Hypocrisy of MGTOW/red-pill people?

bingbongbangbung
They claim to go their own way, not care what others think, and strive to be as masculine as they can be. Yet they simp for each other so hard, basically seek validation from other men, resort to manipulation tactics to get things their way, and get triggered if men don't go by their status quo. All of those traits are literally feminine or blue pilled/simp behaviour if we go by their logic and they're either unaware or they just don't care. It's very much the antithesis to being a sigma male, so kind of cringe they do those.

A truly masculine man according to their logic wouldn't feel insecure or triggered of how their woman presents themselves or behaves. If anything, someone who is a gigaChad shouldn't care at all or even have an ego/esteem boost if they do end up with a promiscuous liberal woman. While the "real" beta losers can only simp for them, they were able to acquire women to themselves by being manly. He shouldn't feel threatened if she flirts or even sleeps with other men, since he can clearly acquire side chicks right?

Of course I'm aware that women that are slutty and leftist to the point of being pornstars, full-on public prostitutes, single mothers, rainbow hair tattoo pierced freaks, or ugly landwhales after hitting the wall are taking it too far. I'm not talking about such women; I'm just referring to women that might have OnlyFans as a side hustle or they might have a public Instagram, or they simply dress slutty. Surely if these sigma men practiced what they preached, they wouldn't mind since they can mold them into a 50s housewife.
Updates
6 mo
Also forgot to mention that they expect loyalty but gaslight everyone to not be loyal while claiming it's loyal. They also expect to exploit the isolation and naivete of poor, rural women in traditional countries, but fail to realize they're using them for their resources.
Hypocrisy of MGTOW/red-pill people?
3 Opinion