make, the only thing that's unattractive is the stereotypical attitude that is perceived to come with this type of woman. If you are a high earning woman and don't look down on men that earn less than you do then you are one of the few. Personally I don't care how much a girl makes, I enjoy intelligent conversations especially with smart women, and I don't base the value of another human being by how much they make.
*Side note* these are also the type of women that claim they are being oppressed by the gender wage gap even though it has been debunked numerous times.10 Reply
+1 yCoz men want pretty looking girls who they could brag as achievement. Not "Lady" who could be extremely independent and doesn't need the world's complement to fulfil her needs.
As far as I am concerned, independent and career focused women (mostly) possess very good self discipline and mannerism. They exert themselves in a manner, that never lets any dick and harry take advantage of her kindness and most importantly her ability to say "NO" scares not just men but even women away.
The ability to not over-exert sounds rude to the whole world when in reality you are standing up for yourself.
00 Reply- 3.2K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yBecause men generally want someone feminine, caring, attractive, younger, innocent, home skills, and available.
Careers, education, and income are not things men generally are very interested in for a woman. For example a lawyer or a waitress are both acceptable jobs for a woman. Which one is more feminine? Who is sweeter and more caring? I don't know but generally a person's work rubs off on them and a high stress lawyer might be... more stressed out than a woman working at hooters (they always seem so pleasant in there). Either way, the lawyer woman gets zero extra points for being a lawyer. So now what else does she have to offer when it comes to the things listed above that men actually care about?
10 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yThey're not. It's a scapegoat women use to explain why they can't attract and keep a good man.
The real problem these women have is their personality, character and attitudes, especially toward men and relationships. It's easy to spot because these women put off a vibe that is very unappealing. They are the polar opposite of what men are drawn to.
Trust me, if you have a warm, kind, friendly disposition, a positive attitude toward men and relationships, you know how to treat a man well, and are even mildly physically attractive, you are a high value woman who will have no problem attracting men. If you are smart and successful, that's a bonus, but not a requirement, and certainly not a turnoff.
People who make this claim are not doing women any favors because they are misleading women about how to be successful with men. You as a man should know this. Makes me wonder if you really are a woman.
20 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yGuys do not see women as datable the same way women look at guys,
To a guy it doesn't matter if she has a great career or really good earning potential,
It may sound old fashioned but guys are looking at the woman's personality, their wanting a family, being able to be at least as skilled in the kitchen as the guys are, are looking for someone to be a partner.
In short they are not looking for ‘Boss Babes’/ ‘Strong and independent and need no man’ types as it would be like trying to date a man.
10 Reply1.7K opinions shared on Dating topic. Incorrect statement, just another shame tactics. If you pursue things that doesn't attract men don't be surprised if you don't attract men. Nothing intimidating about it. You can't change mens preferences just because they don't match what you want to become. You must accept that you earn it for yourself not to get a partner and accept that women that did engage in things men prefer is now has gained an advantage unlike you.
10 Reply
+1 yFor curiosity.. these guys you see being like that.. do you see them mostly online or is it in real life too?
Because in my experience, online they really like to speak up about that, meanwhile I never encounter people like that out and about.
And i am thinking; is it something with to do with the types of people we meet online vs irl.
I don't know, maybe It's just different from place to place.00 Reply2.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. Smart and makes lots of money sounds good.
I have no problem with career driven unless the career requires all of her time or lots of travel.
Such a high powered, career woman might also be too decisive, certain, bossy, ambitious, or no nonsense to make a good partner. I'm not saying that she would necessarily have to be any of those things, though.00 ReplyWomen today don't have a clue what guys want. That's a fact. Not... a... clue. They're too busy with Cashapp, IG, SC, and "Going live" to get horny old men to drop $ into their Cashapp. Most don't even talk with guys, and on the rare occasions they're even with guys... they've got their faces stuck in their phone, or they're looking around... everywhere but AT him. They're looking around to see who else is watching THEM. They're not concerned with empathy, self reflection or understanding... only pumping up their own egos through social media and public validation. I see it probably 500 times daily. They're totally disengaged from the opposite gender. 1981 is gone people. Forever. It's not coming back.
00 Reply2.4K opinions shared on Dating topic. why would that intimidate someone.
I like it when women are independent, then they can take care of themselves if you are busy or go somewhere.
You don't need to be tied to the hip all the time because she needs you around to take care of her.
It is just too much work.00 Reply
Anonymous(45 Plus)+1 yThey are not intimidated, just not attracted. Maybe for a woman to have a great career and become a high earner leans more towards her developing more masculine traits than feminine. A mans life is a battle... he doesn't need to come home to one more...
10 ReplyIt’s not that your independence and strong will intimidates us.
Is how you carry your self in life and the moment.
Looks and success help you get and attract people but the personality and how you carry yourself gets them to stay.
In my opinion00 Reply391 opinions shared on Dating topic. That's because those ladies expect us men to match up to their game of life. There are men who can, but you can't expect all men to. There are men who have had a great deal amount of struggle in life, and they just simply can't match up at that time.
00 Reply
+1 yWhen I think about a woman who is highly driven and career focused and earns more money than me, I just I feel like for me that person is in a different league than me so it's something I'm not intimidated by, it's just that I know my place.
I just know that I'm average and my path in life is different then a lot of women that are like that.10 ReplyCorporations don't hire smart people, they hire useful idiots.
Career women don't want children or families. They are just materialistic.
They want a fake marriage with a fake husband with no kids and they only want to be around for the occasional fake couples photo to show to their fake friends.
00 Reply
+1 yBecause men who make a lot of money don’t care about her money if a woman in Colombia who has never seen a computer lives off of 5k a year and reads at 3rd grade level is hotter than her
and the men who make less money than her she doesn’t want because she will take on most of the financial load
thats why these women struggle with dating you can’t have a career then try to slap a relationship together
00 Reply- 1.4K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI like to date career women. It is my preference really. But if she thinks she needs to "compete" then it can be a turnoff for me. Or if I have to "prove to her" that my career has societal value or whatever.
00 Reply 348 opinions shared on Dating topic. that all depends on how ya use it now please understand that we're not intimidated that's a myth and smart dont necessarily mean intelligent and most career driven women tend to be independent and independent by definition means for yourself by yourself also most independent women tend to be masculine as hell so intimidated is the wrong word to describe all that turned off is the right way to describe all that
00 Reply- 542 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yego which i think is unfair. regardless of gender a human being wants some sense of fulfillment on their life. i think it's selfish for a man to block his wife from workinh because it's not good for his ego
00 Reply
+1 yIt's because they're independent and don't need a man at their side. Either they're insecure or afraid of a woman leaving them
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yWe aren't. This same "smart career driven women" are also usually insufferable women who have a superiority complex. Especially the ones that claim to be "strong independent women"
Why do you think the vast majority of that kind of women are either single or divorced? They have zero relationship skills, and are often times narcissistic..00 Reply2.6K opinions shared on Dating topic. They're not. Women who seem like they will prioritize their career over their future children are just usually unappealing.
212 Reply- +1 y
But let me guess, men who prioritize their career over their families (including children) are sexy right? Lol people like you are hilarious
- +1 y
Carrying a child and breastfeeding have absolutely nothing to do with intelligence or successful women. You’re just a sexist and to your own gender lmao. No need to deny it, it’s all over your crap opinions here
- +1 y
Lmao your manipulation tactic won’t work here. I don’t care for your crap Trumptard opinions either. Just wanted to let the likes of you know we see women like you for the shi you are. Pathetic and useless too
- +1 y
@kylee2437 I thought all people believed that. I guess some people don't. . Weird mentality lol
- +1 y
@kylee2437 Exactly right! I so agree. I feel so sorry for the future children though. I mean passing their anti father roles onto the kids is just cruel. Smh.
- +1 y
Says the sexist who believe only men are allowed a free pass to be successful🙄. Now THAT’S funny
- 1.5K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI think ego and that they don't get to control someone who knows their worth or who knows that she is at least financially not dependent to stay, if he is an asshole to her
00 Reply - 1.2K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yThey’re not. I mean, maybe you are, but you’d be the first that i’ve ever known.
That’s just nonsense women tell themselves to excuse intolerable behavior.00 Reply 500 opinions shared on Dating topic. Nope it is just some men and they’re usually Tate and Pearl fanboys. A man should support his partner in whatever she chooses to do whether it is to be a homemaker or a career woman or both.
00 Reply
+1 yRaised with the boring (to me) mentality of having to be the provider. Men who are comfortable with strong woman are far more attractive.
12 Reply- +1 y
Why are they more attractive? What makes the mentality of being a provider boring?
- +1 y
It’s the trust. Respect. I suppose that is what men looking for “traditional roles” want. But if it’s shared so is that feeling. Nothing wrong with sharing it, only thing left out is someone being left out.
We're NOT. We just don't want bitchy masculine aggressive women who act like men! So sick of people gaslighting this BS on here.
10 Reply- 5K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yThe women that I met like that, we got along quite well. Doctors, CEOs and entrepreneurs.
Women that say such things aren't as successful. They are just making excuses for their unmanageable attitude.
00 Reply - 1.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yNot intimidated, I just hate the double standard. Career driven men are expected to be an ATM for their woman and buy presents, give her money, pay for dates etc. But a rich woman never feels that she should buy stuff for her man.
00 Reply
+1 yFrom my experience they aren’t it’s not what they’re looking for however. They want a wife not a business investor
00 Reply- 3.6K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yI'm not! There's a girl in the show, "Chuck" who plays the part, Hannah. She is VERY attractive BECAUSE she's very adult, intelligent and career-minded.
00 Reply - 402 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yMy babe has a dual masters degree and makes way more more than I do. I can’t say that I was intimidated. I admired that.
00 Reply - 1.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yMostly because they're stupid. They're passing great money and great money for their traditional, stupid beliefs that say men need to fucking earn for shit.
00 Reply 545 opinions shared on Dating topic. Simple answer, no. She is unlikely for me to know how much she earns... I wouldn't check or ask. I can detect career driven and decide if I am interested in her. Intimidated? No,
00 Reply- 995 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yIts probably the traits that come with being very successful and very driven that makes those women less desirable by men.
00 Reply - 782 opinions shared on Dating topic.
+1 yThey can't feel superior if she's better than them.
10 Reply 1K opinions shared on Dating topic. Why does everyone think men are intimidated by such women?
Like, has anyone considered that men just aren't attracted to these women?
02 Reply- +1 y
I have considered this as well. Do you find these type of women unattractive?
+1 yI'll let you know when I actually meet one that isn't doing so well off some man's work.
00 Reply
+1 yDivorce is far more likely when the wife out earns the husband
00 Reply
+1 yIt's not intimidation. They want the best possible mate.
00 Reply
+1 yWe aren't. We're turned off by women who have to keep reminding us they're "smart and career driven". Plus most men want children and a working mom isn't the best option.
00 Reply1.2K opinions shared on Dating topic. They're intimidated. They just don't care about shit. Men aren't hypergamous and don't care about how much money a woman is making. Men care about other things. Men just dont find it attractive.
00 Reply6K opinions shared on Dating topic. Your mistaking "intimidated " for uninterested.
00 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yGood question. I classify these guys having the tiny dick syndrome, where they feel they must have the upper hand somewhere especially in the money making capabilities.
How pathetic.
20 ReplyNot intimidated so much as uninterested. I want my wife to prioritize me and the family. Not her boss.
00 Reply
+1 yI don't have that problem. I like those kind of women. But sadly there are men out there that can not handle those kind of women.
00 Reply- Show More (28)
Why are women intimidated by successful men?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News