I’m straight/heterosexual so this is very weird. So please no smart aleck opinions like “Derp why don’t you date one.”
At the college I go to, there’s a bunch of gay guys. I always catch a bunch of gay guys checking me out. I even overheard two gay guys saying “he has a cute butt” “He’s so handsome, he should be a Hollister model”. Quite frankly I find it kind of creepy but I understand since they are gay. Thankfully they don’t get “touchy”, they don’t make physical contact with me. I don’t even dress “provocatively”, I usually wear fitted long sleeve buttoned down shirts that are tucked into my slim tapered pants. By the way, I don’t have anything against gay people but I wish the women at this college would give me the same attention, the only thing the women at this college do is give me constant glances.
LMAO the same reason why u would check out a girl, why are u posting this just to make your feel better or to get attention? u obviously know why they check u out
Guys catcall and comment on and check out people they find attractive. It doesn't matter if a guy is straight or gay because they all have the extra testosterone that makes them more aggressive in seeking out partners and vocalizing their desires. Gay guys aren't going to catcall men any less than straight guys catcall women
And don't worry about looking gay. It has nothing to do with that. The only reason I could see them thinking you're gay is that they've never seen you with a girlfriend
@Idonthaveausername I don’t cat call any women, I actually look the other way to pretend I didn’t see her. A large portion of men don’t cat call which are MGTOWs and MRAs, because we consider catcalling degeneracy since it gives misandrists ammunition to politically attack males.
I wasn't accusing you of catcalling people. I'm just agreeing with this guy because I get catcalled everyday myself. I'm not interested in those guys either, so it's exactly the same as what you experience down to them commenting on my ass
I think you’re confusing me for someone else, I’ve briefly showed my face on my profile and all I was told by other users is that I look “mean” and “standoffish”.
@Waffles731 He obviously needs help on a systemic level due to their entitlement towards his hetero body. I'm just helping him to understand that there are those that truly do care and wish to make it end.
@Waffles731 It's the only known cure for Cultural Marxism that has this man in turmoil and despair. Obviously you know I'm right or you wouldn't feel so threatened by my simple response to him.
@Waffles731 Cultural Marxism is a product of Communism and proceeds it (in reference to the process of the "revolution")... Communism has killed over 100 million people... So your Cultural Marxism has far more blood on its hands.
@HungLikeAHorsefly Iron clad rebuttal is more like it. They had some screwed up logic so I showed them just how screwed it was by flipping it on them.. Can you NOT comprehend that, moron?
You're the type of people to turn around and say we need a certain type of "refugee" and get mad if I use your logic on you AGAIN and mention how 98% of terrorists are of their ilk. If you're going to use BS logic to argue your points be prepared for it to be thrown back in your face.
You are absolutely right about the terrorists. I've always said things like "why are all these brown people here? We need more white people in the United States." but it turns out most of the terrorists are white people like me. :(
@HungLikeAHorsefly No, they aren't. Not on a global scale... You want to be a globalist cuck, then you need to start learning to look at the global picture of the garbage you're trying to import.
Yeah a cuckservative. I'm a moron, I'm lazy, I don't do anything well and I'm cucked easily. I think if I run a campaign like Trump, then Conservatives will love me and I'll have a real shot at national politics. But maybe I'm not rich enough...
And what's wrong with the word vile its been used for over a thousand years what would you prefer genocidal, morally bankrupt, evil. Its like we didn't kill enough of you people back from the start of the Spanish civil war to the end of the ww2
You clearly have no clue what genocide actually is, the holocaust genocide, immigration not genocide What happened to the native peolles of the u. s australia, and Canada, genocide. Mixed relations ships not genocide. The only time that I am aware of that you could argue whether or not it was genocide is the Irish potato famine, as the English clearly did everything they could to make ir worse
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.
The popular understanding of what constitutes genocide tends to be broader than the content of the norm under international law. Article II of the Genocide Convention contains a narrow definition of the crime of genocide, which includes two main elements:
A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
The intent is the most difficult element to determine. To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group. It is this special intent, or dolus specialis, what makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.
Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted - not randomly – because of their real or perceived membership of one of the four groups protected under the Convention (which excludes political groups, for example). This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and “substantial.”
'Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.' Yeah literally none of that happening
Most Helpful Opinions