And 1 week later, I asked him to meet and in our meeting he told me that he kissed me because he could not contain himself but before having something more intimate, he wanted me to know that he is not emotionally available, without giving any further details, and that if I want something with him, it has to be something physical and have a good time together without pressures. He told me that he respects me but he cannot give me nothing more than that and that he told me before physical contact because he doesn't want to act like a player. Should I trust him? Most guys I've met first had sex with me and then they dumped me. He is the first guy who tells me this beforehand. I feel so confused because it sounded like an arrangement of no-commitment
We kissed passionately, and the following days we kept in touch but I felt him a bit distanced?
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
2Opinion
So, what's the problem? In my point of view he's giving you the chance to refuse his offer before making you uncomfortable through casual sex. As you say, most guys would desperately have sex with you and would ghost you after, because they wouldn't know how to tell you that they wouldn't be into something more serious. On the contrary, this guy acts respectfully and with total honesty, risking his prospect for easy sex, so I don't see why do you have trust issues if he has made everything crystal clear to you! Have sex with him, if you want something casual. Don't have sex with him if you are looking for commitment. He gives you clear options, and that is great. Now it's you that you have to decide whether or not you want this link.
No commitment is correct. Move tf on love
But this also means that he will be free to play around with other women, too!!
So? If you were committed to this man. He won't be committed to you. Unless he wants to
And this man doesn't. Trust me he's going to hurt you if you keep it up
Did you try asking him?