Yes, because it shows that the girl actually respects her body for more than it actually is instead of using it as a sex toy for guys to take advantage of, which would be degrading.
thats true, but their is still classy women , with values they are just not promoted like the unclassy, thats why women end up ith guys who think that all women care for is size and money, they unfortunately believe the lie.
Way more beautiful than now. Women from previous eras had class
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
I believe that there definitely were some pretty sexy girls back in the day. Although, it must have been very difficult grooming yourself back in the day and obtaining such objects like razors. THey ust have been very hairy as well.
"Think about it. Our standards of beauty changed for the better due to the fact that humans have become more critical of beauty. That's why women are getting skinnier fitter and healthier than women back then, which concludes that hot women now are even better looking than hot women back then. "
This statement is purely subjective. Back then, femininity was considered to be an ideal look. Today, many models and celebrities are trying to look more and more like men. Ripped, toned bodies with as little fat as possible. Then they have to get implants to try and look like women again.
Humans have ALWAYS been critical of beauty. The "Venus of Willendorf" is proof of that (and that was as far a polar opposite from our modern standards of beauty as can be imagined).
Imagine if they went on a time machine to go to the future and look at our generation and us women right now, they would say ", Man the guys now are so lucky, I wish our women were as stunning as these women of the future."-Haha.
If those men saw most of our women, I think they would be disgusted. They liked a healthy, curvy body and a sweet natural face. So our skinny, tanned girls, with makeup, extensions and thigh gaps, I don't think they would find attractive at all!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
28Opinion
Girls back then had class, something women sadly lack today
I agree. Girls with class have more value.
Not more value, only more appeal
For you it's appeal. For me it's value.
What do you mean by value, as in better?
Yes, because it shows that the girl actually respects her body for more than it actually is instead of using it as a sex toy for guys to take advantage of, which would be degrading.
thats true, but their is still classy women , with values they are just not promoted like the unclassy, thats why women end up ith guys who think that all women care for is size and money, they unfortunately believe the lie.
Way more beautiful than now. Women from previous eras had class
I believe that there definitely were some pretty sexy girls back in the day. Although, it must have been very difficult grooming yourself back in the day and obtaining such objects like razors. THey ust have been very hairy as well.
Were they as pretty as Marisa Miller, Brooklyn Decker, or Blake Lively?
I can say the same about the guys.. they all looked like Congo apes back then.
there were many pretty ones. they didn't take selfies so there's not enough evidence.
I think there a lot more hot girls now. Especially body wise, like I doubt many squatted back lol.
In terms of the face though I think it's pretty similar except a lot more make up now.
they where just as beautiful back than as girls are now its just the change in clothing and hair styles, back then girls where way too over dressed
It's no different than today. The vast majority of people are ugly or average.
you can thank better diets, less disease, more make-up, more ways to exercise, and evolution!
I like this answer.
I think this is completely arrogant because look at our gneration.
You've never seen erotica from that period, then. There were plenty of natural beauties back then, and during every time period, for that matter.
I actually find today's "hot" women to be ugly compared to those from the late 1800s and early 1900s.
"Think about it. Our standards of beauty changed for the better due to the fact that humans have become more critical of beauty. That's why women are getting skinnier fitter and healthier than women back then, which concludes that hot women now are even better looking than hot women back then. "
This statement is purely subjective. Back then, femininity was considered to be an ideal look. Today, many models and celebrities are trying to look more and more like men. Ripped, toned bodies with as little fat as possible. Then they have to get implants to try and look like women again.
Humans have ALWAYS been critical of beauty. The "Venus of Willendorf" is proof of that (and that was as far a polar opposite from our modern standards of beauty as can be imagined).
Different times, have different beauty standards. And back then they didn't have as much, as we have now.
That's true I notice women are more curvier and thicker then before.
by the time they were consindered hot.
Imagine if they went on a time machine to go to the future and look at our generation and us women right now, they would say ", Man the guys now are so lucky, I wish our women were as stunning as these women of the future."-Haha.
i guess they would find as weird. it's like us going to the year 2514 and look at the women by then
If those men saw most of our women, I think they would be disgusted. They liked a healthy, curvy body and a sweet natural face. So our skinny, tanned girls, with makeup, extensions and thigh gaps, I don't think they would find attractive at all!
Yup there absolutely were hot girls back then! :-P
I think girls then had so much beauty:)
Definitely throughout the 40's and 50's
I think there idea of "hot" was different